The clinical value of PERCIST to predict tumour response and prognosis of patients with oesophageal cancer treated by neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Predictive Value of PERCIST for Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Treated with Preoperative Induction Therapy - A Multicenter Study in Japan

Background

Induction therapy followed by surgery is recommended as an alternative treatment strategy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Patients who achieve pathologic response after induction therapy have better outcomes than non-responders; therefore, therapeutic response must be evaluated. Recently, new approaches for monitoring therapeutic responses, which are based on 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (FDG-PET), have been developed. In this study, we evaluated the predictive value of Positron Emission Tomography Response Criteria in Solid Tumors (PERCIST), which uses standardized uptake values corrected for lean body mass (SUL) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG).

Methods

A total of 130 patients in the Setouchi Lung Cancer Group who underwent FDG-PET imaging before and after induction therapy prior to a planned surgical resection for NSCLC between 2007 and 2016 were studied retrospectively. The pathologic responses of the primary lung tumors and metastatic lymph nodes were compared with their responses based on evaluation using PERCIST.

Results

Postoperative pathologic studies revealed pathologic complete response (pCR) in 42 (32.3%) patients. PERCIST was significantly correlated with pathologic response (p < 0.001). The sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of PERCIST for predicting pCR were 16.7% (7/42), 88.6% (78/88), and 65.4% (85/130), respectively. Patients with pCR had significantly higher reduction rates in SULpeak for both primary lung tumors and metastatic lymph nodes and TLG for primary tumors than non-responders. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis, tumor site in upper lobes, reduction rate of TLG in primary tumor, and pathologic N0 were independent predictors of favorable recurrence-free survival (RFS).

Conclusion

Our study suggested that PERCIST, especially the rate of TLG reduction rate, are useful to predict the pathological response and prognosis after induction therapy. Although improvement is necessary, PERCIST can be a promising method of the post-induction status in lung cancer. Further research is needed to confirm our findings.

Predicting tumor response and prognosis to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma patients using PERCIST: a multicenter study in Japan

PURPOSE

To investigate the usefulness of the positron emission tomography response criteria in solid tumors 1.0 (PERCIST1.0) for predicting tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and prognosis and determine whether PERCIST improvements are necessary for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We analyzed the cases of 177 ESCC patients and examined the association between PERCIST and their pathological responses. Associations of whole-PERCIST with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated by a Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards model. To investigate potential PERCIST improvements, we used the survival tree technique to understand patients' prognoses.

RESULTS

There were significant correlations between the pathologic response and PERCIST of primary tumor (p < 0.001). The optimal cutoff value of the primary tumors' SULpeak response to classify pathologic responses was -50.0%. The diagnostic accuracy of SULpeak response was 87.3% sensitivity, 54.1% specificity, 68.9% accuracy, positive predictive value 60.5%, and negative predictive value 84.1%. Whole-PERCIST was significantly associated with PFS and OS. The survival tree results indicated that a high reduction of the whole SULpeak response was significantly correlated with the patients' prognoses. The cutoff values for the separation of prognoses were - 52.5 for PFS and - 47.1% for OS.

CONCLUSION

PERCIST1.0 can help predict tumor responses and prognoses. However, ¹⁸F-FDG-PET/CT tends to underestimate residual tumors in histopathological response evaluations. Modified PERCIST, in which the partial metabolic response is further classified by the SULpeak response (-50%), might be more appropriate than PERCIST1.0 for evaluating tumor responses and stratifying high-risk patients for recurrence and poor prognosis.