1
|
Pan N, Shi L, He D, Zhao J, Xiong L, Ma L, Li J, Ai K, Zhao L, Huang G. Prediction of prostate cancer aggressiveness using magnetic resonance imaging radiomics: a dual-center study. Discov Oncol 2024; 15:122. [PMID: 38625419 PMCID: PMC11019191 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-024-00980-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/11/2024] [Indexed: 04/17/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE The Gleason score (GS) and positive needles are crucial aggressive indicators of prostate cancer (PCa). This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) radiomics models in predicting GS and positive needles of systematic biopsy in PCa. MATERIAL AND METHODS A total of 218 patients with pathologically proven PCa were retrospectively recruited from 2 centers. Small-field-of-view high-resolution T2-weighted imaging and post-contrast delayed sequences were selected to extract radiomics features. Then, analysis of variance and recursive feature elimination were applied to remove redundant features. Radiomics models for predicting GS and positive needles were constructed based on MRI and various classifiers, including support vector machine, linear discriminant analysis, logistic regression (LR), and LR using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator. The models were evaluated with the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver-operating characteristic. RESULTS The 11 features were chosen as the primary feature subset for the GS prediction, whereas the 5 features were chosen for positive needle prediction. LR was chosen as classifier to construct the radiomics models. For GS prediction, the AUC of the radiomics models was 0.811, 0.814, and 0.717 in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. For positive needle prediction, the AUC was 0.806, 0.811, and 0.791 in the training, internal validation, and external validation sets, respectively. CONCLUSIONS MRI radiomics models are suitable for predicting GS and positive needles of systematic biopsy in PCa. The models can be used to identify aggressive PCa using a noninvasive, repeatable, and accurate diagnostic method.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nini Pan
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Liuyan Shi
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Diliang He
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Jianxin Zhao
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Lianqiu Xiong
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Lili Ma
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Jing Li
- The First Clinical Medical College of Gansu University of Chinese Medicine, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Kai Ai
- Clinical and Technical Support, Philips Healthcare, Xi'an, China
| | - Lianping Zhao
- Department of Radiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China
| | - Gang Huang
- Department of Radiology, Gansu Provincial Hospital, Lanzhou, 730000, Gansu, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Guljaš S, Dupan Krivdić Z, Drežnjak Madunić M, Šambić Penc M, Pavlović O, Krajina V, Pavoković D, Šmit Takač P, Štefančić M, Salha T. Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Study in the mpMRI of the Prostate-Unnecessary or Underutilised? A Narrative Review. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:3488. [PMID: 37998624 PMCID: PMC10670922 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13223488] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2023] [Revised: 10/30/2023] [Accepted: 11/16/2023] [Indexed: 11/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this review is to summarise recent scientific literature regarding the clinical use of DCE-MRI as a component of multiparametric resonance imaging of the prostate. This review presents the principles of DCE-MRI acquisition and analysis, the current role of DCE-MRI in clinical practice with special regard to its role in presently available categorisation systems, and an overview of the advantages and disadvantages of DCE-MRI described in the current literature. DCE-MRI is an important functional sequence that requires intravenous administration of a gadolinium-based contrast agent and gives information regarding the vascularity and capillary permeability of the lesion. Although numerous studies have confirmed that DCE-MRI has great potential in the diagnosis and monitoring of prostate cancer, its role is still inadequate in the PI-RADS categorisation. Moreover, there have been numerous scientific discussions about abandoning the intravenous application of gadolinium-based contrast as a routine part of MRI examination of the prostate. In this review, we summarised the recent literature on the advantages and disadvantages of DCE-MRI, focusing on an overview of currently available data on bpMRI and mpMRI, as well as on studies providing information on the potential better usability of DCE-MRI in improving the sensitivity and specificity of mpMRI examinations of the prostate.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Silva Guljaš
- Clinical Department of Radiology, University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (S.G.); (Z.D.K.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
| | - Zdravka Dupan Krivdić
- Clinical Department of Radiology, University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (S.G.); (Z.D.K.)
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
| | - Maja Drežnjak Madunić
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Mirela Šambić Penc
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Oliver Pavlović
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Vinko Krajina
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Deni Pavoković
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
- Department of Urology, University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| | - Petra Šmit Takač
- Clinical Department of Surgery, Osijek University Hospital Centre, 31000 Osijek, Croatia;
| | - Marin Štefančić
- Department of Radiology, National Memorial Hospital Vukovar, 32000 Vukovar, Croatia;
| | - Tamer Salha
- Faculty of Medicine, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia; (M.D.M.); (M.Š.P.); (O.P.); (V.K.); (D.P.)
- Department of Teleradiology and Artificial Intelligence, Health Centre Osijek-Baranja County, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
- Faculty of Dental Medicine and Health, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 31000 Osijek, Croatia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Hu B, Zhang H, Zhang Y, Jin Y. A nomogram based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging for detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in biopsy-naïve patients. Cancer Imaging 2023; 23:82. [PMID: 37667393 PMCID: PMC10478308 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00606-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/03/2023] [Accepted: 08/28/2023] [Indexed: 09/06/2023] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This study aimed to develop and validate a model based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in biopsy-naïve patients. METHOD This retrospective study included 324 patients who underwent bpMRI and MRI targeted fusion biopsy (MRGB) and/or systematic biopsy, of them 217 were randomly assigned to the training group and 107 were assigned to the validation group. We assessed the diagnostic performance of three bpMRI-based scorings in terms of sensitivity and specificity. Subsequently, 3 models (Model 1, Model 2, and Model 3) combining bpMRI scorings with clinical variables were constructed and compared with each other using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC). The statistical significance of differences among these models was evaluated using DeLong's test. RESULTS In the training group, 68 of 217 patients had pathologically proven csPCa. The sensitivity and specificity for Scoring 1 were 64.7% (95% CI 52.2%-75.9%) and 80.5% (95% CI 73.3%-86.6%); for Scoring 2 were 86.8% (95% CI 76.4%-93.8%) and 73.2% (95% CI 65.3%-80.1%); and for Scoring 3 were 61.8% (95% CI 49.2%-73.3%) and 80.5% (95% CI 73.3%-86.6%), respectively. Multivariable regression analysis revealed that scorings based on bpMRI, age, and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) were independent predictors of csPCa. The AUCs for the 3 models were 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93), 0.90 (95% CI 0.85-0.94), and 0.88 (95% CI 0.83-0.93), respectively. Model 2 showed significantly higher performance than Model 1 (P = 0.03) and Model 3 (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION All three scorings had favorite diagnostic accuracy. While in conjunction with age and PSAD the prediction power was significantly improved, and the Model 2 that based on Scoring 2 yielded the highest performance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Beibei Hu
- Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, Yancheng, China.
| | - Huili Zhang
- Department of Medical Imaging, Jiangsu Vocational College of Medicine, Yancheng, China
| | - Yueyue Zhang
- Department of Radiology, Second Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University, Soochow, China
| | - Yongming Jin
- Department of Radiology, Affiliated Yancheng Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University; Yancheng Third People's Hospital, Yancheng, China.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Zattoni F, Maresca S, Dal Moro F, Bednarova I, Randazzo G, Basso G, Reitano G, Giannarini G, Zuiani C, Girometti R. Abbreviated Versus Multiparametric Prostate MRI in Active Surveillance for Prostate-Cancer Patients: Comparison of Accuracy and Clinical Utility as a Decisional Tool. Diagnostics (Basel) 2023; 13:diagnostics13040578. [PMID: 36832066 PMCID: PMC9955028 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics13040578] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/02/2022] [Revised: 01/30/2023] [Accepted: 02/02/2023] [Indexed: 02/09/2023] Open
Abstract
(1) Purpose: To compare the diagnostic accuracy between full multiparametric contrast-enhanced prostate MRI (mpMRI) and abbreviated dual-sequence prostate MRI (dsMRI) in men with clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) who were candidates for active surveillance. (2) Materials and Methods: Fifty-four patients with a diagnosis of low-risk PCa in the previous 6 months had a mpMRI scan prior to a saturation biopsy and a subsequent MRI cognitive transperineal targeted biopsy (for PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions). The dsMRI images were obtained from the mpMRI protocol. The images were selected by a study coordinator and assigned to two readers blinded to the biopsy results (R1 and R2). Inter-reader agreement for clinically significant cancer was evaluated with Cohen's kappa. The dsMRI and mpMRI accuracy was calculated for each reader (R1 and R2). The clinical utility of the dsMRI and mpMRI was investigated with a decision-analysis model. (3) Results: The dsMRI sensitivity and specificity were 83.3%, 31.0%, 75.0%, and 23.8%, respectively, for R1 and R2. The mpMRI sensitivity and specificity were 91.7%, 31.0%, 83.3%, and 23.8%, respectively, for R1 and R2. The inter-reader agreement for the detection of csPCa was moderate (k = 0.53) and good (k = 0.63) for dsMRI and mpMRI, respectively. The AUC values for the dsMRI were 0.77 and 0.62 for the R1 and R2, respectively. The AUC values for the mpMRI were 0.79 and 0.66 for R1 and R2, respectively. No AUC differences were found between the two MRI protocols. At any risk threshold, the mpMRI showed a higher net benefit than the dsMRI for both R1 and R2. (4) Conclusions: The dsMRI and mpMRI showed similar diagnostic accuracy for csPCa in male candidates for active surveillance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Fabio Zattoni
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +39-0498212931
| | - Silvio Maresca
- Department of Medicine, Institute of Radiology, University of Udine, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Fabrizio Dal Moro
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Iliana Bednarova
- Department of Breast Radiology, Veneto Institute of Oncology, IRCCS, 35128 Padua, Italy
| | - Gianmarco Randazzo
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Giovanni Basso
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Reitano
- Department Surgery, Oncology and Gastroenterology, Urologic Unit, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Gianluca Giannarini
- Urology Unit, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Chiara Zuiani
- Department of Medicine, Institute of Radiology, University of Udine, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy
| | - Rossano Girometti
- Department of Medicine, Institute of Radiology, University of Udine, Santa Maria della Misericordia University Hospital, 33100 Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lu Y, Li B, Huang H, Leng Q, Wang Q, Zhong R, Huang Y, Li C, Yuan R, Zhang Y. Biparametric MRI-based radiomics classifiers for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10 ng/mL. Front Oncol 2022; 12:1020317. [PMID: 36582803 PMCID: PMC9793773 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.1020317] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 12/07/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose To investigate the predictive performance of the combined model by integrating clinical variables and radiomic features for the accurate detection of prostate cancer (PCa) in patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) serum levels of 4-10 ng/mL. Methods A retrospective study of 136 males (mean age, 67.3 ± 8.4 years) with Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1 category ≤3 lesions and PSA serum levels of 4-10 ng/mL were performed. All patients underwent multiparametric MRI at 3.0T and transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic prostate biopsy in their clinical workup. Radiomic features were extracted from axial T2-weighted images (T2WI) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps of each patient using PyRadiomics. Pearson correlation coefficient (PCC) and recursive feature elimination (RFE) were implemented to identify the most significant radiomic features. Independent clinic-radiological factors were identified via univariate and multivariate regression analyses. Seven machine-learning algorithms were compared to construct a single-layered radiomic score (ie, radscore) and multivariate regression analysis was applied to construct the fusion radscore. Finally, the radiomic nomogram was further developed by integrating useful clinic-radiological factors and fusion radscore using multivariate regression analysis. The discriminative power of the nomogram was evaluated by area under the curve (AUC), DeLong test, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), and clinical impact curve (CIC). Results The transitional zone-specific antigen density was identified as the only independent clinic-radiological factor, which yielded an AUC of 0.592 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.527-0.657). The ADC radscore based on six features and Naive Bayes achieved an AUC of 0.779 (95%CI: 0.730-0.828); the T2WI radscore based on 13 features and Support Vector Machine yielded an AUC of 0.808 (95%CI: 0.761-0.855). The fusion radscore obtained an improved AUC of 0.844 (95%CI: 0.801-0.887), which was higher than the single-layered radscores (both P<0.05). The radiomic nomogram achieved the highest value among all models (all P<0.05), with an AUC of 0.872 (95%CI: 0.835-0.909). Calibration curve showed good agreement and DCA together with CIC confirmed the clinical benefits of the radiomic nomogram. Conclusion The radiomic nomogram holds the potential for accurate and noninvasive identification of PCa in patients with PI-RADS ≤3 lesions and PSA of 4-10 ng/mL, which could reduce unnecessary biopsy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yangbai Lu
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan City People’s Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Binfei Li
- Department of Anesthesiology, Zhongshan City People’s Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Hongxing Huang
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan City People’s Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Qu Leng
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan City People’s Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Qiang Wang
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan City People’s Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Rui Zhong
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan City People’s Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Yaqiang Huang
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan City People’s Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Canyong Li
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan City People’s Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China
| | - Runqiang Yuan
- Department of Urology, Zhongshan City People’s Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China,*Correspondence: Yongxin Zhang, ; Runqiang Yuan,
| | - Yongxin Zhang
- Department of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Zhongshan City People’s Hospital, Zhongshan, Guangdong, China,*Correspondence: Yongxin Zhang, ; Runqiang Yuan,
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Ziayee F, Schimmöller L, Blondin D, Boschheidgen M, Wilms LM, Vach M, Arsov C, Albers P, Antoch G, Ullrich T. Impact of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI in 1.5 T versus 3 T MRI for clinically significant prostate cancer detection. Eur J Radiol 2022; 156:110520. [PMID: 36116141 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2022.110520] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/04/2022] [Revised: 08/21/2022] [Accepted: 09/06/2022] [Indexed: 11/03/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE This study analyzes the value of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI (DCE) of the prostate on 1.5 T and 3 T examinations in patients within PI-RADS category 4. METHODS In this retrospective, bi-centric, cohort study all consecutive patients classified as PI-RADS 4 in mpMRI with 100 verified prostate cancers (PCa) in subsequent MRI/US-guided fusion biopsy were included for 1.5 T and 3 T, each. PCa detection in index lesions (IL) upgraded to PI-RADS 4 based on positive DCE findings was compared between 1.5 T and 3 T. Secondary objectives are subgroup analysis of PZ lesions and comparison of ISUP grade group distribution between 1.5 T and 3 T. RESULTS In total, 293 patients within PI-RADS category 4, including 152 (mean 66 ± 8y; median PSA 6.4 ng/ml;116 PZ IL) in the 1.5 T group and 141 (mean 65 ± 8y; median PSA 7.2 ng/ml;100 PZ IL) in the 3 T group were included. Overall amount of PCa (66 % vs 71 %; p = 0.346) and portion of upgraded IL (28 % vs 21 %; p = 0.126) did not differ significantly. At 1.5 T PCa detection was higher in upgraded PZ lesions compared to 3 T (23 % vs 14 %; p = 0.048). The amount of upgraded PZ lesions with ISUP grade group 2-5 PCa was significantly higher at 1.5 T versus 3 T (13.8 % vs 4.0 %; p = 0.007). 33 % (11/33; 1.5 T) and 32 % (10/31; 3 T) of the ISUP grade group 1 PCa of the PZ lesions were detected in upgraded lesions (10% of all PZ index lesions, respectively). CONCLUSION DCE enabled the detection of a substantial amount of additional clinically significant PCa in prostate mpMRI at 1.5 T. The effect was smaller at 3 T and was accompanied in relation to 1.5 T by higher risk of overdiagnosis due to detection of additional low-risk PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F Ziayee
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - L Schimmöller
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - D Blondin
- Community Hospital Moenchengladbach GmbH, Elisabeth-Hospital Rheydt, Department of Radiology, Vascular Radiology, and Nuclear Medicine, D-41239 Moenchengladbach, Germany.
