Prospective comparison of 3D FIESTA versus fat-suppressed 3D SPGR MRI in evaluating knee cartilage lesions

Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging Had Greater Sensitivity in Diagnosing Chondral Lesions of the Knee: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

PURPOSE

To investigate the accuracy and reliability of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in identifying and grading chondral lesions and explore the optimal imaging technique to image cartilage.

METHOD

A comprehensive search was conducted on Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library. Eligible cohort studies published before August 2022 were included. The study reports used MRI to diagnose and grade cartilage lesions, with intraoperative findings as the reference standard. Summary estimates of diagnostic performance were obtained. The reliability of MRI interpretation was summarized. Subgroup analyses were performed based on assessed imaging techniques, field strength, and joint surface.

RESULTS

Forty-three trials and 3,706 patients were included in the systematic review. The overall area under curve for hierarchical summarized receiver operating characteristics was 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.88-0.93). The pooled sensitivity for quantitative MRI, 3-dimensional MRI, and 2-dimensional MRI was 0.82 (95% CI 0.64-0.92), 0.79 (95% CI 0.74-0.83), and 0.63 (95% CI 0.51-0.73), respectively. The pooled sensitivity of 3 Tesla (3T), 1.5 Tesla (1.5T), and <1.5 Tesla MRI was 0.79 (95% CI 0.72-0.85), 0.67 (95% CI 0.60-0.74), and 0.55 (95% CI 0.39-0.71), respectively. There were differences in interobserver consistency across different studies.

CONCLUSIONS

In general, MRI had high specificity in discriminating normal cartilage, but its sensitivity for identifying chondral lesions is less optimal. Further analysis showed that quantitative MRI, 3D MRI, and 3T MRI demonstrate greater sensitivity compared with 2D MRI, 1.5T MRI, and <1.5 Tesla MRI.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of Level II-III studies.

Magnetic resonance imaging is able to detect patellofemoral focal cartilage injuries: a systematic review with meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze the diagnostic accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to detect and grade the severity of patellofemoral (PF) cartilage injuries.

METHODS

A systematic review was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library databases (up to July 1st 2022) to search for studies that reported the diagnostic accuracy of MRI to detect and grade PF cartilage injuries as compared to diagnostic arthroscopy. Risk of bias was judged using the QUADAS-2 tool. Quantitative syntheses were performed to calculate the diagnostic accuracy metric-sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood (LR+) and negative likelihood (LR-) ratios, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR)-and presented as median with 25% and 75% percentiles. The summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves were also calculated. Diagnostic accuracy metrics were calculated for all PF cartilage injuries and then sub-grouped by patellar and trochlear lesions. Diagnostic accuracy was also calculated according to the grading of cartilage injuries.

RESULTS

Forty-five studies were included for qualitative analyses and forty studies were included for quantitative synthesis. A total of 3534 participants with a weighted mean age of 38.1 years were included. Diagnostic accuracy was generally high: sensitivity (0.8, 0.6-1.0), specificity (0.9, 0.8-1.0), LR+ (6.4, 3.1-15.3), LR- (0.3, 0.2-0.4) and DOR (21.3, 9.9-121.1). The area under the curve (AUC) of the SROC was 0.9. The diagnostic accuracy was slightly higher for patellar (sensitivity 0.8, specificity 0.8, LR+ 5.3, LR- 0.2, DOR 28.8) than for trochlear lesions (sensitivity 0.7, specificity 0.9, LR+ 5.5, LR- 0.4, DOR 14.3). The sensitivity was generally higher when grading advanced (vs. early or intermediate) cartilage injuries of the patella.

