1
|
Anderson MJ, Confino JE, Mack CD, Herzog MM, Levine WN. Determining the True Incidence of Glenohumeral Instability Among Players in the National Football League: An Epidemiological Study of Non-Missed Time Shoulder Instability Injuries. Orthop J Sports Med 2023; 11:23259671231198025. [PMID: 37840903 PMCID: PMC10568991 DOI: 10.1177/23259671231198025] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2023] [Accepted: 04/24/2023] [Indexed: 10/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Shoulder instability encompasses a spectrum of glenohumeral pathology ranging from subluxation to dislocation. While dislocation frequently leads to removal from play, athletes are often able to play through subluxation. Previous research on glenohumeral instability among athletes has largely focused on missed-time injuries, which has likely disproportionately excluded subluxation injuries and underestimated the overall incidence of shoulder instability. Purpose To describe the epidemiology of shoulder instability injuries resulting in no missed time beyond the date of injury (non-missed time injuries) among athletes in the National Football League (NFL). Study Design Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods The NFL's electronic medical record was retrospectively reviewed to identify non-missed time shoulder instability injuries during the 2015 through 2019 seasons. For each injury, player age, player position, shoulder laterality, instability type, instability direction, injury timing, injury setting, and injury mechanism were recorded. For injuries that occurred during games, incidence rates were calculated based on time during the season as well as player position. The influence of player position on instability direction was also investigated. Results Of the 546 shoulder instability injuries documented during the study period, 162 were non-missed time injuries. The majority of non-missed time injuries were subluxations (97.4%), occurred during games (70.7%), and resulted from a contact mechanism (91.2%). The overall incidence rate of game-related instability was 1.6 injuries per 100,000 player-plays and was highest during the postseason (3.5 per 100,000 player-plays). The greatest proportion of non-missed time injuries occurred in defensive secondary players (28.4%) and offensive linemen (19.8%), while kickers/punters and defensive secondary players had the highest game incidence rates (5.5 and 2.1 per 100,000 player-plays, respectively). In terms of direction, 54.3% of instability events were posterior, 31.9% anterior, 8.5% multidirectional, and 5.3% inferior. Instability events were most often anterior among linebackers and wide receivers (50% and 100%, respectively), while posterior instability was most common in defensive linemen (66.7%), defensive secondary players (58.6%), quarterbacks (100.0%), running backs (55.6%), and tight ends (75.0%). Conclusion The majority of non-missed time shoulder instability injuries (97.4%) were subluxations, which were likely excluded from or underreported in previous shoulder instability studies due to the inherent difficulty of detecting and diagnosing shoulder subluxation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J.J. Anderson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | - Jamie E. Confino
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - William N. Levine
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Villefort C, Stern C, Gerber C, Wyss S, Ernstbrunner L, Wieser K. Mid-term to long-term results of open posterior bone block grafting in recurrent posterior shoulder instability: a clinical and CT-based analysis. JSES Int 2023; 7:211-217. [PMID: 36911764 PMCID: PMC9998725 DOI: 10.1016/j.jseint.2022.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Background There is little consensus on the best treatment after failed conservative management of recurrent posterior shoulder instability. The purpose of this study was to analyze our clinical and radiological mid-term to long-term results of an open, posterior bone block procedure for the treatment of recurrent posterior shoulder instability. Methods From 1999 to 2015, 14 patients were included in the study and available for clinical and radiographic follow-up (FU). FU included a standardized physical examination, assessment of the Constant-Murley-Score, subjective shoulder value, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, and Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index. Conventional radiographs and a computed tomography (CT)-scan were performed preoperatively and at latest FU. Glenohumeral arthropathy was classified as per Samilson and Prieto. The CT scans were used to evaluate the structure of the graft (resorption, union), graft positioning, glenoid version, centering of the humeral head, and glenoid erosion and morphology. Results The median age at the time of surgery was 26 years (range 16-41 years) and the median FU period was 9 years (range 4-20 years). The rate of reported dynamic postoperative subluxation and instability was 46% (n = 6) and the rate of dynamic posterior instability during clinical testing at FU was 31% (n = 4). The tested instability rate in the traumatic group was 14% (n = 1) compared to the atraumatic group with 50% (n = 3) during clinical FU. The mean Constant-Murley-Score increased from preoperatively (77 ± 11 points) to postoperatively (83 ± 14 points, P = .158). The last FU showed an