Paediatric trauma imaging: Why do we need separate guidance?

Have the UK Pediatric Trauma Protocols resulted in a reduction in chest computed tomography imaging for children presenting with major blunt trauma?

Objectives

To observe variation in imaging requests after publication of the Royal College of Radiologists UK Paediatric Trauma Protocols in 2014, recommending limited use of thoracic computed tomography (CT) to appropriately clinically risk stratified children.

Method

A retrospective observational study using data from the Trauma Audit & Research Network in the United Kingdom, for children (0-16 years of age) for the years 2012-2021. Percentages were calculated to facilitate comparison between year groups (under 1 year of age, 1-10 years of age, 11-15 years of age), and CT imaging categories reviewed: (1) whole-body CT (WBCT); (2) abdominopelvic CT (CTAP) with chest radiograph (CXR); (3) chest, abdomen, and pelvic CT (CTCAP) with CXR; (4) CTCAP without CXR; and (5) other imaging.

Results

Increased use of the recommended protocol (CXR with CTAP) was observed after guidance publication but was not sustained: infants under 1 year old, 0.0% in 2012, 7% in 2017, 0.0% in 2021; 1-10-year-olds, 4% in 2012, 13.9% in 2017, 5.5% in 2021; 11-15-year-olds, 7.1% in 2012, 10.2% in 2017, 6.6% in 2021. Requests for WBCT increased from 2012-2021 (all age groups, 2.4%, 2012, to 5.3%, 2021) and requests for CTCAP were consistently at a higher level than that of the recommended protocol.

Conclusion

The increased use of CXR with CTAP after publication of the guidelines, was not sustained with a decreasing trend observed from ∼2017, raising concern for the ionizing radiation burden in this population.

How confident are UK radiographers at performing paediatric computed tomography trauma scans?

INTRODUCTION

Approximately 45% of paediatric deaths in the United Kingdom (UK) were as a result of trauma. Computed tomography (CT) provides time efficient and accurate diagnosis, increasing chances of survival. Whilst use of CT in evaluating paediatric trauma has been invaluable it carries significant radiation risks, largely because children have greater radiation sensitivity than adults. Although national paediatric trauma workload in the UK is proportionately low, the majority of paediatric patients are conveyed to hospitals which predominantly undertake CT scans on adult patients. This research aimed to determine the confidence levels of radiographers when performing paediatric CT trauma scans in three public hospitals in the UK, and whether a teaching intervention improved their perceived self-confidence.

METHODS

Individual questionnaires containing eight qualitative and quantitative questions were used to ascertain radiographers' perceived confidence levels. A teaching intervention was developed based on responses. A post-intervention questionnaire was used to determine whether radiographers' confidence levels had improved.

RESULTS

Radiographers (n = 45) reported a mean confidence score of 5.6 (standard deviation 2.2) and 8.0 (standard deviation 1.7) scanning paediatric trauma patients pre- and post-intervention respectively. A paired two group t-test found this difference to be statistically significant at p < .00001. Radiographers reported several factors which negatively influenced confidence levels, including limited experience and postgraduate education.

CONCLUSION

Radiographers reported to be less confident scanning paediatric CT trauma patients compared to adults, pre- and post-intervention, however this research does not clarify whether this is as a result of an increase in competence. Further research regarding this concept warrants investigation.

IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE

Results suggest further training based on negative factors reported by radiographers can increase confidence when performing this type of scan, assisting radiographers in optimising paediatric patient doses.

Estimation of age of transition from paediatric to adult healthcare for young people with long term conditions using linked routinely collected healthcare data

Introduction

Healthcare transitions, including from paediatric to adult services, can be disruptive and cause a lack of continuity in care. Existing research on the paediatric-adult healthcare transition often uses a simple age cut-off to assign transition status. This risks misclassification bias, reducing observed changes at transition (adults are included in the paediatric group and vice versa) possibly to differing extents between groups that transition at different ages.