CONCLUSION

The MRI is able to diagnose PF cartilage injuries with reasonably high diagnostic accuracy (as compared to arthroscopy). Clinicians can rely on MRI to reliably diagnose PF cartilage injuries (with some limitations) which will play an important role in deciding for surgical or non-operative treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

3D MRI of Articular Cartilage

Osteoarthritis, characterized by the breakdown of articular cartilage and other joint structures, is one of the most prevalent and disabling chronic diseases in the United States. Magnetic resonance imaging is a commonly used imaging modality to evaluate patients with joint pain. Both two-dimensional fast spin-echo sequences (2D-FSE) and three-dimensional (3D) sequences are used in clinical practice to evaluate articular cartilage. The 3D sequences have many advantages compared with 2D-FSE sequences, such as their high in-plane spatial resolution, thin continuous slices that reduce the effects of partial volume averaging, and ability to create multiplanar reformat images following a single acquisition. This article reviews the different 3D imaging techniques available for evaluating cartilage morphology, illustrates the strengths and weaknesses of 3D approaches compared with 2D-FSE approaches for cartilage imaging, and summarizes the diagnostic performance of 2D-FSE and 3D sequences for detecting cartilage lesions within the knee and hip joints.

Resolution-dependent influences of compressed sensing in quantitative T2 mapping of articular cartilage

This study evaluates the resolution-dependent influences of compressed sensing (CS) in MRI quantification of T2 mapping in articular cartilage with osteoarthritis (OA). T2-weighed 2D experiments of healthy and OA cartilage were fully sampled in k-space with five echo times at both 17.6 μm and 195.3 μm in-plane resolutions; termed as microscopic MRI (μMRI) and macroscopic MRI (mMRI) respectively. These fully sampled k-space data were under-sampled at various 2D CS accelerating factors (AF = 4-32). The under-sampled data were reconstructed individually into 2D images using nonlinear reconstruction, which were used to calculate the T2 maps. The bulk and zonal variations of T2 values in cartilage were evaluated at different AFs. The study finds that the T2 images at AFs up to 8 preserved major visual information and produced negligible artifacts for μMRI. The T2 values remained accurate for different sub-tissue zones at various AFs. The absolute difference between the CS (AF up to 32) and the Ground Truth (i.e., using 100% of the k-space data) of the mean T2 values through the whole tissue depth was higher in mMRI versus μMRI. For mMRI (where the resolution mimics the clinical MRI of human cartilage), the quantitative T2 mapping at AFs up to 4 showed negligible variations. This study demonstrates that both clinical MRI and μMRI can benefit from the use of CS in image acquisition, and μMRI benefits more from the use of CS by acquiring much less data, without losing significant accuracy in the quantification of T2 maps in osteoarthritic cartilage.

Axial-Oblique Versus Standard Axial 3-T Magnetic Resonance Imaging for the Detection of Trochlear Cartilage Lesions: A Prospective Study

Background:

Imaging of the femoral trochlea has been inherently difficult because of its convex anatomy.

Purpose/Hypothesis:

The purpose of this study was to compare the diagnostic utility of a standard axial magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) sequence with an axial-oblique MRI sequence of the knee for the detection of trochlear articular cartilage lesions on a high-field 3-T MRI scanner. We hypothesized that axial-oblique MRI scans of the knee obtained along the true axis of the trochlea would significantly improve the detection of high-grade cartilage lesions.

Study Design:

Cohort study (diagnosis); Level of evidence, 2.

Methods:

Patients who underwent MRI and subsequent surgery for any indication were prospectively enrolled into this study between June 2014 and February 2015. The articular cartilage of the trochlea was evaluated independently by 3 raters on axial and axial-oblique MRI and compared with arthroscopic findings (gold standard). The interrater and intrarater reliability of mild (International Cartilage Repair Society [ICRS] grades 1 or 2) and severe (ICRS grades 3 or 4) lesions on MRI were assessed as well as the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value.

Results:

A total of 99 knees in 96 patients were included in the study. Interrater and intrarater agreement for the identification of severe lesions were moderate to good on the proximal trochlea and fair to moderate on the distal trochlea. No significant differences in sensitivity were found between axial and axial-oblique scans for any grade of lesion (55% vs 51%, respectively; P = .700) or for severe lesions (61% vs 52%, respectively; P = .289). Similarly, specificity for detecting severe lesions was not significantly different between axial and axial-oblique scans (95% vs 87%, respectively; P = .219). Last, no significant differences in sensitivity or specificity were found between MRI sequences when separately evaluating proximal and distal trochlear lesions (all P > .05).

