Can thyroid surgery be decided based on ultrasonographic findings, irrespective of cytopathological findings? Five-year retrospective study in a district general hospital

A Single-Center Retrospective Study of the Impact of Thyroid Cancer on the Malignant Risk of Contralateral TI-RADS 3 and 4 Nodules

BACKGROUND

The incidence of thyroid nodules increases in the general population. Similarly, we have also seen a dramatic increase in the number of thyroid surgeries. However, the mortality rate of thyroid cancer remained stable or even decreased. The purpose of our study was to investigate whether thyroid cancer affects the malignant risk of the contralateral TI-RADS 3 and 4 nodules.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study in our institution for all thyroid procedures due to nodules from December 2018 to December 2019. All eligible patients were divided into the experimental group (bilateral nodules) and the control group (unilateral nodules) to assess whether the proportion of malignant nodules was different between the two groups. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to control potential confounding factors to investigate whether their differences were statistically significant.

RESULTS

A total of 330 patients underwent thyroid surgery, of whom 137 were eligible, including 84 in the experimental group and 53 in the control group. The proportion of malignant nodules was significantly different between the experimental group and the control group (29.8% versus 58.5%, unadjusted OR 0.30, 95% CI: 0.17-0.82, p=0.001). However, after controlling for potential confounding factors, including age (p=0.004), gender (p=0.775), and TI-RADS classification (p ≤ 0.001), we found that the difference was not significant (adjusted OR 1.08, 95% CI: 0.39-3.01, p=0.886).

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence that thyroid cancer affects the malignant risk of the contralateral TI-RADS 3 and 4 nodules. This study has been registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (clinical trial registration number: ChiCTR2000038611, registration time: September 26, 2020).

Thyroid Cancer: Implications of Genomics for Care and Practice

Some families have a germline risk for developing thyroid and other cancers. An understanding of the genomic alterations that occur in these tumors will help to explain the diverse clinical characteristics of thyroid tumors, provide diagnostic information, and direct therapy. This article reviews the classification, genetics, and risks and management of hereditary cancer syndromes, as well as the somatic gene variants found in thyroid epithelial tumors, with clinical implications.

BRAF mutation analysis by ARMS-PCR refines thyroid nodule management

BACKGROUND

Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules leads to nearly 25% indeterminate nodules, while BRAF^V600E mutation helps to predicting papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC). However, the clinical validity and utility of the BRAF^V600E mutation detected using preoperative FNA samples in a large cohort were rarely reported.

AIM

To explore the clinical significance of the BRAF^V600E mutation on preoperative diagnosis and decision-making in a large FNA cohort in China.

DESIGN

This was a prospective study of BRAF^V600E mutation analysis using an amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction (ARMS-PCR) in FNA samples.

PATIENTS

The study involved 2640 samples from 2307 patients undergoing FNA procedures in a Chinese medical centre.

RESULTS

A high mutation rate of 86.7% was found in the PTC population. For indeterminate thyroid nodules, the malignant rate of BRAF^V600E+ and BRAF^V600E- was 87.8% and 39.5% in the Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (BSRTC) III, and 88.2% and 31.8% in the BSRTC IV, respectively. A cost-effective diagnostic model combining both BSRTC grading and BRAF^V600E mutation status showed the highest sensitivity of 82.9% and specificity of 85.4%. Central lymph node metastasis (CLNM) was independent of the BRAF mutation status and accounted for 34.2% of the patients with PTC. C_T values of BRAF^V600E of patients with PTMC were significantly lower in young patients and patients with CLNM.

CONCLUSIONS

The combined analysis of cytological results and BRAF^V600E mutation is highly recommended in BRAF^V600E high-prevalence regions, including China. Prophylactic central neck dissection should be performed in selected patients without regard to the BRAF mutation status.

Controversy regarding when clinically suspicious thyroid nodules should be subjected to surgery: Review of current guidelines

BACKGROUND

The work-up of a thyroid nodule to diagnose malignancy is not always straightforward. There are various international thyroid societies each with their own guidelines on the approach to a thyroid nodule. The aim is therefore to determine whether a clinically suspicious thyroid nodule should be subjected to surgery.

METHOD

A review of various international thyroid society guidelines on their approach to a suspicious thyroid nodule.

RESULTS

Sixty-two relevant articles were identified of which 4 current international thyroid guidelines, consisting of 6 different international societies, were reviewed. The commonalities of each of the thyroid society guidelines are imaging, with ultrasound, and cytopathology as the main diagnostic investigations. The description and the size of the nodule are the 2 most important factors on ultrasound; however, the guidelines vary in their recommendations whether to biopsy a suspicious thyroid nodule. An indeterminate group exists whereby thyroid nodules cannot be confirmed as malignant even with fine needle aspiration cytology (FNA). Although further investigations (Technetium-99m -sestamethoxyisobutylisonitryl scan, 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography scan, and molecular testing) may assist in the diagnosis, there are limitations. There are differences in the guidelines whether suspicious nodules should be subjected to surgery.

CONCLUSION

Ultrasound and cytopathology are the 2 most appropriate investigations to diagnose whether a suspicious thyroid nodule is benign or malignant. The clinician needs to be aware of the differences between the guidelines from the various international thyroid societies, specifically concerning the indeterminate group of patients where a definitive diagnosis cannot be made. Management decisions should be discussed with a thyroid multidisciplinary team for a consensus decision whether or not to subject a patient with a suspicious thyroid nodule to surgery.