Imaging of the post-treatment neck

Posttreatment Head and Neck Cancer Imaging: Anatomic Considerations Based on Cancer Subsites

Posttreatment imaging surveillance of head and neck cancer is challenging owing to complex anatomic subsites and diverse treatment modalities. Early detection of residual disease or recurrence through surveillance imaging is crucial for devising optimal treatment strategies. Posttreatment imaging surveillance is performed using CT, fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, and MRI. Radiologists should be familiar with postoperative imaging findings that can vary depending on surgical procedures and reconstruction methods that are used, which is dictated by the primary subsite and extent of the tumor. Morphologic changes in normal structures or denervation of muscles within the musculocutaneous flap may mimic recurrent tumors. Recurrence is more likely to occur at the resection margin, margin of the reconstructed flap, and deep sites that are difficult to access surgically. Radiation therapy also has a varying dose distribution depending on the primary site, resulting in various posttreatment changes. Normal tissues are affected by radiation, with edema and inflammation occurring in the early stages and fibrosis in the late stages. Distinguishing scar tissue from residual tumor becomes necessary, as radiation therapy may leave behind residual scar tissue. Local recurrence should be carefully evaluated within areas where these postradiation changes occur. Head and Neck Imaging Reporting and Data System (NI-RADS) is a standardized reporting and risk classification system with guidance for subsequent management. Familiarity with NI-RADS has implications for establishing surveillance protocols, interpreting posttreatment images, and management decisions. Knowledge of posttreatment imaging characteristics of each subsite of head and neck cancers and the areas prone to recurrence empowers radiologists to detect recurrences at early stages. ©RSNA, 2024 Test Your Knowledge questions in the supplemental material and the slide presentation from the RSNA Annual Meeting are available for this article.

Imaging of the Posttreatment Head and Neck: Expected Findings and Potential Complications

Interpretation of posttreatment imaging findings in patients with head and neck cancer can pose a substantial challenge. Malignancies in this region are often managed through surgery, radiation therapy, chemotherapy, and newer approaches like immunotherapy. After treatment, patients may experience various expected changes, including mucositis, soft-tissue inflammation, laryngeal edema, and salivary gland inflammation. Imaging techniques such as CT, MRI, and PET scans help differentiate these changes from tumor recurrence. Complications such as osteoradionecrosis, chondroradionecrosis, and radiation-induced vasculopathy can arise because of radiation effects. Radiation-induced malignancies may occur in the delayed setting. This review article emphasizes the importance of posttreatment surveillance imaging to ensure proper care of patients with head and neck cancer and highlights the complexities in distinguishing between expected treatment effects and potential complications. Keywords: CT, MR Imaging, Radiation Therapy, Ear/Nose/Throat, Head/Neck, Nervous-Peripheral, Bone Marrow, Calvarium, Carotid Arteries, Jaw, Face, Larynx © RSNA, 2024.

Radiation-induced alterations in multi-layered, in-vitro skin models detected by optical coherence tomography and histological methods

BACKGROUND

Inflammatory skin reactions and skin alterations are still a potential side effect in radiation therapy (RT), which also need attention for patients' health care.

METHOD

In a pre-clinical study we consider alterations in irradiated in-vitro skin models of epidermal and dermal layers. Typical dose regimes in radiation therapy are applied for irradiation. For non-invasive imaging and characterization optical coherence tomography (OCT) is used. Histological staining method is additionally applied for comparison and discussion.

RESULTS

Structural features, such as keratinization, modifications in epidermal cell layer thickness and disorder in the layering-as indications for reactions to ionizing radiation and aging-could be observed by means of OCT and confirmed by histology. We were able to recognize known RT induced changes such as hyper-keratosis, acantholysis, and epidermal hyperplasia as well as disruption and/or demarcation of the dermo-epidermal junction.

CONCLUSION

The results may pave the way for OCT to be considered as a possible adjunctive tool to detect and monitor early skin inflammation and side effects of radiotherapy, thus supporting patient healthcare in the future.

Adverse Radiation Therapy Effects in the Treatment of Head and Neck Tumors

Whether used as a single modality or as part of a combined approach, radiation therapy (RT) plays an essential role in the treatment of several head and neck malignancies. Despite the improvement in radiation delivery techniques, normal structures in the vicinity of the target area remain susceptible to a wide range of adverse effects. Given their high incidence, some of these effects are referred to as expected postradiation changes (eg, mucositis, sialadenitis, and edema), while others are considered true complications, meaning they should not be expected and can even represent life-threatening conditions (eg, radionecrosis, fistulas, and radiation-induced neoplasms). Also, according to their timing of onset, these deleterious effects can be divided into four groups: acute (during RT), subacute (within weeks to months), delayed onset (within months to years), and very delayed onset (after several years).The authors provide a comprehensive review of the most important radiation-induced changes related to distinct head and neck sites, focusing on their typical cross-sectional imaging features and correlating them with the time elapsed after treatment. Radiologists should not only be familiar with these imaging findings but also actively seek essential clinical data at the time of interpretation (including knowledge of the RT dose and time, target site, and manifesting symptoms) to better recognize imaging findings, avoid pitfalls and help guide appropriate management. ^© RSNA, 2022.

Preimaging and Postimaging of Graft and Flap in Head and Neck Reconstruction

Head and neck reconstructive surgical techniques are complex; now the microvascular free tissue transfer is the most frequently used. The postreconstruction imaging interpretation is challenging due to the altered anatomy and flap variability. We aim to improve radiologists' knowledge with diverse methods of flap reconstruction for an accurate appreciation of their expected cross-sectional imaging appearance and early detection of tumor recurrence and other complication.