Management guidelines for stage III non-small cell lung cancer

Novel model integrating computed tomography-based image markers with genetic markers for discriminating radiation pneumonitis in patients with unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer receiving radiotherapy: a retrospective multi-center radiogenomics study

BACKGROUND

Chemoradiotherapy is a critical treatment for patients with locally advanced and unresectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and it is essential to identify high-risk patients as early as possible owing to the high incidence of radiation pneumonitis (RP). Increasing attention is being paid to the effects of endogenous factors for RP. This study aimed to investigate the value of computed tomography (CT)-based radiomics combined with genomics in analyzing the risk of grade ≥ 2 RP in unresectable stage III NSCLC.

METHODS

In this retrospective multi-center observational study, 100 patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC who were treated with chemoradiotherapy were analyzed. Radiomics features of the entire lung were extracted from pre-radiotherapy CT images. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator algorithm was used for optimal feature selection to calculate the Rad-score for predicting grade ≥ 2 RP. Genomic DNA was extracted from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded pretreatment biopsy tissues. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to identify predictors of RP for model development. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was used to evaluate the predictive capacity of the model. Statistical comparisons of the area under the curve values between different models were performed using the DeLong test. Calibration and decision curves were used to demonstrate discriminatory and clinical benefit ratios, respectively.

RESULTS

The Rad-score was constructed from nine radiomic features to predict grade ≥ 2 RP. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that histology, Rad-score, and XRCC1 (rs25487) allele mutation were independent high-risk factors correlated with RP. The area under the curve of the integrated model combining clinical factors, radiomics, and genomics was significantly higher than that of any single model (0.827 versus 0.594, 0.738, or 0.641). Calibration and decision curve analyses confirmed the satisfactory clinical feasibility and utility of the nomogram.

CONCLUSION

Histology, Rad-score, and XRCC1 (rs25487) allele mutation could predict grade ≥ 2 RP in patients with locally advanced unresectable NSCLC after chemoradiotherapy, and the integrated model combining clinical factors, radiomics, and genomics demonstrated the best predictive efficacy.

Recent Updates in Inhalable Drug Delivery System against Various Pulmonary Diseases: Challenges and Future Perspectives

In the current scenario, pulmonary disease has become a prime burden for morbidity and mortality alongside tremendous social and economic crises throughout the world. Numerous conventional drug delivery system and treatment approach targeting the respiratory region has been driven out. However, effective and accurate recovery has not been achieved yet. In this regard, nanotechnological- based inhalable drug delivery strategy including polymeric, lipidic, or metallic-based respirable microparticles plays an indispensable role in circumventing numerous challenges faced during traditional treatment. Excellent aerodynamic performance leads to enhanced lung targetability, reduced dosing frequency and hence systemic toxicities, as well as improved pharmaceutical attributes, and therefore pharmacokinetic profiles are interminable factors associated with nanotechnologicalbased inhalable delivery. In this review, we comprehensively explored recent advancements in nanotechnologically engineered inhalable formulations targeting each of the mentioned pulmonary diseases. Moreover, we systematically discussed possible respiratory or systemic toxicities about the indeterminate and undefined physicochemical characteristics of inhaled particles.

The Best Supportive Care in Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Lung cancer is a major cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) represents most lung cancer cases, and approximately one-third of patients present with stage III disease at diagnosis. As multiple treatment plans can be adopted for these patients depending on tumor size and nodal staging, stage III NSCLC management is challenging. Over the past decades, multidisciplinary teams (MDTs) have been implemented in healthcare services to coordinate actions among the different health care professionals involved in cancer care. The aim of this review was to discuss real-world evidence of the impact of MDTs on stage III NSCLC management, survival, and quality of life. Here, we performed a literature review to investigate the role of nutrition and navigational nursing in NSCLC care and the influence of MDTs in the choice of treatment plans, including immunotherapy consolidation, and in the management of chemotherapy and radiotherapy-related adverse events. We also performed a mapping review to identify gaps in the implementation of cancer care MDTs in healthcare services around the world.

