1
|
Endrikat J, Gutberlet M, Hoffmann KT, Schöckel L, Bhatti A, Harz C, Barkhausen J. Clinical Safety of Gadobutrol: Review of Over 25 Years of Use Exceeding 100 Million Administrations. Invest Radiol 2024:00004424-990000000-00202. [PMID: 38426761 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000001072] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/02/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent gadobutrol was introduced to the market in February 1998. Over the last 25 years, gadobutrol has been administered more than 100 million times worldwide providing a wealth of data related to safety. OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to perform a thorough review and status update on gadobutrol's safety. MATERIALS AND METHODS Safety data from the clinical phase II-IV program and postmarketing surveillance were descriptively analyzed from February 1998 until December 31, 2022. Literature on special at-risk populations and specific safety aspects was critically summarized. RESULTS Forty-five clinical phase II-IV studies recruited 7856 patients receiving gadobutrol. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) were reported in 3.4% and serious AEs in <0.1% of patients. Nausea (0.7%) and dysgeusia (0.4%) were the most reported AEs. All other drug-related AEs occurred ≤0.3%. After more than 100 million gadobutrol administrations, overall adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from postmarketing surveillance (including clinical trials) were rare with an overall reporting rate of 0.0356%, hypersensitivity reactions (0.0147%), nausea (0.0032%), vomiting (0.0025%), and dyspnea (0.0010%). All other ADRs were <0.001%. No trend for higher rates of AEs was found in patients with reduced renal or liver function. Seven clinical studies reported safety findings in 7292 children ≤18 years, thereof 112 newborns/toddlers younger than 2 years. Overall, 61 ADRs (0.84%) were reported, including 3 serious ones. Adverse events in patients ≥65 years of age ("elderly") were significantly less frequent than in younger patients. A total of 4 reports diagnostic of or consistent with nephrogenic systemic fibrosis have been received. No causal relationship has been established between clinical signs and symptoms and the presence of small amounts of gadolinium in the body in patients with normal renal function after use of gadobutrol. CONCLUSIONS More than 100 million administrations worldwide have shown gadobutrol's well-established benefit-risk profile in any approved indication and populations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Endrikat
- From the Bayer AG, Radiology, Berlin, Germany (J.E., L.S., C.H.); Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Reproductive Medicine, University Medical School of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany (J.E.); Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University of Leipzig, Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany (M.G.); Department of Neuroradiology, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany (K.-T.H.); Bayer US LLC, Benefit Risk Management Pharmacovigilance, Whippany, NJ (A.B.); and Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Schleswig Holstein-Campus Luebeck, Luebeck, Germany (J.B.)
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Jammoul M, Abou-Kheir W, Lawand N. How Safe Is Gadobutrol? Examining the Effect of Gadolinium Deposition on the Nervous System. RADIATION 2023. [DOI: 10.3390/radiation3020007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
This study aimed to evaluate the safety of gadobutrol, a gadolinium-based contrast agent used in medical imaging, by investigating its effect on the nervous system under physiological and inflammatory conditions. Male Sprague Dawley rats were divided randomly into four groups, including gadobutrol, saline, LPS + gadobutrol, and LPS + saline, and were given intraperitoneal injections of gadobutrol (2.5 mmol/kg) or saline for 20 days. Weekly sensorimotor and cognitive behavioral tests were performed over 4 weeks, and Gd concentration in nervous tissues was analyzed using inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) activity was measured to evaluate cytotoxicity, and electromyography (EMG) recordings from the gastrocnemius muscle were also obtained to examine signal transmission in sciatic nerves. The results indicated that gadobutrol did not induce significant behavioral changes under normal conditions. However, when administered along with LPS, the combination led to behavioral dysfunction. ICP-MS analysis revealed a higher concentration of Gd in the cerebrum and spinal cord of gadobutrol + LPS-treated rats, while peripheral nerves showed lower concentrations. In addition, there was a significant increase in LDH activity in the hippocampus of the gadobutrol group. EMG responses to electrical stimulation of the sciatic nerve demonstrated a decreased threshold of nociceptive reflexes in the gadobutrol group. Overall, while gadobutrol may be considered safe under normal physiological conditions, the findings suggest that its safety may be compromised under inflammatory conditions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maya Jammoul