| | - M Boschheidgen
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - L M Wilms
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - M Vach
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - C Arsov
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - P Albers
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - G Antoch
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - T Ullrich
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Alver KH, Yagci AB, Utebey AR, Turk NS, Ufuk F. Comparison of Multiparametric and Fast MRI Protocols in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer and a Detailed Cost Analysis. J Magn Reson Imaging 2022; 56:1437-1447. [PMID: 35274792 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.28142] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2022] [Revised: 02/20/2022] [Accepted: 02/25/2022] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Due to the long acquisition time and high cost of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), biparametric and, more recently, fast prostate magnetic resonance imaging (fpMRI) protocols have been described. However, there is insufficient data about the diagnostic performance and cost of fpMRI. PURPOSE To compare the diagnostic performances and cost analysis of fpMRI and mpMRI in clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCA). STUDY TYPE Retrospective. POPULATION A total of 103 patients (63 had csPCA) with a mean age of 66.83 (± 7.22) years were included. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE A 1.5-T; T1- and T2-weighted turbo spin-echo imaging (T1WI and T2WI), echo-planar diffusion-weighted images, and dynamic contrast-enhanced T1W imaging. ASSESSMENT Three readers independently evaluated the fpMRI and mpMRI images in different sessions blinded to all patient information. Diagnostic performances of fpMRI and mpMRI were evaluated. Kappa coefficient (κ) was used to determine the interreader and intrareader agreement. A detailed cost analysis was performed for each protocol. STATISTICAL TESTS Receiver operating characteristics analysis, area under the curve (AUC), and κ test were used. Diagnostic performance parameters were also calculated. RESULTS Of the 63 malignant index lesions (csPCA), 53/63 of those (84.1%) originated from the peripheral zone and 10/63 lesions (15.9%) originated from the transition zone. The AUC values for fpMRI were 0.878 for reader 1, 0.937 for reader 2, and 0.855 for reader 3. For mpMRI, the AUC values were 0.893 for reader 1, 0.94 for reader 2, and 0.862 for reader 3. Inter and intrareader agreements were moderate to substantial (κ range, 0.5-0.79). The total cost per examination was calculated as €12.39 and €30.10 for fpMRI and mpMRI, respectively. DATA CONCLUSIONS Fast MRI protocol has similar diagnostic performance with mpMRI in detecting csPCA, and fpMRI can be considered an alternative protocol that could create a lower financial burden on health-care systems. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 4 TECHNICAL EFFICACY STAGE: 6.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kadir Han Alver
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Pamukkale, Denizli, Turkey
| | - Ahmet Baki Yagci
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Pamukkale, Denizli, Turkey
| | - Ayse Ruksan Utebey
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Pamukkale, Denizli, Turkey
| | - Nilay Sen Turk
- Department of Pathology, School of Medicine, University of Pamukkale, Denizli, Turkey
| | - Furkan Ufuk
- Department of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Pamukkale, Denizli, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Stamatelatou A, Scheenen TWJ, Heerschap A. Developments in proton MR spectroscopic imaging of prostate cancer. MAGMA (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2022; 35:645-665. [PMID: 35445307 PMCID: PMC9363347 DOI: 10.1007/s10334-022-01011-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/31/2021] [Revised: 03/04/2022] [Accepted: 03/22/2022] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
In this paper, we review the developments of 1H-MR spectroscopic imaging (MRSI) methods designed to investigate prostate cancer, covering key aspects such as specific hardware, dedicated pulse sequences for data acquisition and data processing and quantification techniques. Emphasis is given to recent advancements in MRSI methodologies, as well as future developments, which can lead to overcome difficulties associated with commonly employed MRSI approaches applied in clinical routine. This includes the replacement of standard PRESS sequences for volume selection, which we identified as inadequate for clinical applications, by sLASER sequences and implementation of 1H MRSI without water signal suppression. These may enable a new evaluation of the complementary role and significance of MRSI in prostate cancer management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Angeliki Stamatelatou
- Department of Medical Imaging (766), Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
| | - Tom W J Scheenen
- Department of Medical Imaging (766), Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Arend Heerschap
- Department of Medical Imaging (766), Radboud University Medical Center Nijmegen, Geert Grooteplein 10, P.O. Box 9101, 6500 HB, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Current Status of Biparametric MRI in Prostate Cancer Diagnosis: Literature Analysis. Life (Basel) 2022; 12:life12060804. [PMID: 35743835 PMCID: PMC9224842 DOI: 10.3390/life12060804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2022] [Revised: 05/23/2022] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in the detection of prostate cancer is well-established. Based on the limited role of dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) in PI-RADS v2.1, the risk of potential side effects, and the increased cost and time, there has been an increase in studies advocating for the omission of DCE from MRI assessments. Per PI-RADS v2.1, DCE is indicated in the assessment of PI-RADS 3 lesions in the peripheral zone, with its most pronounced effect when T2WI and DWI are of insufficient quality. The aim of this study was to evaluate the methodology and reporting in the literature from the past 5 years regarding the use of DCE in prostate MRI, especially with respect to the indications for DCE as stated in PI-RADS v2.1, and to describe the different approaches used across the studies. We searched for studies investigating the use of bpMRI and/or mpMRI in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer between January 2017 and April 2022 in the PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar databases. Through the search process, a total of 269 studies were gathered and 41 remained after abstract and full-text screening. The following information was extracted from the eligible studies: general clinical and technical characteristics of the studies, the number of PI-RADS 3 lesions, different definitions of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa), biopsy thresholds, reference standard methods, and number and experience of readers. Forty-one studies were included in the study. Only 51% (21/41) of studies reported the prevalence of csPCa in their equivocal lesion (PI-RADS category 3 lesions) subgroups. Of the included studies, none (0/41) performed a stratified sub-analysis of the DCE benefit versus MRI quality and 46% (19/41) made explicit statements about removing MRI scans based on a range of factors including motion, noise, and image artifacts. Furthermore, the number of studies investigating the role of DCE using readers with varying experience was relatively low. This review demonstrates that a high proportion of the studies investigating whether bpMRI can replace mpMRI did not transparently report information inherent to their study design concerning the key indications of DCE, such as the number of clinically insignificant/significant PI-RADS 3 lesions, nor did they provide any sub-analyses to test image quality, with some removing bad quality MRI scans altogether, or reader-experience-dependency indications for DCE. For the studies that reported on most of the DCE indications, their conclusions about the utility of DCE were heavily definition-dependent (with varying definitions of csPCa and of the PI-RADS category biopsy significance threshold). Reporting the information inherent to the study design and related to the specific indications for DCE as stated in PI-RADS v2.1 is needed to determine whether DCE is helpful or not. With most of the recent literature being retrospective and not including the data related to DCE indications in particular, the ongoing dispute between bpMRI and mpMRI is likely to linger.
Collapse
|
10
|
Greenberg JW, Koller CR, Casado C, Triche BL, Krane LS. A narrative review of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) implementation on screening, detection, and the overall accuracy for prostate cancer. Ther Adv Urol 2022; 14:17562872221096377. [PMID: 35531364 PMCID: PMC9073105 DOI: 10.1177/17562872221096377] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/30/2021] [Accepted: 03/31/2022] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Prostate cancer is the most common malignancy in American men following skin cancer, with approximately one in eight men being diagnosed during their lifetime. Over the past several decades, the treatment of prostate cancer has evolved rapidly, so too has screening. Since the mid-2010s, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)–guided biopsies or ‘targeted biopsies’ has been a rapidly growing topic of clinical research within the field of urologic oncology. The aim of this publication is to provide a review of biparametric MRI (bpMRI) utilization for the diagnosis of prostate cancer and a comparison to multiparametric MRI (mpMRI). Through single-centered studies and meta-analysis across all identified pertinent published literature, bpMRI is an effective tool for the screening and diagnosis of prostate cancer. When compared with the diagnostic accuracy of mpMRI, bpMRI identifies prostate cancer at comparable rates. In addition, when omitting dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) protocol to the MRI, patients incur reduced costs and shorter imaging time while providers can offer more tests to their patient population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jacob W. Greenberg
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | | | - Crystal Casado
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - Benjamin L. Triche
- Department of Radiology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| | - L. Spencer Krane
- Southeastern Louisiana Veterans Health Care System, 2400 Canal St., New Orleans, LA 70119, USA
- Department of Urology, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, LA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Predicting the Grade of Prostate Cancer Based on a Biparametric MRI Radiomics Signature. CONTRAST MEDIA & MOLECULAR IMAGING 2022; 2021:7830909. [PMID: 35024015 PMCID: PMC8718299 DOI: 10.1155/2021/7830909] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/18/2021] [Revised: 10/08/2021] [Accepted: 12/03/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022]
Abstract
Purpose This study aimed to investigate the value of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bp-MRI)-based radiomics signatures for the preoperative prediction of prostate cancer (PCa) grade compared with visual assessments by radiologists based on the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System Version 2.1 (PI-RADS V2.1) scores of multiparametric MRI (mp-MRI). Methods This retrospective study included 142 consecutive patients with histologically confirmed PCa who were undergoing mp-MRI before surgery. MRI images were scored and evaluated by two independent radiologists using PI-RADS V2.1. The radiomics workflow was divided into five steps: (a) image selection and segmentation, (b) feature extraction, (c) feature selection, (d) model establishment, and (e) model evaluation. Three machine learning algorithms (random forest tree (RF), logistic regression, and support vector machine (SVM)) were constructed to differentiate high-grade from low-grade PCa. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to compare the machine learning-based analysis of bp-MRI radiomics models with PI-RADS V2.1. Results In all, 8 stable radiomics features out of 804 extracted features based on T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and ADC sequences were selected. Radiomics signatures successfully categorized high-grade and low-grade PCa cases (P < 0.05) in both the training and test datasets. The radiomics model-based RF method (area under the curve, AUC: 0.982; 0.918), logistic regression (AUC: 0.886; 0.886), and SVM (AUC: 0.943; 0.913) in both the training and test cohorts had better diagnostic performance than PI-RADS V2.1 (AUC: 0.767; 0.813) when predicting PCa grade. Conclusions The results of this clinical study indicate that machine learning-based analysis of bp-MRI radiomic models may be helpful for distinguishing high-grade and low-grade PCa that outperformed the PI-RADS V2.1 scores based on mp-MRI. The machine learning algorithm RF model was slightly better.
