The role of PET in imaging of the tumour microenvironment and response to immunotherapy

Mimicking and analyzing the tumor microenvironment

The tumor microenvironment (TME) is increasingly appreciated to play a decisive role in cancer development and response to therapy in all solid tumors. Hypoxia, acidosis, high interstitial pressure, nutrient-poor conditions, and high cellular heterogeneity of the TME arise from interactions between cancer cells and their environment. These properties, in turn, play key roles in the aggressiveness and therapy resistance of the disease, through complex reciprocal interactions between the cancer cell genotype and phenotype, and the physicochemical and cellular environment. Understanding this complexity requires the combination of sophisticated cancer models and high-resolution analysis tools. Models must allow both control and analysis of cellular and acellular TME properties, and analyses must be able to capture the complexity at high depth and spatial resolution. Here, we review the advantages and limitations of key models and methods in order to guide further TME research and outline future challenges.

Illuminating immunotherapy response via precision T cell-targeted PET imaging

Traditionally, immunotherapy agent selection and treatment strategies are guided by biopsy-based histological information. However, biopsies are limited in that they are invasive, provide static information regarding the tumor immune microenvironment, and only sample a small part of one tumor site. The tumor microenvironment is dynamic and heterogenous. As a result, the immune milieu at one site may be distinct from other metastatic sites. These factors make identifying which patients are likely to respond to different immunotherapies and which harbor intrinsic resistance mechanisms difficult to identify based on a biopsy alone. As such, there is significant interest in alternative methodologies that better characterize the tumor immune microenvironment and monitor immunotherapy response. PET imaging potentially offers a non-invasive way to characterize the tumor immune microenvironment at the primary tumor and metastases and allow for longitudinal characterization. Herein, we review pre-clinically and clinically tested T cell-targeted PET radiopharmaceuticals, as T cells have been the dominant immunotherapy target, and their utility in both evaluating response to immunotherapy and in understanding the systemic immune response to treatment with immunotherapeutics.

Modelling the Tumour Microenvironment, but What Exactly Do We Mean by "Model"?

The Oxford English Dictionary includes 17 definitions for the word "model" as a noun and another 11 as a verb. Therefore, context is necessary to understand the meaning of the word model. For instance, "model railways" refer to replicas of railways and trains at a smaller scale and a "model student" refers to an exemplary individual. In some cases, a specific context, like cancer research, may not be sufficient to provide one specific meaning for model. Even if the context is narrowed, specifically, to research related to the tumour microenvironment, "model" can be understood in a wide variety of ways, from an animal model to a mathematical expression. This paper presents a review of different "models" of the tumour microenvironment, as grouped by different definitions of the word into four categories: model organisms, in vitro models, mathematical models and computational models. Then, the frequencies of different meanings of the word "model" related to the tumour microenvironment are measured from numbers of entries in the MEDLINE database of the United States National Library of Medicine at the National Institutes of Health. The frequencies of the main components of the microenvironment and the organ-related cancers modelled are also assessed quantitatively with specific keywords. Whilst animal models, particularly xenografts and mouse models, are the most commonly used "models", the number of these entries has been slowly decreasing. Mathematical models, as well as prognostic and risk models, follow in frequency, and these have been growing in use.

Influences on PET Quantification and Interpretation

Various factors have been identified that influence quantitative accuracy and image interpretation in positron emission tomography (PET). Through the continuous introduction of new PET technology-both imaging hardware and reconstruction software-into clinical care, we now find ourselves in a transition period in which traditional and new technologies coexist. The effects on the clinical value of PET imaging and its interpretation in routine clinical practice require careful reevaluation. In this review, we provide a comprehensive summary of important factors influencing quantification and interpretation with a focus on recent developments in PET technology. Finally, we discuss the relationship between quantitative accuracy and subjective image interpretation.