Blay JY, Koscielny S, Trédaniel J, Asselain B, Goldwasser F, Misset JL, de Labareyre C, Hagège C, Bismut H, Marty M. Rationale and delineation of a composite index of relative antitumoural efficacy (In-RATE).
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2007;
64:106-14. [PMID:
17681785 DOI:
10.1016/j.critrevonc.2007.04.013]
[Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/30/2005] [Revised: 04/20/2007] [Accepted: 04/20/2007] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Over the last decades, the development of new drugs has allowed cancer patients to experience several lines of chemotherapy, the objective of which is a long term stabilization of the tumour. The objectives of this work was to delineate a composite index of relative antitumoural efficacy (In-RATE) of a regimen over another, including response rate (RR), median time to progression (TTP) and progression rate (PR). When considering two treatments a and b, the In-RATE was defined as RRa/RRb x TTPa/TTPb x PRb/PRa. Values significantly superior or inferior to 1 reveal an advantage for treatment a or b, respectively. The applicability of the In-RATE to published randomized trials in four frequent tumour types (colorectal, non-small cell lung, advanced ovarian and metastatic breast cancers) was suggested to more precisely distinguish the effects of different drugs, and sometimes to detect a significant difference when the published data did not conclude to statistical difference.
Collapse