Modern radiotherapy in cancer treatment during pregnancy

Management of multiple myeloma presenting as malignant spinal cord compression during pregnancy: a case report

not included as this is letter to the editor.

A Case of Radiotherapy During Pregnancy for Oropharyngeal Cancer: Long-Term Pediatric Outcome Evaluation and Literature Review

Oropharyngeal cancer (OphC) is extremely rare during pregnancy, although its incidence is expected to increase in the years to come. Any delay in treatment can heavily affect cancer control and survival. Information regarding radiation therapy during pregnancy and long-term pediatric outcomes is lacking. In this article, we discuss a case of OphC in a pregnant woman, treated with surgery and radiation therapy, offering also an updated review with respect to the limited current evidence of the feasibility and clinical results of radiation therapy during pregnancy. A 39-year-old pregnant woman (through assisted fertilization) with locally advanced OphC underwent surgery and subsequent radiation therapy. A special fetal shielding device and a modified planning optimization strategy were used to reduce the dose to the fetus as much as possible. Phantom and in vivo dosimetry were performed to estimate the dose to the fetus and the related risks, according to International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP) publication 90. Thanks to the actions taken, the mean dose to the fetus was estimated to be around 50 mSv. A healthy baby was born at 33 weeks of gestation + 6 days. After a 10-year follow-up, the patient is in complete remission, and her 16-year-old daughter is healthy with good school performance. Adjuvant radiation therapy in OphC during pregnancy may be optimized to reduce the dose to the fetus, and the measures taken represent a realistic option to ensure the mother and baby's health.

Long-term neurocognitive, psychosocial, and physical outcomes after prenatal exposure to radiotherapy: a multicentre cohort study of the International Network on Cancer, Infertility, and Pregnancy

BACKGROUND

The main data available on the safety of radiation during pregnancy originate from animal studies and from studies of survivors of atomic or nuclear disasters. The effect of radiotherapy to treat maternal cancer on fetal development is uncertain. This report presents a unique cohort and aims to determine the long-term neurocognitive, psychosocial and physical outcomes of offspring of mothers treated with radiotherapy during pregnancy.

METHODS

In this international, multicentre, mixed retrospective-prospective cohort study, we recruited participants between Aug 5, 2006, and Aug 24, 2023, aged between 1·5 and 46 years, at three referral centres in Belgium, the Netherlands, and the USA. Participants were eligible if they were born from mothers treated with radiotherapy during pregnancy. Fetal radiation doses were obtained from medical records and participants were followed up at predefined ages (1·5, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15, and 18 years) and 5-yearly in adulthood, based on age at enrolment, using a neurocognitive test battery (measuring intelligence, attention, and memory), parent-reported executive function and psychosocial questionnaires, and a medical assessment. Results were compared with test-specific normative data. Linear regression models investigated associations between radiotherapy factors (fetal radiation dose, gestational age at the start and end of radiotherapy, and radiotherapy duration) and outcomes.

FINDINGS

68 maternal cases of radiotherapy during pregnancy were registered by the three participating centres, of which 61 resulted in a livebirth and were therefore eligible to participate in the child follow-up study. After excluding those who did not give consent, 43 participants born from 42 mothers treated with radiotherapy during pregnancy were included in the study (median age at first assessment 3 years [IQR 2-11]; median age at last assessment 12 years [9-18]; median number of assessments two [1-4]). 18 (42%) of the included participants were female and 25 (58%) male, and 37 (86%) were of White ethnicity. Mean neurocognitive outcomes of the entire cohort were within normal ranges. No associations were found with fetal radiation dose or timing of radiotherapy during pregnancy. Six (16%) of 38 participants with neurocognitive outcomes scored lower than one SD on at least one neurocognitive outcome, three (7%) reported chronic medical conditions (spasmophilia, spastic diplegia, and IgG deficiency), and three (7%) were diagnosed with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (of whom two scored lower on attention). Of ten (23%) participants with lower neurocognitive score(s), a chronic medical condition, or attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder, eight were born preterm. The remaining 33 (77%) participants showed no neurocognitive, psychosocial, or chronic physical problems.