Collapse
|
12
|
Kang SK, Mali RD, Prabhu V, Ferket BS, Loeb S. Active Surveillance Strategies for Low-Grade Prostate Cancer: Comparative Benefits and Cost-effectiveness. Radiology 2021; 300:594-604. [PMID: 34254851 DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2021204321] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022]
Abstract
Background Active surveillance (AS) is the recommended treatment option for low-risk prostate cancer (PC). Surveillance varies in MRI, frequency of follow-up, and the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) score that would repeat biopsy. Purpose To compare the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of AS strategies for low-risk PC with versus without MRI. Materials and Methods This study developed a mathematical model to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of surveillance strategies in a simulation of men with a diagnosis of low-risk PC. The following strategies were compared: watchful waiting, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) and annual biopsy without MRI, and PSA testing and MRI with varied PI-RADS thresholds for biopsy. MRI strategies differed regarding scheduling and use of PI-RADS score of at least 3, or a PI-RADS score of at least 4 to indicate the need for biopsy. Life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were calculated by using microsimulation. Sensitivity analysis was used to assess the impact of varying parameter values on results. Results For the base case of 60-year-old men, all strategies incorporating prostate MRI extended QALYs and life-years compared with watchful waiting and non-MRI strategies. Annual MRI strategies yielded 16.19 QALYs, annual biopsy with no MRI yielded 16.14 QALYs, and watchful waiting yielded 15.94 QALYs. Annual MRI with PI-RADS score of at least 3 or of at least 4 as the biopsy threshold and annual MRI with biopsy even after MRI with negative findings offered similar QALYs and the same unadjusted life expectancy: 23.05 life-years. However, a PI-RADS score of at least 4 yielded 42% fewer lifetime biopsies. With a cost-effectiveness threshold of $100 000 per QALY, annual MRI with biopsy for lesions with PI-RADS scores of 4 or greater was most cost-effective (incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, $67 221 per QALY). Age, treatment type, risk of initial grade misclassification, and quality-of-life impact of procedural complications affected results. Conclusion The use of active surveillance (AS) with biopsy decisions guided by findings from annual MRI reduces the number of biopsies while preserving life expectancy and quality of life. Biopsy in lesions with PI-RADS scores of 4 or greater is likely the most cost-effective AS strategy for men with low-risk prostate cancer who are younger than 70 years. © RSNA, 2021 Online supplemental material is available for this article. An earlier incorrect version appeared online. This article was corrected on July 13, 2021.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stella K Kang
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.K.K., R.D.M., V.P.), Population Health (S.K.K., S.L.), and Urology (S.L.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, Room 333, New York, NY 10016; Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.S.F.); and Manhattan VA Medical Center, New York, NY (S.L.)
| | - Rahul D Mali
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.K.K., R.D.M., V.P.), Population Health (S.K.K., S.L.), and Urology (S.L.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, Room 333, New York, NY 10016; Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.S.F.); and Manhattan VA Medical Center, New York, NY (S.L.)
| | - Vinay Prabhu
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.K.K., R.D.M., V.P.), Population Health (S.K.K., S.L.), and Urology (S.L.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, Room 333, New York, NY 10016; Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.S.F.); and Manhattan VA Medical Center, New York, NY (S.L.)
| | - Bart S Ferket
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.K.K., R.D.M., V.P.), Population Health (S.K.K., S.L.), and Urology (S.L.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, Room 333, New York, NY 10016; Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.S.F.); and Manhattan VA Medical Center, New York, NY (S.L.)
| | - Stacy Loeb
- From the Departments of Radiology (S.K.K., R.D.M., V.P.), Population Health (S.K.K., S.L.), and Urology (S.L.), New York University Grossman School of Medicine, 660 First Ave, Room 333, New York, NY 10016; Department of Population Health Science and Policy, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, NY (B.S.F.); and Manhattan VA Medical Center, New York, NY (S.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Comparison of Sensitivity and Specificity of Biparametric versus Multiparametric Prostate MRI in the Detection of Prostate Cancer in 431 Men with Elevated Prostate-Specific Antigen Levels. Diagnostics (Basel) 2021; 11:diagnostics11071223. [PMID: 34359307 PMCID: PMC8306749 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11071223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/17/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 07/05/2021] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
(1) Background: the study of dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) has a limited role in the detection of prostate cancer (PCa), and there is a growing interest in performing unenhanced biparametric prostate-MRI (bpMRI) instead of the conventional multiparametric-MRI (mpMRI). In this study, we aimed to retrospectively compare the performance of the mpMRI, which includes DCE study, and the unenhanced bpMRI, composed of only T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), in PCa detection in men with elevated prostate-specific-antigen (PSA) levels. (2) Methods: a 1.5 T MRI, with an endorectal-coil, was performed on 431 men (aged 61.5 ± 8.3 years) with a PSA ≥4.0 ng/mL. The bpMRI and mpMRI tests were independently assessed in separate sessions by two readers with 5 (R1) and 3 (R2) years of experience. The histopathology or ≥2 years follow-up served as a reference standard. The sensitivity and specificity were calculated with their 95% CI, and McNemar’s and Cohen’s κ statistics were used. (3) Results: in 195/431 (45%) of histopathologically proven PCa cases, 62/195 (32%) were high-grade PCa (GS ≥ 7b) and 133/195 (68%) were low-grade PCa (GS ≤ 7a). The PCa could be excluded by histopathology in 58/431 (14%) and by follow-up in 178/431 (41%) of patients. For bpMRI, the sensitivity was 164/195 (84%, 95% CI: 79–89%) for R1 and 156/195 (80%, 95% CI: 74–86%) for R2; while specificity was 182/236 (77%, 95% CI: 72–82%) for R1 and 175/236 (74%, 95% CI: 68–80%) for R2. For mpMRI, sensitivity was 168/195 (86%, 95% CI: 81–91%) for R1 and 160/195 (82%, 95% CI: 77–87%) for R2; while specificity was 184/236 (78%, 95% CI: 73–83%) for R1 and 177/236 (75%, 95% CI: 69–81%) for R2. Interobserver agreement was substantial for both bpMRI (κ = 0.802) and mpMRI (κ = 0.787). (4) Conclusions: the diagnostic performance of bpMRI and mpMRI were similar, and no high-grade PCa was missed with bpMRI.
Collapse
|
14
|
Zhu G, Luo J, Ouyang Z, Cheng Z, Deng Y, Guan Y, Du G, Zhao F. The Assessment of Prostate Cancer Aggressiveness Using a Combination of Quantitative Diffusion-Weighted Imaging and Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Cancer Manag Res 2021; 13:5287-5295. [PMID: 34239327 PMCID: PMC8260110 DOI: 10.2147/cmar.s319306] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2021] [Accepted: 06/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To explore the value of combining dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) quantitative parameters with apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) values in the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Methods The clinical data of 146 patients with prostate lesions, including 87 patients with prostate cancer (PCa) and 59 with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), were collected. After DCE-MRI and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) prostate scans, the magnitude of the DCE-MRI transfer constant (Ktrans), rate constant (kep), the volume of the extravascular extracellular space (ve), and the ADC between the groups were compared, and the correlations between the DCE-MRI parameters and Gleason scores were analyzed. The diagnostic efficacy of these quantitative parameters was assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results The DCE-MRI parameters Ktrans and kep were significantly greater in the PCa group than in the BPH group (p < 0.05). The ROC curve showed the area under the Ktrans, kep, and ADC curves to be 0.665, 0.658, and 0.782, respectively. When all three quantitative indicators were combined, the area under the ROC curve was 0.904, with sensitivity and specificity rates of 83.6% and 93.7%, respectively. The Gleason scores were positively correlated with the Ktrans, kep, and ve (r = 0.39, 0.572, 0.30, respectively; p < 0.05) and negatively correlated with the ADC (r = –0.525; p < 0.05). Conclusion The DCE-MRI quantitative parameters Ktrans and kep, as well as the ADC value, provided effective references for the differential diagnosis of PCa and BPH, as well as more precise and reliable quantitative parameters for grading the aggressiveness of PCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Guangbin Zhu
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Abdominal Surgery, Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510799, People's Republic of China
| | - Jinwen Luo
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Abdominal Surgery, Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510799, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhongmin Ouyang
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Abdominal Surgery, Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510799, People's Republic of China
| | - Zenglan Cheng
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Abdominal Surgery, Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510799, People's Republic of China
| | - Yi Deng
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Abdominal Surgery, Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510799, People's Republic of China
| | - Yubao Guan
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Abdominal Surgery, Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510799, People's Republic of China
| | - Guoxin Du
- Guangzhou Key Laboratory of Enhanced Recovery after Abdominal Surgery, Department of Radiology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510799, People's Republic of China
| | - Fengjin Zhao
- Department of Urology, The Fifth Affiliated Hospital of Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, 510799, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Susceptibility artifacts and PIRADS 3 lesions in prostatic MRI: how often is the dynamic contrast-enhance sequence necessary? Abdom Radiol (NY) 2021; 46:3401-3409. [PMID: 33683430 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-021-03011-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2020] [Revised: 02/15/2021] [Accepted: 02/20/2021] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the need of the dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) sequence in addition to T2-weighted imaging (T2-WI) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer in the presence of artifacts associated with rectal gas (which compromise the diffusion assessment) and/or PIRADS 3 lesions. METHODS This retrospective study was approved by the institutional review board; informed consent was not required. Patients referred consecutively over a period of 5 months for elevated PSA underwent multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI). mpMRI was performed using a 3T MRI system without an endorectal coil. The MRI findings were reviewed by two radiologists and were scored according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2.0 (PI-RADSv2). Any discrepancies were resolved by consensus. For statistical purposes, lesions were classified as PIRADS 1-2, PIRADS 3, or PIRADS 4-5. First, all studies were reviewed using a biparametric assessment (T2-WI + DWI), and the presence or absence of susceptibility artifacts was assessed for each prostate. Subsequently, all images were analyzed using the standard multiparametric approach (T2-WI + DWI + DCE). RESULTS The biparametric evaluation (T2-WI + DWI) showed artifacts (due to the presence of rectal gas or other) in 87 patients (43.5%) and no artifacts in 113 patients (56.5%). In the latter group, 15 patients had peripheral zone (PZ) PIRADS 3 lesions. Thus, a total of 102 patients (51%) had artifacts or PZ PIRADS 3 lesions and therefore required DCE. When evaluating the group of prostates without artifacts, 13.3% of prostates required DCE. A total of 17 (23.9%) PIRADS 4-5 prostate lesions would have not been detected without the use of DCE. CONCLUSION Biparametric evaluation of the prostate revealed some limitation due to the presence of artifacts or PIRADS 3 PZ lesions. Artifacts were present in almost 44% of our patients, but when the DWI was correctly evaluated, only 13.3% of prostates required DCE.
