Principles of genetic variations and molecular diseases: applications in hemophilia A

Blood-Induced Arthropathy: A Major Disabling Complication of Haemophilia

Haemophilic arthropathy (HA) is one of the most serious complications of haemophilia. It starts with joint bleeding, leading to synovitis which, in turn, can cause damage to the cartilage and subchondral bone, eventually inducing degenerative joint disease. Despite significant improvements in haemophilia treatment over the past two decades and recent guidelines from ISTH and WFH recommending FVIII trough levels of at least 3 IU/dL during prophylaxis, patients with haemophilia still develop joint disease. The pathophysiology of HA is complex, involving both inflammatory and degenerative components. Early diagnosis is key for proper management. Imaging can detect joint subclinical changes and influence prophylaxis. Magnetic resonance imagining (MRI) and ultrasound are the most frequently used methods in comprehensive haemophilia care centres. Biomarkers of joint health have been proposed to determine osteochondral joint deterioration, but none of these biomarkers has been validated or used in clinical practice. Early prophylaxis is key in all severe haemophilia patients to prevent arthropathy. Treatment is essentially based on prophylaxis intensification and chronic joint pain management. However, there remain significant gaps in the knowledge of the mechanisms responsible for HA and prognosis-influencing factors. Better understanding in this area could produce more effective interventions likely to ultimately prevent or attenuate the development of HA.

Comprehensive Analysis of Hemophilia A (CAHEA): Towards Full Characterization of the F8 Gene Variants by Long-Read Sequencing

BACKGROUND

 Hemophilia A (HA) is the most frequently occurring X-linked bleeding disorder caused by heterogeneous variants in the F8 gene, one of the largest genes known. Conventional molecular analysis of F8 requires a combination of assays, usually including long-range polymerase chain reaction (LR-PCR) or inverse-PCR for inversions, Sanger sequencing or next-generation sequencing for single-nucleotide variants (SNVs) and indels, and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification for large deletions or duplications.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 This study aimed to develop a LR-PCR and long-read sequencing-based assay termed comprehensive analysis of hemophilia A (CAHEA) for full characterization of F8 variants. The performance of CAHEA was evaluated in 272 samples from 131 HA pedigrees with a wide spectrum of F8 variants by comparing to conventional molecular assays.

RESULTS

 CAHEA identified F8 variants in all the 131 pedigrees, including 35 intron 22-related gene rearrangements, 3 intron 1 inversion (Inv1), 85 SNVs and indels, 1 large insertion, and 7 large deletions. The accuracy of CAHEA was also confirmed in another set of 14 HA pedigrees. Compared with the conventional methods combined altogether, CAHEA assay demonstrated 100% sensitivity and specificity for identifying various types of F8 variants and had the advantages of directly determining the break regions/points of large inversions, insertions, and deletions, which enabled analyzing the mechanisms of recombination at the junction sites and pathogenicity of the variants.

CONCLUSION

 CAHEA represents a comprehensive assay toward full characterization of F8 variants including intron 22 and intron 1 inversions, SNVs/indels, and large insertions and deletions, greatly improving the genetic screening and diagnosis for HA.

F8 gene inversion and duplication cause no obvious hemophilia A phenotype

Hemophilia A (HA, OMIM#306700) is an X-linked recessive bleeding disorder caused by the defects in the F8 gene, which encodes coagulation factor VIII (FVIII). Intron 22 inversion (Inv22) is found in about 45% of patients with severe hemophilia A. Here, we reported a male without obvious hemophilia A phenotype but bearing an inherited segmental variant duplication encompassing F8 as well as Inv22. The duplication was approximately 0.16 Mb and involved from exon 1 to intron 22 of F8. This partial duplication and Inv22 in F8 was first found in the abortion tissue of his older sister with recurrent miscarriage. The genetic testing of his family revealed that his phenotypically normal older sister and mother also had this heterozygous Inv22 and a 0.16 Mb partial duplication of F8, while his father was genotypically normal. The integrity of the F8 gene transcript was verified by sequencing of the adjacent exons at the inversion breakpoint, which explained why this male had no phenotype for hemophilia A. Interestingly, although he had no significant hemophilia A phenotype, the expression of C1QA in his mother, sister, and the male subject was only about half of that in his father and normal population. Our report broadens the mutation spectrum of F8 inversion and duplication and its pathogenicity in hemophilia A.