INTERPRETATION

We show on average normal neurocognitive, psychosocial, and physical outcomes after prenatal exposure to radiotherapy. Differences in outcomes could not be explained by exposure to radiotherapy during pregnancy. These results suggest that extra-abdomino-pelvic radiotherapy exposure during pregnancy in general does not adversely affect outcomes of liveborn children. Further research with a larger sample is necessary to confirm these findings.

FUNDING

Kom Op Tegen Kanker, KWF Kankerbestrijding, Stichting Tegen Kanker, Research Foundation Flanders.

Radiation oncology department policy development for patients who may become pregnant

In the context of radiation oncology, radiation exposure from radiation therapy simulation, image guidance, and radiation therapy procedures can have severe adverse biological effects on a developing embryo or fetus. Patients who may be pregnant are screened for the possibility of pregnancy to prevent unnecessary or excessive exposure of radiation in utero. Some radiation therapy patients for whom a pregnancy test is indicated may elect to decline the test. In addition, some patients who are found upon screening to be pregnant may decide, with their attending radiation oncologist, to continue with treatment. A radiation oncology department policy was developed to provide guidelines regarding screening and consent. The policy was designed to prevent unnecessary exposure to patients who may be pregnant, and to limit dose to the embryo or fetus in patients for whom treatment is medically indicated. The policy is presented as an example for physicists intending to develop or revise their own practice's policy regarding patients who may become pregnant.

Cancer in pregnancy: treatment effects

PURPOSE

Pregnant patients present a unique challenge to cancer therapy. Due to the potential catastrophic implications related to teratogenic effects or pregnancy loss, oncologic management of this vulnerable patient group must be strategic and personalized.

METHODS

This article will discuss the unique treatment approach to the pregnant cancer patient. This includes discussion of the role of imaging during staging, treatment, and follow-up with an emphasis on avoiding ionizing radiation when possible.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Specific considerations and modifications to standard cancer treatments, including surgery and systemic therapies such as chemotherapy, immunotherapy, targeted and hormone therapies are crucial components of providing oncologic care to minimize negative effects to the mother and developing fetus. Radiation and proton therapy are also options that may be employed in specific circumstances. Finally, this article will address the long-term treatment effects of these therapies on future fertility.

A review on fetal dose in Radiotherapy: A historical to contemporary perspective

This paper aims to review on fetal dose in radiotherapy and extends and updates on a previous work¹ to include proton therapy. Out-of-field doses, which are the doses received by regions outside of the treatment field, are unavoidable regardless of the treatment modalities used during radiotherapy. In the case of pregnant patients, fetal dose is a major concern as it has long been recognized that fetuses exposed to radiation have a higher probability of suffering from adverse effects such as anatomical malformations and even fetal death, especially when the 0.1Gy threshold is exceeded. In spite of the low occurrence of cancer during pregnancy, the radiotherapy team should be equipped with the necessary knowledge to deal with fetal dose. This is crucial so as to ensure that the fetus is adequately protected while not compromising the patient treatment outcomes. In this review paper, various aspects of fetal dose will be discussed ranging from biological, clinical to the physics aspects. Other than fetal dose resulting from conventional photon therapy, this paper will also extend the discussion to modern treatment modalities and techniques, namely proton therapy and image-guided radiotherapy, all of which have seen a significant increase in use in current radiotherapy. This review is expected to provide readers with a comprehensive understanding of fetal dose in radiotherapy, and to be fully aware of the steps to be taken in providing radiotherapy for pregnant patients.

Direct and indirect effects on child neurocognitive development when maternal cancer is diagnosed during pregnancy: What do we know so far?

Cancer during pregnancy threatens the lives of mother and foetus and its incidence is rising, making it an emerging medical challenge. Evidence on the direct impact of cancer therapies on neonatal outcomes resulted in general guidelines for maternal treatment that safeguards foetal development. Less focus has been placed on indirect factors, in pre- and postnatal periods, that may exert long-term impacts specifically on child neurocognition. Foetal development, in the context of maternal cancer during pregnancy, may be influenced directly by exposure to cancer diagnostics and (co-)treatment, or indirectly through maternal inflammation, malnutrition, hormonal fluctuations, prematurity, and psycho-biological stress. Maternal stress and insecure mother-infant bonding related to postpartum cancer treatment may further impact child cognitive-behavioural development. Understanding the independent and synergistic effects of the factors impacting neurocognitive development creates the opportunity to intervene during the oncological treatment to improve the child's long-term outcome, both by medical and psychosocial care and support.

