Results from the first year as a major trauma radiology unit in the UK

Does simulation training result in improved on-call outcomes among newly appointed radiology registrars?

AIM

To quantify the impact of a marked increase in radiology trainee numbers and the compensatory introduction of formal simulation on-call training by investigating the discrepancy rates among on-call radiologists in training before and after the introduction of structured simulation training.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The first 100 cases reported by a cohort of Specialty Trainee Year 2 doctors (ST2), having commenced on-call reporting, were analysed. This included registrars working in two major tertiary centres. Two groups of registrars were compared directly: those who undertook the simulation training and those who did not. Discrepancies were divided by severity into minor, moderate, and major categories. The criteria for each category were based on previously published literature.

RESULTS

Twelve registrars from 2017 were compared with 12 from previous years (two in 2013, four in 2014, and six in 2015); 2,320 cases were analysed. There was a statistically significant reduction in the total number of discrepancies (p=0.01) made by registrars who underwent simulation training. A similar improvement was observed in the number of major discrepancies; however, this was not statistically significant.

CONCLUSION

The present study shows that simulation training successfully increases competency in on-call work. Despite doubling the number of doctors in training, discrepancy rates did not worsen and in fact improved.

The Cheshire & Merseyside Collaborative trainee-led on-call service: a review of safety and efficiency

AIM

To assess safety and efficiency of the Cheshire & Merseyside Collaborative, the largest trainee led on-call service in the UK, based on discrepancy rates and time taken to issue reports.

MATERIALS & METHODS

All studies reported by the collaborative in a 4-week period were evaluated for discrepancy and the time taken to issue a report. These figures were compared against the Royal College of Radiologists (RCR) guidelines and a recent national audit of discrepancy rates. The time taken to report was measured against the National Institute of Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) and Trauma Audit Research Network (TARN) guidelines.

RESULTS

The overall discrepancy rates for the collaborative were 2.5% for minor discrepancies and 2% for major discrepancies, which is within the RCR standard. The median time taken to issue a report was 30 min, which is within the NICE and TARN 1-h targets.

CONCLUSIONS

The Cheshire & Merseyside Collaborative can be deemed a safe and efficient way of delivering an out-of-hours radiology service.

Clinical guided computer tomography decisions are advocated in potentially severely injured trauma patients: a one-year audit in a level 1 trauma Centre with long pre-hospital times

BACKGROUND

The International Commission on Radiological Protection's (ICRP) justification principles state that an examination is justified if the potential benefit outweighs the risk for radiation harm. Computer tomography (CT) contributes 50% of the radiation dose from medical imaging, and in trauma patients, the use of standardized whole body CT (SWBCT) increases. Guidelines are lacking, and reviews conclude conflictingly regarding the benefit. We aimed to study the degree of adherence to ICRP's level three justification, the individual dose limitation principle, in our institution.

METHODS

This is a retrospective clinical audit. We included all 144 patients admitted with trauma team activation to our regional Level 1 trauma centre in 2015. Injuries were categorized according to the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) codes. Time variables, vital parameters and interventions were registered. We categorized patients into trauma admission SWBCT, selective CT or no CT examination strategy groups. We used descriptive statistics and regression analysis of predictors for CT examination strategy.

RESULTS

The 144 patients (114 (79.2%) males) had a median age of 31 (range 0-91) years. 105 (72.9%) had at least one AIS ≥ 2 injury, 26 (18.1%) in more than two body regions. During trauma admission, at least one vital parameter was abnormal in 46 (32.4%) patients, and 73 (50.7%) underwent SWBCT, 43 (29.9%) selective CT and 28 (19.4%) no CT examination. No or only minor injuries were identified in 17 (23.3%) in the SWBCT group. Two (4.6%) in the selective group were examined with a complement CT, with no new injuries identified. A significantly (p < 0.001) lower proportion of children (61.5%) than adults (89.8%) underwent CT examination despite similar injury grades and use of interventions. In adjusted regression analysis, patients with a high-energy trauma mechanism had significantly (p = 0.028) increased odds (odds ratio = 4.390, 95% confidence interval 1.174-16.413) for undergoing a SWBCT.

CONCLUSION

The high proportion of patients with no or only minor injuries detected in the SWBCT group and the significantly lower use of CT among children, indicate that use of a selective CT examination strategy in a higher proportion of our patients would have approximated the ICRP's justification level three, the individual dose limitation principle, better.

Significance of the vacuum phenomenon in patients with trauma evaluated by whole-body computed tomography

BACKGROUND

Severely traumatized patients undergo whole-body computed tomography (WCT) to detect lethal anatomical injuries. When checking the images, we have sometimes recognized minute gas (the vacuum phenomenon [VP]) near the traumatized lesions. Accordingly, we investigated the significance of the VP in patients with trauma.

BASIC PROCEDURES

From April to October 2013, a medical record review was retrospectively performed for all patients with trauma. The exclusion criteria included an age more than 60 years, patients who did not receive the WCT, scan and those in cardiopulmonary arrest on arrival. The subjects were divided into 2 groups: a VP group (n=19), which included patients who had the VP, and a control group (n=49).

MAIN FINDINGS

There were no significant differences between the 2 groups with regard to age, the mechanism of injury, or the survival rate. In contrast, the ratio of women, the Injury Severity Score, and the duration of hospitalization in the VP group were significantly higher than those in the control group. The greatest number of the VP was located at or near rib fractures, followed by joint spaces that experienced a traumatic impact.

PRINCIPAL CONCLUSION

This study demonstrated that the VP tended to be observed most often in severely traumatized female cases. The VP is observed at locations that experience a traumatic impact, so an analysis of the VP may be useful to elucidate the mechanism of injuries. The presence of traumatic VP itself does not influence the final outcome.