Prospective randomised controlled trial on the effect of videos on the cooperativeness of children undergoing MRI and their requirement for general anaesthesia

The effect of video-based education program applied before children's pediatric Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) on anxiety in Turkey: A randomized controlled study

OBJECTIVE

This study is a randomized controlled trial conducted to examine the effects of a Turkish video-based education program on scanned image quality and child and parent anxiety during Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI).

DESIGN AND METHODS

The study was conducted with 66 children aged between 4 and 15 years at Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University Health Practice and Research Hospital, between January 2019 and December 2019. A video-based educational program was applied to an intervention group before MRI.

RESULTS

The video-based education program reduced children's anxiety and fear (p < 0.001). The study also showed a significant reduction in parental stress (p < 0.001). The image quality in the intervention group was better than that in the control group (control group: 3.24 ± 1.20; intervention group: 4.18 ± 0.81) (p = 0.001). Significantly fewer children refused to enter the MRI room in the intervention group than in the control group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Child-friendly and video-based educational programs can be organized for children and parents in diagnostic and treatment procedures for children in hospitals.

PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS

MRI scans can be uncomfortable for children and require transport to a better-equipped hospital for sedation. They can also cause financial loss for children and their parents and disrupt facility workflow. An educational program to adjust the children and their families will improve the scanning process and its success rate.

Improving children's cooperativeness during magnetic resonance imaging using interactive educational animated videos: a prospective, randomised, non-inferiority trial

INTRODUCTION

A previous prospective, randomised controlled trial showed that animated videos shown to children before magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan reduced the proportion of children needing repeated MRI sequences and improved confidence of the children staying still for at least 30 min. Children preferred the interactive video. We hypothesised that the interactive video is non-inferior to showing two videos (regular and interactive) in improving children's cooperativeness during MRI scans.

METHODS

In this Institutional Review Board-approved prospective, randomised, non-inferiority trial, 558 children aged 3-20 years scheduled for elective MRI scan from June 2017 to March 2019 were randomised into the interactive video only group and combined (regular and interactive) videos group. Children were shown the videos before their scan. Repeated MRI sequences, general anaesthesia (GA) requirement and improvement in confidence of staying still for at least 30 min were assessed.

RESULTS

In the interactive video group ( n = 277), 86 (31.0%) children needed repeated MRI sequences, two (0.7%) needed GA and the proportion of children who had confidence in staying still for more than 30 min increased by 22.1% after the video. In the combined videos group ( n = 281), 102 (36.3%) children needed repeated MRI sequences, six (2.1%) needed GA and the proportion of children who had confidence in staying still for more than 30 min increased by 23.2% after the videos; the results were not significantly different between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The interactive video group demonstrated non-inferiority to the combined videos group.

Nonpharmacological Interventions to Reduce Sedation and General Anesthesia in Pediatric MRI: A Meta-analysis

CONTEXT

Nonpharmacological strategies are increasingly used in pediatric procedures, but in pediatric MRI, sedation and general anesthesia are still commonly required.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of nonpharmacological interventions in reducing use of sedation and general anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing MRI, and to investigate effects on scan time, image quality, and anxiety.

DATA SOURCES

We searched Ovid Medline, CINAHL, Embase, and CENTRAL from inception through October 10, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

We included randomized controlled trials and quasi-experimental designs comparing the effect of a nonpharmacological intervention with standard care on use of sedation or general anesthesia, scan time, image quality, or child and parental anxiety among infants (<2 years), children, and adolescents (2-18 years) undergoing MRI.

DATA EXTRACTION

Standardized instruments were used to extract data and assess study quality.

RESULTS

Forty-six studies were eligible for the systematic review. Limited to studies on children and adolescents, the meta-analysis included 20 studies with 33 873 patients. Intervention versus comparator analysis showed that nonpharmacological interventions were associated with reduced need for sedation and general anesthesia in the randomized control trials (risk ratio, 0.68; 95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.95; l2 = 35%) and nonrandomized studies (risk ratio, 0.58; 95% confidence interval, 0.51-0.66; l2 = 91%). The effect was largest among children aged 3 to 10 years when compared with older children and adolescents aged 11 to 18 years.

LIMITATIONS

There was substantial heterogeneity among nonrandomized studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Nonpharmacological interventions must be considered as standard procedure in infants, children, and adolescents undergoing MRI.

