Nickel–thiolate and iron–thiolate cyanocarbonyl complexes: Modeling the nickel and iron sites of [NiFe] hydrogenase

Thiolate Coordination vs C-S Bond Cleavage of Thiolates in Dinickel(II) Complexes

A detailed study for the synthesis of dinickel(II)-thiolate and dinickel(II)-hydrosulfide complexes and the complete characterization of the relevant intermediates involved in the C-S bond cleavage of thiolates are presented. Hydrated Ni(II) salts mediate the hydrolytic C-S bond cleavage of thiolates (NaSR/RSH; R = Me, Et, ⁿBu, ^tBu), albeit inefficiently, to yield a mixture of a dinickel(II)-hydrosulfide complex, [Ni₂(BPMP)(μ-SH)(DMF)₂]²⁺ (1), and the corresponding dinickel(II)-thiolate complexes, such as [Ni₂(BPMP)(μ-SEt)(ClO₄)]¹⁺ (2) (HBPMP is 2,6-bis[[bis(2-pyridylmethyl)amino]methyl]-4-methylphenol). A systematic study for the reactivity of thiolates with Ni(II) was therefore pursued which finally yielded 1 as a pure product which has been characterized in comparison with the dinickel(II)-dichloride complex, [Ni₂(BPMP)(Cl)₂(MeOH)₂]¹⁺ (3). While the reaction of thiolates with anhydrous Ni(OTf)₂ in dry conditions could only yield [Ni₂(BPMP)(OTf)₂]¹⁺ (5) instead of the expected dinickel(II)-thiolate compound, the C-S bond cleavage could be suppressed by the use of a chelating thiol, such as PhCOSH, to yield [Ni₂(BPMP)(SCOPh)₂]¹⁺ (6). Finally, with the suitable choice of a monodentate thiol, a dinickel(II)-monothiolate complex, [Ni₂(BPMP)(SPh)(DMF)(MeOH)(H₂O)]²⁺ (7), was isolated as a pure product within 1 h of reaction, which after a longer time of reaction yielded 1 and PhOH. Complex 7 may thus be regarded as the intermediate that precedes the C-S bond cleavage and is generated by the reaction of a thiolate with an initially formed dinickel(II)-solvento complex, [Ni₂(BPMP)(MeOH)₂(H₂O)₂]³⁺(4). Selected dinickel(II) complexes were explored further for the scope of substitution reactions, and the results include the isolation of a dinickel(II)-bis(thiolate) complex, [Ni₂(BPMP)(μ-SPh)₂]¹⁺ (8).

Models of the Ni-L and Ni-SIa States of the [NiFe]-Hydrogenase Active Site

A new class of synthetic models for the active site of [NiFe]-hydrogenases are described. The Ni(I/II)(SCys)2 and Fe(II)(CN)2CO sites are represented with (RC5H4)Ni(I/II) and Fe(II)(diphos)(CO) modules, where diphos = 1,2-C2H4(PPh2)2(dppe) or cis-1,2-C2H2(PPh2)2(dppv). The two bridging thiolate ligands are represented by CH2(CH2S)2(2-) (pdt(2-)), Me2C(CH2S)2(2-) (Me2pdt(2-)), and (C6H5S)2(2-). The reaction of Fe(pdt)(CO)2(dppe) and [(C5H5)3Ni2]BF4 affords [(C5H5)Ni(pdt)Fe(dppe)(CO)]BF4 ([1a]BF4). Monocarbonyl [1a]BF4 features an S = 0 Ni(II)Fe(II) center with five-coordinated iron, as proposed for the Ni-SIa state of the enzyme. One-electron reduction of [1a](+) affords the S = 1/2 derivative [1a](0), which, according to density functional theory (DFT) calculations and electron paramagnetic resonance and Mössbauer spectroscopies, is best described as a Ni(I)Fe(II) compound. The Ni(I)Fe(II) assignment matches that for the Ni-L state in [NiFe]-hydrogenase, unlike recently reported Ni(II)Fe(I)-based models. Compound [1a](0) reacts with strong acids to liberate 0.5 equiv of H2 and regenerate [1a](+), indicating that H2 evolution is catalyzed by [1a](0). DFT calculations were used to investigate the pathway for H2 evolution and revealed that the mechanism can proceed through two isomers of [1a](0) that differ in the stereochemistry of the Fe(dppe)CO center. Calculations suggest that protonation of [1a](0) (both isomers) affords Ni(III)-H-Fe(II) intermediates, which represent mimics of the Ni-C state of the enzyme.

Hydrogenase cluster biosynthesis: organometallic chemistry nature's way

It has been over a decade now since it was revealed that the metal containing active sites of hydrogenases possess carbonyl and cyanide ligands bound to iron. The presence of these ligands in hydrogenases came as a surprise and to-date these ligands have not been observed to be associated with any other enzymatic metallocenter. The elucidation of the structures of these unique metalloenzymes and their associated metal clusters created opportunity for a number of different lines of research. For synthetic chemists, the structures of hydrogenase active sites have provided attractive targets for syntheses that advance our understanding of the electronic structure and reactivity of these unique enzyme active sites. These efforts contribute to the synthesis of first row transition metal catalysts for hydrogen oxidation and hydrogen production that could have significant impacts on alternative and renewable energy solutions. Although effective synthetic approaches have been identified to generate models with a high degree of similarity to these active sites, the details of how these metal clusters are synthesized biochemically have not been resolved. Since hydrogen metabolism is presumed to be an early feature in the energetics of life and hydrogen metabolizing organisms can be traced very early in molecular phylogeny, the metal clusters at hydrogenase active sites are presumed to be among the earliest of known co-factors. Comparison of mineral based precursors and synthetic cluster analog chemistry to what is observed in contemporary biological systems may shed light on how proto-metabolically relevant catalysts first arose prebiotically by the processes of adoption of pre-existing functionality and ligand assisted catalysis.