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Wassim Abou-Kheir
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| | - Nada Lawand
- Department of Anatomy, Cell Biology and Physiological Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
- Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, American University of Beirut, Beirut 1107 2020, Lebanon
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Liu X, Zhang W, Li Z, Fu Y, Ren J, Shen W, Wang J, Xu Y, Song B. Improved display of abdominal contrast-enhanced MRA using gadobutrol: comparison with Gd-DTPA. Clin Radiol 2019; 74:978.e1-978.e7. [PMID: 31551147 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.08.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/10/2019] [Accepted: 08/20/2019] [Indexed: 02/05/2023]
Abstract
AIM To qualitatively and quantitatively compare gadobutrol with gadopentetate dimeglumine (Gd-DTPA) in abdominal contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography (CE-MRA) and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (CE-MRI) during one-stop imaging. MATERIALS AND METHODS This prospective, blinded, multicentre, intra-individual comparison study was approved by the institutional review board. All patients underwent gadobutrol- and Gd-DTPA-enhanced MRA and MRI. Qualitative analysis for vessels was performed using a three-point scale while quantity analysis was performed by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Visceral organs enhancements were also analysed. A Wilcoxon matched-pair signed-rank test was used to evaluate the quality and quantity results. RESULTS One hundred and twelve patients were enrolled. Quality analyses results for large vessels and small vessels of gadobutrol and Gd-DTPA were 18.38±1.51 and 6.76±1.58 and 17.87±1.84 and 6.09±1.55, respectively. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests revealed gadobutrol was significantly superior to Gd-DTPA (p=0.036) for small vessels. For large vessel quantity analysis, gadobutrol demonstrated significantly higher signal-to-noise ratios (SNR; p=0.041) than Gd-DTPA, with mean values of 948.156±349.731 and 838.925±248.197. There was no statistically significant in enhancement of liver, spleen, and renal tissue during gadobutrol- and Gd-DTPA-enhanced imaging (p>0.05). One patient reported an adverse event. Dizziness and vomiting occurred after injection of Gd-DTPA. CONCLUSIONS The present study demonstrates gadobutrol-enhanced MRA was superior to that of Gd-DTPA without statistical significance in visceral organ enhancement. It indicates gadobutrol may be more suitable for abdominal one-stop imaging for CE-MRA and CE-MRI by improving depiction of vessels in MRA images.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- X Liu
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - W Zhang
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Z Li
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - Y Fu
- Department of Radiology, The First Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin Province, China
| | - J Ren
- Department of Radiology, Sichuan Cancer Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China
| | - W Shen
- Department of Radiology, Tianjin First Central Hospital, Tianjin, Tianjin Province, China
| | - J Wang
- Department of Radiology, The Third Affiliated Hospital of Zhongshan University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - Y Xu
- Department of Radiology, Nanfang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, Guangdong Province, China
| | - B Song
- Department of Radiology, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, Sichuan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Glutig K, Hahn G, Kuvvetli P, Endrikat J. Safety of gadobutrol: results of a non-interventional study of 3710 patients, including 404 children. Acta Radiol 2019; 60:873-879. [PMID: 30253660 PMCID: PMC6604256 DOI: 10.1177/0284185118801151] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Background The safety of gadolinium-based contrast agents is a hot topic in
radiology. Purpose To evaluate the safety profile of gadobutrol during routine use. Material and Methods Prospective, non-interventional study in 80 centers in Germany. The primary
outcome was the number of adverse drug reactions (ADR) following gadobutrol
administration. Results A total of 3710 patients were included in the analysis, including 404
children (10.9%). A total of 6026 magnetic resonance imaging examinations of
organs/organ systems and 872 magnetic resonance angiography examinations
were performed. A total of 22 (0.59%) patients experienced at least one ADR.