Objective

To develop and assess methods for estimating the transition point from paediatric to adult healthcare from routine healthcare records.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of young people (12 to 23 years) with long term conditions was constructed from linked primary and secondary care data in England. Inpatient and outpatient records were classified as paediatric or adult based on treatment and clinician specialities. Transition point was estimated using three methods based on record classification (First Adult: the date of first adult record; Last Paediatric: date of last paediatric record; Fitted: a date determined by statistical fitting). Estimated transition age was compared between methods. A simulation explored impacts of estimation approaches compared to a simple age cut-off when assessing associations between transition status and healthcare events.

Results

Simulations showed using an age-based cut-off at 16 or 18 years as transition point, common in research on transition, may underestimate transition-associated changes. Many health records for those aged <14 years were classified as adult, limiting utility of the First Adult approach. The Last Paediatric approach is least sensitive to this possible misclassification and may best reflect experience of the transition.

Conclusions

Estimating transition point from routine healthcare data is possible and offers advantages over a simple age cut-off. These methods, adapted as necessary for data from other countries, should be used to reduce risk of misclassification bias in studies of transition in nationally representative data.

Clinicoradiological Predictors of Severity of Traumatic Intra-Abdominal Injury in Pediatric Patients: A Retrospective Study

Background

Adequate assessment of traumatic injury in patients of all age groups is essential for timely intervention and prevention of mortality and morbidity. This study aimed to assess the value of certain clinical as well as radiological factors as predictors of severity of the intra-abdominal injury as detected on computed tomography (CT) and to review the guidelines, protocols, and practices followed in imaging of abdominal trauma in patients of pediatric age group.

Methods

This retrospective observational study included 263 pediatric patients (18 years of age or younger) who presented to the emergency department (ED) with a history of trauma to the abdomen. The study was conducted over a period of 12 months. Correlation of five variables, i.e., age of the child, focused abdominal sonography in trauma (FAST) status, mechanism of injury, presenting complaints and clinical features (hypotension, tachycardia, etc), fractures identified on trauma X-ray series, was done with CT findings (severity of injury). All five variables were statistically analyzed and p-values were derived for age, mechanism of injury, presenting complaints, clinical features, and trauma x-ray series, while parameters like sensitivity and specificity were determined for FAST status

Results

All variables well correlated with the severity of injury with p-values <0.05. On multivariate analysis, FAST status had the highest (47.94) odds ratio among the five variables for predicting severe intra-abdominal injury while vital signs had the lowest (0.076). Further, age group of 0-4 years was found most prone to higher grades of injury with odds ratio of 7.83. Motor vehicle crash had odds ratio of 26.6 for severe injury, the highest among mechanisms of injury. While for FAST status, sensitivity was found to be 89.4%, specificity 85%, and negative predictive value 90%, trauma series radiographs had a sensitivity of 42.27%, specificity of 77.85% and negative predictive value of 60.55%.

Conclusion

Clinical parameters and traditional imaging techniques can predict the severity of injury on CT and guide further imaging and intervention.

Paediatric trauma: experience from the UK's busiest trauma centre

Paediatric major trauma is relatively uncommon (6% of all traumas) and therefore unfamiliar to many radiologists. The indications for and interpretation of imaging are different to those commonly encountered in adults. In a centre that rarely encounters paediatric trauma, there can be trepidation over the best way to image children due to concerns regarding radiation and the injury patterns that occur at various ages. Within paediatric trauma, as per the Royal College of Radiologists "paediatric trauma protocols" guidelines and National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidance, the main reliance is on computed tomography (CT) and plain radiographs. This review of paediatric trauma from a busy UK major trauma centre demonstrates the most appropriate use of different imaging techniques, the extent of imaging, and the types of injuries that occur in a selection of paediatric trauma patients with a variety of trauma mechanisms. Cases include trauma related to road traffic accidents, bicycle handlebar injuries, falls, and even stabbings. Important learning points highlighted include the use of targeted body part imaging in children, the significance of handlebar injuries, and the importance of assessing for underlying injury in paediatric rib fractures and abdominal bruising and tenderness. We hope these examples will help to support and guide radiologists when encountering paediatric trauma within their own centres.