Role of the cGAS-STING pathway in radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

One of the most important therapeutic interventions for non-small cell lung cancer is radiotherapy. Ionizing radiation (IR) is classified by traditional radiobiology principles as a direct cytocidal therapeutic agent against cancer, although there is growing recognition of other antitumor immunological responses induced by this modality. The most effective therapeutic combinations to harness radiation-generated antitumor immunity and enhance treatment results for malignancies resistant to existing radiotherapy regimens could be determined by a more sophisticated understanding of the immunological pathways created by radiation. Innate immune signaling is triggered by the activation of cGAS-STING, and this promotes adaptive immune responses to help fight cancer. This identifies a molecular mechanism radiation can use to trigger antitumor immune responses by bridging the DNA-damaging ability of IR with the activation of CD8 + cytotoxic T cell-mediated killing of tumors. We also discuss radiotherapy-related parameters that affect cGAS-STING signaling, negative consequences of cGAS-STING activation, and intriguing treatment options being tested in conjunction with IR to support immune activation by activating STING-signaling. Improved therapeutic outcomes will result from a better understanding of how IR promotes cGAS-STING signaling in immune-based treatment regimens that maximize radiotherapy's anticancer effectiveness.

Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: An Overview of Treatment Options

Lung cancer is the second-most commonly diagnosed cancer and the leading cause of cancer death worldwide. The most common histological type is non-small-cell lung cancer, accounting for 85% of all lung cancer cases. About one out of three new cases of non-small-cell lung cancer are diagnosed at a locally advanced stage—mainly stage III—consisting of a widely heterogeneous group of patients presenting significant differences in terms of tumor volume, local diffusion, and lymph nodal involvement. Stage III NSCLC therapy is based on the pivotal role of multimodal treatment, including surgery, radiotherapy, and a wide-ranging option of systemic treatments. Radical surgery is indicated in the case of hilar lymphnodal involvement or single station mediastinal ipsilateral involvement, possibly after neoadjuvant chemotherapy; the best appropriate treatment for multistation mediastinal lymph node involvement still represents a matter of debate. Although the main scope of treatments in this setting is potentially curative, the overall survival rates are still poor, ranging from 36% to 26% and 13% in stages IIIA, IIIB, and IIIC, respectively. The aim of this article is to provide an up-to-date, comprehensive overview of the state-of-the-art treatments for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer.

Operative versus Nonoperative Treatment in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Recommended for Surgery

Background

There is currently limited evidence for a correlation between the recommended operation and overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

Methods

NSCLC patients with stages III and IV, recommended for operation, were identified in the US National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (SEER).We used propensity score matching (PSM) and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to ensure the robustness of our findings. The cumulative rates of death were compared between patients with and without recommended operations using the Kaplan-Meier curves.

Results

Operation was recommended for 3331 patients but was not performed in 912 (27.4%) patients (then on-operative group). After PSM, 553 pairs matched. Compared to the nonoperative group, the hazard ratios (HRs) in the operative group were 0.46 (95% CI 0.23-0.95 and p=0.037) in stage IIIA and 0.54 (95% CI 0.42-0.68 and p < 0.001) in stage IVA. However, in stages IIIB, IIIC, and IVB, the recommended operative group was not associated with better OS. The OS was not different in stage IIIA-N2, stage IVA-N1, and stage IVA-N3 patients between groups (p=0.28, p=0.14, and p=0.79, respectively). Moreover, the recommended operative group had better OS than the nonoperative group in stage IIIA-N0 (p=0.00085), stage IIIA-N1 (p=0.009), stage IVA-N0 (p < 0.001), and stage IVA-N2 (p=0.034).

Conclusion

Compared to the nonoperative group, recommended operation improved survival in NSCLC patients with stage IIIA-N0, stage IIIA-N1, stage IVA-N0, and stage IVA-N2. However, in stages IIIA-N2, IIIB, IIIC, IVA-N1, IVA-N3, and IVB, recommended operation did not lead to significantly improved survival time.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in stage III non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease with different subtypes, multidisciplinary teams-led management, and a poor prognosis. Currently, the clinical benefits of stage III NSCLC in the neoadjuvant setting are still unclear. We performed a meta-analysis of published data on neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in stage III NSCLC to systematically evaluate its efficacy and safety.