Nausea and vomiting were the most frequent ADRs, experienced by nine (0.24%)
and three (0.08%) patients, respectively. One serious ADR was recorded
(anaphylactoid reaction). No deaths were reported. Conclusion This non-interventional study in 3710 patients confirmed gadobutrol as a safe
and reliable contrast agent in adults and children.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Katja Glutig
- Department of Radiology, St. Joseph Hospital, Dresden, Germany
| | - Gabriele Hahn
- Pediatric Radiology, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| | - Petra Kuvvetli
- Bayer Vital GmbH, Pharmaceuticals, Medical Affairs Radiology, Leverkusen, Germany
| | - Jan Endrikat
- Bayer AG, Radiology, Berlin, Germany
- University Medical School of Saarland, Dept of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, 66421 Homburg/Saar, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
Intravenous gadobutrol [Gadovist™ (EU); Gadavist® (USA)] is a second-generation, extracellular non-ionic macrocyclic gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) that is approved for use in paediatric (including term neonates) and adult patients undergoing diagnostic contrast-enhanced (CE) MRI for visualization of pathological lesions in all body regions or for CE MRA to evaluate perfusion and flow-related abnormalities. Its unique physicochemical profile, including its high thermostability and proton relaxation times, means that gadobutrol is formulated at twice the gadolinium ion concentration of other GBCAs, resulting in a narrower bolus and consequently, improved dynamic image enhancement. Based on > 20 years of experience in the clinical trial and real-world settings (> 50 million doses) and its low risk for developing nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF), gadobutrol represents an effective and safe diagnostic GBCA for use in CE MRI and MRA to visualize pathological lesions and vascular perfusion and flow-related abnormalities in all body regions in a broad spectrum of patients, including term neonates and other paediatric patients, young and elderly adult patients, and those with moderate or severe renal or hepatic impairment or cardiovascular (CV) disease.
Collapse
|
6
|
Schieda N, Blaichman JI, Costa AF, Glikstein R, Hurrell C, James M, Jabehdar Maralani P, Shabana W, Tang A, Tsampalieros A, van der Pol CB, Hiremath S. Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Kidney Disease: A Comprehensive Review and Clinical Practice Guideline Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists. Can J Kidney Health Dis 2018; 5:2054358118778573. [PMID: 29977584 PMCID: PMC6024496 DOI: 10.1177/2054358118778573] [Citation(s) in RCA: 63] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2018] [Accepted: 03/31/2018] [Indexed: 12/29/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA) in renal impairment is controversial, with physician and patient apprehension in acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and dialysis because of concerns regarding nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). The position that GBCA are absolutely contraindicated in AKI, category G4 and G5 CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2), and dialysis-dependent patients is outdated and may limit access to clinically necessary contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations. This review and clinical practice guideline addresses the discrepancy between existing Canadian guidelines regarding use of GBCA in renal impairment and NSF. SOURCES OF INFORMATION Published literature (including clinical trials, retrospective cohort series, review articles, and case reports), online registries, and direct manufacturer databases were searched for reported cases of NSF by class and specific GBCA and exposed patient population. METHODS A comprehensive review was conducted identifying cases of NSF and their association to class of GBCA, specific GBCA used, patient, and dose (when this information was available). Based on the available literature, consensus guidelines were developed by an expert panel of radiologists and nephrologists. KEY FINDINGS In patients with category G2 or G3 CKD (eGFR ≥ 30 and < 60 mL/min/1.73 m2), administration of standard doses of GBCA is safe and no additional precautions are necessary. In patients with AKI, with category G4 or G5 CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) or on dialysis, administration of GBCA should be considered individually and alternative imaging modalities utilized whenever possible. If GBCA are necessary, newer GBCA may be administered with patient consent obtained by a physician (or their delegate) citing an exceedingly low risk (much less than 1%) of developing NSF. Standard GBCA dosing should be used; half or quarter dosing is not recommended and repeat injections should be avoided. Dialysis-dependent patients should receive dialysis; however, initiating dialysis or switching from peritoneal to hemodialysis to reduce the risk of NSF is unproven. Use of a macrocyclic ionic instead of macrocyclic nonionic GBCA or macrocyclic instead of newer linear GBCA to further prevent NSF is unproven. Gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoversetamide remain absolutely contraindicated in patients with AKI, those with category G4 or