American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score of 85 ± 12; the Western Ontario Shoulder Instability Index score was 715 ± 475 points. The mean subjective shoulder value increased from 58% ± 19 preoperatively to 73% ± 17 at final FU (P = .005). Degenerative changes increased by at least one grade in 67% of the patients. Mean preoperative glenoid retroversion (CT) was 7.5° ± 6°. The position of the graft was optimal in 86% (n = 12). In 62% of the cases, a major resorption of the graft (Zhu grade II) was observed. Conclusion The rate of tested recurrent instability at last FU was as high as 31% (n = 4, atraumatic [n = 3] vs. traumatic [n = 1]) after a median FU of 9 years. Given the moderate improvement of clinical outcome scores, shoulder stability and the increase of degenerative joint changes by at least one grade (Samilson/Prieto) in 67% of patients, a posterior bone block procedure is not a uniformly satisfying treatment option for recurrent posterior shoulder subluxation, especially in cases of atraumatic posterior instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christina Villefort
- Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christoph Stern
- Department of Radiology, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Christian Gerber
- Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Sabine Wyss
- Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Lukas Ernstbrunner
- Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Karl Wieser
- Department of Orthopaedics, Balgrist University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gouveia K, Kay J, Memon M, Simunovic N, Bedi A, Ayeni OR. Return to Sport After Surgical Management of Posterior Shoulder Instability: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 2022; 50:845-857. [PMID: 33974810 DOI: 10.1177/03635465211011161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/31/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Posterior shoulder instability accounts for a small proportion of all shoulder instability, although it can affect athletes of all types, from contact to overhead athletes. Surgical treatment is quite successful in these patients; however, the literature reports a wide range of rates of return to sport. PURPOSE/HYPOTHESIS The purpose was to determine the return-to-sport rates after surgical stabilization for posterior shoulder instability. It was hypothesized that patients would experience a high rate of return to sport. STUDY DESIGN Systematic review and meta-analysis; Level of evidence, 4. METHODS Embase, PubMed, and MEDLINE were searched for relevant literature from database inception until April 2020, and studies were screened by 2 reviewers independently and in duplicate for studies reporting rates of return to sport after surgical management of posterior shoulder instability. Demographic data as well as data on return to sport and functional outcomes were recorded. A meta-analysis of proportions was used to combine the rates of return to sport using a random effects model. A risk of bias was assessed for all included studies. RESULTS Overall, 32 studies met inclusion criteria and comprised 1100 patients (1153 shoulders) with a mean age of 22.8 years (range, 11-65) and a mean follow-up of 43.2 months (range, 10-228). The pooled rate of return to any level of sport was 88% (95% CI, 84%-92%; I2 = 68.7%). In addition, the pooled rate of return to the preinjury level was 68% (95% CI, 60%-76%; I2 = 79%). Moreover, the pooled return-to-sport rate for contact athletes was 94% (95% CI, 90%-97%; I2 = 0%), while for throwing athletes it was 88% (95% CI, 83%-92%; I2 = 0%). CONCLUSION Surgical management of posterior shoulder instability resulted in a high rate of return to sport, as well as significant pain reduction and functional improvement in most patients. However, only two-thirds of athletes can return to their preinjury levels of sport.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kyle Gouveia
- Michael G. DeGroote School of Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Jeffrey Kay
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Muzammil Memon
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Nicole Simunovic
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| | - Asheesh Bedi
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA
| | - Olufemi R Ayeni
- Division of Orthopaedic Surgery, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Yan YY, Holmes RD, Mallinson PI, Andrews GT, Munk PL, Ouellette HA. Imaging Review of Hockey-Related Upper Extremity Injuries. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2022; 26:3-12. [PMID: 35139555 DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1731422] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
Ice hockey is a fast-paced contact sport with a high incidence of injuries. Upper extremity injury is one of the most common regions of the body to be injured in hockey. This imaging review will equip the radiologist with a knowledge of the more common and severe upper extremity injuries that occur in this sport.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yet Yen Yan
- Musculoskeletal Section, Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.,Department of Radiology, Changi General Hospital, Singapore, Singapore
| | - R Davis Holmes
- Musculoskeletal Section, Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Paul I Mallinson
- Musculoskeletal Section, Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Gordon T Andrews