Fetal dose estimation for Virtual Tangential-fields Arc Therapy whole breast irradiation by optically stimulated luminescence dosimeters

Breast cancer is the most frequently diagnosed tumor in pregnant women and radiation therapy should carefully be weighted up because of the dose to the fetus. The aim of this study was to investigate fetal dose in a patient treated with Virtual Tangential-fields Arc Therapy (ViTAT), an innovative technique for whole breast irradiation. Optically stimulated luminescence detectors (OSLDs) were calibrated on a Varian TrueBeam linac, with both a 6X and 6XFFF beam quality, and used for out-of-field measurements. Fetal dose related with ViTAT technique was compared to the standard 3D conformal radiation therapy technique (3DCRT). The fetal dose delivered with a ViTAT technique planned with 6XFFF beam was also investigated. Measurements were taken on a phantom composed of Rando Alderson Phantom slices and solid water slabs. OSLDs were placed in a region identified by the height of the fundus from conception to the twentieth week using a custom made PMMA grid. Due to the higher number of monitor units, the peripheral dose of ViTAT delivered with 6X beams is higher than that of 3DCRT. However, nanoDots measurements prove that ViTAT can be used in place of 3DCRT while maintaining similar fetal dose levels if 6XFFF beams are used.

Volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT): a review of clinical outcomes—what is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation?

Modern conformal radiation therapy using techniques such as modulation, image guidance and motion management have changed the face of radiotherapy today offering superior conformity, efficiency, and reproducibility to clinics worldwide. This review assesses the impact of these advanced radiotherapy techniques on patient toxicity and survival rates reported from January 2017 to September 2020. The main aims are to establish if dosimetric and efficiency gains correlate with improved survival and reduced toxicities and to answer the question ‘What is the clinical evidence for the most effective implementation of VMAT?’. Compared with 3DCRT, improvements have been reported with VMAT in prostate, locally advanced cervical carcinoma and various head and neck applications, leading to the shift in technology to VMAT. Other sites such as thoracic neoplasms and nasopharyngeal carcinomas have observed some improvement with VMAT although not in line with improved dosimetric measures, and the burden of toxicity and the incidence of cancer related deaths remain high, signaling the need to further mitigate toxicity and increase survival. As technological advancement continues, large randomised long-term clinical trials are required to determine the way-forward and offer site-specific recommendations. These studies are usually expensive and time consuming, therefore utilising pooled real-world data in a prospective nature can be an alternative solution to comprehensively assess the efficacy of modern radiotherapy techniques.

Proton therapy of a pregnant patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Background and purpose

Radiotherapy during pregnancy is rarely administered due to lack of data and practical challenges. This is the first detailed report of proton therapy as cancer treatment for a pregnant patient with nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Materials and methods

Pencil beam scanning proton therapy was prescribed to a pregnant patient to a total dose of 70 Gy (RBE) to the therapeutic CTV and 54.25 Gy to the prophylactic CTV, delivered in 35 fractions with a simultaneous integrated boost technique.

Results

Phantom measurements showed a thirty-fold decrease in fetal radiation dose when using proton compared to photon therapy, with a total fetal dose of 5.5 mSv for the complete proton treatment, compared to 185 and 298 mSv for the photon treatment with and without lead shielding, respectively. After adminstering proton therapy during pregnancy, at 39 weeks of gestation, a healthy boy with a birthweight on the 83th percentile was delivered. Pediatric follow-up at 2 months of age of the offspring showed normal growth and age-adequate motor development with no signs of neurological problems. MR follow-up of the tumor 3 months after the end of treatment showed complete remission.

Conclusion

This case demonstrates the potential of proton therapy for treatment during pregnancy.Compared to photon therapy, proton therapy can significantly limit fetal dose, while simultaneously offering a more optimized treatment to the patient.

