Quality assurance in cardiovascular CT: a practical guide

Impact of an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan on CT coronary angiography scan length and effective radiation dose

Objective

Imaged scan length (z-axis coverage) is a simple parameter that can reduce CT dose without compromising image quality. In CT coronary angiography (CTCA), z-axis coverage may be planned using non-contrast calcium score scan (CaCS) to identify the relevant coronary anatomy. However, standardised Agatston CaCS is acquired at 120 kV which adds a relatively high contribution to total study dose and CaCS is no longer routinely recommended in UK guidelines. We evaluate an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan on CTCA scan length and effective radiation dose.

Methods

An ultra-low dose tin filter (Sn-filter) planning scan (100 kVp, maximum iterative reconstruction) was performed and used to plan the z-axis coverage on 48 consecutive CTCAs (62% men, 62 ± 13 years) compared with 47 CTCA planned using a localiser alone (46% men, 59 ± 12 years) between May and June 2019. Excess scanning beyond the ideal scan length was calculated for both groups. Estimations of radiation dose were also compared between the two groups.

Results

Addition of an ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan to CTCA protocol was associated with reduction in overscanning with no impact on image quality. There was no significant difference in total study effective dose with the addition of the planning scan, which had an average dose-length product of 3 mGy.cm. (total study dose: Protocol A 2.1 mSv vs Protocol B 2.2 mSv, p = 0.92).

Conclusion

An ultra-low dose unenhanced planning scan facilitates optimal scan length for the diagnostic CTCA, reducing overscanning and preventing incomplete cardiac imaging with no significant dose penalty or impact on image quality.

Advances in knowledge

An ultra-low dose CTCA planning is feasible and effective at optimising scan length.

Image Quality and Dose Reduction by Dual Source Computed Tomography Coronary Angiography: Protocol Comparison

Purpose:

To compare image quality and radiation dose among different protocols in patients who underwent a 128-slice dual source computed tomography coronary angiography (DSCT-CTCA).

Methods:

Ninety patients were retrospectively grouped according to heart rate (HR): 26 patients (group A) with stable HR ≤60 bpm were acquired using high pitch spiral mode (FLASH); 48 patients (group B) with irregular HR ≤60 bpm or stable HR between 60 and 70 bpm using step and shoot mode; and 16 patients (group C) with irregular HR >60 bpm or stable HR ≥70 bpm by retrospective electrocardiogram pulsing acquisition. Signal to noise ratio (SNR) and contrast to noise ratio (CNR) were measured for the main vascular structures. Moreover, the dose-length product and the effective dose were assessed.

Results:

Both SNR and CNR were higher in group A compared to group C (18.27 ± 0.32 vs 11.22 ± 0.50 and 16.75 ± 0.32 vs 10.17 ± 0.50; P = .001). The effective dose was lower in groups A and B (2.09 ± 1.27 mSv and 4.60 ± 2.78 mSv, respectively) compared to group C (9.61 ± 5.95 mSv) P < .0001.

Conclusion:

The correct selection of a low-dose, HR-matched CTCA scan protocol with a DSCT scanner provides substantial reduction of radiation exposure and better SNR and CNR.