Dual data and motif clustering improves the modeling and interpretation of phosphoproteomic data

Dissecting signaling regulators driving AXL-mediated bypass resistance and associated phenotypes by phosphosite perturbations

Receptor tyrosine kinase (RTK)-targeted therapies are often effective but invariably limited by drug resistance. A major mechanism of acquired resistance involves "bypass" switching to alternative pathways driven by non-targeted RTKs that restore proliferation. One such RTK is AXL whose overexpression, frequently observed in bypass resistant tumors, drives both cell survival and associated malignant phenotypes such as epithelial-to-mesenchymal (EMT) transition and migration. However, the signaling molecules and pathways eliciting these responses have remained elusive. To explore these coordinated effects, we generated a panel of mutant lung adenocarcinoma PC9 cell lines in which each AXL intracellular tyrosine residue was mutated to phenylalanine. By integrating measurements of phosphorylation signaling and other phenotypic changes associated with resistance through multivariate modeling, we mapped signaling perturbations to specific resistant phenotypes. Our results suggest that AXL signaling can be summarized into two clusters associated with progressive disease and poor clinical outcomes in lung cancer patients. These clusters displayed favorable Abl1 and SFK motifs and their phosphorylation was consistently decreased by dasatinib. High-throughput kinase specificity profiling showed that AXL likely activates the SFK cluster through FAK1 which is known to complex with Src. Moreover, the SFK cluster overlapped with a previously established focal adhesion kinase (FAK1) signature conferring EMT-mediated erlotinib resistance in lung cancer cells. Finally, we show that downstream of this kinase signaling, AXL and YAP form a positive feedback loop that sustains drug tolerant persister cells. Altogether, this work demonstrates an approach for dissecting signaling regulators by which AXL drives erlotinib resistance-associated phenotypic changes.

Computational systems approach towards phosphoproteomics and their downstream regulation

Protein phosphorylation plays an essential role in modulating cell signalling and its downstream transcriptional and translational regulations. Until recently, protein phosphorylation has been studied mostly using low-throughput biochemical assays. The advancement of mass spectrometry (MS)-based phosphoproteomics transformed the field by enabling measurement of proteome-wide phosphorylation events, where tens of thousands of phosphosites are routinely identified and quantified in an experiment. This has brought a significant challenge in analysing large-scale phosphoproteomic data, making computational methods and systems approaches integral parts of phosphoproteomics. Previous works have primarily focused on reviewing the experimental techniques in MS-based phosphoproteomics, yet a systematic survey of the computational landscape in this field is still missing. Here, we review computational methods and tools, and systems approaches that have been developed for phosphoproteomics data analysis. We categorise them into four aspects including data processing, functional analysis, phosphoproteome annotation and their integration with other omics, and in each aspect, we discuss the key methods and example studies. Lastly, we highlight some of the potential research directions on which future work would make a significant contribution to this fast-growing field. We hope this review provides a useful snapshot of the field of computational systems phosphoproteomics and stimulates new research that drives future development.

Phosphoproteomics data-driven signalling network inference: Does it work?

The advent of global phosphoproteome profiling has led to wide phosphosite coverage and therefore the opportunity to predict kinase-substrate associations from these datasets. However, the regulatory kinase is unknown for most substrates, due to biased and incomplete database annotations. In this study we compare the performance of six pairwise measures to predict kinase-substrate associations using a data driven approach on publicly available time resolved and perturbation mass spectrometry-based phosphoproteome data. First, we validated the performance of these measures using as a reference both a literature-based phosphosite-specific protein interaction network and a predicted kinase-substrate (KS) interactions set. The overall performance in predicting kinase-substrate associations using pairwise measures across both these reference sets was poor. To expand into the wider interactome space, we applied the approach on a network comprising pairs of substrates regulated by the same kinase (substrate-substrate associations) but found the performance to be equally poor. However, the addition of a sequence similarity filter for substrate-substrate associations led to a significant boost in performance. Our findings imply that the use of a filter to reduce the search space, such as a sequence similarity filter, can be used prior to the application of network inference methods to reduce noise and boost the signal. We also find that the current gold standard for reference sets is not adequate for evaluation as it is limited and context-agnostic. Therefore, there is a need for additional evaluation methods that have increased coverage and take into consideration the context-specific nature of kinase-substrate associations.