The future of CT: deep learning reconstruction

There have been substantial advances in computed tomography (CT) technology since its introduction in the 1970s. More recently, these advances have focused on image reconstruction. Deep learning reconstruction (DLR) is the latest complex reconstruction algorithm to be introduced, which harnesses advances in artificial intelligence (AI) and affordable supercomputer technology to achieve the previously elusive triad of high image quality, low radiation dose, and fast reconstruction speeds. The dose reductions achieved with DLR are redefining ultra-low-dose into the realm of plain radiographs whilst maintaining image quality. This review aims to demonstrate the advantages of DLR over other reconstruction methods in terms of dose reduction and image quality in addition to being able to tailor protocols to specific clinical situations. DLR is the future of CT technology and should be considered when procuring new scanners.

High-Energy Fractures of the Pelvis and Acetabulum in Pediatric Patients

Fractures of the pelvis and acetabulum, although uncommon in the pediatric cohort, represent a range of injuries with similarities to those seen in the adult cohort but with key differences that are important for the treating physician to be aware of to allow for systematic evaluation and management of these potentially life-threatening injuries. As the pediatric skeleton matures, changes in anatomy and physiology influence injury pattern, diagnosis, treatment, and complications. High-energy fractures of the pediatric pelvis are particularly concerning given the reported mortality rates ranging from 3.2% to 18%, with severe fracture patterns being associated with visceral injury in up to 60% of patients. The unique complexity of pediatric patients requires a multidisciplinary team to fully address their care. A systematic approach to the initial evaluation and diagnosis of pediatric patients with fractures of the acetabulum or pelvic ring aids in choosing between surgical and nonsurgical management of these fractures and avoiding complications unique to the maturing skeleton. We present such an approach to assist the practitioner who infrequently treats these uncommon injuries.

Emergency department imaging of pediatric trauma patients during combat operations in Iraq and Afghanistan

BACKGROUND

Military hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan treated children with traumatic injuries during the recent conflicts. Diagnostic imaging is an integral component of trauma management; however, few published data exist on its use in the wartime pediatric population.

OBJECTIVE

The authors describe the emergency department (ED) utilization of radiology resources for pediatric trauma patients in Iraq and Afghanistan.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We queried the Department of Defense Trauma Registry (DODTR) for all pediatric patients admitted to military fixed-facility hospitals in Iraq and Afghanistan from January 2007 to January 2016. We retrieved ED data on ultrasound (US), radiographic and computed tomography (CT) studies.

RESULTS

During the study period, there were 3,439 pediatric encounters, which represented 8.0% of all military hospital trauma admissions. ED providers obtained a total of 12,376 imaging studies on 2,920 (84.9%) children. Of the 12,376 imaging studies, 1,341 (10.8%) were US, 4,868 (39.3%) were radiographic and 6,167 (49.8%) were CT exams. Most children undergoing radiographic evaluation were boys (77.8%) and located in Afghanistan (70.4%), and they sustained penetrating injuries (68.0%). Children who underwent imaging had higher composite injury severity scores in comparison to those who did not undergo imaging (10 versus 9).

CONCLUSION

Military health care providers frequently utilized radiographic studies in the evaluation of pediatric trauma casualties in Iraq and Afghanistan. Deployed military hospitals that treat children would benefit from dedicated pediatric-specific imaging training and protocols.

Perspectives of health professionals on the best care settings for pediatric trauma casualties: a qualitative study

BACKGROUND

Critically-injured children are frequently treated by providers who lack specialty pediatric training in facilities that have not been modified for the care of children. We set out to understand the attitudes and perspectives of policy makers, and senior nursing and medical managers in the Israeli healthcare system, concerning the provision of medical care to pediatric trauma casualties in emergency departments.

METHODS

We conducted semi-structured interviews with 17 health professionals from medical centers across Israel and the Ministry of Health. The interviews were analyzed by qualitative methods.