G5 CKD, or those on dialysis. The panel agreed that screening for renal disease is important but less critical when using macrocyclic and newer linear GBCA. Monitoring for and reporting of potential cases of NSF in patients with AKI or CKD who have received GBCA is recommended. LIMITATIONS Limited available literature (number of injections and use in renal impairment) regarding the use of gadoxetate disodium. Limited, but growing and generally high-quality, number of clinical trials evaluating GBCA administration in renal impairment. Limited data regarding the topic of Gadolinium deposition in the brain, particularly as it related to patients with renal impairment. IMPLICATIONS In patients with AKI and category G4 and G5 CKD (eGFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and in dialysis-dependent patients who require GBCA-enhanced MRI, GBCA can be administered with exceedingly low risk of causing NSF when using macrocyclic agents and newer linear agents at routine doses.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Schieda
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Jason I. Blaichman
- Faculty of Medicine, Department of Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
| | - Andreu F. Costa
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre, Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Rafael Glikstein
- Brain and Mind Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
- Neuroradiology Section, MRI Modality Lead, Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Casey Hurrell
- Canadian Association of Radiologists, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew James
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
- Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Wael Shabana
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - An Tang
- Department of Radiology, Radio-oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Montreal, Québec, Canada
- Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal, Québec, Canada
| | - Anne Tsampalieros
- Division of Nephrology, Children’s Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Clinical Epidemiology Program and the University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | | | - Swapnil Hiremath
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Kidney Research Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Schieda N, Blaichman JI, Costa AF, Glikstein R, Hurrell C, James M, Jabehdar Maralani P, Shabana W, Tang A, Tsampalieros A, van der Pol C, Hiremath S. Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents in Kidney Disease: Comprehensive Review and Clinical Practice Guideline Issued by the Canadian Association of Radiologists. Can Assoc Radiol J 2018; 69:136-150. [PMID: 29706252 DOI: 10.1016/j.carj.2017.11.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 54] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2017] [Accepted: 11/13/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023] Open
Abstract
Use of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCAs) in renal impairment is controversial, with physician and patient apprehension in acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney disease (CKD), and dialysis because of concerns regarding nephrogenic systemic fibrosis (NSF). The position that GBCAs are absolutely contraindicated in AKI, CKD stage 4 or 5 (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] <30 mL/min/1.73 m2) and dialysis-dependent patients is outdated, and may limit access to clinically necessary contrast-enhanced MRI examinations. Following a comprehensive review of the literature and reported NSF cases to date, a committee of radiologists and nephrologists developed clinical practice guidelines to assist physicians in making decisions regarding GBCA administrations. In patients with mild-to-moderate CKD (eGFR ≥30 and <60 mL/min/1.73 m2), administration of standard doses of GBCA is safe and no additional precautions are necessary. In patients with AKI, with severe CKD (eGFR <30 mL/min/1.73 m2), or on dialysis, administration of GBCAs should be considered individually and alternative imaging modalities utilized whenever possible. If GBCAs are necessary, newer GBCAs may be administered with patient consent obtained by a physician (or their delegate), citing an exceedingly low risk (much less than 1%) of developing NSF. Standard GBCA dosing should be used; half or quarter dosing is not recommended and repeat injections should be avoided. Dialysis-dependent patients should receive dialysis; however, initiating dialysis or switching from peritoneal to hemodialysis to reduce the risk of NSF is unproven. Use of a macrocyclic ionic instead of macrocyclic nonionic GBCA or macrocyclic instead of newer linear GBCA to further prevent NSF is unproven. Gadopentetate dimeglumine, gadodiamide, and gadoversetamide remain absolutely contraindicated in patients with AKI, with stage 4 or 5 CKD, or on dialysis. The panel agreed that screening for renal disease is important but less critical when using macrocyclic and newer linear GBCAs. Monitoring for and reporting of potential cases of NSF in patients with AKI or CKD who have received GBCAs is recommended.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicola Schieda
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada.
