1
|
Behar M, Peck KK, Yildirim O, Tisnado J, Saha A, Arevalo-Perez J, Lis E, Yamada Y, Holodny AI, Karimi S. T1-Weighted, Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MR Perfusion Imaging Can Differentiate between Treatment Success and Failure in Spine Metastases Undergoing Radiation Therapy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2023; 44:1451-1457. [PMID: 38049990 PMCID: PMC10714859 DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a8057] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2023] [Accepted: 10/05/2023] [Indexed: 12/06/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE Current imaging techniques have difficulty differentiating treatment success and failure in spinal metastases undergoing radiation therapy. This study investigated the correlation between changes in dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging perfusion parameters and clinical outcomes following radiation therapy for spinal metastases. We hypothesized that perfusion parameters will outperform traditional size measurements in discriminating treatment success and failure. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective study included 49 patients (mean age, 63 [SD, 13] years; 29 men) with metastatic lesions treated with radiation therapy who underwent dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging. The median time between radiation therapy and follow-up dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging was 62 days. We divided patients into 2 groups: clinical success (n = 38) and failure (n = 11). Failure was defined as PET recurrence (n = 5), biopsy-proved (n = 1) recurrence, or an increase in tumor size (n = 7), while their absence defined clinical success. A Mann-Whitney U test was performed to assess differences between groups. RESULTS The reduction in plasma volume was greater in the success group than in the failure group (-57.3% versus +88.2%, respectively; P < .001). When we assessed the success of treatment, the sensitivity of plasma volume was 91% (10 of 11; 95% CI, 82%-97%) and the specificity was 87% (33 of 38; 95% CI, 73%-94%). The sensitivity of size measurements was 82% (9 of 11; 95% CI, 67%-90%) and the specificity was 47% (18 of 38; 95% CI, 37%-67%). CONCLUSIONS The specificity of plasma volume was higher than that of conventional size measurements, suggesting that dynamic contrast-enhanced MR imaging is a powerful tool to discriminate between treatment success and failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mark Behar
- From the Department of Radiology (M.B., K.K.P., O.Y., J.T., A.S., J.A.-P., E.L., A.I.H., S.K.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Kyung K Peck
- From the Department of Radiology (M.B., K.K.P., O.Y., J.T., A.S., J.A.-P., E.L., A.I.H., S.K.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Medical Physics (K.K.P.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Onur Yildirim
- From the Department of Radiology (M.B., K.K.P., O.Y., J.T., A.S., J.A.-P., E.L., A.I.H., S.K.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Jamie Tisnado
- From the Department of Radiology (M.B., K.K.P., O.Y., J.T., A.S., J.A.-P., E.L., A.I.H., S.K.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Atin Saha
- From the Department of Radiology (M.B., K.K.P., O.Y., J.T., A.S., J.A.-P., E.L., A.I.H., S.K.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Julio Arevalo-Perez
- From the Department of Radiology (M.B., K.K.P., O.Y., J.T., A.S., J.A.-P., E.L., A.I.H., S.K.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Eric Lis
- From the Department of Radiology (M.B., K.K.P., O.Y., J.T., A.S., J.A.-P., E.L., A.I.H., S.K.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Yoshiya Yamada
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Y.Y.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Andrei I Holodny
- From the Department of Radiology (M.B., K.K.P., O.Y., J.T., A.S., J.A.-P., E.L., A.I.H., S.K.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
- Department of Radiology (A.I.H.), Weill Medical College of Cornell University, New York, New York
- Department of Neuroscience (A.I.H.), Weill-Cornell Graduate School of the Medical Sciences, New York, New York
| | - Sasan Karimi
- From the Department of Radiology (M.B., K.K.P., O.Y., J.T., A.S., J.A.-P., E.L., A.I.H., S.K.), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mulyadi R, Putri PP, Handoko, Zairinal RA, Prihartono J. Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging parameter changes as an early biomarker of tumor responses following radiation therapy in patients with spinal metastases: a systematic review. Radiat Oncol J 2023; 41:225-236. [PMID: 38185927 PMCID: PMC10772591 DOI: 10.3857/roj.2023.00290] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2023] [Revised: 08/18/2023] [Accepted: 08/21/2023] [Indexed: 01/09/2024] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This systematic review aims to assess and summarize the clinical values of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) parameter changes as early biomarkers of tumor responses following radiation therapy (RT) in patients with spinal metastases. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic search was conducted on five electronic databases: PubMed, Scopus, Science Direct, Cochrane, and Embase. Studies were included if they mentioned DCE-MRI parameter changes before and after RT in patients with spinal metastases with a correlation to tumor responses based on clinical and imaging criteria. The Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies 2 was used to assess study quality. RESULTS This systematic review included seven studies involving 107 patients. All seven studies evaluated the transfer constant (Ktrans), six studies evaluated the plasma volume fraction (Vp), three studies evaluated the extravascular extracellular space volume fraction, and two studies evaluated the rate constant. There were variations in the type of primary cancer, RT techniques used, post-treatment scan time, and median follow-up time. Despite the variations, however, the collected evidence generally suggested that significant differences could be detected in DCE-MRI parameters between before and after RT, which might reflect treatment success or failures in long-term follow-up. Responders showed higher reduction and lower values of Ktrans and Vp after RT. DCE-MRI parameters showed changes and detectable recurrences significantly earlier (up to 6 months) than conventional MRI with favorable diagnostic values. CONCLUSION The results of this systematic review suggested that DCE-MRI parameter changes in patients with spinal metastases could be a promising tool for treatment-response assessment following RT. Lower values and higher reduction of Ktrans and Vp after treatment demonstrated good prediction of local control. Compared to conventional MRI, DCE-MRI showed more rapid changes and earlier prediction of treatment failure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rahmad Mulyadi
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Pungky Permata Putri
- Department of Radiology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | - Handoko
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| | | | - Joedo Prihartono
- Department of Community Medicine Pre Clinic, Faculty of Medicine, Universitas Indonesia, Jakarta, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|