Melanoma in pregnancy: Diagnosis and management in early-stage and advanced disease

Approximately one-third of women diagnosed with melanoma are of child-bearing age. The annual incidence of melanoma has risen steadily over the last 40 years, resulting in increasing numbers of women diagnosed with melanoma both during pregnancy, and post-partum. To date, there are no formal guidelines on the management of pregnancy associated melanoma (PAM), both early stage and metastatic. This article reviews the existing literature and provides a framework for the investigation and multidisciplinary management of PAM.

NVP-AUY922 alleviates radiation-induced lung injury via inhibition of autophagy-dependent ferroptosis

Radiation-induced lung injury (RILI) is a common complication of radiotherapy for which no effective interventions are available. NVP-AUY922, a resorcinylic isoxazole amide drug, exhibits anti-inflammatory, immunomodulatory, and therapeutic effects against various types of cancers. In this study, we explore the role and underlying mechanisms of NVP-AUY922 in the treatment of RILI. We established a model of BEAS-2B cell injury and a mouse model of RILI. Cell proliferation, death, gross weight, and survival rates of mice, and histological parameters were assessed. Additionally, inflammation-related indices and indicators related to ferroptosis were evaluated. Furthermore, immunofluorescence and co-immunoprecipitation were used to determine the interaction between GPX4, LAMP-2A, and HSC70. NVP-AUY922 significantly ameliorated radiation-induced lung tissue damage, inflammatory cell infiltration, proinflammatory cytokine release, and lung epithelial BEAS-2B cell damage. NVP-AUY922 markedly limited the activation of ferroptosis, which is involved in RILI. Mechanistically, NVP-AUY922 prevented chaperone-mediated autophagy of the GPX4 pathway in vitro and in vivo, and the autophagy inhibitor Baf-A1 significantly increased the level of GPX4 and alleviated lung inflammation. NVP-AUY922 can alleviate RILI by inhibiting chaperone-mediated lysosomal degradation of GPX4, demonstrating its potential as a novel protective agent against RILI.

Assessment of Fetal Dose and Health Effect to the Fetus from Breast Cancer Radiotherapy during Pregnancy

Decision for radiotherapy during the first trimester of pregnancy may occur, as patients may not realize their pregnancy at the very early stage. Since radiation dose can affect fetal development, the aim of this study was to evaluate fetal dose and associated deterministic effects and risks to the fetus from breast cancer radiotherapy of an 8-week pregnant patient. PHITS (Particle and Heavy Ion Transport code System) Monte Carlo simulation and the J-45 computational pregnancy phantom were used to simulate breast cancer radiotherapy from a 6 MV TrueBeam linear accelerator using the three dimensional-conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) technique with a prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) of 50 Gy. Once the fetal dose was evaluated, the occurrence of the deterministic effects and risks for developing stochastic effects in the fetus were assessed using the recommendations of NCRP Report No. 174, AAPM Report No. 50, and ICRP Publication 84. The fetal dose was evaluated to be 3.37 ± 2.66 mGy, suggesting that the fetus was expected to have no additional deterministic effects, while the risks for developing cancer and malfunctions were similar to that expected from exposure to background radiation. The comparison with the other studies showed that accurate consideration of fetal position and size was important for dose determination in the fetus, especially at the early pregnancy stage when the fetus is very small.

Radiotherapy and pregnancy

We present the updated recommendations of the French society for radiation oncology on radiotherapy and pregnancy. The occurrence of cancer during pregnancy is a rare event (approximately 1 in 1000 pregnancies). The risks for the embryo or the foetus depend on the gestational age at the time of irradiation. The main risks are malformations with microcephaly and mental retardation. There is also a risk of radiation-induced cancer in the unborn child. In the case of only supradiaphragmatic irradiation, radiotherapy can be performed most often in pregnant women without risk to the foetus. On the other hand, in the case of an indication for subdiaphragmatic irradiation, therapeutic termination of the pregnancy should be proposed. In all cases, when radiotherapy is chosen, a phantom estimation of the dose delivered to the foetus, confirmed by in vivo measurement, is recommended. Conformational radiotherapy is the preferred technique because of the lower dose delivered to the foetus (except in tumour locations where other techniques such as IMRT are recommended).

