Current overview and special considerations for second breast cancer in Hodgkin lymphoma survivors

How I Follow Hodgkin Lymphoma in First Complete (Metabolic) Remission?

Hodgkin lymphoma is characterized by a high cure rate in the modern era of medicine regardless of stage, but patients suffer from a high risk of comorbidity associated with the administered therapy. The main aim of this review article is to assess and analyze the various comorbidities associated with Hodgkin lymphoma and address the survivorship of patients, including fertility, secondary cancers due to cardiovascular toxicity, and quality of life. Furthermore, this review explores the optimal strategy for detecting relapse. The treatment paradigm of Hodgkin lymphoma has shifted, with a paradigm shift toward achieving a high cure rate and low toxicity as a standard of care in this patient population. Checkpoint inhibitors, especially nivolumab, in combination with chemotherapy are increasingly being studied in the first line of therapy. However, their long-term toxicity remains to be assessed in longer follow-up. In conclusion, Hodgkin lymphoma survivors, regardless of their treatment, should be followed up individually by a multidisciplinary survivorship team in order to detect and properly treat the long-term side effects of therapy.

Second malignant neoplasms in lymphomas, secondary lymphomas and lymphomas in metabolic disorders/diseases

With inconsistent findings, evidence has been obtained in recent years that metabolic disorders are closely associated with the development of lymphomas. Studies and multiple analyses have been published also indicating that some solid tumor survivors develop a secondary lymphoma, whereas some lymphoma survivors subsequently develop a second malignant neoplasm (SMN), particularly solid tumors. An interaction between the multiple etiologic factors such as genetic factors and late effects of cancer therapy may play an important role contributing to the carcinogenesis in patients with metabolic diseases or with a primary cancer. In this review, we summarize the current knowledge of the multiple etiologic factors for lymphomagenesis, focusing on the SMN in lymphoma, secondary lymphomas in primary cancers, and the lymphomas associated to metabolic disorders/diseases, which have been received less attention previously. Further, we also review the data of coexistence of lymphomas and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in patients with infection of hepatitis C virus and hepatitis B virus.

Pushing the boundaries. Concurrent Hodgkin lymphoma and breast cancer treatment with preservation of pregnancy: A case report

Background

Breast cancer and hematological cancers are the most commonly diagnosed malignancies during pregnancy. This case report is the first to describe the ultimate challenge to preserve a pregnancy while the expectant mother is diagnosed and treated simultaneously for two concurrent primary malignancies, a stage IIA Hodgkin lymphoma and pT2N0(Sn) breast cancer.

Clinical case

A 36-year-old pregnant primigravida underwent a routine non-invasive prenatal test at 14 weeks and 4 days of gestation. Genome-wide sequencing was used and revealed an aberrant DNA/chromosome copy number profile among which a strong 2p-gain, possibly related to a maternal malignancy. Physical examination showed an enlarged cervical lymph node and ultrasound guided biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of a nodular sclerosing classical Hodgkin lymphoma subsequently staged as an early stage, unfavorable (IIA) Hodgkin lymphoma. Whole body magnetic resonance imaging for further staging also indicated a suspicious nodule in the right breast. Further investigation resulted in the concurrent diagnosis of a pT2N0(Sn) invasive ductal adenocarcinoma. Patient underwent a mastectomy with sentinel lymph node biopsy at 15 weeks and 5 days of gestation, followed by 4-weekly chemotherapy administration, consisting of doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine and dacarbazine (ABVD). Pregnancy went further relatively uncomplicated and fetal assessment was reassuring during pregnancy. Due to fever of unknown origin and preterm labor, a cesarean section was performed on a gestational age of 35 weeks and 4 days. Oncological treatment was completed after delivery with involved-field radiation therapy for the Hodgkin lymphoma. Completion of systemic treatment for breast cancer consisted of docetaxel/cyclophosphamide chemotherapy, and anti-hormonal treatment in the form of ovarian function suppression and letrozole.

Conclusion

Here we show for the first time that two concurrent primary malignancies can be treated successfully during pregnancy with respect to maternal and fetal chances. Motivated modifications of breast cancer treatment (mastectomy instead of lumpectomy, AVBD instead of epirubicin-cyclophosphamide chemotherapy), allowed treatment of both cancers during pregnancy. Final treatment was administered after delivery.

Childhood cancer survivors face markedly worse overall survival after diagnosis with breast cancer, melanoma, or colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Childhood cancer survivors (CCS) are at elevated risk of secondary malignancies (SM). Enhanced screening for SM is recommended, but compliance is poor. We hypothesized that CCS with adult-onset SM (colorectal cancer [CRC], melanoma, or breast cancer [BC]) would present with more advanced disease and have decreased overall survival (OS).

METHODS

The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program was queried for patients diagnosed with cancer at age less than or equal to 18 also diagnosed with adult-onset CRC, melanoma, or BC. A cohort without a history of prior malignancy was likewise identified. Tumor features and clinical outcomes were compared.

RESULTS

CCS with a SM (n = 224) were compared with patients without a childhood cancer history (n = 1,392,670). CCS were diagnosed younger (BC = 37.6 vs. 61.3, p < 0.01, CRC = 35.0 vs. 67.1, p < 0.01, melanoma = 29.6 vs. 61.3 years old, p < 0.01). CCS with BC were more likely to have Stage III or IV disease (25.2% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.01). Hormone-receptor expression also differed; CCS were less likely to develop Luminal A-type tumors (48.6% vs. 66.9%, p = 0.01). After age-adjustment, CCS had worse OS (Hazard ratio: CRC = 2.449, p < 0.01, melanoma = 6.503, p < 0.01, BC = 3.383, p < 0.01).

CONCLUSION

CCS were younger when diagnosed with a SM. After age-adjustment, OS was diminished. Heightened surveillance may be necessary for CCS diagnosed with SM.