A systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy after chemoradiation for locally advanced cervical cancer

Investigating the protective effects of Astragalus polysaccharides on cyclophosphamide-induced bone marrow suppression in mice and bone mesenchymal stem cells

BACKGROUND

This study determines the role and mechanism of APS in cyclophosphamide-induced myelosuppression in mice and bone mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) cell model.

METHODS

Cy-induced myelosuppression mice and BMSCs cell model were established. Fifty C57BL/6 mice (weighing 20 ± 2 g) were randomly divided into five groups. Femur and tibia samples, bone marrow samples, and blood samples were collected 3 days after the last injection of Cy. Histopathology changes and cell apoptosis were detected. Cell viability, apoptosis, cycle distribution, reactive oxygen species activity, osteogenesis ability, and protein levels were detected. γ-H2AX and senescence-associated β-galactosidase activity expression was detected by immunofluorescence. Cy-induced senescence and Wnt/β-catenin related protein levels were detected using western blotting.

RESULTS

The results showed that APS effectively induced Cy-induced histological injury and cell apoptosis rate. After treated with APS, ROS and ALP levels were significantly increased. In BMSCs, cell viability, apoptosis, and cell cycle distribution were also influenced by APS treatment. Compared with the control group, cell viability was significantly increased, the cell apoptosis rate was decreased while the number of cells remained in the G0-G1 phase was increased. Meanwhile, ROS levels were significantly increased in APS group. Cell senescence and Wnt/β-catenin related protein (γ-H2AX, SA-β-gal, p21, p16, p-β-catenin/ β-catenin, c-Myc, and AXIN2) levels were also altered both in vivo and in vitro. Interestingly, the effects of APS were reversed by BML-284.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that APS protected Cy-induced myelosuppression through the Wnt/β-catenin pathway and APS is a potential therapeutic drug for Cy-induced myelosuppression.

Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer with Concurrent Chemoradiotherapy plus or Not Adjuvant Chemotherapy: A Retrospective Analysis Based on 2018 FIGO Staging

Background: The comprehensive treatment mode of combining concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with adjuvant chemotherapy (AC) is a commonly used mainstream model in the clinical practice of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). However, the necessity for AC after CCRT lacks sufficient evidence-based medical support. This study constructs a predictive model for the survival time dependence of CCRT ± AC for LACC based on the 2018 International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging with internal validation, the prognosis was assessed with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) and concurrent cisplatin, and provides guidance for future stratified treatment. Materials and Methods: The retrospective analysis included 482 patients with LACC who CCRT from January 2016 to January 2023. Patients who used the 2009 FIGO staging were all standardized for the 2018 FIGO staging. The 482 patients with LACC were divided into a training set (n = 290) and a validation set (n = 192) at a ratio of 6:4. COX multivariate regression model and LASSO regression were used to screen for independent prognostic factors affecting progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and a nomogram clinical prediction model was constructed based on these factors. Evaluate the effectiveness of the model through the receiver operating characteristic curve, calibration curve, decision curve, risk heat map, and survival curves for risk stratification. Results: The PFS and OS independent prognostic risk factors affecting the 2018 FIGO staging of LACC during CCRT were validated to be similar to the 2009 FIGO staging prediction model reported in previous literature. In the training cohort, area under the curve (AUC) values at 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.941, 0.882, and 0.885 for PFS, and 0.946, 0.946, and 0.969 for OS, respectively. When applied to a test cohort, the model also showed accurate prediction result (AUC at 1, 3, and 5 years were 0.869, 0.891, and 0.899 for PFS, and 0.891, 0.941 and 0.878 for OS, respectively). Subgroup analysis suggests that patients with LACC, adenocarcinoma, stage IVA, pelvic lymph node metastasis, pretreatment hemoglobin ≤100 g/l and residual tumor diameter >2 cm, who received CCRT in the 2018 FIGO stage, may benefit more from adjuvant chemtherapy. Conclusions: Based on the 2018 FIGO staging, a nomogram prediction model for PFS and OS in patients with LACC undergoing CCRT was developed. The model, established by combining weighted clinical and pathological factors, can provide more personalized treatment predictions in clinical practice. For patients with high-risk factors such as residual tumor diameter > 2 cm after CCRT for LACC, AC may bring benefits.

Adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiotherapy as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer versus chemoradiotherapy alone (OUTBACK): an international, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Standard treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer is chemoradiotherapy, but many patients relapse and die of metastatic disease. We aimed to determine the effects on survival of adjuvant chemotherapy after chemoradiotherapy.