RESULTS

There was lack of clarity and uniformity concerning the definition of a pediatric trauma casualty. All of the participants attributed extreme importance to the professional level of the care team manager, and most suggested that this should be a pediatric emergency medicine specialist. They emphasized the importance of around-the-clock availability of pediatric medical teams to care for young trauma casualties, and the crucial need for caregivers to be equipped with a wide variety of professional skills for the adequate treatment of a broad spectrum of injuries. All participants described significant variability in pediatric-care training and experience among physicians and nurses working in emergency departments. Most participants believe that pediatric trauma casualties should be treated in designated pediatric emergency departments, in a limited number of medical centers across the country.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that specialized pediatric EDs would constitute the best location for intake of children with major traumatic injuries. Pediatric emergency medicine specialists should manage trauma cases using pediatric surgeons as ad-hoc consultants. The term 'pediatric patient' should be defined to allow trauma patients to be referred to the most appropriate ED. Teams working at these EDs should undergo specialized pediatric emergency medicine training. Finally, to regulate the key aspects of trauma care, clear statutory guidelines should be formulated at national and local levels.

Radiological assessment of paediatric cervical spine injury in blunt trauma: the potential impact of new NICE guidelines on the use of CT

AIM

To determine the potential effect of changes to the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) guidelines to the use of computed tomography (CT) in the assessment of suspected paediatric cervical spine (c-spine) injury.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A 5 year retrospective study was conducted of c-spine imaging in paediatric (<10 years) patients presenting following blunt trauma at a Level 1 trauma centre in London. All patients under the age of 10 years who underwent any imaging of the c-spine following blunt trauma were included. Clinical data relating to the presenting signs and symptoms were obtained from the retrospective review of electronic records and paper notes. This was then applied to the previous NICE guideline (CG56) and to the new NICE guideline (CG176). Patients with incomplete data were excluded.

RESULTS

Two hundred and seventy-eight patients <10 years underwent imaging of the c-spine following blunt trauma. Two hundred and seventy (97.12%) examinations had complete data and were included in further analysis. One hundred and forty-nine (55.19%) met the criteria for a CT of the c-spine under NICE CG56, whereas 252 (93.33%) met the updated NICE CG176 criteria for c-spine CT. Five (1.85%) patients had a c-spine injury and met the criteria under both CG56 and CG176 NICE guidelines.

CONCLUSION

Recent changes to NICE Head Injury Guidelines relating to radiological assessment of paediatric c-spine following blunt trauma are likely to result in an increased usage of CT as the initial radiological investigation over plain radiographs, without an apparent increase in specificity in the present series.

Focused abdominal sonography for trauma in the clinical evaluation of children with blunt abdominal trauma

Introduction

In pediatric care, the role of focused abdominal sonography in trauma (FAST) remains ill defined. The objective of this study was to assess the sensitivity and specificity of FAST for detecting free peritoneal fluid in children.

Methods

The trauma registry of a single level I pediatric trauma center was queried for the results of FAST examination of consecutive pediatric (<18 years) blunt trauma patients over a period of 36 months, from January 2010 to December 2012. Demographics, type of injuries, FAST results, computerized tomography (CT) results, and operative findings were reviewed.

Results

During the study period, 543 injured pediatric patients (mean age 8.2 ± 5 years) underwent FAST examinations. In 95 (17.5 %) FAST was positive for free peritoneal fluid. CT examination was performed in 219 (40.3 %) children. Positive FAST examination was confirmed by CT scan in 61/73 (83.6 %). CT detected intra-peritoneal fluid in 62/448 (13.8 %) of the patients with negative FAST results. These findings correspond to a sensitivity of 50 %, specificity of 88 %, positive predictive value (PPV) of 84 %, and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 58 %. In patients who had negative FAST results and no CT examination (302), no missed abdominal injury was detected on clinical ground. FAST examination in the young age group (<2 years) yielded lower sensitivity and specificity (36 and 78 % respectively) with a PPV of only 50 %.

Conclusions

This study shows that although a positive FAST evaluation does not necessarily correlate with an IAI, a negative one strongly suggests the absence of an IAI, with a high NPV. These findings are emphasized in the analysis of the subgroup of children less than 2 years of age. FAST examination tempered with sound clinical judgment seems to be an effective tool to discriminate injured children in need of further imaging evaluation.