| | - Jason I Blaichman
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Andreu F Costa
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre and Dalhousie University, Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
| | - Rafael Glikstein
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Brain and Mind Research Institute, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Casey Hurrell
- Canadian Association of Radiologists, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Matthew James
- Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada; Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada
| | | | - Wael Shabana
- Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - An Tang
- Department of Radiology, Radio-oncology and Nuclear Medicine, University of Montreal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada; Centre de recherche du Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Anne Tsampalieros
- Division of Nephrology, Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada; Clinical Epidemiology Program, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| | - Christian van der Pol
- Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard University, Boston, Massachusetts, USA
| | - Swapnil Hiremath
- Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine and Kidney Research Centre, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Endrikat J, Schwenke C, Vogtlaender K, Dohannish S, Breuer J. Safety profile of gadoxetate disodium in elderly patients (≥65 years). Acta Radiol 2018; 59:81-88. [PMID: 28372493 PMCID: PMC5751856 DOI: 10.1177/0284185117700673] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
Background Safety data on routine clinical use of gadoxetate disodium in elderly patients is not reported yet. Purpose To assess the safety of liver specific gadoxetate disodium in contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in elderly patients (≥65 years) in comparison to adults (18–64 years). Material and Methods Safety data on gadoxetate disodium were analyzed from 12 clinical phase II–III studies and from our pharmacovigilance database. A comparison between elderly (≥65 years) versus adults (18–64 years) was performed with respect to the frequency of drug-related adverse events (AEs) in clinical phase II–III studies and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the pharmacovigilance database. Results In clinical studies, 1989 patients were enrolled: 675 elderly and 1314 adults. Twenty-three elderly patients (3.4%) suffered at least one drug-related AE in contrast to 58 patients (4.4%) in the group of adults (odds ratio = 0.76; 95% confidence interval = 0.45–1.27). Since marketing authorization in 2004, more than 3.5 million patients have been exposed to gadoxetate disodium worldwide: 1.7 million (48.6%) in elderly and 1.8 million (51.4%) in adults. The number of patients with post-marketing ADRs (total n = 793) was 354 (0.021%) in the elderly group and 439 (0.024%) in the adult group. Thus, there were significantly fewer patients with ADRs reported in the group of elderly versus adults (P = 0.028). Hypersensitivity/immune system disorders, gastrointestinal disorders, and respiratory disorders were the most frequent ADRs in both groups, elderly and adults. Conclusion The incidence of drug-related AEs in clinical studies was similar and that of patients with ADRs in the post-marketing setting was lower in elderly (≥65 years) compared with younger adults aged 18–64 years. Overall, gadoxetate disodium shows a favorable safety profile in both age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Endrikat
- Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany
- Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, University Medical School of Saarland, Homburg/Saar, Germany
| | | | - Kai Vogtlaender
- Bayer AG, Integrated Analysis & Life Cycle Management Statistics, Wuppertal, Germany
| | - Susan Dohannish
- Bayer Pharmaceuticals, Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management, Whippany, NJ, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Franckenberg S, Berger F, Schaerli S, Ampanozi G, Thali M. Fatal anaphylactic reaction to intravenous gadobutrol, a gadolinium-based MRI contrast agent. Radiol Case Rep 2017; 13:299-301. [PMID: 29552267 PMCID: PMC5851274 DOI: 10.1016/j.radcr.2017.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2017] [Revised: 09/06/2017] [Accepted: 09/08/2017] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
We present the rare case of a fatal anaphylactic reaction to gadobutrol, a magnetic resonance imaging contrast agent, in a 42-year-old man. The patient underwent elective magnetic resonance imaging for diagnostic clarification of a suspicious finding in the abdomen. The patient had undergone contrast-enhanced computed tomography previously without the occurrence of any adverse effects. Adverse drug reactions in gadobutrol have a very low prevalence of 0.32%-3.5%, with serious adverse drug reactions in <0.1%. There are only a few cases of fatal anaphylactoid reactions to gadolinium-based contrast agents in general. However, if an anaphylactoid reaction occurs, it can present itself with a fulminant course within minutes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabine Franckenberg
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital of Zurich, Raemistrasse 100, 8091 Zurich, Switzerland
- Corresponding author.