Collapse
|
16
|
Boschheidgen M, Schimmöller L, Kasprowski L, Abrar D, Arsov C, Albers P, Antoch G, Wittsack HJ, Ullrich T. Arterial spin labelling as a gadolinium-free alternative in the detection of prostate cancer. Magn Reson Imaging 2021; 80:33-38. [PMID: 33905833 DOI: 10.1016/j.mri.2021.04.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/15/2020] [Revised: 04/04/2021] [Accepted: 04/21/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the capability of Gadolinium-free arterial spin labelling (ASL) sequences as novel, contrast-free, non-invasive alternative perfusion imaging method to differentiate prostate cancer (PCA) from benign prostate tissue compared to conventional DCE MRI. METHODS Thirty men with histologically confirmed PCA were included in this prospectively enrolled single center cohort study. All patients received multiparametric MRI (T2, DWI, DCE) at 3 T with additional ASL of the PCA lesion. Primary endpoint was differentiability of PCA versus benign prostate tissue by signal intensities (SI) and contrast ratios (CR) in ASL in comparison to DCE. For DCE also Signal-Enhancement-Ratio (SER) of native and early contrast enhancement SI was assessed. Secondary objectives were differences regarding PCA localisation in peripheral (PZ) or transition zone (TZ) and PCA detection. RESULTS In both, ASL and DCE, average SI of PCA differed significantly from SI in benign tissue in the TZ and PZ (p < 0,01, respectively). ASL had significantly higher CR discerning PCA and benign tissue in PZ and TZ (PZ = 5.19; TZ = 6.45) compared to DCE SI (PZ = 1.61; TZ = 1.43) and DCE SER (PZ = 1.59; TZ = 1.43) (p < 0.01, respectively). In subjective evaluation, PCA could be detected in ASL in 28 patients, compared to 29 in DCE. CONCLUSION ASL had significantly higher CR differentiating PCA from benign tissue in PZ and TZ compared to DCE. Visual detection of PCA does not differ significantly between the two sequences. As perfusion gadolinium-based contrast media is seen more critical in the last few years, ASL seems to be a promising alternative to DCE in PCA detection.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Boschheidgen
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - L Schimmöller
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - L Kasprowski
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - D Abrar
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - C Arsov
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - P Albers
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Urology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - G Antoch
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - H J Wittsack
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| | - T Ullrich
- University Dusseldorf, Medical Faculty, Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, D-40225 Dusseldorf, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection With Biparametric MRI: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2021; 216:608-621. [DOI: 10.2214/ajr.20.23219] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/20/2023]
|
18
|
Zeng J, Cheng Q, Zhang D, Fan M, Shi C, Luo L. Diagnostic Ability of Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Prostate Cancer and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Equivocal Lesions: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Front Oncol 2021; 11:620628. [PMID: 33680965 PMCID: PMC7933498 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.620628] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/23/2020] [Accepted: 01/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) now has been used to diagnose prostate cancer (PCa). Equivocal lesions are defined as PIRADS category 3 or a Likert scale of 1 to 5 category 3 lesions. Currently, there are no clear recommendations for the management of these lesions. This study aimed to estimate the diagnostic capacity of DCE-MRI for PCa and clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in equivocal lesions. Materials and methods Two researchers searched PubMed, Embase and Web of Science to identify studies that met our subject. We searched for articles that mention the accuracy of the diagnosis of DCE-MRI for PCa or csPCa in equivocal lesions and used histopathological results as the reference standard. We used a tool (the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies-2 tool) to evaluate the quality of the studies that we screened out. Meta-regression was used to explore the reasons for heterogeneity in results. Results Ten articles were eventually included in our study. The sensitivity, specificity and 95% confidence intervals (CI) for DCE-MRI in diagnosing csPCa were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.56–0.76), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.46–0.68). The sensitivity and specificity and 95% CI for DCE-MRI in diagnosing PCa were 0.57 (95% CI, 0.46–0.68), 0.58 (95% CI, 0.45–0.70). The areas under the curve (AUC) of DCE-MRI were 0.67 (95% CI, 0.63–0.71) and 0.60 (95% CI, 0.55–0.64) while diagnosing csPCa and PCa. Through meta-regression, we found that study design, magnetic field strength, the definition of csPCa, and the scoring system were the sources of heterogeneity. Conclusion The results of our study indicate that the role of DCE-MRI in equivocal lesions may be limited.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Zeng
- Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Qingqing Cheng
- Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Dong Zhang
- Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Meng Fan
- Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Changzheng Shi
- Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.,Engineering Research Center of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Guangzhou, China
| | - Liangping Luo
- Medical Imaging Center, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.,Engineering Research Center of Medical Imaging Artificial Intelligence for Precision Diagnosis and Treatment, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Vente CD, Vos P, Hosseinzadeh M, Pluim J, Veta M. Deep Learning Regression for Prostate Cancer Detection and Grading in Bi-Parametric MRI. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2021; 68:374-383. [DOI: 10.1109/tbme.2020.2993528] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
|
20
|
Abstract
Currently there is a lot of interest in the use of a "biparametric" or "abbreviated" prostate MR protocol, which usually refers to removal of the dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI, in the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer. In this article we describe the benefits of DCE as part of the PI-RADS lexicon, with particular reference to its role in PI-RADS V2 category 3 peripheral zone lesions. We also discuss the benefits of triplanar T2-weighted images, and finally discuss how a mpMRI protocol is of benefit in prostate cancer staging, in evaluating for local disease recurrence, and as a biomarker for neoadjuvant therapy response.
Collapse
|
21
|
Round table: arguments in supporting abbreviated or biparametric MRI of the prostate protocol. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:3974-3981. [PMID: 32303773 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02510-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022]
Abstract
Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.1 update, in the attempt to improve clinical guidelines for multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) of the prostate, has clear limitations. The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced sequences is not defined, precise guidance on the clinical management (biopsy or clinical surveillance) for score 3 lesions [equivocal for clinical significant prostate cancer (sPCa)] is not offered and criteria for lesions interpretation remain difficult and subjective. We report criteria and arguments in supporting the use of abbreviated or biparametric prostate MRI protocol in clinical practice for detection and management of PCa.
Collapse
|
22
|
Ward R, Purysko AS. Round table: arguments against using multiparametric prostate MRI protocols. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2020; 45:3997-4002. [PMID: 32140766 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-020-02456-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/04/2023]
Abstract
Biparametric MRI (bpMRI), which uses only T2-weighted imaging and diffusion-weighted imaging, continues to gain support for the detection of prostate cancer, as this imaging technique offers many benefits over traditional mpMRI. However, the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2.1 document released in 2019 emphasized that mpMRI is still preferred over bpMRI in most clinical scenarios. As one article in a series of four providing arguments for and against using mpMRI and bpMRI protocols, this paper provides arguments against using mpMRI. Within this article, we discuss recent data suggesting equivalent performance between bpMRI and mpMRI in the detection of prostate cancer. The limited utility of dynamic contrast enhancement in the evaluation of prostate cancer according to the PI-RADS v2.1 document is also reviewed. Finally, we detail the large financial and time costs, legal and logistical issues, and potential for patient harm that must be considered with the administration of contrast.
Collapse
|
23
|
Padhani AR, Schoots I, Villeirs G. Contrast Medium or No Contrast Medium for Prostate Cancer Diagnosis. That Is the Question. J Magn Reson Imaging 2020; 53:13-22. [PMID: 32363651 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27180] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/15/2020] [Revised: 04/11/2020] [Accepted: 04/13/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
The benefits and drawbacks of the dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI sequence for prostate cancer diagnosis are increasingly being recognized, with many centers adopting the biparametric (bp) MRI approach as the default initial approach. The abandonment of the routine use of contrast medium requires an assessment of the loss of diagnostic power against the gains in operational logistics, costs, time, capacity, and side effects. It is the balance of these factors weighted against the clinical priorities of patients that determines which patient groups can safely avoid dynamic contrast enhancement. Although systematic reviews and individual studies are broadly supportive of the bpMRI approach, the pathway impacts for men with suspected cancer using the bpMRI approach are still not well documented for clinical practice. Robust prospectively acquired data for bpMRI regarding biopsy avoidance, detection of clinically significant and insignificant cancers, and for increasing the precision of tumor grade and volume are needed. There is a requirement for prospective, randomized, or blinded head-to-head, multicenter studies, addressing the noninferiority of biopsy yields prompted by bpMRI and multiparametric MRI approaches. These studies should more precisely define patient groups where the benefits and harms of contrast enhancement are aligned to their clinical priorities. Only then can we be confident in recommending bpMRI as an initial diagnostic approach for prostate cancer diagnosis. Level of Evidence 1 Technical Efficacy Stage 5.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anwar R Padhani
- Paul Strickland Scanner Centre, Mount Vernon Cancer Centre, Northwood, UK
| | - Ivo Schoots
- Department of Radiology & Nuclear Medicine, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Geert Villeirs
- Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
24
|
Biparametric prostate MRI and clinical indicators predict clinically significant prostate cancer in men with "gray zone" PSA levels. Eur J Radiol 2020; 127:108977. [PMID: 32330776 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2020.108977] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/19/2020] [Revised: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 03/29/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To predict clinically significant prostate cancer (cs-PCa) by combining the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2 (PI-RADS v2) score based on biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bp-MRI) and clinical indicators in men with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in the gray zone of 4-10 ng/mL. METHOD We retrospectively analyzed 364 patients with elevated PSA levels in the gray zone who had pathologically confirmed disease and had undergone MRI examinations from January 2015 to October 2019; a training group (n = 255) and validation group (n = 109) were randomly established. Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the training group was performed to identify the independent predictors for cs-PCa, thereby establishing a predictive model that was evaluated in the training and validation groups by analyzing the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. RESULTS In the training group, the PI-RADS v2 score and prostate volume (PV) were independent predictors of cs-PCa (P < 0.05). The prediction model comprising the PI-RADS v2 score and PV had a larger AUC than the other predictors alone in the training group. The diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of the prediction model were 84.1 % and 83.4 %, respectively. The prediction model was indicated to have better predictive performance in the validation group. CONCLUSIONS The prediction model exhibits a satisfactory predictive value for cs-PCa in men with PSA levels in the gray zone. PI-RADS v2 is the strongest univariate predictor for the detection of cs-PCa in men with PSA in the gray zone, but combining this with the PV can provide superior predictive ability.
Collapse
|
25
|
Cancer Detection Rates of Systematic and Targeted Prostate Biopsies after Biparametric MRI. Prostate Cancer 2020; 2020:4626781. [PMID: 32308996 PMCID: PMC7157788 DOI: 10.1155/2020/4626781] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/28/2019] [Revised: 01/29/2020] [Accepted: 03/06/2020] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Objective To compare prostate cancer detection rates (CDRs) and pathology results with targeted prostate biopsy (TB) and systematic prostate biopsy (SB) in biopsy-naive men. Methods An in-patient control study of 82 men undergoing SB and subsequent TB in case of positive prostate MRI between 2015 and 2017 in the Jeroen Bosch Hospital, the Netherlands. Results Prostate cancer (PCa) was detected in 54.9% with 70.7% agreement between TB and SB. Significant PCa (Gleason score ≥7) was detected in 24.4%. The CDR with TB and SB was 35.4% and 48.8%, respectively (p=0.052). The CDR of significant prostate cancer with TB and SB was both 20.7%. Clinically significant pathology upgrading occurred in 7.3% by adding TB to SB and 22.0% by adding SB to TB. Conclusions There is no statistically significant difference between CDRs of SB and TB. Both SB and TB miss significant PCas. Moreover, pathology upgrading occurred more often by adding SB to TB than vice versa. This indicates that the omission of SB in this study population might not be justified.