- Musculoskeletal Section, Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Peter L Munk
- Musculoskeletal Section, Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| | - Hugue A Ouellette
- Musculoskeletal Section, Department of Radiology, Vancouver General Hospital, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Anderson MJJ, Mack CD, Herzog MM, Levine WN. Epidemiology of Shoulder Instability in the National Football League. Orthop J Sports Med 2021; 9:23259671211007743. [PMID: 33997084 PMCID: PMC8113962 DOI: 10.1177/23259671211007743] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/04/2020] [Accepted: 08/18/2020] [Indexed: 11/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Shoulder instability is a common and potentially debilitating injury among collision sport athletes that can lead to long-term damage of the glenohumeral joint. Limited data exist regarding instability among elite athletes in the National Football League (NFL). Purpose To describe the epidemiology of shoulder instability in the NFL from 2012 through 2017. Study Design Descriptive epidemiology study. Methods The NFL's injury database was reviewed for shoulder instability injuries resulting in missed time during the study inclusion dates. Injuries were classified by type and direction, as well as timing, setting, and mechanism. Median missed time was determined for the different types and directions of instability. Incidence rates for game-related injuries were calculated based on timing during the season and player position. Finally, the relationship between player position and instability direction was assessed. Results During the 6-year study period, 355 players sustained 403 missed-time shoulder instability injuries. Most injuries occurred during games (65%) via a contact mechanism (85%). The overall incidence rate of game-related instability was 3.6 injuries per 100,000 player-plays and was highest during the preseason (4.9 per 100,000 player-plays). The defensive secondary position accounted for the most injuries, but quarterbacks had the highest incidence rate in games (5.5 per 100,000 player-plays). Excluding unspecified events (n = 128; 32%), 70% (n = 192) of injuries were subluxations and 30% (n = 83) were dislocations; 75% of dislocations were anterior, while subluxations were more evenly distributed between the anterior and posterior directions (45% vs 52%, respectively). Players missed substantially more time after dislocation compared with subluxation (median, 47 days vs 13 days, respectively). When instability direction was known, the majority of instability events among quarterbacks and offensive linemen were posterior (73% and 53%, respectively), while anterior instability was most common for all other positions. Conclusion Shoulder instability is a common injury in the NFL and can result in considerable missed time. Dislocations occur less frequently than subluxations but lead to greater time lost. While most dislocations are anterior, more than half of subluxations are posterior, which is likely the result of repetitive microtrauma to the posterior capsulolabral complex sustained during sport-specific motions such as blocking. The risk of instability varies by player position, and position may also influence instability direction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matthew J J Anderson
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| | | | | | - William N Levine
- Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Columbia University Irving Medical Center, New York, New York, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Christensen DL, Elsenbeck MJ, Wolfe JA, Nickel WN, Roach W, Waltz RA, Dickens JF, LeClere LE. Risk Factors for Failure of Nonoperative Treatment of Posterior Shoulder Labral Tears on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Mil Med 2021; 185:e1556-e1561. [PMID: 32601668 DOI: 10.1093/milmed/usaa122] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/24/2020] [Revised: 05/17/2020] [Accepted: 05/18/2020] [Indexed: 01/29/2023] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION There are no reports in the literature describing risk factors for failure of nonoperative treatment of patients with posterior labral tears on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). The purpose of this study is to identify risk factors for failure of nonoperative treatment in patients with an isolated posterior glenoid labral tear identified on MRI only. Patients with posterior labral tears on MRI who fail to improve with nonoperative treatment likely share a constellation of clinical history, physical exam, and radiographic findings. METHODS One hundred and fifty-nine active duty military service members under the age of 40 with a posterior labral tear seen on MRI and who were clinically evaluated by a musculoskeletal trained physician were identified. We retrospectively evaluated their records ensuring a minimum of 2 years follow-up after MRI to identify surgical intervention for the posterior labral tear during this time period. Patients were stratified into two groups, those treated with any combination of nonoperative modalities and those treated with posterior labral repair surgery during the 2 years after the MRI. The electronic medical records were reviewed for clinical presentation and physical exam results. We measured multiple radiographic parameters, including glenoid version, size of the tear, and bone loss on