Interventions and methods to prepare, educate or familiarise children and young people for radiological procedures: a scoping review

Children attending hospital for radiological procedures can experience uncertainty, anxiety and distress; this can result in sub-optimal experiences for children, poor scan quality and the need for radiological procedures to be rescheduled or sedation to be used. The preparation and education of children before clinical procedures has been shown to have a positive influence on procedural outcomes. This scoping review aimed to locate and examine the evidence relating to non-invasive interventions and methods to prepare, educate and familiarise children for radiological procedures within a healthcare setting. A comprehensive search strategy identified 36 articles. A narrative synthesis approach was adopted to make sense of the key findings. Studies investigated a range of radiological procedures (MRI, plain radiographs, CT, fluoroscopy and Micturating cystourethrogram) using a wide range of interventions (smartphone applications, storybooks, videos, mock scanners) which varied by method, mode of delivery and target audience. The outcomes used to evaluate the value and impact of the interventions are wide, varied and inconsistently applied making it difficult to judge which interventions offer the optimal impact on scan quality, scan completion and children’s experiences. This review highlights that there is a need to further understand which specific elements of the non-invasive interventions ‘work best’ for children. There is a need for consistency on the outcomes measured and for these measures to include child-centred outcomes alongside scan quality and length of radiological procedure.

Using a checklist to assess if a child undergoing MRI needs general anaesthesia

AIM

To assess if a child-assessment checklist covering tasks children are expected to perform during magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can determine whether the child requires general anaesthesia (GA) during MRI.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

In this institute review board approved study, children who underwent MRI from September 2016 to June 2017 at KK Women's and Children's Hospital were assessed using a checklist by a research assistant before their examination. During this project, the checklist had no influence on whether the MRI was performed under GA or not. The checklist consisted of five items rated on a binary scale assessing the child's behaviour. Binary logistic regression was performed separately on the overall sample and for a subset of younger children to identify variables associated with the requirement for GA.

RESULTS

The mean age of the overall sample (798 children) and the subset of children <8 years (124 children) were 11.7±3.7 and 5.5±1.3 years, respectively. In both groups, children who required GA were significantly younger than those who did not (p<0.001). No gender differences were observed. Children who required GA scored higher on the checklist compared to those who did not in both groups (p<0.001). The diagnostic accuracy of the checklist was found to be good (area under the curve [AUC]=0.97 for both groups), with a suggested cut-off score of 4. Intraclass correlation coefficient of the ratings by two independent individuals was 0.78.

CONCLUSION

The child assessment checklist was useful in identifying GA requirement in children undergoing MRI and can be administered by non-medical staff with good inter-rater reliability.

General anesthesia / sedation requirement influences the way MRI brain scans are ordered in a tertiary pediatric hospital

BACKGROUND

MRI guidelines have been created to help clinicians order scans appropriately. Some scans in children are carried out under general anesthesia (GA) / sedation.

PURPOSE

To evaluate if the requirement for GA/sedation influences the way MRI brain scans are ordered.

STUDY TYPE

Retrospective.

POPULATION

Children with MRI brain scans in 2015 to 2017.

FIELD STRENGTH

3T, 1.5T.

ASSESSMENT

Institutional Review Board approval for waiver of consent was obtained. Clinical MRI brain reports for children were classified into whether they conformed to the American College of Radiology (ACR) 2013 guidelines by research assistants under supervision of a pediatric radiologist. Scans were sorted into those with normal brains or abnormality.

STATISTICAL TEST

The statistical difference between groups was assessed using t-test for continuous variables and chi-square test for categorical variables with IBM SPSS 19.

RESULTS

Of the total 1893 MRI scans, 431 were performed under GA and six under sedation. Of the 431 cases performed under GA/sedation, 383 (87.6%) were ordered according to guidelines. Of the 1456 cases that did not require GA/sedation, 710 (48.8%) conformed to guidelines. The percentage of scans ordered according to guidelines was 38.8% higher in those who had scans performed under GA/sedation (P < 0.001). MRI scans were normal in 635 (58.0%) out of the 1093 cases ordered according to guidelines and normal in 638 (79.8%) out of the 800 cases that did not follow guidelines. Scans not ordered according to guidelines had higher proportion of normal scans (21.8%) compared with those ordered according to guidelines (P < 0.001).

DATA CONCLUSION

Higher adherence to imaging guidelines is seen in younger patients who were exposed to the risks of GA/sedation for the MRI. Scans not adhering to guidelines had a higher percentage of having no brain abnormality detected.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 6 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:e250-e255.