METHODS

The OUTBACK trial was a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial done in 157 hospitals in Australia, China, Canada, New Zealand, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, and the USA. Eligible participants were aged 18 year or older with histologically confirmed squamous cell carcinoma, adenosquamous cell carcinoma, or adenocarcinoma of the cervix (FIGO 2008 stage IB1 disease with nodal involvement, or stage IB2, II, IIIB, or IVA disease), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status 0-2, and adequate bone marrow and organ function. Participants were randomly assigned centrally (1:1) using a minimisation approach and stratified by pelvic or common iliac nodal involvement, requirement for extended-field radiotherapy, FIGO 2008 stage, age, and site to receive standard cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (40 mg/m2 cisplatin intravenously once-a-week for 5 weeks, during radiotherapy with 45·0-50·4 Gy external beam radiotherapy delivered in fractions of 1·8 Gy to the whole pelvis plus brachytherapy; chemoradiotherapy only group) or standard cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy followed by adjuvant chemotherapy with four cycles of carboplatin (area under the receiver operator curve 5) and paclitaxel (155 mg/m2) given intravenously on day 1 of a 21 day cycle (adjuvant chemotherapy group). The primary endpoint was overall survival at 5 years, analysed in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all eligible patients who were randomly assigned). Safety was assessed in all patients in the chemoradiotherapy only group who started chemoradiotherapy and all patients in the adjuvant chemotherapy group who received at least one dose of adjuvant chemotherapy. The OUTBACK trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01414608, and the Australia New Zealand Clinical Trial Registry, ACTRN12610000732088.

FINDINGS

Between April 15, 2011, and June 26, 2017, 926 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the chemoradiotherapy only group (n=461) or the adjuvant chemotherapy group (n=465), of whom 919 were eligible (456 in the chemoradiotherapy only group and 463 in the adjuvant chemotherapy group; median age 46 years [IQR 37 to 55]; 663 [72%] were White, 121 [13%] were Black or African American, 53 [6%] were Asian, 24 [3%] were Aboriginal or Pacific islander, and 57 [6%] were other races) and included in the analysis. As of data cutoff (April 12, 2021), median follow-up was 60 months (IQR 45 to 65). 5-year overall survival was 72% (95% CI 67 to 76) in the adjuvant chemotherapy group (105 deaths) and 71% (66 to 75) in the chemoradiotherapy only group (116 deaths; difference 1% [95% CI -6 to 7]; hazard ratio 0·90 [95% CI 0·70 to 1·17]; p=0·81). In the safety population, the most common clinically significant grade 3-4 adverse events were decreased neutrophils (71 [20%] in the adjuvant chemotherapy group vs 34 [8%] in the chemoradiotherapy only group), and anaemia (66 [18%] vs 34 [8%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 107 (30%) in the adjuvant chemotherapy group versus 98 (22%) in the chemoradiotherapy only group, most commonly due to infectious complications. There were no treatment-related deaths.

INTERPRETATION

Adjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel chemotherapy given after standard cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy for unselected locally advanced cervical cancer increased short-term toxicity and did not improve overall survival; therefore, it should not be given in this setting.

FUNDING

National Health and Medical Research Council and National Cancer Institute.

Efficacy and safety of adjuvant chemotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) is generally treated using concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (CCRT); yet, the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) following CCRT remains controversial.

METHODS

The databases Embase, Web of Science, and PubMed were analyzed for relevant research. Primary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

Fifteen trials with 4041 patients were included. Pooled HRs for PFS and OS were 0.81 (95 % CI: 0.67-0.96) and 0.69 (95 % CI: 0.51-0.93), respectively. However, subgroup analyses indicated that in randomized trials and trials with larger sample sizes (n > 100) as well as ACT cycles ≤ 3, ACT was not linked with improved PFS and OS. Moreover, ACT induced a greater rate of hematologic toxicities (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

Higher quality of evidence suggests that ACT could not yield additional survival benefits for LACC; however, identifying high-risk patients who may benefit from ACT is required to design further clinical trials and better inform treatment decisions.

Recurrence risk stratification for locally advanced cervical cancer using multi-modality transformer network

Objectives

Recurrence risk evaluation is clinically significant for patients with locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). We investigated the ability of transformer network in recurrence risk stratification of LACC based on computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance (MR) images.

Methods

A total of 104 patients with pathologically diagnosed LACC between July 2017 and December 2021 were enrolled in this study. All patients underwent CT and MR scanning, and their recurrence status was identified by the biopsy. We randomly divided patients into training cohort (48 cases, non-recurrence: recurrence = 37: 11), validation cohort (21 cases, non-recurrence: recurrence = 16: 5), and testing cohort (35 cases, non-recurrence: recurrence = 27: 8), upon which we extracted 1989, 882 and 315 patches for model's development, validation and evaluation, respectively. The transformer network consisted of three modality fusion modules to extract multi-modality and multi-scale information, and a fully-connected module to perform recurrence risk prediction. The model's prediction performance was assessed by six metrics, including the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, f1-score, sensitivity, specificity and precision. Univariate analysis with F-test and T-test were conducted for statistical analysis.