Collapse
|
26
|
Stabile A, Giganti F, Kasivisvanathan V, Giannarini G, Moore CM, Padhani AR, Panebianco V, Rosenkrantz AB, Salomon G, Turkbey B, Villeirs G, Barentsz JO. Factors Influencing Variability in the Performance of Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Literature Review. Eur Urol Oncol 2020; 3:145-167. [DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2020.02.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 49] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2019] [Revised: 02/08/2020] [Accepted: 02/20/2020] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
|
27
|
Liang Z, Hu R, Yang Y, An N, Duo X, Liu Z, Shi S, Liu X. Is dynamic contrast enhancement still necessary in multiparametric magnetic resonance for diagnosis of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Transl Androl Urol 2020; 9:553-573. [PMID: 32420161 PMCID: PMC7215029 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2020.02.03] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The purpose of this study is to systematically review the literatures assessing the value of dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE) in the multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) for the diagnosis of prostate cancer (PCa). Methods We searched Embase, PubMed and Web of science until January 2019 to extract articles exploring the possibilities whether the pre-biopsy biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) can replace the position of mpMRI in the diagnosis of PCa. The sensitivity and specificity of bpMRI were all included. The study quality was assessed by QUADAS-2. Bivariate random effects meta-analyses and a hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic plot were performed for further study through Revman 5 and Stata12. Results After searching, we acquired 752 articles among which 45 studies with 5,217 participants were eligible for inclusion. The positive likelihood ratio for the detection of PCa was 2.40 (95% CI: 1.50–3.80) and the negative likelihood ratio was 0.31 (95% CI: 0.18–0.53). The sensitivity and specificity were 0.77 (95% CI: 0.73–0.81) and 0.81 (95% CI: 0.76–0.85) respectively. Based on our result, pooled specificity demonstrated little difference between bpMRI and mpMRI [bpMRI, 0.81 (95% CI, 0.76–0.85); mpMRI, 0.82 (95% CI, 0.72–0.88); P=0.169]. The sensitivity, however, indicated a significant difference between these two groups [bpMRI, 0.77 (95% CI, 0.73–0.81); mpMRI, 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78–0.89); P=0.001]. Conclusions bpMRI with high b-value is a sensitive tool for diagnosing PCa. Consistent results were found in multiple subgroup analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Liang
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China
| | - Rui Hu
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China
| | - Yongjiao Yang
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University Second Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China
| | - Neng An
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University Second Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China
| | - Xiaoxin Duo
- Department of Cardiology, The Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University, Shijiazhuang 050000, China
| | - Zheng Liu
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China
| | - Shangheng Shi
- Department of Transplantation, Affiliated Hospital of Medical College Qingdao University, Qingdao 266000, China
| | - Xiaoqiang Liu
- Department of Urology, Tianjin Medical University General Hospital, Tianjin 300000, China
| |
Collapse
|
28
|
Assessment of DCE Utility for PCa Diagnosis Using PI-RADS v2.1: Effects on Diagnostic Accuracy and Reproducibility. Diagnostics (Basel) 2020; 10:diagnostics10030164. [PMID: 32192081 PMCID: PMC7151226 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics10030164] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2020] [Revised: 03/11/2020] [Accepted: 03/16/2020] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
The role of dynamic contrast-enhanced-MRI (DCE-MRI) for Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) scoring is a controversial topic. In this retrospective study, we aimed to measure the added value of DCE-MRI in combination with T2-weighted (T2W) and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) using PI-RADS v2.1, in terms of reproducibility and diagnostic accuracy, for detection of prostate cancer (PCa) and clinically significant PCa (CS-PCa, for Gleason Score ≥ 7). 117 lesions in 111 patients were identified as suspicion by multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and addressed for biopsy. Three experienced readers independently assessed PI-RADS score, first using biparametric MRI (bpMRI, including DWI and T2W), and then multiparametric MRI (also including DCE). The inter-rater and inter-method agreement (bpMRI- vs. mpMRI-based scores) were assessed by Cohen's kappa (κ). Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analysis was performed to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy for PCa and CS-PCa detection among the two scores. Inter-rater agreement was excellent for the three pairs of readers (κ ≥ 0.83), while the inter-method agreement was good (κ ≥ 0.73). Areas under the ROC curve (AUC) showed similar high-values (0.8 ≤ AUC ≤ 0.85). The reproducibility of PI-RADS v2.1 scoring was comparable and high among readers, without relevant differences, depending on the MRI protocol used. The inclusion of DCE did not influence the diagnostic accuracy.
Collapse
|
29
|
Zawaideh JP, Sala E, Shaida N, Koo B, Warren AY, Carmisciano L, Saeb-Parsy K, Gnanapragasam VJ, Kastner C, Barrett T. Diagnostic accuracy of biparametric versus multiparametric prostate MRI: assessment of contrast benefit in clinical practice. Eur Radiol 2020; 30:4039-4049. [PMID: 32166495 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-020-06782-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 44] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2019] [Revised: 02/16/2020] [Accepted: 02/27/2020] [Indexed: 01/28/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE To assess the added value of dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) in prostate MR in clinical practice. METHODS Two hundred sixty-four patients underwent prostate MRI, with T2 and DWI sequences initially interpreted, prior to full multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) interpretation using a Likert 1-5 scale. A prospective opinion was given on likely benefit of contrast prior to review of the DCE sequence, and retrospectively following full mpMRI review. The final histology result following targeted and/or systematic biopsy of the prostate was used for outcome purposes. RESULTS Biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) and mpMRI were assigned the same score in 86% of cases; when dichotomising to a negative or positive MRI (Likert score ≥ 3), concordance increased to 92.8%. At Likert score ≥ 3 bpMRI detected 89.9% of all cancers and 93.5% clinically significant prostate cancers (csPCa) and mpMRI 90.7% and 94.6%, respectively. mpMRI had fewer false positives than bpMRI (11.4% vs 18.9%) and a lower Likert 3 rate (8.3% vs 17%), conferring higher specificity (74% vs 67%), but similar sensitivity (95% versus 94%) and ROC-AUC (90% vs 89%). At a positive MRI threshold of Likert ≥ 4, mpMRI had a higher sensitivity than bpMRI (89% versus 80%) and detected more csPCa (89.2% versus 79.6%). DCE was prospectively considered of potential benefit in 27.3%, but readers would only recall 11% of patients for DCE sequences, mainly to assess score 3 peripheral zone lesions. Following full mpMRI review, DCE was considered helpful in 28.4% of cases; in 23/75 (30.6%) of these cases this only became apparent after reviewing the sequence, reasons included increased confidence, presence of "safety-net" lesions or inflammatory lesions. CONCLUSION BpMRI has equivalent cancer detection rates to mpMRI; however, mpMRI had fewer Likert 3 call rates and increased specificity and was subjectively considered of benefit by readers in 28.4% of cases. KEY POINTS • bpMRI has similar cancer detection rates to the full mpMRI protocol at a positive MRI threshold of Likert 3. • mpMRI had fewer intermediate category 3 calls (8.3%) than bpMRI (17%) and fewer false positives than bpMRI (11.4% vs 18.9%), conferring higher specificity (74% vs 67%). • Readers considered DCE beneficial in 28.4% of cases, but in a relatively high number (30.6%) this only became apparent after reviewing the sequence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jeries P Zawaideh
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK. .,Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), Radiology Section, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
| | - Evis Sala
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Nadeem Shaida
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Brendan Koo
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| | - Anne Y Warren
- CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Pathology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Luca Carmisciano
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), Biostatistics Section, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
| | - Kasra Saeb-Parsy
- CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Vincent J Gnanapragasam
- CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Christof Kastner
- CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,Department of Urology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, Cambridge, UK
| | - Tristan Barrett
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.,CamPARI Prostate Cancer Group, Addenbrooke's Hospital and University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK
| |
Collapse
|
30
|
MRI of the Prostate With and Without Endorectal Coil at 3 T: Correlation With Whole-Mount Histopathologic Gleason Score. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2020; 215:133-141. [PMID: 32160050 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.19.22094] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE. The purpose of this article is to prospectively compare image quality and diagnostic accuracy of clinically significant prostate cancer with and without endorectal coil (ERC) at 3 T using a combination of T2-weighted and diffusion-weighted MRI. SUBJECTS AND METHODS. Twenty-three patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer underwent MRI with and without ERC at the same visit. Patients subsequently underwent radical prostatectomy. Specimens were assessed by whole-mount histopathologic examination. Two radiologists reviewed MR images for image quality (5-point scale) and disease using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data Systems version 2 (PI-RADSv2). Sensitivity, specificity, and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were calculated with and without ERC. Additionally, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) was correlated with Gleason score and ADC values of each lesion were compared with and without ERC. RESULTS. Image quality was comparable with and without ERC (3.8 vs 3.5). Twenty-nine cancer foci larger than 0.5 cm in diameter were found in 23 patients on histopathologic examination; 18 tumors had a Gleason score of 7 or greater. Two radiologists recorded AUC for tumors with a Gleason score of 7 or greater as 0.96 and 0.96 with ERC and 0.88 and 0.91 without ERC. All 13 tumors with a Gleason score of 3 + 4 were detected with ERC, but only 9 were detected without ERC. One of five tumors with Gleason scores less than 3 + 4 was missed with and without ERC. ADC significantly correlated with Gleason score. There was no significant difference in the ADC of a lesion on MRI with and without an ERC. CONCLUSION. MRI with and without ERC was equally accurate at showing prostate cancers with Gleason scores of 4 + 3 or greater. However, MRI with ERC was superior at showing cancer with a Gleason score of 3 + 4. There was no significant difference in ADC values between scores acquired with or without an ERC.
Collapse
|
31
|
Cho J, Ahn H, Hwang SI, Lee HJ, Choe G, Byun SS, Hong SK. Biparametric versus multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate: detection of clinically significant cancer in a perfect match group. Prostate Int 2020; 8:146-151. [PMID: 33425791 PMCID: PMC7767942 DOI: 10.1016/j.prnil.2019.12.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/01/2019] [Revised: 12/12/2019] [Accepted: 12/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Biparametric (bp) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) could be an alternative MRI for the detection of the clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). Purpose To compare the accuracies of prostate cancer detection and localization between prebiopsy bpMRI and postbiopsy multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) taken on different days, using radical prostatectomy specimens as the reference standards. Material and methods Data of 41 total consecutive patients who underwent the following examinations and procedures between September 2015 and March 2017 were collected: (1) magnetic resonance- and/or ultrasonography-guided biopsy after bpMRI; (2) postbiopsy mpMRI; and (3) radical prostatectomy with csPCa. Two radiologists scored suspected lesions on bpMRI and mpMRI independently using Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System version 2. The diagnostic accuracy of detecting csPCa and the Dice similarity coefficient were obtained. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) ratios were also obtained for quantitative comparison between bpMRI and mpMRI. Results Diagnostic accuracies on bpMRI and mpMRI were 0.83 and 0.82 for reader 1; 0.80 and 0.82 for reader 2. There are no significantly different values of diagnostic sensitivities or specificities between the readers or between MRI protocols. Intra-observer Dice similarity coefficient was significantly lower in reader 2, compared to that in reader 1 between the two MRI protocols. The range of mean ADC ratio was 0.281-0.635. There was no statistically significant difference in the ADC ratio between bpMRI and mpMRI. Conclusions Diagnostic performance of bpMRI without dynamic contrast enhancement MRI is not significantly different from mpMRI with dynamic contrast enhancement MRI in the detection of csPCa.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jungheum Cho
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Hyungwoo Ahn
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Sung Il Hwang
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Hak Jong Lee
- Department of Radiology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Gheeyoung Choe
- Department of Pathology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Seok-Soo Byun
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| | - Sung Kyu Hong
- Department of Urology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
32
|
Han C, Liu S, Qin XB, Ma S, Zhu LN, Wang XY. MRI combined with PSA density in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL: Biparametric versus multiparametric MRI. Diagn Interv Imaging 2020; 101:235-244. [PMID: 32063483 DOI: 10.1016/j.diii.2020.01.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2019] [Revised: 01/18/2020] [Accepted: 01/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To compare the performance of biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) to that of multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) in combination with prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL. MATERIALS AND METHODS A total of 123 men (mean age, 66.3±8.9 [SD]; range: 42-83 years) with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL with suspected csPCa were included. All patients underwent mpMRI at 3 Tesla and transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy in their clinical workup and were followed-up for >1 year when no csPCa was found at initial biopsy. The mpMRI images were reinterpreted according to the Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS, v2.1) twice in two different sessions using either mpMRI sequences or bpMRI sequences. The patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether csPCa was detected. The PI-RADS (mpMRI or bpMRI) categories and PSAD were used in combination to detect csPCa. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and decision curve analyses were performed to compare the efficacy of the different models (mpMRI, bpMRI, PSAD, mpMRI+PSAD and bpMRI+PSAD). RESULTS Thirty-seven patients (30.1%, 37/123) had csPCa. ROC analysis showed that bpMRI (AUC=0.884 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.814-0.935]) outperformed mpMRI (AUC=0.867 [95% CI: 0.794-0.921]) (P=0.035) and that bpMRI and mpMRI performed better than PSAD (0.682 [95% CI: 0.592-0.763]) in detecting csPCa; bpMRI+PSAD (AUC=0.907 [95% CI: 0.841-0.952]) performed similarly to mpMRI+PSAD (AUC=0.896 [95% CI: 0.828-0.944]) (P=0.151) and bpMRI (P=0.224). The sensitivity and specificity were 81.1% (95% CI: 64.8-92.0%) and 88.4% (95% CI: 79.7-94.3%), respectively for bpMRI, and 83.8% (95% CI: 68.0-93.8%) and 80.2% (95% CI: 70.2-88.0%), respectively for mpMRI (P>0.999 for sensitivity and P=0.016 for specificity). Among the 5 decision models, the decision curve analysis showed that all models (except for PSAD) achieved a high net benefit. CONCLUSION In patients with PSA serum levels of 4∼10ng/mL, bpMRI and bpMRI combined with PSAD achieve better performance than mpMRI in detecting csPCa; bpMRI has a higher specificity than mpMRI, which could decrease unnecessary biopsy, and may serve as a potential alternative to mpMRI to optimize clinical workup.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Han
- Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, 100034 Beijing, China
| | - S Liu
- Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, 100034 Beijing, China
| | - X B Qin
- Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, 100034 Beijing, China
| | - S Ma
- Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, 100034 Beijing, China
| | - L N Zhu
- Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, 100034 Beijing, China
| | - X Y Wang
- Department of Radiology, Peking University First Hospital, No. 8 Xishiku Street, Xicheng District, 100034 Beijing, China.
