Risk Factors of Fluoropyrimidine Induced Cardiotoxicity among Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Risk factors for fluorouracil-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with gastrointestinal tumor

Objective

To explore the risk factors for cardiotoxicity in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) tumors treated with fluorouracil drugs.

Methods

This study included patients with GI tumors who received fluorouracil at our hospital between January 2018 and April 2022. The demographic and clinical characteristics were collected. The risk factors associated with the cardiotoxicity of fluorouracil were explored using multivariable logistic regression.

Results

A total of 300 patients were finally included and divided into the cardiotoxicity (n = 81) and non-cardiotoxicity groups (n = 219). The occurrence of fluorouracil-induced cardiotoxicity was higher in patients with hypertension, hyperlipidemia, diabetes mellitus, older age, those treated with capecitabine, and combined radiotherapy. The multivariable logistic regression showed that treatment with capecitabine, history of hyperlipidemia, history of diabetes, older age, and combined radiotherapy were independent risk factors for the cardiotoxicity of fluorouracil.

Conclusion

Hyperlipidemia, diabetes, older age, treatment with capecitabine, and adjuvant radiotherapy might be independent risk factors for the cardiotoxicity of fluorouracil in patients with GI tumors.

Cardiovascular safety of 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine in colorectal cancer patients: real-world evidence

BACKGROUND

Fluoropyrimidines, including 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine, are the most common chemotherapeutic agents for colorectal carcinoma. Although previous studies have suggested varying degrees of cardiotoxicity with these drugs, there is a notable lack of large-scale investigations with appropriate control groups. This study aimed to evaluate cardiovascular outcome among colorectal carcinoma patients treated with fluoropyrimidines.

METHODS

A retrospective propensity score- matched cohort study was conducted in patients diagnosed with colorectal carcinoma between January 1, 1993 and December 31, 2021 at public hospitals in Hong Kong. Cardiovascular outcomes in patients prescribed fluoropyrimidines were compared with controls. Further analyses to compare 5-fluroracil and capecitabine were performed.

RESULTS

A total of 51,888 colorectal carcinoma patients were identified. After 1:1 propensity score matching, 21,216 patients were included in the final analysis, with 10,608 patients in each group. 1.06% patients experienced a major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE) at 1 year. There was no significant difference in MACE risk between the two groups (HR 0.91, 95% confidence interval (95%CI): 0.70-1.18, p = 0.46). Risk of cardiovascular death was similar between the two groups (HR 1.05, 95%CI: 0.69-1.60, p = 0.82). Subgroup analysis did not demonstrate a statistically significant elevated risk of MACE during fluoropyrimidine use in high-risk patient groups. Further comparison of 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine did not reveal a difference in MACE (0.80% vs. 0.98%; HR 1.09, 95%CI: 0.64-1.85, p < 0.75).

CONCLUSION

Fluoropyrimidine use in patients with colorectal carcinoma did not increase the risk of MACE, cardiovascular death, or other specific cardiovascular conditions. There was no significant difference in cardiovascular risk between 5-fluorouracil and capecitabine.

Predicting cardiovascular events with fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy using a standard cardiovascular risk calculator

AIMS

Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy is important for treatment of many solid tumours but is associated with cardiotoxicity. The relationship of fluoropyrimidine-associated cardiotoxicity (FAC) with conventional cardiovascular (CV) risk factors is poorly understood, and standard cardiovascular risk scores are not validated in this context.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Single-centre retrospective study of patients treated with fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy using electronic health records for cardiovascular risk factors (and calculation of QRISK3 score), cancer treatment, and clinical outcomes. FAC was defined by cardiovascular events during or within 3 months of fluoropyrimidine treatment, and Cox regression was used to assess associations of CV risk and cancer treatment with FAC. One thousand eight hundred ninety-eight patients were included (45% male; median age 64 years), with median follow up 24.5 (11.5-48.3 months); 52.7% of patients were at moderate or high baseline CV risk (QRISK3 score >10%) Cardiovascular events occurred in 3.1% (59/1898)-most commonly angina (64.4%, 38/59) and atrial fibrillation (13.6%, 8/59), with 39% events during cycle one of treatment. In univariable analysis, QRISK3 score >20% was significantly associated with incident FAC (HR 2.25, 95% CI 1.11-4.93, P = 0.03). On multivariable analysis, beta-blocker use (HR 1.04, 95% CI 1.00-1.08, P = 0.04) and higher BMI (HR 2.33, 95% CI 1.04-5.19, P = 0.04) were independently associated with incident CV events. Thirty-two of the 59 patients with FAC were subsequently rechallenged with fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy, with repeat CV events in 6% (2/32). Incident FAC did not affect overall survival (P = 0.50).