| | - Florian Berger
- Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sarah Schaerli
- Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Garyfalia Ampanozi
- Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Michael Thali
- Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zurich, 8057 Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
|
11
|
Endrikat J, Anzalone N. Gadobutrol in India-A Comprehensive Review of Safety and Efficacy. MAGNETIC RESONANCE INSIGHTS 2017; 10:1178623X17730048. [PMID: 28932122 PMCID: PMC5598798 DOI: 10.1177/1178623x17730048] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/06/2017] [Accepted: 08/11/2017] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
Gadobutrol is a gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agent for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). In India, gadobutrol is approved for MRI of the central nervous system (CNS), liver, kidneys, breast and for MR angiography for patients 2 years and older. The standard dose for all age groups is 0.1 mmol/kg body weight. The safety profile has been demonstrated in 42 clinical phase 2 to 4 studies (>6800 patients), 7 observational studies, and by assessing pharmacovigilance data of 29 million applications. Furthermore, studies in children, adults, and elderly and in patients with impaired liver or kidney function did not show any increased adverse event rate. Diagnostic efficacy was demonstrated in numerous studies and various indications, such as diseases of the CNS, peripheral and supra-aortic vessels, kidneys, liver, and breast.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Endrikat
- Radiology, Bayer AG, Berlin, Germany.,Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics and Reproductive Medicine, University Medical School of Saarland, Homburg, Germany
| | - Nicoletta Anzalone
- Department of Neuroradiology, Scientific Institute HS Raffaele, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Lee H, Song S, Oh YK, Kang W, Kim E. Is gender still a predisposing factor in contrast-media associated adverse drug reactions? A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials and observational studies. Eur J Radiol 2017; 89:81-89. [PMID: 28267554 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2017.01.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/12/2016] [Revised: 01/09/2017] [Accepted: 01/17/2017] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the role of gender as a risk factor for developing contrast media-associated adverse drug reactions (CM-ADRs) by comparing the incidence of CM-ADR between male and female patients according to study design, ADR type, and computed tomography (CT) examination. MATERIAL AND METHODS We systematically searched three electronic databases for eligible studies. In the studies included (n=18), we assessed effect estimates of the relative incidence of CM-ADR, analysed by experimental design, ADR type and CT examination. This was calculated by using a random effects model if clinical conditions showed heterogeneity; otherwise, a fixed effects model was used. RESULTS We identified 10,776 patients administered CM. According to the designs, studies were classified into randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies. Results were as follows: risk ratio (RR)=1.07 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.79-1.46, P=0.66) for RCTs, and RR=0.77 (95% CI: 0.58-1.04, P=0.09) for observational studies. The results of analysis according to ADR type and for undergoing CT demonstrated that the incidence of CM-ADR did not differ between males and females. CONCLUSIONS We found no significant difference in the incidence of CM-ADRs between male and female patients according to study design, ADR type, or CT examination. Future studies to determine why gender has shown different roles as a risk factor between CM-ADRs and non-CM ADRs are needed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heeyoung Lee
- Evidence-Based Research Laboratory, Division of Health, Social and Clinical Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Seungyeon Song
- Evidence-Based Research Laboratory, Division of Health, Social and Clinical Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Yun-Kyoung Oh
- Evidence-Based Research Laboratory, Division of Health, Social and Clinical Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea; Department of Pharmacy, Konkuk University Medical Center, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - WonKu Kang
- College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
| | - Eunyoung Kim
- Evidence-Based Research Laboratory, Division of Health, Social and Clinical Pharmacotherapy, College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea; College of Pharmacy, Chung-Ang University, Seoul, South Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Heshmatzadeh Behzadi A, Prince MR. Preventing Allergic Reactions to Gadolinium-Based Contrast Agents. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2016; 25:275-279. [PMID: 27748715 DOI: 10.1097/rmr.0000000000000106] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/06/2023]
Abstract
Although the low incidence of immediate-type gadolinium-based contrast agent (GBCA) allergic reactions is widely known, preventing these reactions and properly managing them to reduce their adverse sequel can improve the already exceedingly favorable GBCA safety profile. This review article should help those who order, supervise, or administer GBCA contrast agents, including recognizing and handling allergic reaction risks intrinsic to their use. Areas of focus include factors indicating increased allergic reaction risk, patient selection strategies, skin testing, premedication, and treatment of adverse events.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ashkan Heshmatzadeh Behzadi
