Chemotherapy is superior to checkpoint inhibitors after radical surgery for urothelial carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of oncologic and toxicity outcomes

European Association of Urology Guidelines on Upper Urinary Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: 2023 Update

CONTEXT

The European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines panel on upper urinary tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) has updated the guidelines to aid clinicians in evidence-based management of UTUC.

OBJECTIVE

To provide an overview of the EAU guidelines on UTUC as an aid to clinicians.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

The recommendations provided in these guidelines are based on a review of the literature via a systematic search of the PubMed, Ovid, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases. Data were searched using the following keywords: urinary tract cancer, urothelial carcinomas, renal pelvis, ureter, bladder cancer, chemotherapy, ureteroscopy, nephroureterectomy, neoplasm, (neo)adjuvant treatment, instillation, recurrence, risk factors, metastatic, immunotherapy, and survival. The results were assessed by a panel of experts.

EVIDENCE SYNTHESIS

Even though data are accruing, for many areas there is still insufficient high-level evidence to provide strong recommendations. Patient stratification on the basis of histology and clinical examination (including imaging) and assessment of patients at risk of Lynch syndrome will aid management. Kidney-sparing management should be offered as a primary treatment option to patients with low-risk UTUC and two functional kidneys. In particular, for patients with high-risk or metastatic UTUC, new treatment options have become available. In high-risk UTUC, platinum-based chemotherapy after radical nephroureterectomy, and adjuvant nivolumab for unfit or patients who decline chemotherapy, are options. For metastatic disease, gemcitabine/carboplatin chemotherapy is recommended as first-line treatment for cisplatin-ineligible patients. Patients with PD-1/PD-L1-positive tumours should be offered a checkpoint inhibitor (pembrolizumab or atezolizumab).

CONCLUSIONS

These guidelines contain information on the management of individual patients according to the current best evidence. Urologists should take into account the specific clinical characteristics of each patient when determining the optimal treatment regimen according to the risk stratification of these tumours.

PATIENT SUMMARY

Cancer of the upper urinary tract is rare, but because 60% of these tumours are invasive at diagnosis, timely and appropriate diagnosis is most important. A number of known risk factors exist.

Perspectives on the future of urothelial carcinoma therapy: chemotherapy and beyond

INTRODUCTION

Despite recent developments in the landscape of urothelial carcinoma (UC) treatment, platinum combination chemotherapy still remains a milestone. Recently immunotherapeutic agents have gained ever-growing attractivity, particularly in the metastatic setting. Novel chemotherapeutic strategies and agents, such as antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs), and powerful combination regimens have been developed to overcome the resistance of most UC to current therapies.

AREAS COVERED

Herein, we review the current standard-of-care chemotherapy, the development of ADCs, the rationale for combining therapy regimens with chemotherapy in current trials, and future directions in UC management.

EXPERT OPINION

Immunotherapy has prompted a revolution in the treatment paradigm of UC. However, only a few patients experience a long-term response when treated with single-agent immunotherapies. Combination treatments are necessary to bypass resistance mechanisms and broaden the clinical utility of current options. Current evidence supports the intensification of standard-of-care chemotherapy with maintenance immunotherapy. However, the optimal sequence, combination, and duration must be determined to achieve individual longevity with acceptable health-related quality of life. In that regard, ADCs appear as a promising alternative for single and combination strategies in UC, as they specifically target the tumor cells, thereby, theoretically improving treatment efficacy and avoiding extensive off-target toxicities.

Anticancer maintenance chemotherapy prolonged prognosis of metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients: A single institute retrospective study using propensity score matching

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of anticancer maintenance chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

METHODS

We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes of 74 patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma who had been treated with or without anticancer maintenance chemotherapy between 2006 and 2020 at Osaka University Hospital. Progression-free survival and cancer-specific survival periods were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method starting from the end date of induction chemotherapy. The backgrounds of patients who had treated with or without anticancer maintenance chemotherapy were adjusted using the propensity score matching method.