| |
Collapse
|
33
|
Dirix P, Van Bruwaene S, Vandeursen H, Deckers F. Magnetic resonance imaging sequences for prostate cancer triage: two is a couple, three is a crowd? Transl Androl Urol 2020; 8:S476-S479. [PMID: 32042622 DOI: 10.21037/tau.2019.09.42] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Piet Dirix
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Iridium Kankernetwerk, Oosterveldlaan 22, 2610 Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium.,Translational Cancer Research Unit (TCRU), Centre for Oncological Research (CORE), University of Antwerp, Edegem (Antwerp), Belgium
| | - Siska Van Bruwaene
- Department of Urology, AZ Groeninge Hospital, President Kennedylaan 4, 8500 Kortrijk, Belgium
| | - Hendrik Vandeursen
- Department of Urology, GZA Sint-Augustinus Hospital, Oosterveldlaan 24, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
| | - Filip Deckers
- Department of Radiology, GZA Sint-Augustinus Hospital, Oosterveldlaan 24, Wilrijk (Antwerp), Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
34
|
Cosma I, Tennstedt-Schenk C, Winzler S, Psychogios MN, Pfeil A, Teichgraeber U, Malich A, Papageorgiou I. The role of gadolinium in magnetic resonance imaging for early prostate cancer diagnosis: A diagnostic accuracy study. PLoS One 2019; 14:e0227031. [PMID: 31869380 PMCID: PMC6927639 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2019] [Accepted: 12/10/2019] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Objective Prostate lesions detected with multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) are classified for their malignant potential according to the Prostate Imaging-Reporting And Data System (PI-RADS™2). In this study, we evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of the mpMRI with and without gadolinium, with emphasis on the added diagnostic value of the dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE). Materials and methods The study was retrospective for 286 prostate lesions / 213 eligible patients, n = 116/170, and 49/59% malignant for the peripheral (Pz) and transitional zone (Tz), respectively. A stereotactic MRI-guided prostate biopsy served as the histological ground truth. All patients received a mpMRI with DCE. The influence of DCE in the prediction of malignancy was analyzed by blinded assessment of the imaging protocol without DCE and the DCE separately. Results Significant (CSPca) and insignificant (IPca) prostate cancers were evaluated separately to enhance the potential effects of the DCE in the detection of CSPca. The Receiver Operating Characteristics Area Under Curve (ROC-AUC), sensitivity (Se) and specificity (Spe) of PIRADS-without-DCE in the Pz was 0.70/0.47/0.86 for all cancers (IPca and CSPca merged) and 0.73/0.54/0.82 for CSPca. PIRADS-with-DCE for the same patients showed ROC-AUC/Se/Spe of 0.70/0.49/0.86 for all Pz cancers and 0.69/0.54/0.81 for CSPca in the Pz, respectively, p>0.05 chi-squared test. Similar results for the Tz, AUC/Se/Spe for PIRADS-without-DCE was 0.75/0.61/0.79 all cancers and 0.67/0.54/0.71 for CSPca, not influenced by DCE (0.66/0.47/0.81 for all Tz cancers and 0.61/0.39/0.75 for CSPca in Tz). The added Se and Spe of DCE for the detection of CSPca was 88/34% and 78/33% in the Pz and Tz, respectively. Conclusion DCE showed no significant added diagnostic value and lower specificity for the prediction of CSPca compared to the non-enhanced sequences. Our results support that gadolinium might be omitted without mitigating the diagnostic accuracy of the mpMRI for prostate cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ilinca Cosma
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
- Institute of Radiology, Suedharz Hospital Nordhausen, Nordhausen, Germany
| | | | - Sven Winzler
- Institute of Radiology, Suedharz Hospital Nordhausen, Nordhausen, Germany
| | - Marios Nikos Psychogios
- Department of Neuroradiology, Clinic of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Alexander Pfeil
- Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Ulf Teichgraeber
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
| | - Ansgar Malich
- Institute of Radiology, Suedharz Hospital Nordhausen, Nordhausen, Germany
| | - Ismini Papageorgiou
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Jena, Jena, Germany
- Institute of Radiology, Suedharz Hospital Nordhausen, Nordhausen, Germany
- * E-mail:
| |
Collapse
|
35
|
Billdal DC, While PT, Selnaes KM, Sunoqrot MRS, Langørgen S, Bertilsson H, Bathen TF, Elschot M. Relative Enhanced Diffusivity in Prostate Cancer: Protocol Optimization and Diagnostic Potential. J Magn Reson Imaging 2019; 51:1900-1910. [PMID: 31794113 DOI: 10.1002/jmri.27011] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/20/2019] [Revised: 11/15/2019] [Accepted: 11/19/2019] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Relative enhanced diffusivity (RED) is a potential biomarker for indirectly measuring perfusion in tissue using diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with 3 b values. PURPOSE To optimize the RED MRI protocol for the prostate, and to investigate its potential for prostate cancer (PCa) diagnosis. STUDY TYPE Prospective. POPULATION Ten asymptomatic healthy volunteers and 35 patients with clinical suspicion of PCa. SEQUENCE 3T T2 - and diffusion-weighted MRI with b values: b = 0, 50, [100], 150, [200], 250, [300], 400, 800 s/mm2 (values in brackets were only used for patients). ASSESSMENT Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess noise sensitivity of RED as a function of intermediate b value. Volunteers were scanned 3 times to assess repeatability of RED. Patient data were used to investigate RED's potential for discriminating between biopsy-confirmed cancer and healthy tissue, and between true and false positive radiological findings. STATISTICAL TESTS Within-subject coefficient of variation (WCV) to assess repeatability and receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis and logistic regression to assess diagnostic performance of RED. RESULTS The repeatability was acceptable (WCV = 0.2-0.3) for all intermediate b values tested, apart from b = 50 s/mm2 (WCV = 0.3-0.4). The simulated RED values agreed well with the experimental data, showing that an intermediate b value between 150-250 s/mm2 minimizes noise sensitivity in both peripheral zone (PZ) and transition zone (TZ). RED calculated with the b values 0, 150 and 800 s/mm2 was significantly higher in tumors than in healthy tissue in both PZ (P < 0.001, area under the curve [AUC] = 0.85) and PZ + TZ (P < 0.001, AUC = 0.84). RED was shown to aid apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in differentiating between false-positive findings and true-positive PCa in the PZ (AUC; RED = 0.71, ADC = 0.74, RED+ADC = 0.77). DATA CONCLUSION RED is a repeatable biomarker that may have value for prostate cancer diagnosis. An intermediate b value in the range of 150-250 s/mm2 minimizes the influence of noise and maximizes repeatability. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE 2 Technical Efficacy Stage: 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2020;51:1900-1910.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel C Billdal
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Peter T While
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Kirsten M Selnaes
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Mohammed R S Sunoqrot
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Sverre Langørgen
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Helena Bertilsson
- Department of Cancer Research and Molecular Medicine, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Urology, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Tone F Bathen
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Mattijs Elschot
- Department of Circulation and Medical Imaging, NTNU, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.,Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
36
|
Cuocolo R, Stanzione A, Ponsiglione A, Verde F, Ventimiglia A, Romeo V, Petretta M, Imbriaco M. Prostate MRI technical parameters standardization: A systematic review on adherence to PI-RADSv2 acquisition protocol. Eur J Radiol 2019; 120:108662. [DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108662] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/01/2019] [Revised: 08/26/2019] [Accepted: 09/05/2019] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|
37
|
Latifoltojar A, Appayya MB, Barrett T, Punwani S. Similarities and differences between Likert and PIRADS v2.1 scores of prostate multiparametric MRI: a pictorial review of histology-validated cases. Clin Radiol 2019; 74:895.e1-895.e15. [PMID: 31627804 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.08.020] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/14/2019] [Accepted: 08/27/2019] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
Abstract
The UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) 2019 "Prostate cancer: diagnosis and management" guidelines have recommended that all patients suspected of prostate cancer undergo multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) prior to biopsy. The Likert scoring system is advocated for mpMRI reporting based on multicentre studies that have demonstrated its effectiveness within the National Health Service (NHS). In recent years, there has been considerable drive towards standardised prostate reporting, which led to the development of "Prostate Imaging-Reporting And Data System" (PI-RADS). The PI-RADS system has been adopted by the majority of European countries and within the US. This paper reviews these systems indicating the similarities and specific differences that exist between PI-RADS and Likert assessment through a series of histologically proven clinical cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- A Latifoltojar
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Division of Medicine, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK
| | - M B Appayya
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Division of Medicine, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK
| | - T Barrett
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital, 277 Hills Rd, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK; Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre, 277 Hills Road Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK
| | - S Punwani
- Centre for Medical Imaging, University College London, Division of Medicine, Charles Bell House, 43-45 Foley Street, London W1W 7TS, UK; Department of Radiology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, London NW1 2BU, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
38
|
Tokas T, Junker D, Nagele U. One-stop biparametric MRI and MRI/ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy: can we include the histopathology result and our treatment recommendations in our diagnostic pathway? World J Urol 2019; 38:2067-2068. [PMID: 31529245 DOI: 10.1007/s00345-019-02940-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/20/2019] [Accepted: 08/28/2019] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Theodoros Tokas
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall in Tirol, Milser Str. 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria.
| | - Daniel Junker
- Department of Radiology, General Hospital Hall in Tirol, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| | - Udo Nagele
- Department of Urology and Andrology, General Hospital Hall in Tirol, Milser Str. 10, 6060, Hall in Tirol, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
39
|
Interobserver Agreement and Positivity of PI-RADS Version 2 Among Radiologists with Different Levels of Experience. Acad Radiol 2019; 26:1017-1022. [PMID: 30268722 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.08.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2018] [Revised: 08/15/2018] [Accepted: 08/17/2018] [Indexed: 12/22/2022]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To evaluate interobserver agreement of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) v2 category among radiologists with different levels of experience. The secondary objective was to evaluate the positivity for significant cancer among each category (splitting category 4 into two) and among different lesion sizes. MATERIALS AND METHODS Institutional review board and ethics comitee approved retrospective study. Eight radiologists with different levels of experienced in prostatic magnetic resonance imaging-two more experienced, four with intermediate experience, and two abdominal radiology fellows-interpreted 160 lesions. Reference standard was fusion-targeted biopsy. Percentage agreement, k coefficients, and analysis concordance were used. RESULTS Coefficient of concordance according to categories was 0.71 considering both zones, 0.72 for peripheral zone (PZ) and 0.44 for peripheral zone (TZ). Agreement for PI-RADS score of 3 or greater was 0.48 in PZ and 0.57 in TZ. Tumor positivity rates were 54.3% and 66.0% for PI-RADS 3 + 1 and 4 for PZ, respectively; and 25.0 and 49.2% for PI-RADS 3 + 1 and 4 for TZ, respectively (p < 0.001 in both analysis). Lesions <10, 10-14, and ≥15 mm had 55.3%, 74.6%, and 93.5% of positivity rates for cancer in PZ (p = 0.002 and <0.001) and 26.7%, 56.5%, and 59.6% in TZ, respectively (p = 0.245 and 0.632). Sensitivities, specificities, and accuracies of magnetic resonance imaging for prostate cancer using PI-RADS v2 were 76%, 72%, and 74% for PZ; and 76%, 69%, and 71% for TZ, respectively. CONCLUSION This study shows that PI-RADS v2 has overall good interobserver agreement among radiologists with different levels of experience. PI-RADS category 3 + 1 showed lower positivity rates for significant cancer compared to category 4. Lastly, lesions 10-14 mm has similar positivity rates compared to ≥15 mm for TZ lesions.