CONCLUSIONS

High BMI and use of beta-blockers are associated with risk of CV events during fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. QRISK3 score may also play a role in identifying patients at high risk of CV events during fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. Re-challenge with further fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy can be considered in patients following CV events during prior treatment.

Association of pre-existing cardiovascular disease with administration of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in patients with gastrointestinal malignancies

Objective

Fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy is a first-line treatment for many gastrointestinal (GI) cancers, however, cardiotoxicity concerns may limit administration in patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease (CVD). This study investigated the association of pre-existing CVD with use of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy in tumour-eligible GI cancer patients.

Methods and analysis

National cancer registry data from the Virtual Cardio-Oncology Research Initiative from England between 2014 and 2018 was used to identify GI cancer patients eligible to receive fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy. Linkage to Hospital Episode Statistics and CVD registry data were used to ascertain prior CVD and outcomes. Primary outcome was first administration of fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy following cancer diagnosis. Cox proportional hazard models determined HR and 95% CIs for the association between initiation of fluoropyrimidine treatment and prior CVD.

Results

112 726 eligible patients were identified (median age 71 years (IQR 62-80), 39.7% female). 33 026 (29.3%) had pre-existing CVD. 73 392 (65.1%) patients had a diagnosis of colorectal, 23 208 (20.6%) oesophageal, 14 788 (13.1%) gastric and 1338 (1.2%) small bowel cancer. Individuals with pre-existing CVD had a 27% reduced rate of receiving fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy (HR, 0.73; 95% CI 0.70 to 0.75) on multivariable analysis. Significantly reduced rates of fluoropyrimidine administration were found across all subtypes of pre-existing CVD.

Conclusions

GI cancer patients with all types of pre-existing CVD are less likely to receive fluoropyrimidine chemotherapy despite eligibility. This suggests widespread caution regarding administration of fluoropyrimidines across this population; further research is needed to assess whether such conservatism is justified.

Multimodality imaging in cardio-oncology: the added value of CMR and CCTA

During the last 30 years, we have assisted to a great implementation in anticancer treatment with a subsequent increase of cancer survivors and decreased mortality. This has led to an ongoing interest about the possible therapy-related side-effects and their management to better guide patients therapy and surveillance in the chronic and long-term setting. As a consequence cardio-oncology was born, involving several different specialties, among which radiology plays a relevant role. Till the end of August 2022, when European Society of Cardiology (ESC) developed the first guidelines on cardio-oncology, no general indications existed to guide diagnosis and treatment of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity (CTR-CVT). They defined multimodality imaging role in primary and secondary prevention strategies, cancer treatment surveillance and early CTR-CVT identification and management. Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) has acquired a central role in coronary assessment, as far as coronary artery disease (CAD) exclusion is concerned; but on the side of this well-known application, it also started to be considered in left ventricular function evaluation, interstitial fibrosis quantification and cardiac perfusion studies. Cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR), instead, has been acknowledged as the gold standard alternative to trans-thoracic echocardiography (TTE) poor acoustic window in quantification of heart function and strain modifications, as well as pre- and post-contrast tissue characterization by means of T1-T2 mapping, early Gadolinium enhancement (EGE), late Gadolinium enhancement (LGE) and extracellular volume (ECV) evaluation. Our review is intended to provide a focus on the actual role of CMR and CCTA in the setting of a better understanding of cardiotoxicity and to draw some possible future directions of cardiac imaging in this field, starting from the recently published ESC guidelines.