MRI. Qualitative and quantitative data were compared between groups using Fisher's exact test and Student's t-test, respectively. This study was conducted under institutional review board approval. RESULTS Of the 157 patients' shoulders in our study, 52% (n = 82) of patients with posterior labral tears underwent nonoperative treatment while 48% (n = 75) underwent surgery. The significant risk factors associated with surgery were a history of a specific injury, primary presenting complaint of instability, patient reported history of subluxation, inability to trust their shoulder with overhead activity, decreased strength with weight lifting, positive posterior load/shift exam, positive anterior apprehension, increased osseous glenoid retroversion, increased humeral head subluxation ratio, and anterior labral height (P < 0.05). Patients with a chief complaint of pain were much more likely to succeed with nonoperative treatment while those with instability underwent surgery more often. Ten (12.5%) of the surgical procedures included an anterior and posterior labral repair/stabilization procedure. CONCLUSION Patients with an MRI confirmed posterior labral tear, which present with subjective complaints and physical exam maneuvers consistent with instability, appear less likely to be treated nonoperatively. Increased glenoid retroversion and posterior humeral head subluxation may also predispose patients toward surgical treatment. Additionally, posterior labral tears may extend into the anterior labrum more frequently than is recognized on MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel L Christensen
- Walter Reed Department of Surgery Orthopaedic Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University, 8901 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20889
| | - Michael J Elsenbeck
- Walter Reed Department of Surgery Orthopaedic Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University, 8901 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20889
| | - Jared A Wolfe
- Walter Reed Department of Surgery Orthopaedic Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University, 8901 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20889
| | - Walter N Nickel
- Walter Reed Department of Surgery Orthopaedic Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University, 8901 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20889
| | - William Roach
- Walter Reed Department of Surgery Orthopaedic Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University, 8901 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20889
| | - Robert A Waltz
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery United States Naval Academy, Naval Health Clinic Annapolis, 121 Blake Rd, Annapolis, MD 21402
| | - Jonathan F Dickens
- Walter Reed Department of Surgery Orthopaedic Service, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University, 8901 Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD 20889
| | - Lance E LeClere
- Department of Orthopaedic Surgery United States Naval Academy, Naval Health Clinic Annapolis, 121 Blake Rd, Annapolis, MD 21402
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Longo UG, Ciuffreda M, Locher J, Casciaro C, Mannering N, Maffulli N, Denaro V. Posterior shoulder instability: a systematic review. Br Med Bull 2020; 134:34-53. [PMID: 32419023 DOI: 10.1093/bmb/ldaa009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 03/14/2020] [Accepted: 03/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/12/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION This review aims to provide information on outcomes of surgical procedures for soft tissue or bony glenoid and/or humeral abnormalities in case of posterior shoulder instability. SOURCE OF DATA A systematic review of the literature according to the PRISMA guidelines was performed. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Medline, CINAHL, Cochrane, Embase, Ovid and Google Scholar databases using various combinations of the keywords 'shoulder', 'posterior instability', 'dislocation', 'reversed bony bankart', 'reversed Hill Sachs', and 'capsulolabral' was performed. AREAS OF AGREEMENT A total of 847 shoulders in 810 patients were included. A redislocation event occurred in 33 (8.7%) of 411 shoulders with soft tissue abnormalities and in 12 (9.1%) of 132 shoulders with bony abnormalities of the glenoid, humeral head or both. AREAS OF CONTROVERSY The optimal treatment modalities for posterior shoulder dislocation remain to be defined. GROWING POINTS Operative stabilization for posterior shoulder instability should be lesion-specific and should correct all components of the posterior instability. AREAS TIMELY FOR DEVELOPING RESEARCH Future prospective studies should aim to establish the optimal treatment modalities for posterior shoulder instability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Umile Giuseppe Longo
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Trigoria, Rome, Italy
| | - Mauro Ciuffreda
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Trigoria, Rome, Italy
| | - Joel Locher
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Trigoria, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Casciaro
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Trigoria, Rome, Italy
| | - Nicholas Mannering
- The University of Melbourne, Melbourne Medical School, Melbourne VIC 3010, Australia
| | - Nicola Maffulli