METHODS

We searched the databases to identify eligible studies of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy for stage III NSCLC. The primary outcomes mainly included pathological and radiological response outcomes, the feasibility of surgery, and the safety of the regimen. The pathological and radiological response included the rate of major pathologic response (MPR), complete pathologic response (pCR), radiological response outcomes, and R0 resection; The feasibility included the rate of surgical resection, conversion to thoracotomy, surgical complications, pathological downstaging of clinical disease stage. The safety included the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and severe adverse events (SAEs). R 4.1.3 software was conducted for data analysis, and p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

Nine trials containing a total of 382 populations were eligible for the meta-analysis, with the pooled surgical resection rate of 90%. Owing to the large heterogeneity of the single-rate meta-analysis, the random effect model was adopted. The estimated pooled prevalence of MPR was 56% (95%CI 0.39-0.72) and of pCR was 39% (95%CI 0.28-0.51). The pooled rate of TRAEs was 65% (95%CI 0.17-0.99) and SAEs was 24% (95%CI 0.05-0.49).

CONCLUSION

Compared to neoadjuvant chemotherapy or immunotherapy, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy achieved more pathological and radiological relief, and has a high surgical resection rate and low risk of conversion to thoracotomy and surgical complications, with poor tolerance of toxicity but rarely developing life-threatening adverse events. In conclusion, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy is suggested to be beneficial for stage III NSCLC.

Conversion therapy from unresectable stage IIIC non-small-cell lung cancer to radical surgery via anti-PD-1 immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and anti-angiogenesis: A case report and literature review

The prognosis of patients with stage IIIC non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is poor due to the loss of surgical treatment opportunities. Improving the prognosis of these patients with IIIC NSCLC urgently needs to be addressed. Here, we report a stage IIIC (T4N3M0 IIIC (AJCC 8th)) NSCLC patient treated with 2 cycles of anti-PD-1 immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy and anti-angiogenesis therapy; after two cycles of treatment, the patient achieved a partial response and obtained the opportunity for surgical treatment. After the operation, the patient achieved a pathological complete response and successfully transformed from unresectable stage IIIC lung cancer to radical surgery (ypT0N0M0). Our study is expected to provide new ideas for treating patients with unresectable stage IIIC NSCLC in the future.

A robust CD8+ T cell-related classifier for predicting the prognosis and efficacy of immunotherapy in stage III lung adenocarcinoma

Patients with stage III lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) have significant survival heterogeneity, meanwhile, CD8⁺ T cell has a remarkable function in immunotherapy. Therefore, developing novel biomarkers based on CD8⁺ T cell can help evaluate the prognosis and guide the strategy of immunotherapy for patients with stage III LUAD. Thus, we abstracted twelve datasets from multiple online databases and grouped the stage III LUAD patients into training and validation sets. We then used WGCNA and CIBERSORT, while univariate Cox analysis, LASSO analysis, and multivariate Cox analysis were performed. Subsequently, a novel CD8⁺ T cell-related classifier including HDFRP3, ARIH1, SMAD2, and UPB1 was developed, which could divide stage III LUAD patients into high- and low-risk groups with distinct survival probability in multiple cohorts (all P < 0.05). Moreover, a robust nomogram including the traditional clinical parameters and risk signature was constructed, and t-ROC, C-index, and calibration curves confirmed its powerful predictive capacity. Besides, we detected the difference in immune cell subpopulations and evaluated the potential benefits of immunotherapy between the two risk subsets. Finally, we verified the correlation between the gene expression and CD8⁺ T cells included in the model by immunohistochemistry and validated the validity of the model in a real-world cohort. Overall, we constructed a robust CD8⁺ T cell-related risk model originally which could predict the survival rates in stage III LUAD. What’s more, this model suggested that patients in the high-risk group could benefit from immunotherapy, which has significant implications for accurately predicting the effect of immunotherapy and evaluating the prognosis for patients with stage III LUAD.