Prenatal diagnosis for hemophilia A (intron 22 inversion) reveals a rare association with Klinefelter syndrome with diagnostic difficulties in molecular interpretation

Hemophilia A is an X-linked recessive disorder caused by genetic abnormalities in the F8 . Klinefelter syndrome is sex chromosome aneuploidy caused by nondisjunction during meiosis in the germ cells or mitotic cell divisions in the early embryonic cells. We here report an intriguing case of a prenatal diagnosis where a rare association of hemophilia A and Klinefelter syndrome was found in a fetus. This case highlights the diagnostic difficulty where the inverse-PCR for intron 22 inversion defect leading to hemophilia A did not amplify. Indirect molecular testing was done using multiallelic extragenic variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) DXS52 (St14) and polymorphic markers. The interpretation was further complicated by the presence of Klinefelter syndrome. This case highlights the challenges faced when such rare combinations are found during prenatal diagnosis.

Accessibility and visibility of genetic testing for haemophilia across Europe: Where do we stand?

INTRODUCTION

Haemophilia is characterized by bleeding complications resulting from clotting factor VIII (FVIII) or IX (FIX) deficiency. Identifying the causal pathogenic genetic variant denotes a vital aspect of haemophilia management.

AIM

This study evaluated the accessibility and performances of genetic testing for haemophilia across Europe. The types of genetic analyses, techniques used, turn-around time (TAT) and costs were collected and analysed, as were data updating and quality control.

METHODS

Reported data were retrieved from open access resources, including international databases, Google, laboratory websites, PubMed and government organizations.

RESULTS

Overall, 51 genetic laboratories across 15 European countries providing recently updated molecular haemophilia testing were identified. Gene sequencing for small variants of both F8 and F9 genes was provided in most surveyed laboratories. Almost two-thirds of them offer analysis for inversions using a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) method and detection of copy number variation (CNV) using multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Cost and TAT were found to vary considerably. In total, 74% of laboratories exhibited a last modified date or change history. The same percentage of laboratories was in possession of an ISO 15189 standard accreditation, whereas only few of them recently performed external quality assessment schemes (EQA) for haemophilia.

CONCLUSION

Despite several initiatives to improve access to genetic testing for haemophilia, such access must still be improved. Our study similarly revealed the large heterogeneity of the variants tested, techniques employed, TAT, cost and quality among the surveyed laboratories.

Comprehensive analysis of F8 large deletions: Characterization of full breakpoint junctions and description of a possible DNA breakage hotspot in intron 6

BACKGROUND

Large F8 deletions represent 3-5% of the variations found in severe hemophilia A patients, but only a few deletion breakpoints have been characterized precisely.

OBJECTIVES

Resolving at the nucleotide level 24 F8 large deletions to provide new data on the mechanisms involved in these rearrangements.

METHODS

Breakpoint junctions of 24 F8 large deletions were characterized using a combination of long-range polymerase chain reaction, whole F8 NGS sequencing, and Sanger sequencing. Repeat elements, non-B DNA, and secondary structures were analyzed around the breakpoints.

RESULTS

Deletions ranged from 1.667 kb to 0.5 Mb in size. Nine involved F8 neighboring genes. Simple blunt ends and 2-4 bp microhomologies were identified at the breakpoint junctions of 10 (42%) and 8 (33%) deletions, respectively. Five (21%) deletions resulted from homeologous recombination between two Alu elements. The remaining case corresponded to a more complex rearrangement with an insertion of a 19 bp-inverted sequence at the junction. Four different breakpoints were located in a 562-bp region in F8 intron 6. This finding suggested that this region, composed of two Alu elements, is a DNA breakage hotspot. Non-B DNA and secondary structures were identified in the junction regions and may contribute to DNA breakage.

CONCLUSION

Molecular characterization of deletion breakpoints revealed that non-homologous non-replicative DNA repair mechanisms and replication-based mechanisms seemed to be the main causative mechanisms of F8 large deletions. Moreover, we identified a possible F8 DNA breakage hotspot involved in non-recurrent rearrangements.

Results of genetic analysis of 11 341 participants enrolled in the My Life, Our Future hemophilia genotyping initiative in the United States

BACKGROUND

Hemophilia A (HA) and hemophilia B (HB) are rare inherited bleeding disorders. Although causative genetic variants are clinically relevant, in 2012 only 20% of US patients had been genotyped.