Conclusion:

The axial-oblique sequence was unable to improve the sensitivity of MRI in detecting articular cartilage lesions on the trochlea. Both conventional axial and axial-oblique sequences, reviewed independently of the complete MRI series, had low sensitivity in detecting trochlear articular cartilage lesions. For this reason, clinicians should utilize all MRI planes to evaluate the articular cartilage of the trochlea. Future studies should focus on improving MRI techniques for detecting and characterizing cartilage lesions of the trochlea.

Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in grading knee chondral defects

PURPOSE

To determine the accuracy of routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the grading of knee cartilage lesions through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

A search of English-language literature published before February 2012 was carried out in PubMed. Articles using arthroscopy as a gold standard, a 6-knee region dividing method, and a 5-level grading system were included in our meta-analysis. After data extraction, a bivariate mixed-effects model and hierarchical weighted symmetric summary receiver operating curve were used to pool the results of diagnostic tests. A sensitivity analysis was conducted to explore the potential sources of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Overall, 8 studies were included in the meta-analysis. The overall sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio, positive likelihood ratio, and negative likelihood ratio were 75% (95% confidence interval [CI], 62% to 84%), 94% (95% CI, 89% to 97%), 47 (95% CI, 18 to 122), 12.5 (95% CI, 6.5 to 24.2), and 0.27 (95% CI, 0.17 to 0.42), respectively. There was substantial heterogeneity among the results. Sensitivity analysis showed the inconsistency of 2 studies. However, eliminating the 2 studies had no significant impact on the overall results.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results showed that MRI was effective in discriminating normal morphologic cartilage from disease but was less sensitive in detecting knee chondral lesions (higher than grade 1). The negative results of MRI should not prevent a diagnostic arthroscopy.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, meta-analysis of Level I and II studies.

MR imaging features of gadofluorine-labeled matrix-associated stem cell implants in cartilage defects

Objectives

The purpose of our study was to assess the chondrogenic potential and the MR signal effects of GadofluorineM-Cy labeled matrix associated stem cell implants (MASI) in pig knee specimen.

Materials and Methods

Human mesenchymal stem cells (hMSCs) were labeled with the micelle-based contrast agent GadofluorineM-Cy. Ferucarbotran-labeled hMSCs, non-labeled hMSCs and scaffold only served as controls. Chondrogenic differentiation was induced and gene expression and histologic evaluation were performed. The proportions of spindle-shaped vs. round cells of chondrogenic pellets were compared between experimental groups using the Fisher's exact test. Labeled and unlabeled hMSCs and chondrocytes in scaffolds were implanted into cartilage defects of porcine femoral condyles and underwent MR imaging with T1- and T2-weighted SE and GE sequences. Contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) between implants and adjacent cartilage were determined and analyzed for significant differences between different experimental groups using the Kruskal-Wallis test. Significance was assigned for p<0.017, considering a Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons.

Results

Collagen type II gene expression levels were not significantly different between different groups (p>0.017). However, hMSC differentiation into chondrocytes was superior for unlabeled and GadofluorineM-Cy-labeled cells compared with Ferucarbotran-labeled cells, as evidenced by a significantly higher proportion of spindle cells in chondrogenic pellets (p<0.05). GadofluorineM-Cy-labeled hMSCs and chondrocytes showed a positive signal effect on T1-weighted images and a negative signal effect on T2-weighted images while Ferucarbotran-labeled cells provided a negative signal effect on all sequences. CNR data for both GadofluorineM-Cy-labeled and Ferucarbotran-labeled hMSCs were significantly different compared to unlabeled control cells on T1-weighted SE and T2*-weighted MR images (p<0.017).

Conclusion

hMSCs can be labeled by simple incubation with GadofluorineM-Cy. The labeled cells provide significant MR signal effects and less impaired chondrogenesis compared to Ferucarbotran-labeled hMSCs. Thus, GadoflurineM-Cy might represent an alternative MR cell marker to Ferucarbotran, which is not distributed any more in Europe or North America.