RESULTS

Twenty-nine patients had undergone anticancer maintenance chemotherapy, whereas 45 patients had not. The median progression-free survival periods were 18.7 and 5.6 months (p = 0.0209), and the median cancer-specific survival periods were 25.1 and 15.2 months (p = 0.1299), in patients with or without anticancer maintenance chemotherapy respectively. In multivariate analysis, anticancer maintenance chemotherapy significantly prolonged both progression-free survival (hazard ratio 3.65, 95% confidence interval 1.96-6.78, p < 0.0001) and cancer-specific survival (hazard ratio 3.05, 95% confidence interval 1.62-5.76, p = 0.0006) in patients with partial response or stable disease after induction chemotherapy. Also, anticancer maintenance chemotherapy significantly prolonged both progression-free survival (13.1 months vs. 4.9 months, p = 0.0027) and cancer-specific survival (35.1 months vs. 11.8 months, p = 0.0044) in propensity score matched patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Anticancer maintenance chemotherapy may be considered the treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma patients after induction chemotherapy.

Impact of Adjuvant Chemotherapy on Variant Histology of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Propensity Score-Matched Cohort Analysis

Background

The advantage of adjuvant chemotherapy for upper urinary tract urothelial cancer (UTUC) has been reported, whereas its impact on upper tract cancer with variant histology remains unclear. We aimed to answer the abovementioned question with our real-world data.

Design, Setting, and Participants

Patients who underwent radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) and were confirmed to have variant UTUC were retrospectively evaluated for eligibility of analysis. In the Taiwan UTUC Collaboration database, we identified 245 patients with variant UTUC among 3,109 patients with UTUC who underwent RNU after excluding patients with missing clinicopathological information.

Intervention

Those patients with variant UTUC were grouped based on their history of receiving adjuvant chemotherapy or not.

Outcome Measurements and Statistical Analysis

Propensity score matching was used to reduce the treatment assignment bias. Multivariable Cox regression model was used for the analysis of overall, cancer-specific, and disease-free survival.

Results and Limitations

For the patients with variant UTUC who underwent adjuvant chemotherapy compared with those without chemotherapy, survival benefit was identified in overall survival in univariate analysis (hazard ratio (HR), 0.527; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.285–0.973; p = 0.041). In addition, in multivariate analysis, patients with adjuvant chemotherapy demonstrated significant survival benefits in cancer-specific survival (OS; HR, 0.454; CI, 0.208–0.988; p = 0.047), and disease-free survival (DFS; HR, 0.324; 95% CI, 0.155–0.677; (p = 0.003). The main limitations of the current study were its retrospective design and limited case number.

Conclusions

Adjuvant chemotherapy following RNU significantly improved cancer-related survivals in patients with UTUC with variant histology.

Adjuvant immunotherapy for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder

INTRODUCTION

There are substantial unmet needs with regards to adjuvant therapy for muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the bladder, including patients with persistent disease histologically following neoadjuvant platinum-based therapy and radical resection, as well as patients who are not eligible for or refuse cytotoxic chemotherapy. As such, increased interest has been developed in advancing the use of systemic immunotherapy in the postoperative setting.

AREAS COVERED

We begin by examining current uses of systemic immunotherapy in the treatment of advanced UC. We also review emerging neoadjuvant data and describe current adjuvant approaches. We then report and analyze data on adjuvant immunotherapy, including the recent randomized trials on adjuvant nivolumab and atezolizumab, and conclude with a discussion on the available evidence and likely directions of the field.

EXPERT OPINION

Systemic immunotherapy can serve to enhance postoperative therapies for muscle-invasive bladder UC, as exemplified by the recent approval of nivolumab. Further research will serve to define optimal immunotherapy timing and combinations with other systemic therapies, as well as identify predictive biomarkers to allow effective tailoring of therapy for each patient.