OBJECTIVES

My Life, Our Future (MLOF) was a multisector cross-sectional US initiative to improve our understanding of hemophilia through widespread genotyping.

METHODS

Subjects and potential genetic carriers were enrolled at US hemophilia treatment centers (HTCs). Bloodworks performed genotyping and returned results to providers. Clinical data were abstracted from the American Thrombosis and Hemostasis Network dataset. Community education was provided by the National Hemophilia Foundation.

RESULTS

From 2013 to 2017, 107 HTCs enrolled 11 341 subjects (68.8% male, 31.2% female) for testing for HA (n = 8976), HB (n = 2358), HA/HB (n = 3), and hemophilia not otherwise specified (n = 4). Variants were detected in most male patients (98.2%% HA, 98.1% HB). 1914 unique variants were found (1482 F8, 431 F9); 744 were novel (610 F8, 134 F9). Inhibitor data were available for 6986 subjects (5583 HA; 1403 HB). In severe HA, genotypes with the highest inhibitor rates were large deletions (77/80), complex intron 22 inversions (9/17), and no variant found (7/14). In severe HB, the highest rates were large deletions (24/42). Inhibitors were reported in 27.3% of Black versus 16.2% of White patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of MLOF are reported, the largest hemophilia genotyping project performed to date. The results support the need for comprehensive genetic approaches in hemophilia. This effort has contributed significantly towards better understanding variation in the F8 and F9 genes in hemophilia and risks of inhibitor formation.

Genome-Wide Identification of Long Noncoding RNA and Their Potential Interactors in ISWI Mutants

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) have been identified as key regulators of gene expression and participate in many vital physiological processes. Chromatin remodeling, being an important epigenetic modification, has been identified in many biological activities as well. However, the regulatory mechanism of lncRNA in chromatin remodeling remains unclear. In order to characterize the genome-wide lncRNA expression and their potential interacting factors during this process in Drosophila, we investigated the expression pattern of lncRNAs and mRNAs based on the transcriptome analyses and found significant differences between lncRNAs and mRNAs. Then, we performed TSA-FISH experiments of candidate lncRNAs and their potential interactors that have different functions in Drosophila embryos to determine their expression pattern. In addition, we also analyzed the expression of transposable elements (TEs) and their interactors to explore their expression in ISWI mutants. Our results provide a new perspective for understanding the possible regulatory mechanism of lncRNAs and TEs as well as their targets in chromatin remodeling.

The Ribosomal Protein RpL22 Interacts In Vitro with 5′-UTR Sequences Found in Some Drosophila melanogaster Transposons

Mobility of eukaryotic transposable elements (TEs) are finely regulated to avoid an excessive mutational load caused by their movement. The transposition of retrotransposons is usually regulated through the interaction of host- and TE-encoded proteins, with non-coding regions (LTR and 5′-UTR) of the transposon. Examples of new potent cis-acting sequences, identified and characterized in the non-coding regions of retrotransposons, include the insulator of gypsy and Idefix, and the enhancer of ZAM of Drosophila melanogaster. Recently we have shown that in the 5′-UTR of the LTR-retrotransposon ZAM there is a sequence structured in tandem-repeat capable of operating as an insulator both in Drosophila (S2R⁺) and human cells (HEK293). Here, we test the hypothesis that tandem repeated 5′-UTR of a different LTR-retrotransposon could accommodate similar regulatory elements. The comparison of the 5′-UTR of some LTR-transposons allowed us to identify a shared motif of 13 bp, called Transposable Element Redundant Motif (TERM). Surprisingly, we demonstrated, by Yeast One-Hybrid assay, that TERM interacts with the D. melanogaster ribosomal protein RpL22. The Drosophila RpL22 has additional Ala-, Lys- and Pro-rich sequences at the amino terminus, which resembles the carboxy-terminal portion of histone H1 and histone H5. For this reason, it has been hypothesized that RpL22 might have two functions, namely the role in organizing the ribosome, and a potential regulatory role involving DNA-binding similar to histone H1, which represses transcription in Drosophila. In this paper, we show, by two independent sets of experiments, that DmRpL22 is able to directly and specifically bind DNA of Drosophila melanogaster.