Fluoropyrimidine-induced hand-foot syndrome and cardiotoxicity: recommendations for the use of the oral fluoropyrimidine S-1 in metastatic colorectal cancer

BACKGROUND

Fluoropyrimidines (FPs) are an essential part of the majority of systemic regimens in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). The use of the oral FP S-1 has been approved by the European Medicines Agency as monotherapy or in combination with oxaliplatin or irinotecan, with or without bevacizumab, for the treatment of patients with metastatic CRC in whom it is not possible to continue treatment with another FP due to hand-foot syndrome (HFS) or cardiovascular toxicity (CVT). Subsequently, this indication has been included in the 2022 ESMO guidelines for metastatic CRC. Recommendations for use in daily practice are not available.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Based on peer-reviewed published data on the use of S-1 in Western patients with metastatic CRC who switched from infusional 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) or capecitabine to S-1 for reasons of HFS or CVT, recommendations for its use were formulated by an international group of medical oncologists with expertise in the treatment of metastatic CRC and a cardio-oncologist.

RESULTS

In patients who experience pain and/or functional impairment due to HFS during treatment with capecitabine or infusional 5-FU, a switch to S-1 is recommended without prior dose reduction of capecitabine/5-FU. S-1 should preferably be initiated at full dose when HFS has decreased to grade ≤1. In patients with cardiac complaints, in whom an association with capecitabine or infusional 5-FU treatment cannot be excluded, capecitabine/5-FU should be discontinued and a switch to S-1 is recommended.

CONCLUSIONS

These recommendations should guide clinicians in daily practice in the treatment of patients with metastatic CRC with FP-containing regimens.

Cancer Treatment-Related Cardiovascular Toxicity in Gynecologic Malignancies: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review

Improvements in early detection and treatment of gynecologic malignancies have led to an increasing number of survivors who are at risk of long-term cardiac complications from cancer treatment. Multimodality therapies for gynecologic malignancies, including conventional chemotherapy, targeted therapeutics, and hormonal agents, place patients at risk of cancer therapy-related cardiovascular toxicity during and following treatment. Although the cardiotoxicity associated with some female predominant cancers (eg, breast cancer) have been well recognized, there has been less recognition of the potential adverse cardiovascular effects of anticancer therapies used to treat gynecologic malignancies. In this review, the authors provide a comprehensive overview of the cancer therapeutic agents used in gynecologic malignancies, associated cardiovascular toxicities, risk factors for cardiotoxicity, cardiac imaging, and prevention strategies.

Redefining the Incidence and Profile of Fluoropyrimidine-Associated Cardiotoxicity in Cancer Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aim: The cardiac toxicity that occurs during administration of anti-tumor agents has attracted increasing concern. Fluoropyrimidines have been used for more than half a century, but their cardiotoxicity has not been well clarified. In this study, we aimed to assess the incidence and profile of fluoropyrimidine-associated cardiotoxicity (FAC) comprehensively based on literature data. Methods: A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Embase, Medline, Web of Science, and Cochrane library databases and clinical trials on studies investigating FAC. The main outcome was a pooled incidence of FAC, and the secondary outcome was specific treatment-related cardiac AEs. Random or fixed effects modeling was used for pooled meta-analyses according to the heterogeneity assessment. PROSPERO registration number: (CRD42021282155). Results: A total of 211 studies involving 63,186 patients were included, covering 31 countries or regions in the world. The pooled incidence of FAC, by meta-analytic, was 5.04% for all grades and 1.5% for grade 3 or higher. A total of 0.29% of patients died due to severe cardiotoxicities. More than 38 cardiac AEs were identified, with cardiac ischemia (2.24%) and arrhythmia (1.85%) being the most frequent. We further performed the subgroup analyses and meta-regression to explore the source of heterogeneity, and compare the cardiotoxicity among different study-level characteristics, finding that the incidence of FAC varied significantly among different publication decades, country/regions, and genders. Patients with esophagus cancer had the highest risk of FAC (10.53%), while breast cancer patients had the lowest (3.66%). The treatment attribute, regimen, and dosage were significantly related to FAC. When compared with chemotherapeutic drugs or targeted agents, such a risk was remarkably increased (χ2 = 10.15, p < 0.01; χ2 = 10.77, p < 0.01). The continuous 5-FU infusion for 3–5 consecutive days with a high dosage produced the highest FAC incidence (7.3%) compared with other low-dose administration patterns. Conclusions: Our study provides comprehensive global data on the incidence and profile of FAC. Different cancer types and treatment appear to have varying cardiotoxicities. Combination therapy, high cumulative dose, addition of anthracyclines, and pre-existing heart disease potentially increase the risk of FAC.

