A survey of UK percutaneous lung biopsy practice: current practices in the era of early detection, oncogenetic profiling, and targeted treatments

A survey of liver ablation amongst UK interventional radiologists

AIM

To characterise training for, and conduct of, image-guided liver tumour ablation amongst UK interventional radiologists.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A web-based survey of British Society of Interventional Radiology members was carried out between 31 August to 1 October 2022. Twenty-eight questions were designed, covering four domains: (1) respondent background, (2) training, (3) current practice, and (4) operator technique.

RESULTS

One hundred and six responses were received, with an 87% completion rate and an approximate response rate of 13% of society members. All UK regions were represented, with the majority from London (22/105, 21%). Seventy-two out of 98 (73%) were either extremely or very interested in learning about liver ablation during training, although levels of exposure varied widely, and 37/103 (36%) had no exposure. Performed numbers of cases also varied widely, between 1-10 cases and >100 cases per operator annually. All (53/53) used microwave energy, and most routinely used general anaesthesia (47/53, 89%). Most 33/53 (62%) did not have stereotactic navigation system, and 25/51(49%) always, 18/51 (35%) never, and 8/51(16%) sometimes gave contrast medium (mean 40, SD 32%) after procedures. Fusion software to judge ablation completeness was never used by 86% (43/55), sometimes used by 9% (5/55), and always used by 13% (7/55) of respondents.

CONCLUSION

Although there are high levels of interest in image-guided liver ablation amongst UK interventional radiologists, training arrangements, operator experience, and procedural technique vary widely. As image-guided liver ablation evolves, there is a growing need to standardise training and techniques, and develop the evidence base to ensure high-quality oncological outcomes.

Canadian Association of Radiologists/Canadian Association of Interventional Radiologists/Canadian Society of Thoracic Radiology Guidelines on Thoracic Interventions

Thoracic interventions are frequently performed by radiologists, but guidelines on appropriateness criteria and technical considerations to ensure patient safety regarding such interventions is lacking. These guidelines, developed by the Canadian Association of Radiologists, Canadian Association of Interventional Radiologists and Canadian Society of Thoracic Radiology focus on the interventions commonly performed by thoracic radiologists. They provide evidence-based recommendations and expert consensus informed best practices for patient preparation; biopsies of the lung, mediastinum, pleura and chest wall; thoracentesis; pre-operative lung nodule localization; and potential complications and their management.

Lung, Pleural, and Mediastinal Biopsies: From Preprocedural Assessment to Technique and Management of Complications

Biopsies of the lung, pleura, and mediastinum play a crucial role in the workup of thoracic lesions. Percutaneous image-guided biopsy of thoracic lesions is a relatively safe and noninvasive way to obtain a pathologic diagnosis which is required to direct patient management. This article reviews how to safely perform image-guided biopsies of the lung, pleura, and mediastinum, from the preprocedural assessment to reviewing intraprocedural techniques, and how to avoid and manage complications.

Value of low-dose and optimized-length computed tomography (CT) scan in CT-guided percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy of pulmonary nodules

Objective

To investigate the value of application of low-dose and optimized length CT scan on puncture results, complications and patients’ radiation dosage during CT-guided percutaneous biopsy of pulmonary nodules (PTNB).

Methods

A total of 231 patients with PTNB under CT guidance were collected. Low dose scanning utilized tube current of 20 mA as compared with 40 mA in conventional dosage. Optimized length in CT is defined as intentionally narrowing the range of CT scanning just to cover 25 mm (5 layers) around the target layer during needle adjustment. According to whether low-dose scans and optimized length scans techniques were utilized, patients were divided into three groups: conventional group (conventional sequence + no optimization), optimized length group (conventional sequence + optimized length), and low-dose optimized length group (low dose sequence + optimized length). The ED (effective dose), the DLP (dose length product), the average CTDIvol (Volume CT dose index), total milliampere second between subgroups were compared.

Results

Compared with the conventional group, ED, intraoperative guidance DLP, total milliseconds and operation time in the optimized length group were reduced by 18.2% (P=0.01), 37% (P=0.003), 17.5% (P=0.013) and 13.3% (P=0.021) respectively. Compared with the optimized length group, the ED was reduced by 87%, preoperative positioning, intraoperative guidance and postoperative review DLP were also reduced by 88%, total milliampere second was reduced by 79%, with an average CTDIvol was reduced by 86%, in the low-dose optimized length group (P<0.001 for all).