Pairing of single mutations yields obligate Cre-type site-specific recombinases

Tyrosine site-specific recombinases (SSRs) represent a versatile genome editing tool with considerable therapeutic potential. Recent developments to engineer and evolve SSRs into heterotetramers to improve target site flexibility signified a critical step towards their broad utility in genome editing. However, SSR monomers can form combinations of different homo- and heterotetramers in cells, increasing their off-target potential. Here, we discover that two paired mutations targeting residues implicated in catalysis lead to simple obligate tyrosine SSR systems, where the presence of all distinct subunits to bind as a heterotetramer is obligatory for catalysis. Therefore, only when the paired mutations are applied as single mutations on each recombinase subunit, the engineered SSRs can efficiently recombine the intended target sequence, while the subunits carrying the point mutations expressed in isolation are inactive. We demonstrate the utility of the obligate SSR system to improve recombination specificity of a designer-recombinase for a therapeutic target in human cells. Furthermore, we show that the mutations render the naturally occurring SSRs, Cre and Vika, obligately heteromeric for catalytic proficiency, providing a straight-forward approach to improve their applied properties. These results facilitate the development of safe and effective therapeutic designer-recombinases and advance our mechanistic understanding of SSR catalysis.

Correction of a Factor VIII genomic inversion with designer-recombinases

Despite advances in nuclease-based genome editing technologies, correcting human disease-causing genomic inversions remains a challenge. Here, we describe the potential use of a recombinase-based system to correct the 140 kb inversion of the F8 gene frequently found in patients diagnosed with severe Hemophilia A. Employing substrate-linked directed molecular evolution, we develop a coupled heterodimeric recombinase system (RecF8) achieving 30% inversion of the target sequence in human tissue culture cells. Transient RecF8 treatment of endothelial cells, differentiated from patient-derived induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) of a hemophilic donor, results in 12% correction of the inversion and restores Factor VIII mRNA expression. In this work, we present designer-recombinases as an efficient and specific means towards treatment of monogenic diseases caused by large gene inversions.

Correction of disease-causing large genomic inversions remains challenging. Here, the authors developed a dual designer-recombinase system (RecF8) that efficiently corrects a 140 kb inversion frequently found in patients with severe Hemophilia A.

Complete characterisation of two new large Xq28 duplications involving F8 using whole genome sequencing in patients without haemophilia A

INTRODUCTION

Depending on the location of insertion of the gained region, F8 duplications can have variable clinical impacts from benign impact to severe haemophilia A phenotype.

AIM

To characterize two large Xq28 duplications involving F8 incidentally detected by chromosome microarray analysis (CMA) in two patients presenting severe intellectual disability but no history of bleeding disorder.

METHODS

Whole genome sequencing (WGS) was performed in order to characterize the two large Xq28 duplications at nucleotide level.

RESULTS

In patient 1, a 60-73 kb gained region encompassing the exons 23-26 of F8 and SMIM9 was inserted at the int22h-2 locus following a non-homologous recombination between int22h-1 and int22h-2. We hypothesized that two independent events, micro-homology-mediated break-induced replication (MMBIR) and break-induced replication (BIR), could be involved in this rearrangement. In patient 2, the CMA found duplication from 101 to 116-kb long encompassing the exons 16-26 of F8 and SMIM9. The WGS analysis identified a more complex rearrangement with the presence of three genomic junctions. Due to the multiple micro-homologies observed at breakpoints, a replication-based mechanism such as fork stalling and template switching (FoSTeS) was greatly suspected. In both cases, these complex rearrangements preserved an intact copy of the F8.

CONCLUSION

This study highlights the value of WGS to characterize the genomic junction at the nucleotide level and ultimately better describe the molecular mechanisms involved in Xq28 structural variations. It also emphasizes the importance of specifying the structure of the genomic gain in order to improve genotype-phenotype correlation and genetic counselling.

Case Report: Identification of a de novo Missense Mutation in the F8 Gene, p.(Phe690Leu)/c.2070C > A, Causing Hemophilia A: A Case Report