Evaluation and management of rectal bleeding in pregnancy

Rectal bleeding occurs in about 40% of pregnant women, and is predominantly attributed to benign perianal pathology (haemorrhoids or anal fissures). More sinister causes of rectal bleeding may be heralded by key red flag clinical and biochemical features. These features should be evaluated in all women with rectal bleeding. Imaging investigations or flexible sigmoidoscopy may be warranted. The latter can be performed safely by experienced operators in pregnant women. Women with evidence of haemodynamic compromise, elevated inflammatory markers, significant anaemia, signs of intestinal obstruction or compromise to the fetus should be evaluated urgently. Providers must be mindful of the changes in normal ranges for common haematological and biochemical parameters in pregnancy compared with the non-pregnant state. Faecal calprotectin is an established tool for identification of intestinal inflammation and is valid in pregnancy. An elevated faecal calprotectin level (≥ 50 µg/g) signifies a need for further diagnostic evaluation. Inflammatory bowel disease may present initially, or with worsening disease activity, in pregnancy. Expedient diagnosis with the use of faecal calprotectin, sigmoidoscopy with or without intestinal ultrasound, exclusion of alternative or compounding infective aetiologies, and institution of appropriate therapy are critical. Medical therapies for management of inflammatory bowel disease can be safely instituted in pregnancy. Colorectal cancer incidence is increasing in younger age groups, but fortunately remains rare. When diagnosed in pregnancy, colorectal cancer can be successfully and safely managed with a collaborative multidisciplinary team approach. Early diagnosis is key to optimising outcomes.

Cancer and Pregnancy: A Comprehensive Review

Cancer diagnosis and treatment in pregnant women is a challenging situation. A multidisciplinary network of specialists is required to guide both, the expecting mother and the unborn child through the diagnostic workup and the cytotoxic therapy, by balancing the respective risks and benefits. Tumor entity, stage, biology and gestational week at diagnosis determine the appropriate approach. As premature delivery emerged as one of the main risk factors for adverse long-term outcome of the progeny, it should be avoided, if reasonable from the oncological perspective. This article offers a comprehensive review with respect to the various aspects of cancer in pregnancy.

Anesthetic management of precise radiotherapy under apnea-like condition

Objective

To study the safety and feasibility of implementation of precise radiotherapy with inducement of an apnea-like condition.

Methods

Two patients with lung tumors underwent precise radiotherapy under an apnea-like condition. The apnea-like condition was induced 11 times between the two patients for tumor localization and treatment. The changes in the blood oxygen saturation, blood pressure, heart rate, and end-tidal carbon dioxide during the apnea-like periods were observed, and the incidence of adverse reactions was recorded.

Results

The average apnea-like time was 6.2 minutes (range, 3–9 minutes), and the average radiotherapy time was 4.6 minutes (range, 1–7 minutes). The lowest blood oxygen saturation level was 97%, with a change of <1%. The heart rate and average arterial blood pressure increased during the apnea-like periods. Contact sores appeared on the patients’ posterior pharyngeal wall after the first apnea-like period; no other adverse events occurred.

Conclusion

Precise radiotherapy under an apnea-like condition is safe and feasible for patients with lung tumors.

Breast cancer during pregnancy: retrospective institutional case series

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy associated breast cancer is a rare disease. It presents a unique entity of breast cancer with aggressive phenotype. The main aim was to evaluate how the international guidelines were followed in daily practice.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data concerning patients' and tumours' characteristics, management, delivery and maternal outcome were recorded from institutional electronic database. In this paper a case series of pregnant breast cancer patients treated at single tertiary institution between 2007 and 2019 are presented and the key recommendations on managing such patients are summarized.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients met the search criteria. The majority of tumours were high grade, triple negative or HER2 positive, two patients were de novo metastatic. Treatment plan was made for each patient by multidisciplinary team. Eight patients were treated with systemic chemotherapy with no excess toxicity or severe maternal/fetal adverse effects. In all but two patients, delivery was on term and without major complications. Only one event, which was not in whole accordance with international guidelines, was identified. It was the use of blue dye in one patient.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with pregnancy associated breast cancer should be managed like non-pregnant breast cancer patients and should expect a similar outcome, without causing harm to the unborn child. To achieve a good outcome in pregnancy associated breast cancer, a multidisciplinary approach is mandatory.