Conclusion

Optimizing the length during CT scanning can effectively reduce the intraoperative radiation dose and reduce the operation time compared with conventional plan; low-dose and optimized length CT scan can further reduce the total radiation dose compared with optimized length group with no differences on intraoperative complications, biopsy results and operation time.

Recurrence and disease-free survival outcomes after computed tomography-guided needle biopsy in stage IA non-small cell lung cancer patients in China: a propensity score matching analysis

Background

Whether preoperative biopsy before radical resection can lead to recurrence and impact patient survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains controversial. In this study, we carried out a retrospective analysis to determine whether preoperative biopsy can cause disease recurrence and influence disease-free survival (DFS) in patients with stage IA NSCLC.

Methods

Patients diagnosed with stage IA NSCLC (solid nodule) between January 2010 and December 2014 were identified from the databases of 7 Chinese medical centers and divided into two groups: a preoperative computed tomography (CT)-guided needle biopsy (CTNB) plus radical resection group, and a non-CTNB group. The propensity score matching (PSM) method was adopted to balance the observed covariates, and Kaplan-Meier estimates were used for survival analysis. Cox regression was used in a single-factor analysis to identify the factors affecting DFS in stage IA NSCLC.

Results

After initial screening, 730 patients were enrolled in this study, with 186 and 544 patients in the CTNB group and the non-CTNB group, respectively. After PSM, 186 patients were eventually included in each group. No significant differences in basic clinical features were identified between the two groups (P>0.05). The rates of recurrence were 17.2% and 14.0% in the CTNB and non-CTNB groups (χ²=0.735, P=0.391), respectively. No notable differences in DFS (χ²=1.895, P=0.173) or overall survival (OS, χ²=1.785, P=0.182) were observed. Lung adenocarcinoma [hazard ratio (HR), 0.167, P=0.001] and lesion size (>2 cm) (HR, 2.712, P=0.000) were identified as risk factors for DFS in stage IA NSCLC.

Conclusions

CTNB does not increase the incidence of recurrence in stage IA NSCLC or affect patient survival; therefore, it is not a risk factor for DFS. Lung adenocarcinoma and lesion size are risk factors for DFS.

2020 Clinical Practice Guideline for Percutaneous Transthoracic Needle Biopsy of Pulmonary Lesions: A Consensus Statement and Recommendations of the Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology

Percutaneous transthoracic needle biopsy (PTNB) is one of the essential diagnostic procedures for pulmonary lesions. Its role is increasing in the era of CT screening for lung cancer and precision medicine. The Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology developed the first evidence-based clinical guideline for PTNB in Korea by adapting pre-existing guidelines. The guideline provides 39 recommendations for the following four main domains of 12 key questions: the indications for PTNB, pre-procedural evaluation, procedural technique of PTNB and its accuracy, and management of post-biopsy complications. We hope that these recommendations can improve the diagnostic accuracy and safety of PTNB in clinical practice and promote standardization of the procedure nationwide.

Fluoroscopy guided percutaneous biopsy in combination with bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound in the diagnosis of suspicious lung lesions - the triple approach

Flexible bronchoscopy and endobronchial ultrasound guided transbronchial needle aspiration (EBUS-TBNA) are the pulmonologists´ basic procedures for the biopsy of suspicious lung lesions. If inconclusive, other guiding-modalities for tissue sampling are needed, computed tomography performed by a radiologist, or – if available – radial EBUS or electromagnetic navigation biopsy.

We wanted to investigate if same-day X-ray fluoroscopy-guided transthoracic fine-needle aspiration biopsy (F-TTNAB) performed by the pulmonologist immediately after bronchoscopy and EBUS is a feasible alternative.

We retrospectively identified consecutive patients in whom F-TTNAB followed a bronchoscopy and EBUS in the same séance. Patients in whom the suspicion of malignancy was invalidated after complete work up were followed for six months to identify false-negative cases.

In total 125 patients underwent triple approach (bronchoscopy, EBUS and F-TTNAB) during the same séance. Malignancy was diagnosed in 86 (69%), and 77 of these (90%) were primary lung cancers. The diagnostic yield of F-TTNAB for malignancy was 77%, and sensitivity was 90%. Pneumothorax occurred in 35 (28%) patients, and was administered with pleural drainage in 22 (18% of all patients). No cases of prolonged haemoptysis were observed. The risk of pneumothorax differed insignificantly with lesion size ≤2.0 cm (27%) versus >2.0 cm (29%).

We conclude that it is feasible for pulmonologist to perform F-TTNAB immediately after endoscopy as a combined triple approach in a fast-track workup of suspected lung cancer.