Hemophilia A is an X-linked recessive bleeding disorder caused by various types of pathological defects in the factor VIII gene (F8/FVIII). Preimplantation genetic testing for monogenic disease (PGT-M) is a powerful tool to tackle the transmission of monogenic inherited disorders from generation to generation. In our case, a mutation in F8 had passed through female carriers in a hemophilia A family and resulted in two male patients with hemophilia A. To identify the etiological genetic variants of F8, next-generation sequencing (NGS) was used for chromosome copy number variation detection, Sanger sequencing to verify mutation sites, single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) for site amplification, and sequencing to validate the genetic linkage. Finally, a novel missense mutation, p. (Phe690Leu)/c.2070C > A, occurring in exon 13 of F8, was screened out as a pathogenic mutation. Following this, an F8 normal euploid blastocyst was transferred. At the 18th week, the pregnant mother underwent amniocentesis, NGS, Sanger sequencing, and SNP typing that further confirmed that the fetus had a healthy genotype. After delivery, a neonatal blood sample was sent for FVIII concentration detection, and the result established that the FVIII protein was rescued to a nearly average level. We first identified a new type of pathogenic mutation in F8, which has not been previously reported, selected a genetically healthy progeny for an affected family, and provided valuable knowledge of the diagnosis and treatment of hemophilia A.

Aberrant X chromosomal rearrangement through multi-step template switching during sister chromatid formation in a patient with severe hemophilia A

Background

Hemophilia A (HA) is an X‐linked recessive bleeding disorder caused by pathogenic variants of the coagulation factor VIII gene (F8). Half of the patients with severe HA have a recurrent inversion in the X chromosome, that is, F8 intron 22 or intron 1 inversion. Here, we characterized an abnormal F8 due to atypical complex X chromosome rearrangements in a Japanese patient with severe HA.

Methods

Recurrent F8 inversions were tested with inverse shifting‐PCR. The genomic structure was investigated using PCR‐based direct sequencing or quantitative PCR.

Results

The proband's X chromosome had a 119.5 kb insertion, a reverse duplex of an extragenic sequence on the F8 telomere region into the F8 intron 1 with two breakpoints. The telomeric breakpoint was a joining from the F8 intron 1 to the inverted FUNDC2 via a two‐base microhomology, and the centromeric breakpoint was a recombination between F8 intron 1 homologous sequences. The rearrangement mechanism was suggested as a multi‐step rearrangement with template switching such as fork stalling and template switching (FoSTeS)/microhomology‐mediated break‐induced replication (MMBIR) and/or homologous sequence‐associated recombination during a sister chromatid formation.

Conclusion

We identified the aberrant X chromosome with a split F8 due to a multi‐step rearrangement in a patient with severe HA.

Incidental finding of unreported large duplication in F8 gene during prenatal analysis: Which management for genetic counselling?

Detection of incidental finding and variant of unknown significance (VUS) during prenatal diagnosis has particularly increased with the emergence of genetic tests such chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA). Many factors and clear guidelines need to be applied in the interpretation of the potential clinical consequences of unreported complex copy number variations (deletions/duplications). From a clinical case where an unreported and not completely intragenic duplication in F8 gene has been identified in a 12-week-old fetus without haemophilia A history documented in the family, we will examine and study the difficulties of interpretation and the challenges that the detection of such variant has on genetic counselling.

Laboratory hemostasis: from biology to the bench

Physiological hemostasis is an intricate biological system, where procoagulant and anticoagulant forces interplay and preserves blood fluidity when blood vessels are intact, or trigger clot formation to prevent excessive bleeding when blood vessels are injured. The modern model of hemostasis is divided into two principal phases. The first, defined as primary hemostasis, involves the platelet-vessel interplay, whilst the second, defined as secondary hemostasis, mainly involves coagulation factors, damaged cells and platelet surfaces, where the so-called coagulation cascade rapidly develops. The activation and amplification of the coagulation cascade is finely modulated by the activity of several physiological inhibitors. Once bleeding has been efficiently stopped by blood clot formation, dissolution of the thrombus is essential to restore vessel permeability. This process, known as fibrinolysis, also develops through coordinate action of a vast array of proteins and enzymes. An accurate diagnosis of hemostasis disturbance entails a multifaceted approach, encompassing family and personal history of hemostatic disorders, accurate collection of clinical signs and symptoms, integrated with laboratory hemostasis testing. Regarding laboratory testing, a reasonable approach entails classifying hemostasis testing according to cost, complexity and available clinical information. Laboratory workout may hence initiate with some rapid and inexpensive "screening" tests, characterized by high negative predictive value, then followed by second- or third-line analyses, specifically aimed to clarify the nature and severity of bleeding or thrombotic phenotype. This article aims to provide a general overview of the hemostatic process, and to provide some general suggestions to optimally facilitate laboratory hemostasis testing.