Biomaterial-mediated internal radioisotope therapy

Radiation therapy (RT), including external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and internal radioisotope therapy (RIT), has been an indispensable strategy for cancer therapy in clinical practice in recent years. Ionized atoms and free radicals emitted from the nucleus of radioisotopes can cleave a single strand of DNA, inducing the apoptosis of cancer cells. Thus far, nuclides used for RIT could be classified into three main types containing alpha (α), beta (β), and Auger particle emitters. In order to enhance the bioavailability and reduce the physiological toxicity of radioisotopes, various biomaterials have been utilized as multifunctional nanocarriers, including targeting molecules, macromolecular monoclonal antibodies, peptides, inorganic nanomaterials, and organic and polymeric nanomaterials. Therapeutic radioisotopes have been labeled onto these nanocarriers via different methods (chelating, chemical doping, encapsulating, displacement) to inhibit or kill cancer cells. With the continuous development of research in this respect, more promising biomaterials as well as novel therapeutic strategies have emerged to achieve the high-performance RIT of cancer. In this review article, we summarize recent advances in biomaterial-mediated RIT of cancer and provide guidance for non-experts to understand nuclear medicine and to conduct cancer radiotherapy.

[Prenatal Radiation Exposure in Nuclear Medicine]

Radiation exposure from nuclear medicine procedures during pregnancy may cause uncertainty among patients and medical professionals. In 2019, the German Society of Medical Physics (DGMP) and the German Society of Radiology (DRG) published a fully revised version of the report "Prenatal Radiation Exposure Arising from Medical Indication, Dose Calculation, Conclusions for Physicians and Pregnant Women". This report offers a basis for dose calculation and determination of radiation exposure to the unborn. This review summarizes the most notable general adaptions made in the report's newest version and specifically points out the changes relevant to the field of nuclear medicine.The DGMP report provides physicians and medical physicists with means to estimate prenatal radiation exposure to the unborn conservatively, in a prompt and comprehensible approach. The rapidly evolving field of indications in nuclear medicine and radiology gave rise to the initiative of profoundly revising the previous version of the report from 2002. It now accounts for the extended range of devices, nuclear medicine hybrid imaging and radiotracers recently introduced. The most extensive change is a shift from the former 3-step-concept for the dose calculation to a 2-step-concept. In diagnostic nuclear medicine the first step comprises a conservative approximation of radiation exposure on the basis of current diagnostic reference levels (DRL). If exposure is assessed to be below 20 mSv, risk to the unborn child is sufficiently low, no further approaches are considered necessary. If calculated doses exceed 20 mSv, for diagnostic studies without existing DRL or in case of radionuclide therapies step 2 requires dose calculation based on administered activity and the stage of pregnancy.The DGMP report on prenatal radiation exposure offers valuable guidance for physicians and medical physicists in the field of nuclear medicine. The calculation concept provides an important basis to estimate radiation exposure to the unborn. Its extensive revision in 2019 accounts for recent scientific and technical developments and a reform of the stepwise approach to dose estimation.

Multidisciplinary consensus on cancer management during pregnancy

Cancer during pregnancy is a challenge for multi- and interdisciplinary collaboration due to the diagnostic, prognostic and therapeutic implications, the need for an integrated harmonization of medical action for the pregnant patient and the embryo or foetus and the characteristics of each gestational period, which will determine the protocol to be proposed and its limitations. For this reason, a group of experts appointed by participating scientific societies, which includes the Spanish Society of Medical Oncology (Sociedad Española de Oncología Médica—SEOM), the Spanish Association of Surgeons (Asociación Española de Cirujanos—AEC), the Spanish Society of Gynaecology and Obstetrics (Sociedad Española de Ginecología y Obstetricia—SEGO), the Spanish Society of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging (Sociedad Española de Medicina Nuclear e Imagen Molecular—SEMNIM), the Spanish Society of Oncological Radiotherapy (Sociedad Española de Oncología Radioterápica—SEOR) and the Spanish Society of Medical Radiology (Sociedad Española de Radiología Médica—SERAM), have worked together to establish consensus recommendations that allow the harmonization of management and ultimately the optimization of the healthcare of pregnant patients with cancer. When cancer is detected in a pregnant woman, the week of gestation in which the diagnosis is made must be considered, as well as the characteristics of the tumour. It is strongly recommended that a multidisciplinary team assesses the situation and guides the patient and her family during the informing, diagnosis and treatment process. Likewise, the foetus should be monitored and managed by specialized obstetricians who are part of a multidisciplinary cancer committee.