Collapse
|
40
|
Barrett T, Rajesh A, Rosenkrantz AB, Choyke PL, Turkbey B. PI-RADS version 2.1: one small step for prostate MRI. Clin Radiol 2019; 74:841-852. [PMID: 31239107 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2019.05.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 91] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2019] [Accepted: 05/30/2019] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Multiparametric (mp) prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is playing an increasingly prominent role in the diagnostic work-up of patients with suspected prostate cancer. Performing mpMRI before biopsy offers several advantages including biopsy avoidance under certain clinical circumstances and targeting biopsy of suspicious lesions to enable the correct diagnosis. The success of the technique is heavily dependent on high-quality image acquisition, interpretation, and report communication, all areas addressed by previous versions of the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) recommendations. Numerous studies have validated the approach, but the widespread adoption of PI-RADS version 2 has also highlighted inconsistencies and limitations, particularly relating to interobserver variability for evaluation of the transition zone. These limitations are addressed in the recently released version 2.1. In this article, we highlight the key changes proposed in PI-RADS v2.1 and explore the background reasoning and evidence for the recommendations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Barrett
- Department of Radiology, Addenbrooke's Hospital and the University of Cambridge, Cambridge CB2 0QQ, UK.
| | - A Rajesh
- University Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trust, Leicester General Hospital, Radiology Department, Gwendolen Road, Leicester LE5 4PW, UK
| | - A B Rosenkrantz
- Department of Radiology, NYU School of Medicine, NYU Langone Medical Center, 660 1st Ave, Third Floor, New York, NY 10016, USA
| | - P L Choyke
- Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| | - B Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, Center for Cancer Research, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD 20892, USA
| |
Collapse
|
41
|
Jambor I, Verho J, Ettala O, Knaapila J, Taimen P, Syvänen KT, Kiviniemi A, Kähkönen E, Perez IM, Seppänen M, Rannikko A, Oksanen O, Riikonen J, Vimpeli SM, Kauko T, Merisaari H, Kallajoki M, Mirtti T, Lamminen T, Saunavaara J, Aronen HJ, Boström PJ. Validation of IMPROD biparametric MRI in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer: A prospective multi-institutional trial. PLoS Med 2019; 16:e1002813. [PMID: 31158230 PMCID: PMC6546206 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002813] [Citation(s) in RCA: 41] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2019] [Accepted: 04/25/2019] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) combined with targeted biopsy (TB) is increasingly used in men with clinically suspected prostate cancer (PCa), but the long acquisition times, high costs, and inter-center/reader variability of routine multiparametric prostate MRI limit its wider adoption. METHODS AND FINDINGS The aim was to validate a previously developed unique MRI acquisition and reporting protocol, IMPROD biparametric MRI (bpMRI) (NCT01864135), in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa in a multi-institutional trial (NCT02241122). IMPROD bpMRI has average acquisition time of 15 minutes (no endorectal coil, no intravenous contrast use) and consists of T2-weighted imaging and 3 separate diffusion-weighed imaging acquisitions. Between February 1, 2015, and March 31, 2017, 364 men with a clinical suspicion of PCa were enrolled at 4 institutions in Finland. Men with an equivocal to high suspicion (IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 3-5) of PCa had 2 TBs of up to 2 lesions followed by a systematic biopsy (SB). Men with a low to very low suspicion (IMPROD bpMRI Likert score 1-2) had only SB. All data and protocols are freely available. The primary outcome of the trial was diagnostic accuracy-including overall accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value (NPV), and positive predictive value-of IMPROD bpMRI for clinically significant PCa (SPCa), which was defined as a Gleason score ≥ 3 + 4 (Gleason grade group 2 or higher). In total, 338 (338/364, 93%) prospectively enrolled men completed the trial. The accuracy and NPV of IMPROD bpMRI for SPCa were 70% (113/161) and 95% (71/75) (95% CI 87%-98%), respectively. Restricting the biopsy to men with equivocal to highly suspicious IMPROD bpMRI findings would have resulted in a 22% (75/338) reduction in the number of men undergoing biopsy while missing 4 (3%, 4/146) men with SPCa. The main limitation is uncertainty about the true PCa prevalence in the study cohort, since some of the men may have PCa despite having negative biopsy findings. CONCLUSIONS IMPROD bpMRI demonstrated a high NPV for SPCa in men with a clinical suspicion of PCa in this prospective multi-institutional clinical trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02241122.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ivan Jambor
- Department of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Department of Radiology, Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, New York, New York, United States of America
| | - Janne Verho
- Department of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Otto Ettala
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Juha Knaapila
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Pekka Taimen
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Kari T. Syvänen
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Aida Kiviniemi
- Department of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Esa Kähkönen
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Ileana Montoya Perez
- Department of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Department of Future Technologies, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Marjo Seppänen
- Department of Surgery, Satakunta Central Hospital, Pori, Finland
| | - Antti Rannikko
- Department of Urology, Helsinki University and Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Outi Oksanen
- Department of Radiology, Helsinki University Hospital, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Jarno Riikonen
- Department of Urology, Tampere University Hospital and University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland
| | | | - Tommi Kauko
- Department of Biostatistics, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Harri Merisaari
- Department of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Department of Future Technologies, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
| | - Markku Kallajoki
- Institute of Biomedicine, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Department of Pathology, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Tuomas Mirtti
- Department of Pathology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland
| | - Tarja Lamminen
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Jani Saunavaara
- Department of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Hannu J. Aronen
- Department of Radiology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
- Medical Imaging Centre of Southwest Finland, Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| | - Peter J. Boström
- Department of Urology, University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Turku, Finland
| |
Collapse
|
42
|
Roh AT, Fan RE, Sonn GA, Vasanawala SS, Ghanouni P, Loening AM. How Often is the Dynamic Contrast Enhanced Score Needed in PI-RADS Version 2? Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 2019; 49:173-176. [PMID: 31126664 DOI: 10.1067/j.cpradiol.2019.05.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2019] [Revised: 04/03/2019] [Accepted: 05/07/2019] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Prostate imaging reporting and data system version 2 (PI-RADS v2) relegates dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE) imaging to a minor role. We sought to determine how often DCE is used in PI-RADS v2 scoring. MATERIALS AND METHODS We retrospectively reviewed data from 388 patients who underwent prostate magnetic resonance imaging and subsequent biopsy from January 2016 through December 2017. In accordance with PI-RADS v2, DCE was deemed necessary if a peripheral-zone lesion had a diffusion-weighted imaging score of 3, or if a transition-zone lesion had a T2 score of 3 and diffusion-weighted imaging experienced technical failure. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis assessed the accuracy of prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD) at different threshold values for differentiating lesions that would be equivocal with noncontrast technique. Accuracy of PSAD was compared to DCE using McNemar's test. RESULTS Sixty-nine lesions in 62 patients (16%) required DCE for PI-RADS scoring. Biopsy of 10 (14%) of these lesions showed clinically significant cancer (Gleason score ≥7). In the subgroup of patients with equivocal lesions, those with clinically significant cancer had significantly higher PSADs than those with clinically insignificant lesions (means of 0.18 and 0.13 ng/mL/mL, respectively; P= 0.038). In this subgroup, there was no statistical difference in accuracy in determining clinically significant cancer between a PSAD threshold value of 0.13 and DCE (P= 0.25). CONCLUSIONS Only 16% of our patients needed DCE to generate the PI-RADS version 2 score, raising the possibility of limiting the initial screening prostate MRI to a noncontrast exam. PSAD may also be used to further decrease the need for or to replace DCE altogether.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Albert T Roh
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Richard E Fan
- Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | - Geoffrey A Sonn
- Department of Radiology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.; Department of Urology, Stanford University, Stanford, CA
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
43
|
Gatti M, Faletti R, Calleris G, Giglio J, Berzovini C, Gentile F, Marra G, Misischi F, Molinaro L, Bergamasco L, Gontero P, Papotti M, Fonio P. Prostate cancer detection with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bpMRI) by readers with different experience: performance and comparison with multiparametric (mpMRI). Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:1883-1893. [PMID: 30788558 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-019-01934-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 75] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To study the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer (PCa) by readers with different experience, comparing performance with biparametric magnetic resonance imaging (bmMRI) and with the reference multiparametric (mpMRI). METHODS Retrospective analysis of 68 patients with mpMRI of the prostate at 1.5 Tesla using a 32 phased-array coil. Forty-five patients (cases) underwent radical prostatectomy, whereas 23 (controls) had a negative prostate biopsy and ≥ 2.5 years of negative follow-up. Six observers (two with 1000 cases interpreted, two with 300, two with 100) performed the analysis first with bpMRI including diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) maps and T2-weighted (T2W) imaging in three planes and, after 1 month, with mpMRI, adding dynamic contrast enhancement (DCE). The performance was quantified by sensitivity (SNS), specificity (SPC) and area under the curve (AUC) of the ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristics) procedure. RESULTS Concordance within observers of equivalent experience was good (weighted Cohen's k ≈ 0.7). The two expert readers performed as well in bpMRI as in mpMRI (SNS = 0.91-0.96, AUC = 0.86-0.93; p ≥ 0.10); readers with 300 cases performed well in mpMRI, but significantly worse in bpMR: SNS = 0.58 versus 0.91 (p < 0.0001) and AUC = 0.73 versus 0.86 (p = 0.01); the limited experience of readers with 100 cases showed in mpMRI (SNS = 0.71; AUC = 0.77) and even more in bpMRI (SNS = 0.50; AUC = 0.68). CONCLUSION The study revealed the impact of the readers' experience when using bpMRI. The bpMRI without contrast media was a valid alternative for expert readers, whereas less experienced ones needed DCE to significantly boost SNS and AUC. Results indicate 700-800 cases as threshold for reliable interpretation with bpMRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marco Gatti
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy.
| | - Riccardo Faletti
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Giorgio Calleris
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Jacopo Giglio
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Claudio Berzovini
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesco Gentile
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Marra
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Francesca Misischi
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| | - Luca Molinaro
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Laura Bergamasco
- Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Gontero
- Urology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Mauro Papotti
- Pathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Paolo Fonio
- Radiology Unit, Department of Surgical Sciences, University of Turin, Via Genova 3, 10126, Turin, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
44
|
Kim YJ, Huh JS, Park KK. Effectiveness of Bi-Parametric MR/US Fusion Biopsy for Detecting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer in Prostate Biopsy Naïve Men. Yonsei Med J 2019; 60:346-351. [PMID: 30900420 PMCID: PMC6433566 DOI: 10.3349/ymj.2019.60.4.346] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/11/2018] [Revised: 02/07/2019] [Accepted: 02/12/2019] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore the effect of bi-parametric MRI-ultrasound (MR/US) fusion prostate biopsy on the detection of overall cancer and significant prostate cancer (sPCa). MATERIALS AND METHODS We examined 140 patients with suspected prostate cancer lesions on MRI from August 2016 to March 2018. All patients had undergone 3T pre-biopsy bi-parametric (T2 weighted and diffusion-weighted) prostate MRI (bpMRI), and their MRI images were evaluated with Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) version 2.0. MR/US fusion targeted prostate biopsy was performed for lesions with a PI-RADS score ≥3 before systemic biopsy. The results of targeted and systemic biopsy were evaluated in regards to detection rate according to PI-RADS score. RESULTS Of the patients (mean age=67.2 years, mean prostate-specific antigen level=8.1 ng/mL), 66 (47.1%) and 37 (26.4%) patients were diagnosed with cancer and significant prostate cancer, respectively. The rate of positive targeted biopsy increased with higher PI-RADS score (3: 40.4%, 4: 56.7%, 5: 90.0%). The proportion of significant prostate cancer among positive target lesions was 65.3% (32/49). CONCLUSION bpMRI is a feasible tool with which to identify sPCa. MR/US fusion biopsy, rather than systemic biopsy, can help identify sPCa. We recommend using supplemental tools to increase prostate cancer detection in patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Young Joo Kim
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea
| | - Jung Sik Huh
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea
| | - Kyung Kgi Park
- Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Jeju National University, Jeju, Korea.
| |
Collapse
|
45
|
Investigating the role of DCE-MRI, over T2 and DWI, in accurate PI-RADS v2 assessment of clinically significant peripheral zone prostate lesions as defined at radical prostatectomy. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2019; 44:1520-1527. [PMID: 30361870 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-018-1807-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE PI-RADS v2 dictates that dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging be used to further classify peripheral zone (PZ) cases that receive a diffusion-weighted imaging equivocal score of three (DWI3), a positive DCE resulting in an increase in overall assessment score to a four, indicative of clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa). However, the accuracy of DCE in predicting csPCa in DWI3 PZ cases is unknown. This study sought to determine the frequency with which DCE changes the PI-RADS v2 DWI3 assessment category, and to determine the overall accuracy of DCE-MRI in equivocal PZ DWI3 lesions. MATERIALS AND METHODS This is a retrospective study of patients with pathologically proven PCa who underwent prostate mpMRI at 3T and subsequent radical prostatectomy. PI-RADS v2 assessment categories were determined by a radiologist, aware of a diagnosis of PCa, but blinded to final pathology. csPCa was defined as a Gleason score ≥ 7 or extra prostatic extension at pathology review. Performance characteristics and diagnostic accuracy of DCE in assigning a csPCa assessment in PZ lesions were calculated. RESULTS A total of 271 men with mean age of 59 ± 6 years mean PSA 6.7 ng/mL were included. csPCa was found in 212/271 (78.2%) cases at pathology, 209 of which were localized in the PZ. DCE was necessary to further classify (45/209) of patients who received a score of DWI3. DCE was positive in 29/45 cases, increasing the final PI-RADS v2 assessment category to a category 4, with 16/45 having a negative DCE. When compared with final pathology, DCE was correct in increasing the assessment category in 68.9% ± 7% (31/45) of DWI3 cases. CONCLUSION DCE increases the accuracy of detection of csPCa in the majority of PZ lesions that receive an equivocal PI-RADS v2 assessment category using DWI.