Results

The proposed transformer network is superior to conventional radiomics methods and other deep learning networks in both training, validation and testing cohorts. Particularly, in testing cohort, the transformer network achieved the highest AUC of 0.819 ± 0.038, while four conventional radiomics methods and two deep learning networks got the AUCs of 0.680 ± 0.050, 0.720 ± 0.068, 0.777 ± 0.048, 0.691 ± 0.103, 0.743 ± 0.022 and 0.733 ± 0.027, respectively.

Conclusions

The multi-modality transformer network showed promising performance in recurrence risk stratification of LACC and may be used as an effective tool to help clinicians make clinical decisions.

Treatment Outcomes of Computer Tomography-Guided Brachytherapy in Cervical Cancer in Hong Kong: A Retrospective Review

Simple Summary

This retrospective study reviews 135 patients with locally advanced cervical cancer treated with chemo-radiotherapy with image-guided adaptive brachytherapy with CT guidance. The study has a long follow-up period of 53.6 months. The outcome was excellent with a five-year local control, pelvic control, distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival rates being 90.7%, 84.2%, 80.0% and 87.2%, respectively. Adenocarcinoma was significantly associated with worse local control, pelvic control, distant metastasis-free survival and overall survival rates.

Abstract

(1) Background: To report the long-term clinical outcomes of computer-tomography (CT)-guided brachytherapy (BT) for locally advanced cervical cancer. (2) Methods: A total of 135 patients with FIGO stage IB-IVA cervical cancer treated with definitive radiotherapy +/− chemotherapy with an IGABT boost at Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, between November 2013 and December 2019 were included. Treatment included pelvic radiotherapy 40 Gy/20 Fr/4 weeks +/− chemotherapy then CT-guided BT (7 Gy × 4 Fr) and a sequential parametrial boost. The primary outcome was local control. Secondary outcomes were pelvic control, distant metastasis-free survival, overall survival (OS) and late toxicities. (3) Results: The median follow-up was 53.6 months (3.0–99.6 months). The five-year local control, pelvic control, distant metastasis-free survival and OS rates were 90.7%, 84.3%, 80.0% and 87.2%, respectively. The incidence of G3/4 long-term toxicities was 6.7%, including proctitis (2.2%), radiation cystitis (1.5%), bowel perforation (0.7%), ureteric stricture (0.7%) and vaginal stenosis and fistula (0.7%). Patients with adenocarcinomas had worse local control (HR 5.82, 95% CI 1.84–18.34, p = 0.003), pelvic control (HR 4.41, 95% CI 1.83–10.60, p = 0.001), distant metastasis-free survival (HR 2.83, 95% CI 1.17–6.84, p = 0.021) and OS (HR 4.38, 95% CI: 1.52–12.67, p = 0.003) rates. Distant metastasis-free survival was associated with HR-CTV volume ≥ 30 cm³ (HR 3.44, 95% CI 1.18–9.42, p = 0.025) and the presence of pelvic lymph node (HR 3.44, 95% CI 1.18–9.42, p = 0.025). OS was better in patients with concurrent chemotherapy (HR 4.33, 95% CI: 1.40–13.33, p = 0.011). (4) Conclusions: CT-guided BT for cervical cancer achieved excellent long-term local control and OS. Adenocarcinoma was associated with worse clinical outcomes. (4) Conclusion: CT-guided BT for cervical cancer achieved excellent long-term local control and OS. Adenocarcinoma was associated with worse clinical outcomes.

Is There a Place for Adjuvant Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer?

Findings on the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) after the concurrent chemoradiation (CCRT) therapy were inconsistent, and the OUTBACK trial was expected to shed some light regarding the topic. Its results on ACT in LACC were negative, with the conclusion of not to use it. The objective of this review was to present the inconsistencies of previous studies, along with the OUTBACK trial in more detail, and to rethink whether its results provide an unambiguous and definite answer to the optimal position of ACT in the treatment of LACC. To critically appraise the OUTBACK trial and understand the consequences of its results, we used only randomized controlled studies (RCTs) on ACT in LACC that have been included in high-quality systematic reviews and meta-analyses. We calculated the pooled prediction intervals using a random effects meta-analysis of all published randomized studies including the OUTBACK trial. After combining the OUTBACK trial with the results of four previous randomized trials, the pooled hazard ratio for overall survival benefit of CCRT + ACT was 0.95 (95% CI 0.75; 1.20). The pooled hazard ratio of the four previous trials was 1.00 (95% CI 0.69; 1.44). The OUTBACK trial improved the precision of the pooled estimate, but the clinical heterogeneity and the consequent prediction intervals are still very wide, and with 95% reliability, we can expect that if the new study, using a similar approach to the ACT, on a randomly selected patient population from the presented five trials is conducted, its hazard ratio for overall survival after ACT would be between 0.47 and 1.93. In conclusion, there is an absolute need for further research in order to optimally define the position of ACT in the treatment of LACC.