Does fluoroscopy improve outcomes in paediatric forearm fracture reduction?

Ultrasound assistance in treatment with elastic stable intramedullary nail fixation in radial and ulnar fractures in children

PURPOSE

Radial and ulnar fractures are one of the most common fractures in children. When closed reduction of fractures fails, elastic stable intramedullary nail (ESIN) fixation can mostly be used under the guidance of fluoroscopy. In this study, we evaluated the effect of ultrasound (US) as assistance for radial and ulnar fracture reduction and the insertion of ESINs.

METHODS

There were 56 patients with midshaft radial and ulnar fractures included in our hospital from March 2019 to August 2021. After applying the inclusion and exclusion criteria and according to the treatment method, they were divided into the US group (patients treated with US assistance) and the conventional group (C-group, patients treated with fluoroscopy guidance). All patients' clinical data were collected. Operation time, fluoroscopy times, radiation dose, and post-operative complications were analyzed. The elbow function was evaluated using the Mayo Elbow Performance Index.

RESULTS

There were 26 patients in the US group and 30 in the C-group. The average operation time was 44.5±19.4 min in the US group and 65.1±16.2 min in the C-group. There were significant differences regarding the surgery time, fluoroscopy time, and radiation dose between the groups (all p = 0.001). The average follow-up time was 13.5±3.1 months. No significant difference was found regarding radial nerve injury, extensor pollicis longus rupture, non-union or delayed union, ulnar nerve injury, or acute compartment syndrome. There was no difference in elbow function at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSION

US guidance can be adopted for the treatment of displaced radial and ulnar fracture reduction and the insertion of ESINs. It can significantly decrease fluoroscopy times, radiation doses, and duration of surgery.

Pediatric fracture reduction in the emergency department

Limb fractures are a large part of pediatric trauma activity. Conservative treatment is possible because of children's bone remodeling potential. In case of displaced fractures, when a closed reduction can be done in the emergency room (ER), this avoids general anesthesia, hospitalization and the associated costs. In well-defined situations, there is a consensus about the indication for fracture reduction in the ER. Some complex fracture cases require immediate treatment in the operating room: intra-articular fractures, pathological fractures, fractures with associated skin, nerve or vascular injuries and/or early signs of compartment syndrome. And last, there is another set of fractures where the indication is not so clear. To specify the indications and technical implementation of these treatments in ER, we did a non-systematic narrative review of literature in the MEDLINE® database using the PubMed search engine to query "emergency room AND children AND fracture AND reduction". We retained the most recent articles addressing the questions related to indications and their care, sedation protocol and complications. The sedation protocol for the ER is established collaboratively by surgical, ER and anesthesia teams. The residual angulation that can be tolerated after reduction depends on the patient's age, remaining growth potential and location of the fracture line. When reduction is done in the ER, the complication and secondary displacement rates are not higher, although surgeon experience and specific procedural training appear to be crucial.

Fluoroscopy as Definitive Postreduction Imaging of Pediatric Wrist and Forearm Fractures Is Safe and Saves Time

BACKGROUND

Recent studies indicate that formal postreduction radiographs may be unnecessary for closed, isolated pediatric wrist, and forearm when mini C-arm fluoroscopy is used for reduction. Our institution changed the Emergency Department (ED) management protocol to reflect this by allowing orthopaedic providers to determine if fluoroscopy was acceptable to assess fracture reduction. We hypothesized that using fluoroscopy as definitive postreduction imaging would decrease total encounter time, without an increase in the rate of rereduction or surgery.

METHODS

Patients with closed, isolated distal radius/distal ulna (DR/DU) or both bone forearm (BBFA) fractures that required sedation and reduction under mini C-arm fluoroscopy at our Level 1 pediatric ED were reviewed for 6 months both before and after this policy change. Before, all patients had formal postreduction radiographs; after, the decision was left to the orthopaedic physician. Timestamp data were collected, as was the need for rereduction or surgery. In addition to descriptive statistics, between-group differences were analyzed with the Student t test, χ test, and multivariable regression as appropriate.

RESULTS

A total of 243 patients (119 before, 124 after) had 165 DR/DU and 78 BBFA fractures. Demographic data were similar before and after. After protocol implementation, univariable analysis (Student t test) showed that sedation times were longer, while total ED time and the time from sedation beginning to discharge were similar. The proportion of patients requiring rereduction or surgery were similar.After multivariable regression, "fluoroscopy as definitive imaging" was the only independent determinant of the time intervals compared with using conventional radiography. Sedation was an average of 13.8 minutes longer (P<0.001), while the interval from sedation beginning to discharge was 15.8 minutes shorter (P=0.007), and total ED time was 33.0 minutes shorter (P=0.018). Fluoroscopy as definitive imaging was not a predictor of surgery (odds ratio=0.63, P=0.520), although having a BBFA increased the likelihood (odds ratio=4.50, P=0.008).

CONCLUSIONS

Implementing a protocol in which the provider could use mini C-arm fluoroscopy for definitive postreduction imaging did not result in increased rates remanipulation or need for surgery. Regression analysis further demonstrated time savings associated with foregoing conventional radiographs.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III-therapeutic.