Collapse
|
46
|
Hermie I, Van Besien J, De Visschere P, Lumen N, Decaestecker K. Which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer in PI-RADS 3 lesions? A retrospective study in a high-volume academic center. Eur J Radiol 2019; 114:92-98. [PMID: 31005183 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2018] [Revised: 02/17/2019] [Accepted: 02/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To investigate which clinical and radiological characteristics can predict clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) in PI-RADS 3 lesions. To investigate which clinical and radiological characteristics influence the clinician to biopsy a PI-RADS 3 lesion. MATERIALS AND METHODS mpMRI PI-RADS 3 lesions scored by 1 out of 3 highly specialized radiologists in a single high-volume center during the period March 2015 to August 2017 were investigated. This score was based on T2 weighted and diffusion weighted imaging (DWI) sequences. Clinical characteristics of all patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions were collected from medical records. Radiological characteristics were collected from radiology reports. Some radiological characteristics such as apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in a region of interest at the tumor site and ADC at a site contralateral to the tumor site were calculated on DWI sequences. Cox regression analysis was performed to identify which characteristics could predict csPCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions and which characteristics could influence the behavior of a clinician whether or not to biopsy a PI-RADS 3 lesion. RESULTS csPCa could be detected in 31 out of 131 patients with PI-RADS 3 lesions (22.9%). A lower median prostate volume (p = 0.015) and a lower ratio of ADC of the tumor on ADC of the contralateral prostate (ADCT/ADCCLP) (p < 0.001) significantly predisposed for csPCa in multivariate logistic regression. For peripheral zone lesions, a diagnostic model with biopsy of only those PI-RADS 3 lesions with a prostate volume <44 cc and a ratio of ADCT/ADCCLP < 70% showed a sensitivity for detection of csPCa of 59% with a specificity of 88%. (area under the curve 0.780) A suspicious rectal examination (p = 0.011) and the mentioning of prostatitis on the MRI report (p = 0.020) influenced clinicians to biopsy a PI-RADS 3 lesion positively and negatively respectively. For transition zone lesions, previous negative biopsies (p = 0.044) predisposed for csPCa. CONCLUSION Prostate volume and the ratio of ADC tumor on ADC of the contralateral prostate have the potential to predict csPCa in PI-RADS 3 lesions with a sensitivity of 59% and specificity of 88%. A suspicious rectal examination and the mentioning of prostatitis on the MRI report influenced the decision of clinicians to biopsy a PI-RADS 3 lesion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Isabeau Hermie
- Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Jeroen Van Besien
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Pieter De Visschere
- Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Nicolaas Lumen
- Department of Urology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Karel Decaestecker
- Department of Radiology, Ghent University Hospital, Corneel Heymanslaan 10, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| |
Collapse
|
47
|
Abbreviated Biparametric Versus Standard Multiparametric MRI for Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2019; 212:357-365. [PMID: 30512996 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.18.20103] [Citation(s) in RCA: 55] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022]
|
48
|
Girometti R, Cereser L, Bonato F, Zuiani C. Evolution of prostate MRI: from multiparametric standard to less-is-better and different-is better strategies. Eur Radiol Exp 2019; 3:5. [PMID: 30693407 PMCID: PMC6890868 DOI: 10.1186/s41747-019-0088-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/04/2019] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) has become the standard of care to achieve accurate and reproducible diagnosis of prostate cancer. However, mpMRI is quite demanding in terms of technical rigour, patient's tolerability and safety, expertise in interpretation, and costs. This paper reviews the main technical strategies proposed as less-is-better solutions for clinical practice (non-contrast biparametric MRI, reduction of acquisition time, abbreviated protocols, computer-aided diagnosis systems), discussing them in the light of the available evidence and of the concurrent evolution of Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS). We also summarised research results on those advanced techniques representing an alternative different-is-better line of the still ongoing evolution of prostate MRI (quantitative diffusion-weighted imaging, quantitative dynamic contrast enhancement, intravoxel incoherent motion, diffusion tensor imaging, diffusional kurtosis imaging, restriction spectrum imaging, radiomics analysis, hybrid positron emission tomography/MRI).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rossano Girometti
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine - University Hospital "S. Maria della Misericordia", p.le S. Maria della Misericordia, 15-33100, Udine, Italy.
| | - Lorenzo Cereser
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine - University Hospital "S. Maria della Misericordia", p.le S. Maria della Misericordia, 15-33100, Udine, Italy
| | - Filippo Bonato
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine - University Hospital "S. Maria della Misericordia", p.le S. Maria della Misericordia, 15-33100, Udine, Italy
| | - Chiara Zuiani
- Institute of Radiology, Department of Medicine, University of Udine - University Hospital "S. Maria della Misericordia", p.le S. Maria della Misericordia, 15-33100, Udine, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
49
|
Mannaerts CK, Kajtazovic A, Lodeizen OAP, Gayet M, Engelbrecht MRW, Jager GJ, Wijkstra H, de Reijke TM, Beerlage HP. The added value of systematic biopsy in men with suspicion of prostate cancer undergoing multiparametric MRI-targeted biopsy. Urol Oncol 2019; 37:298.e1-298.e9. [PMID: 30660493 DOI: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.01.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2018] [Revised: 12/27/2018] [Accepted: 01/03/2019] [Indexed: 02/01/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Incorporation of multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) and targeted biopsy (TBx) in the diagnostic pathway for prostate cancer (CaP) is rapidly becoming common practice. In men with a prebiopsy positive mpMRI a TBx only approach, thereby omitting transrectal ultrasound-guided systematic biopsy (SBx), has been postulated. In this study we evaluated the additional clinical relevance of SBx in men with a positive prebiopsy mpMRI (Prostate Imaging Reporting and Data System [PI-RADS] ≥ 3) undergoing TBx for CaP detection, Gleason grading and CaP localization. MATERIAL AND METHODS Prospective data of 255 consecutive men with a prebiopsy positive mpMRI (PI-RADS ≥ 3) undergoing 12-core SBx and subsequent MRI-transrectal ultrasound fusion TBx in 2 institutions between 2015 and 2018 was obtained. The detection rate for significant CaP (Gleason score [GS] ≥ 3 + 4) for TBx and SBx were compared. The rate of potentially missed significant CaP by a TBx only approach was determined and GS concordance and CaP localization by TBx and SBx was evaluated. RESULTS TBx yielded significant CaP in 113 men (44%) while SBx yielded significant CaP in 110 men (43%) (P = 0.856). Insignificant CaP was found in 21 men (8%) by TBx, while SBx detected 34 men (13%) with insignificant CaP (P = 0.035). A TBx only approach, omitting SBx, would have missed significant CaP in 13 of the 126 men (10%) with significant CaP on biopsy. Ten of the 118 men (8%), both positive on TBx and SBx, were upgraded in GS by SBx while 11 men (9%) had higher maximum tumor core involvement on SBx. Nineteen of the 97 men (20%) with significant CaP in both TBx and SBx were diagnosed with unilateral significant CaP on mpMRI and TBx while SBx demonstrated bilateral significant CaP. CONCLUSIONS In men with a prebiopsy positive mpMRI, TBx detects high-GS CaP while reducing insignificant CaP detection as compared to SBx. SBx and TBx as stand-alone missed significant CaP in 13% and 10% of the men with significant CaP on biopsy, respectively. A combination of SBx and TBx remains necessary for the most accurate assessment of detection, grading, tumor core involvement, and localization of CaP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe K Mannaerts
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
| | - Amir Kajtazovic
- Department of Urology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Olivia A P Lodeizen
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Maudy Gayet
- Department of Urology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Marc R W Engelbrecht
- Department of Radiology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Gerrit J Jager
- Department of Radiology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands
| | - Hessel Wijkstra
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| | - Theo M de Reijke
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - Harrie P Beerlage
- Department of Urology, Amsterdam University Medical Centers, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Urology, Jeroen Bosch Hospital, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands; Department of Electrical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
50
|
Gaur S, Harmon S, Gupta RT, Margolis DJ, Lay N, Mehralivand S, Merino MJ, Wood BJ, Pinto PA, Shih JH, Choyke PL, Turkbey B. A Multireader Exploratory Evaluation of Individual Pulse Sequence Cancer Detection on Prostate Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI). Acad Radiol 2019; 26:5-14. [PMID: 29705281 PMCID: PMC6202287 DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.03.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2018] [Revised: 03/19/2018] [Accepted: 03/24/2018] [Indexed: 01/07/2023]
Abstract
RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES To determine independent contribution of each prostate multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI) sequence to cancer detection when read in isolation. MATERIALS AND METHODS Prostate mpMRI at 3-Tesla with endorectal coil from 45 patients (n = 30 prostatectomy cases, n = 15 controls with negative magnetic resonance imaging [MRI] or biopsy) were retrospectively interpreted. Sequences (T2-weighted [T2W] MRI, diffusion-weighted imaging [DWI], and dynamic contrast-enhanced [DCE] MRI; N = 135) were separately distributed to three radiologists at different institutions. Readers evaluated each sequence blinded to other mpMRI sequences. Findings were correlated to whole-mount pathology. Cancer detection sensitivity, positive predictive value for whole prostate (WP), transition zone, and peripheral zone were evaluated per sequence by reader, with reader concordance measured by index of specific agreement. Cancer detection rates (CDRs) were calculated for combinations of independently read sequences. RESULTS 44 patients were evaluable (cases median prostate-specific antigen 6.83 [ range 1.95-51.13] ng/mL, age 62 [45-71] years; controls prostate-specific antigen 6.85 [2.4-10.87] ng/mL, age 65.5 [47-71] years). Readers had highest sensitivity on DWI (59%) vs T2W MRI (48%) and DCE (23%) in WP. DWI-only positivity (DWI+/T2W-/DCE-) achieved highest CDR in WP (38%), compared to T2W-only (CDR 24%) and DCE-only (CDR 8%). DWI+/T2W+/DCE- achieved CDR 80%, an added benefit of 56.4% from T2W-only and of 42% from DWI-only (P < .0001). All three sequences interpreted independently positive gave highest CDR of 90%. Reader agreement was moderate (index of specific agreement: T2W = 54%, DWI = 58%, DCE = 33%). CONCLUSIONS When prostate mpMRI sequences are interpreted independently by multiple observers, DWI achieves highest sensitivity and CDR in transition zone and peripheral zone. T2W and DCE MRI both add value to detection; mpMRI achieves highest detection sensitivity when all three mpMRI sequences are positive.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sonia Gaur
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 10 Center Drive, Room B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. ; ;
| | - Stephanie Harmon
- Clinical Research Directorate/Clinical Monitoring Research Program, Leidos Biomedical Research, Inc., National Cancer Institute, Campus at Frederick, 8560 Progress Drive, Frederick, MD 21707, USA.
| | - Rajan T. Gupta
- Duke University Medical Center, Duke Cancer Institute, Durham, NC 27710, USA.
| | - Daniel J. Margolis
- Weill Cornell Imaging, New York-Presbytarian Hospital, New York, NY 10021, USA.
| | - Nathan Lay
- Computer-Aided Diagnosis Laboratory, Clinical Center, NIH, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
| | - Sherif Mehralivand
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. ;
| | - Maria J. Merino
- Department of Pathology, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
| | - Bradford J. Wood
- Center for Interventional Oncology, Clinical Center, NIH, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA.
| | - Peter A. Pinto
- Urologic Oncology Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 10 Center Drive, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. ;
| | - Joanna H. Shih
- Biometric Research Branch, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 6130 Executive Plaza, Room 8132, Rockville, MD 20852, USA.
| | - Peter L. Choyke
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 10 Center Drive, Room B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. ; ;
| | - Baris Turkbey
- Molecular Imaging Program, National Cancer Institute, NIH, 10 Center Drive, Room B3B85, Bethesda, MD 20814, USA. ; ;
| |
Collapse
|