- *Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical Center †Department of Radiology, Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Endrikat J, Vogtlaender K, Dohanish S, Balzer T, Breuer J. Safety of Gadobutrol: Results From 42 Clinical Phase II to IV Studies and Postmarketing Surveillance After 29 Million Applications. Invest Radiol 2016; 51:537-43. [PMID: 26964075 PMCID: PMC4982758 DOI: 10.1097/rli.0000000000000270] [Citation(s) in RCA: 25] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/16/2015] [Accepted: 01/28/2016] [Indexed: 02/02/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to provide a systematic safety analysis of gadobutrol after more than 29 million applications in clinical routine. MATERIALS AND METHODS Forty-two clinical development phase II to IV studies on gadobutrol or comparator and the postmarketing safety surveillance database for gadobutrol (1998-2015) were analyzed. Adverse events (AEs) and drug-related AEs were evaluated in the clinical development database and spontaneous adverse drug reactions (ADRs) in the postmarketing database. Subgroup analyses were run on patients with special medical history and on patients of different age groups. RESULTS In the clinical development studies, 6809 and 2184 patients received gadobutrol or comparators, respectively. The incidence of drug-related AEs was 3.5% for both groups. With the exception of nausea (0.7% related cases in both groups), all other drug-related AEs were 0.3% or less in both groups. Hypersensitivity reactions were sporadic (<0.1%). Patients with history of allergies to contrast agents experienced slightly more drug-related AEs. No differences were seen between age groups.The overall reporting rate of ADRs from postmarketing surveillance was 0.05%. The most frequent ADRs were anaphylactoid/hypersensitivity reactions, nausea, vomiting, and dyspnea.For 3 single-agent reports of nephrogenic systemic fibrosis, using a conservative approach, association with gadobutrol could not be excluded. CONCLUSIONS Gadobutrol is well tolerated and has a favorable safety profile for patients of all age groups.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jan Endrikat
- From the *Radiology, Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin; †Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Reproductive Medicine, University Medical School of Saarland, Homburg, Saarland; ‡Global Integrated Analysis & Life Cycle Management Statistics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany; §Global Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management, and ∥Radiology, Bayer Pharma AG, Whippany, NJ
| | - Kai Vogtlaender
- From the *Radiology, Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin; †Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Reproductive Medicine, University Medical School of Saarland, Homburg, Saarland; ‡Global Integrated Analysis & Life Cycle Management Statistics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany; §Global Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management, and ∥Radiology, Bayer Pharma AG, Whippany, NJ
| | - Susan Dohanish
- From the *Radiology, Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin; †Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Reproductive Medicine, University Medical School of Saarland, Homburg, Saarland; ‡Global Integrated Analysis & Life Cycle Management Statistics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany; §Global Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management, and ∥Radiology, Bayer Pharma AG, Whippany, NJ
| | - Thomas Balzer
- From the *Radiology, Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin; †Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Reproductive Medicine, University Medical School of Saarland, Homburg, Saarland; ‡Global Integrated Analysis & Life Cycle Management Statistics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany; §Global Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management, and ∥Radiology, Bayer Pharma AG, Whippany, NJ
| | - Josy Breuer
- From the *Radiology, Bayer Pharma AG, Berlin; †Department of Gynecology, Obstetrics, and Reproductive Medicine, University Medical School of Saarland, Homburg, Saarland; ‡Global Integrated Analysis & Life Cycle Management Statistics, Bayer Pharma AG, Wuppertal, Germany; §Global Pharmacovigilance and Risk Management, and ∥Radiology, Bayer Pharma AG, Whippany, NJ
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Clinical characteristics of adverse reactions to nonionic low osmolality contrast media in patients transferred from the CT room to the emergency room. SPRINGERPLUS 2016; 5:929. [PMID: 27386373 PMCID: PMC4927528 DOI: 10.1186/s40064-016-2380-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2016] [Accepted: 05/20/2016] [Indexed: 11/10/2022]
Abstract
Nonionic low osmolality contrast media (LOCMs) are used universally in computed tomography (CT) imaging. Although adverse reactions due to nonionic LOCMs are a common cause of emergency room (ER) admissions, few studies have investigated these adverse reactions. In the present study, we evaluated the characteristics of patients who were transferred from the CT room to the ER due to adverse reactions to contrast media, and we determined the risk factors for severe adverse reactions. A single-center retrospective study was conducted over a 41-month period. Baseline and clinical characteristics were evaluated and analyzed according to moderate and severe severity. In particular, risk factors of severe reactions were determined using logistic regression analysis. In total, 70 patients were admitted to the ER with adverse reactions due to nonionic LOCMs. Of these, 33 developed a moderate reaction, and 37 developed a severe reaction. Compared with the moderate reaction group, the severe reaction group was older, had higher blood pressures, showed more symptoms indicating the cardiovascular and central nervous system, and developed faster reactions to LOCMs. According to the multivariate logistic regression analysis, the age of the patient and time to onset of reaction demonstrated a statistical relationship with severe adverse reactions. In the receiver operating characteristic analysis, the optimal cutoff values for age and time to onset were 60 years and 5 min. In conclusion, clinicians should be attentive to anaphylaxis due to nonionic LOCM, in particular, for elderly patients aged older than 60 years and a time to reaction onset of less than 5 min.