Good news on the active management of pregnant cancer patients

Cancer occurs in approximately 1/1000 to 1/2000 pregnancies and presents complex medical and ethical dilemmas for patients and providers. The most common cancers diagnosed in the gestational period include breast, cervical, melanoma, and lymphomas. The majority of existing evidence regarding the treatment of cancer during pregnancy is derived from experiences with breast cancer. Other cancers often pose unique challenges given the location of the tumors and their traditional mode of treatment with pelvic surgery and radiation. Additionally, many emerging therapies for cancer target mechanisms that are necessary for fetal development, such as angiogenesis, and are contraindicated in pregnant women. Although limitations on the treatment of cancer during pregnancy currently exist, increasing evidence shows that many surgical and systemic therapies can be effective for a mother’s oncologic outcomes without significant detriment to the developing fetus. Traditional perspectives of cancer during gestation may sway providers to encourage pregnancy termination, delays in therapy, or early delivery. However, recent studies and reviews discourage such practices. Although every cancer diagnosis in pregnancy requires an individualized approach and should use the multidisciplinary perspectives of maternal–fetal medicine specialists as well as medical and surgical oncologists, providers should feel empowered to safely employ systemic, surgical, and even reserved cases of radiation therapies for their pregnant patients with cancer. The aim of this review is to highlight some of the recent advances in cancer therapies for common cancer subtypes and encourage providers to use this growing body of evidence to employ treatments with curative intent while continuing to evaluate the long-term effects of these therapies on mothers and their children.

Top Ten Tips Palliative Care Clinicians Should Know About Caring for Serious Illness in Pregnancy

Palliative care (PC) teams are increasingly being called upon to provide care earlier and more remote from end of life. Because much of the field has grown out of hospice and geriatric care, most teams have little to no experience caring for pregnant women or their fetuses when serious or life-threatening illness strikes. This article, written by a team of oncologists (gynecologic, medical, and radiation) and PC providers, seeks to demystify the care of seriously ill pregnant women and their fetuses by exploring the diagnostic, treatment, prognostication, symptom management, and communication needs of these patients. Truly comprehensive PC extends throughout the life span, from conception to death, regardless of age. Accordingly, increased knowledge of the unique needs of these vulnerable groups will enhance our ability to provide care across this continuum.

Radiotherapy in Pregnancy-Associated Breast Cancer

Breast radiotherapy during pregnancy is a matter of debate as both the efficacy of treatment and the safety of the developing fetus should be considered. Currently there is not enough data to support the safety of in-utero exposure to radiation even with modern radiotherapy techniques. So it is highly recommended that breast radiotherapy is postponed to after delivery, though it might be considered in very selected patients according to risk-benefit assessment.

Ionizing radiation for maternal medical indications

Ionizing radiation should be considered an avoidable exposure although all pregnant women receive some radiation from their environment. The potential effect of ionizing radiation on the fetus is determined by the dose and the timing of the exposure with growing interest in the potential risks of transgenerational effects of radiation as an epigenetic phenomenon. High dosage exposure is very unlikely in routine situations such as occupational, diagnostic, or therapeutic exposures. Individual diagnostic radiation procedures (fetal dosage <50 mGy), are not associated with any increase in lethality (miscarriage or stillbirth), genetic damage, teratogenicity, growth impairment, mental retardation, or sterility. More recent modeling has suggested that a 10 mGy fetal dose is associated with an excess risk of childhood cancer risk as low as 1 in 4545, well below historical estimates.When the mother's condition necessitates diagnostic radiation it is necessary to balance the risks of the procedure with the benefits to be gained. As almost all diagnostic imaging involves doses below the 50 mGy threshold, clinically indicated investigations should not be withheld because of concerns regarding fetal radiation exposure. Even radiotherapy directed away from the abdomen or pelvis may be considered during pregnancy, if the benefits outweigh the risks and no suitable alternative is available.