Bleeding risk assessment in hemophilia A carriers from Dakar, Senegal

: Hemophilia A carriers have an abnormal X chromosome with a molecular abnormality of FVIII gene. These carriers, long considered to be free of bleeding risk, could have the same symptoms as mild hemophiliacs. This study aim to assess bleeding risk of hemophilia A carriers monitored at the Clinical Hematology Department of Dakar. This is a prospective study of a period of 6 months including 22 hemophilia A carriers aged between 8 and 48 years. Hemophilia carriers were recruited using the genealogical tree of hemophiliacs followed in the service. Their diagnosis was carried out by long range PCR and Sanger sequencing method searching the molecular abnormality responsible for hemophilia in their family. Bleeding risk was determined using a questionnaire consisting of different bleeding symptoms quoted from -1 to 4 according to the severity. Total of different values allow to determine the bleeding score which was pathological if it was greater than or equal to 1. Medium age was 22.5 years (8-48) (SD = 9.28). Four hemophilia A carriers (18.1%) presented bleeding symptoms and had a bleeding score at least 1 (P = 0.02). Menorrhagia was predominant (13.6%) followed by epistaxis (9%), gingivorrhagia (9%), and prolonged bleeding after tooth extraction (9%). Factor VIII level was lower in hemophilia carriers who presented bleeding (42 ± 8.61 UI/l) versus hemophilia carriers without bleeding (100 ± 50.95 UI/l) (P = 0.001). There was no significant correlation between bleeding occurrence and age (P = 0.81), activated patial thromboplastin time value (P = 0.97) and FVIII/Von Willebrand Factor ratio (P = 0.12). One in five hemophilia carriers presented bleeding and the questionnaire was effective to identify hemophilia carriers who had a risk of bleeding.

Transposable elements in Drosophila

Transposable elements (TEs) are mobile genetic elements that can mobilize within host genomes. As TEs comprise more than 40% of the human genome and are linked to numerous diseases, understanding their mechanisms of mobilization and regulation is important. Drosophila melanogaster is an ideal model organism for the study of eukaryotic TEs as its genome contains a diverse array of active TEs. TEs universally impact host genome size via transposition and deletion events, but may also adopt unique functional roles in host organisms. There are 2 main classes of TEs: DNA transposons and retrotransposons. These classes are further divided into subgroups of TEs with unique structural and functional characteristics, demonstrating the significant variability among these elements. Despite this variability, D. melanogaster and other eukaryotic organisms utilize conserved mechanisms to regulate TEs. This review focuses on the transposition mechanisms and regulatory pathways of TEs, and their functional roles in D. melanogaster.

Intrinsic Molecular Processes: Impact on Mutagenesis

Mutations provide resources for genome evolution by generating genetic variability. In addition, mutations act as a driving force leading to disease pathogenesis, and thus have important implications for disease diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment. Understanding the mechanisms underlying how mutations occur is therefore of prime importance for elucidating evolutionary and pathogenic processes. Recent genomics studies have revealed that mutations occur non-randomly across the human genome. In particular, the distribution of mutations is highly associated with intrinsic molecular processes including transcription, chromatin organization, DNA replication timing, and DNA repair. Interplay between intrinsic processes and extrinsic mutagenic exposure may thus imprint a characteristic mutational landscape on tumors. We discuss the impact of intrinsic molecular processes on mutation acquisition in cancer.

[New developments in molecularbiological diagnostic]

Today, we have access to excellent and advanced molecular methods that are already widely used. This requires rules to control the quality of the methods as well as the laboratory. Both aspects will be discussed in the article. Following the isolation of nucleic acids they are used for genotyping which allows to address several questions: diagnosis of inherited diseases, inherited predispositions, forensic analyses, identification and typing of bacteria or viruses, elucidation of evolutionary aspects. Importantly, it has to be realized that the type and heterogeneity of phenotypically relevant mutations determines the method used for testing. Today, most laboratories use either PCR analyses or Sanger sequencing for diagnostic applications. However, increasingly next generation sequencing (NGS) is applied. The clinical use of NGS is still very challenging, but we can expect that the switch to regular application of this method will be coming in the very near future. The price for NGS has gone down to approx. USD 1000,- which makes the routine diagnostic use feasible. Nevertheless, several challenges have yet to be solved, such as the processing of the large data volume as well as storage of the data. Supporting data bases exist already and some will be discussed in the article. The understanding of the clinical relevance of many polymorphisms is another issue that has yet to be solved, particularly as in the context of personalized medicine polymorphisms have become increasingly important.