Efficacy and safety of camrelizumab (a PD‑1 inhibitor) combined with chemotherapy as a neoadjuvant regimen in patients with locally advanced non‑small cell lung cancer

Camrelizumab is a novel programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitor developed in China that exhibits good efficacy in several advanced cancer types, including non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC); however, its utility as a neoadjuvant regimen in NSCLC remains unclear. Thus, the present study aimed to explore the efficacy and safety of neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced NSCLC. A total of 56 patients with stage IIIA/IIIB resectable NSCLC were analyzed in the present prospective observational study. Amongst the cohort, 31 patients underwent neoadjuvant camrelizumab (200 mg every 2 weeks) plus paclitaxel and carboplatin (PC) chemotherapy, while another 25 cases underwent neoadjuvant PC chemotherapy alone. The pathological response, disease-free survival (DFS) time, overall survival (OS) time and adverse events (AEs) were analyzed. The complete pathological response (25.8 vs. 8.3%; P=0.159) and major pathological response (MPR) (61.3 vs. 37.5%; P=0.080) rates were higher in the camrelizumab plus PC group compared with the findings in the PC group, although the results were not statistically significant. DFS time was significantly prolonged in the camrelizumab plus PC group compared with that in the PC group (P=0.030); however, there was no difference in OS time between these two groups (P=0.251). Following adjustment by multivariate analysis, the camrelizumab plus PC regimen versus the PC regimen alone was independently associated with higher MPR [odds ratio, 5.216; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.178-23.086; P=0.030], and favorable DFS [hazard ratio (HR), 0.055; 95% CI, 0.007-0.442; P=0.006] and OS (HR, 0.025; 95% CI, 0.002-0.416; P=0.010) times. The most common AEs of the neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus PC regimen were alopecia (51.6%), nausea and vomiting (45.2%), anemia (41.9%) and fatigue (41.9%), the majority of which occurred in patients with grade 1–2 disease. The present results indicated that neoadjuvant camrelizumab plus PC chemotherapy exhibited a superior pathological response and survival profile to PC chemotherapy alone, and was well tolerated in patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

Increased activation of cGAS‐STING pathway enhances radiosensitivity of non‐small cell lung cancer cells

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Development and validation of a prediction model using molecular marker for long-term survival in unresectable stage III non-small cell lung cancer treated with chemoradiotherapy

Background

This study aimed to establish a predictive nomogram integrating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation status for 3‐ and 5‐year overall survival (OS) in unresectable/inoperable stage III non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with definitive chemoradiotherapy.

Methods

A total of 533 stage III NSCLC patients receiving chemoradiotherapy from 2013 to 2017 in our institution were included and divided into training and testing sets (2:1). Significant factors impacting OS were identified in the training set and integrated into the nomogram based on Cox proportional hazards regression. The model was subject to bootstrap internal validation and external validation within the testing set and an independent cohort from a phase III trial. The accuracy and discriminative capacity of the model were examined by calibration plots, C‐indexes and risk stratifications.

Results

The final multivariate model incorporated sex, smoking history, histology (including EGFR mutation status), TNM stage, planning target volume, chemotherapy sequence and radiation pneumonitis grade. The bootstrapped C‐indexes in the training set were 0.688, 0.710 for the 3‐ and 5‐year OS. For external validation, C‐indexes for 3‐ and 5‐year OS were 0.717, 0.720 in the testing set and 0.744, 0.699 in the external testing cohort, respectively. The calibration plots presented satisfying accuracy. The derivative risk stratification strategy classified patients into distinct survival subgroups successfully and performed better than the traditional TNM staging.

Conclusions

The nomogram incorporating EGFR mutation status could facilitate survival prediction and risk stratification for individual stage III NSCLC, providing information for enhanced immunotherapy decision and future trial design.

Treatment strategies for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer in elderly patients: Translating scientific evidence into clinical practice

Treatment of locally advanced NSCLC (LA-NSCLC) is focused on multimodal strategy, including chemotherapy and radiotherapy (in combination or as alternative treatments), followed by surgery in selected cases. Recently, durvalumab consolidation after definitive chemo-radiation has shown a meaningful overall survival benefit. However, it is important to note that elderly patients represent a high proportion of NSCLC population and frailty and comorbidities can significantly limit treatment options. Indeed, elderly patients are under-represented in clinical trials and data to drive treatment selection in this category of patients are scanty. Available data, main issues and controversies on multimodal treatment in elderly LA-NSCLC patients will be reviewed in this paper.