Sensitivity of magnetic resonance imaging for detection of patellofemoral articular cartilage defects

PURPOSE

Chondral defects within the patellofemoral compartment are common and lack the ability to heal on their own. Early detection of these lesions with a noninvasive modality would be beneficial in delaying or preventing their possible progression to osteoarthritis. We hypothesized that magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a sensitive, specific, and accurate imaging modality for the detection of patellofemoral chondral defects with substantial interobserver reliability and that MRI has a higher sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for detecting patellar defects than trochlear defects.

METHODS

A systematic review of multiple medical databases was performed by use of the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) protocol. Analysis of studies that reported diagnostic performance of MRI in the assessment of patellofemoral chondral defects (patella and trochlea), using arthroscopy as the reference gold standard, was performed. Sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and interobserver reliability were reported. Significant heterogeneity across studies precluded meta-analysis.

RESULTS

MRI was more sensitive in detection of patellar (87%) versus trochlear (72%) defects. MRI was similarly specific for patellar (86%) and trochlear (89%) defects. MRI was similarly accurate for patellar (84%) and trochlear (83%) defects. Interobserver agreement was substantial to almost perfect for both patellar and trochlear defects.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI is a highly sensitive, specific, and accurate noninvasive diagnostic modality for the detection of chondral defects in the patellofemoral compartment of the knee, using arthroscopy as the reference gold standard. Although there was wide variability in the statistical parameters assessed, MRI was more sensitive for detection of patellar versus trochlear defects and similarly specific and accurate for patellar and trochlear defects. Interobserver reliability is substantial to near perfect in the assessment of these lesions, without a significant difference between patellar and trochlear defects.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Use of MRI may allow early detection of chondral defects within the patellofemoral compartment, enabling clinicians to adopt strategies to delay or prevent progression to osteoarthritis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of Level I, II, and III studies.

The clinical utility and diagnostic performance of magnetic resonance imaging for identification of early and advanced knee osteoarthritis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Current diagnostic strategies for detection of structural articular cartilage abnormalities, the earliest structural signs of osteoarthritis, often do not capture the condition until it is too far advanced for the most potential benefit of noninvasive interventions.

PURPOSE

To systematically review the literature relative to the following questions: (1) Is magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) a valid, sensitive, specific, accurate, and reliable instrument to identify knee articular cartilage abnormalities compared with arthroscopy? (2) Is MRI a sensitive tool that can be utilized to identify early cartilage degeneration?

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review.

METHODS

A systematic search was performed in November 2010 using PubMed MEDLINE (from 1966), CINAHL (from 1982), SPORTDiscus (from 1985), SCOPUS (from 1996), and EMBASE (from 1974) databases.

RESULTS

Fourteen level I and 13 level II studies were identified that met inclusion criteria and provided information related to diagnostic performance of MRI compared with arthroscopic evaluation. The diagnostic performance of MRI demonstrated a large range of sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies. The sensitivity for identifying articular cartilage abnormalities in the knee joint was reported between 26% and 96%. Specificity and accuracy were reported between 50% and 100% and between 49% and 94%, respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for identifying early osteoarthritis were reported between 0% and 86%, 48% and 95%, and 5% and 94%, respectively. As a result of inconsistencies between imaging techniques and methodological shortcomings of many of the studies, a meta-analysis was not performed, and it was difficult to fully synthesize the information to state firm conclusions about the diagnostic performance of MRI.

CONCLUSION

There is evidence in some MRI protocols that MRI is a relatively valid, sensitive, specific, accurate, and reliable clinical tool for identifying articular cartilage degeneration. Because of heterogeneity of MRI sequences, it is not possible to make definitive conclusions regarding its global clinical utility for guiding diagnosis and treatment strategies.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Traumatic sports injuries to the knee may be significant precursor events to early onset of posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Magnetic resonance imaging may aid in early identification of structural injuries to articular cartilage as evidenced by articular cartilage degeneration grading.