Risk of cardiovascular disease among different fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy regimens as adjuvant treatment for resected colorectal cancer

Background

Patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) are more likely to develop cardiovascular disease (CVD) than those without cancer. Little is known regarding their CV risk after operative chemotherapy. We aimed to compare the risk of CV disease among different fluoropyrimidine derivatives.

Methods

We assembled a nationwide cohort of patients with newly diagnosed CRC between 2004 and 2015 who received fluoropyrimidine-based adjuvant chemotherapy for resected CRC by linking the Taiwan Cancer Registry (TCR), National Health Insurance Research Database (NHIRD), and Taiwan Death Registry (TDR). All eligible patients were followed from CRC diagnosis (index date) until a CV event, death, loss to follow-up, or December 31st 2018, whichever came first. CV outcomes included acute myocardial infarction (AMI), life-threatening arrhythmia (LTA), congestive heart failure (CHF), and ischemic stroke (IS). We used stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting using propensity score (SIPTW) to balance all covariates among the three chemotherapy groups: tegafur-uracil (UFT), non-UFT, and mixed. In addition, survival analysis was conducted to examine the association between study outcomes and chemotherapy groups.

Results

From 2004 to 2015, 10,615 (32.8%) patients received UFT alone, 14,511 (44.8%) patients received non-UFT, and 7,224 (22.3%) patients received mixed chemotherapy. After SIPTW, the UFT group had significantly lower all-cause mortality and cancer-related death rates than the other two chemotherapy groups. However, the UFT group had significantly higher rates of cancer death, ischemic stroke, and heart failure than those of the other two chemotherapy groups. The UFT group also had a significantly higher AMI rate than the mixed group. There was no significant difference in LTA among the three groups. Similar findings were observed in the subgroup analysis (stage II and age <70 years, stage II and age ≥70 years, stage III and age <70 years, stage III and age ≥70 years) as the overall population was observed.

Conclusion

Higher heart failure and ischemic stroke rates were found in the UFT group than in the other two chemotherapy groups, especially those with stage III CRC and ≥70 years of age. Careful monitoring of this subset of patients when prescribing UFT is warranted.

Treatment-Related Coronary Disorders of Fluoropyrimidine Administration: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background: Coronary disorders are recognized as the most common manifestation of fluoropyrimidine-related cardiotoxicity in clinical practice. However, there are limited and conflicting data on the incidence and profiles of fluoropyrimidine-related coronary disorders. In this meta-analysis, we aimed to systematically assess the incidence of all-grade and grade 3 or higher fluoropyrimidine-related coronary disorders, and further explore the factors that influence its occurrence.

Methods: Studies reporting the fluoropyrimidine-related coronary disorders were retrieved from a systematic search of English literature in the PubMed, Web of Science, Medline, and Cochrane database from 1 Jan 2001, to 1 Jan 2022. The NIH assessment tool was used to evaluate the quality of each study. The data of basic study characteristics, treatment details, and results of coronary toxicities were extracted. According to the results of the heterogeneity test (I² and p-value statistic), a random-effect model or fixed-effect model was selected for the pooled analysis of the incidence of adverse coronary events. Subgroup analysis was conducted to further explore the risks influencing the occurrence of fluoropyrimidine-related coronary disorders. The stability and publication bias of our results were evaluated by sensitivity analysis and Egger test, respectively.

Results: A total of 63 studies were finally included in our pooled analysis, involving 25,577 patients. The pooled cumulative incidence of all-grade and grade 3 or higher coronary disorders was 2.75% (95% CI 1.89%–3.76%) and 1.00% (95% CI 0.62%–1.47%), respectively. The coronary disorders were most reported as myocardial ischemia (1.28%, 95% CI 0.42%–2.49%) and angina/chest pain (1.1%, 95% CI 0.54%–1.81%). Subgroup analysis revealed that studies in the female-only population seemed to have a lower incidence of fluoropyrimidine-related coronary disorders. The occurrence of adverse coronary events varied among different tumor types. Patients with esophageal cancer have the highest coronary toxicity (6.32%), while those with breast cancer have a relatively lower incidence (0.5%). Coronary disorders induced by 5-FU monotherapy are more frequent than that induced by capecitabine (3.31% vs. 1.21%, p < 0.01). Fluoropyrimidine combination therapy, whether combined with other chemotherapy drugs, targeted therapy drugs, or radiotherapy, significantly increased the incidence of coronary complications (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: This meta-analysis has defined the incidence of fluoropyrimidine-related coronary disorders and depicted its epidemiological profiles for the first time, which may provide a reference for clinical practice in cancer management.