Collapse
|
16
|
Prince MR, Lee HG, Lee CH, Youn SW, Lee IH, Yoon W, Yang B, Wang H, Wang J, Shih TTF, Huang GS, Lirng JF, Palkowitsch P. Safety of gadobutrol in over 23,000 patients: the GARDIAN study, a global multicentre, prospective, non-interventional study. Eur Radiol 2016; 27:286-295. [PMID: 26960538 PMCID: PMC5127858 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-016-4268-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 24] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2015] [Revised: 01/19/2016] [Accepted: 02/02/2016] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To investigate the safety and tolerability of gadobutrol at the recommended dose in patients requiring contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging/angiography (MRI/MRA) in the routine setting. METHODS GARDIAN prospectively enrolled 23,708 patients undergoing routine gadobutrol-enhanced MRI/MRA for approved indications at 272 study centres in Europe, Asia, North America, and Africa and monitored for adverse events. RESULTS Median gadobutrol dose was 0.11 mmol/kg body weight. The overall incidence of adverse drug reactions (ADRs) was 0.7 % (n = 170 patients), with similar incidences in patients with renal impairment or cardiac disease, from different geographic regions and in different gadobutrol dose groups. Patients at risk for contrast media reaction had an ADR incidence of 2.5 %. Five patients (0.02 %) experienced serious adverse events, four were drug-related. One patient experienced a fatal anaphylactoid shock, assessed to be related to injection of gadobutrol. The contrast quality of gadobutrol-enhanced images was rated by treating physicians as good or excellent in 97 % cases, with similar ratings in all patient subgroups and indications. CONCLUSIONS The GARDIAN study shows that gadobutrol at the recommended dose is well tolerated across a large, diverse patient population. KEY POINTS • Gadobutrol at recommended dose shows low rates of adverse drug reactions • Gadobutrol demonstrates a uniform safety profile across diverse patient groups • Gadobutrol provides excellent contrast quality in routine practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martin R Prince
- Department of Radiology, Weill Cornell Medical College, 416 east 55th Street, New York, NY, 10022, USA. .,Department of Radiology, Columbia College of Physicians and Surgeons, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
| | - Hae Giu Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Chang-Hee Lee
- Department of Radiology, Korea University Guro Hospital, Seoul, South Korea
| | - Sung Won Youn
- Department of Radiology, Catholic University of Daegu Medical Center, Daegu, South Korea
| | - In Ho Lee
- Department of Radiology, Chungnam National University Hospital, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, South Korea
| | - Woong Yoon
- Department of Radiology, Chonnam National University Hospital, Gwangju, South Korea
| | - Benqiang Yang
- Department of Radiology, General Hospital of Shenyang Military Region, Shenyang, China
| | - Haiping Wang
- Department of Radiology, Tangshan Worker's Hospital, Tangshan, China
| | - Jin Wang
- Department of Radiology, Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Tiffany Ting-Fang Shih
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, National Taiwan University, Medical College and Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Guo-Shu Huang
- Department of Radiology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Jiing-Feng Lirng
- Department of Radiology, Taipei Veterans General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
| | - Petra Palkowitsch
- Medical & Clinical Affairs Radiology, Bayer Pharmaceutical Division, Berlin, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|