Using Machine Learning Approaches to Predict Short-Term Risk of Cardiotoxicity Among Patients with Colorectal Cancer After Starting Fluoropyrimidine-Based Chemotherapy

Cardiotoxicity is a severe side effect for colorectal cancer (CRC) patients undergoing fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy. To develop and compare machine learning algorithms to predict cardiotoxicity risk among nationally representative CRC patients receiving fluoropyrimidine, CRC Patients with at least one claim of fluoropyrimidine after their cancer diagnosis were included. The outcome was the 30-day cardiotoxicity from the first day of starting fluoropyrimidine. The machine learning models including extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost), random forest (RF), and logistic regression (LR) were developed using 2006-2011 SEER-Medicare data, and model performances were evaluated using 2012-2014 data. Precision, F1 score, and area under the receiver operating characteristics curve (AUC) were measured to evaluate model performances. Feature importance plots were obtained to quantify the predictor importance. Among 36,030 CRC patients, 18.74% of them developed cardiotoxicity within 30 days since the first fluoropyrimidine. The XGBoost approach had better prediction performance with higher precision (0.619) and F1 score (0.406) in predicting the 30-day cardiotoxicity, compared to the RF (precision, 0.607 and F1 score, 0.395) and LR (precision, 0.610 and F1 score, 0.398). According to the DeLong's test for AUC difference, the XGBoost significantly outperformed the RF and LR (XGBoost, 0.816 vs. RF, 0.804, P < 0.001; XGBoost vs. LR, 0.812, P = 0.003, respectively). Feature importance plots identified pre-existing cardiac conditions, surgery, older age as top significant risk factors for cardiotoxicity events among CRC patients after receiving fluoropyrimidine. In summary, the developed machine learning models can accurately predict the occurrence of 30-day cardiotoxicity among CRC patients receiving fluoropyrimidine-based chemotherapy.

Dynamic observation of 5-fluorouracil-induced myocardial injury and mitochondrial autophagy in aging rats

Patients treated with 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) can develop rare but potentially severe cardiac effects, including cardiomyopathy, angina pectoris, heart failure and cardiogenic shock. The specific pathologies and underlying mechanisms are yet to be fully understood. The results of previous studies have indicated that mitochondrial autophagy is widely detected in many angiocardiopathies. In the present study, the dynamic changes in the homeostasis of mitochondrial injury and autophagy were observed in rats treated with 5-FU for different durations. A corresponding control group and a 5-FU model group were established in groups of Sprague-Dawley rats aged 2 and 18 months, and the myocardial enzyme levels were determined at different time points. At 2 weeks post-model establishment, cardiac ultrasound and myocardial histological staining were performed, cardiomyocyte apoptosis and myocardial mitochondrial function were assessed, and mitochondrial ultrastructure was examined. In addition, the expression levels of autophagy-related proteins were evaluated in the 18-month-old rats on days 7 and 14 of 5-FU administration. The experimental results demonstrated that 5-FU induced an elevation in the levels of myocardial enzymes, as well as changes in the cardiac structure and function, and that these changes were more prominent over longer drug durations. In addition, 5-FU decreased the levels of myocardial mitochondrial ATP and mitochondrial membrane potential, and aggravated myocardial fibrosis and cardiomyocyte apoptosis compared with those observed in the untreated control group, treated with the same volume of saline as 5-FU in the 5-FU group. These injuries were particularly evident in aging rats. Notably, 5-FU increased the expression levels of myocardial mitochondrial autophagy-related proteins, and electron microscopy revealed a more severe autophagic state in the model groups compared with that in the control groups. In conclusion, 5-FU induced myocardial mitochondrial damage, the degree of which was more severe in aging rats compared with that in young rats. The mitochondrial autophagy induced by 5-FU was excessive, and the degree of autophagy was aggravated with increased 5-FU administration time.