- Department of Musculoskeletal Disorders, Faculty of Medicine and Surgery, University of Salerno, Salerno 84081, Italy
- Centre for Sports and Exercise Medicine, Barts and The London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Mile End Hospital, London E1 2AD, UK
| | - Vincenzo Denaro
- Department of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery, Campus Bio-Medico University, Via Alvaro del Portillo, 200, 00128 Trigoria, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Albano D, Messina C, Sconfienza LM. Posterior Shoulder Instability: What to Look for. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 2020; 28:211-221. [PMID: 32241659 DOI: 10.1016/j.mric.2019.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/02/2023]
Abstract
Posterior shoulder instability is often hard to diagnose with clinical examination. Patients generally present with vague pain, weakness, and/or joint clicking but less frequently complaining of frank sensation of instability. Imaging examinations, especially MR imaging and magnetic resonance arthrography, have a pivotal role in the identification and management of this condition. This review describes the pathologic micro/macrotraumatic magnetic resonance features of posterior shoulder instability as well as the underlying joint abnormalities predisposing to this condition, including developmental anomalies of the glenoid fossa, humeral head, posterior labrum, and capsular and ligamentous structures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Domenico Albano
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, Milano 20161, Italy; Sezione di Scienze Radiologiche, Dipartimento di Biomedicina, Neuroscienze e Diagnostica Avanzata, Università degli Studi di Palermo, Via del Vespro 127, Palermo 90127, Italy
| | - Carmelo Messina
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, Milano 20161, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Pascal 36, Milano 20133, Italy
| | - Luca Maria Sconfienza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, Milano 20161, Italy; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Pascal 36, Milano 20133, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Abstract
Posterior shoulder instability is a relatively uncommon condition, occurring in ∼10% of those with shoulder instability. Because of the rarity of the condition and the lack of knowledge in treatment, it is often misdiagnosed or patients experience a delay in diagnosis. Posterior instability typically affects athletes participating in contact or overhead sports and is usually the result of repetitive microtrauma or blunt force with the shoulder in the provocative position of flexion, adduction, and internal rotation, leading to recurrent subluxation events. Acute traumatic posterior dislocations are rare injuries with an incidence rate of 1.1 per 100,000 person years. This rate is ∼20 times lower than that of anterior shoulder dislocations. Risk factors for recurrent instability are: (1) age below 40 at time of first instability; (2) dislocation during a seizure; (3) a large reverse Hill-Sachs lesion; and (4) glenoid retroversion. A firm understanding of the pathoanatomy, along with pertinent clinical and diagnostic modalities is required to accurately diagnosis and manage this condition.
Collapse
|
10
|
Valencia Mora M, Ibán MÁR, Heredia JD, Gutiérrez-Gómez JC, Diaz RR, Aramberri M, Cobiella C. Physical Exam and Evaluation of the Unstable Shoulder. Open Orthop J 2017; 11:946-956. [PMID: 29114336 PMCID: PMC5646139 DOI: 10.2174/1874325001711010946] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2017] [Revised: 10/09/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 01/03/2023] Open
Abstract
Background: The clinical evaluation of the patient with shoulder instability can be challenging. The pathological spectrum ranges from the straightforward “recurrent anterior dislocation” patient to the overhead athlete with a painful shoulder but not clear instability episodes. Advances in shoulder arthroscopy and imaging have helped in understanding the anatomy and physiopathology of the symptoms. The aim of this general article is to summarize the main examination manoeuvres that could be included in an overall approach to a patient with a suspicion of instability. Material and Methods: In order to achieve the above-mentioned objective, a thorough review of the literature has been performed. Data regarding sensibility and specificity of each test have been included as well as a detailed description of the indications to perform them. Also, the most frequent and recent variations of these diagnostic tests are included. Results: Laxity and instability should be considered separately. For anterior instability, a combination of apprehension, relocation and release tests provide great specificity. On the other hand, multidirectional or posterior instability can be difficult to diagnose especially when the main complain is pain. Conclusion: A detailed interview and clinical examination of the patient are mandatory in order to identify a shoulder instability problem. Range of motion of both shoulders, clicking of catching sensations as well as pain, should be considered together with dislocation and subluxation episodes. Specific instability and hyperlaxity tests should be also performed to obtain an accurate diagnosis.
Collapse
|
11
|
Alepuz ES, Pérez-Barquero JA, Jorge NJ, García FL, Baixauli VC. Treatment of The Posterior Unstable Shoulder. Open Orthop J 2017; 11:826-847. [PMID: 28979596 PMCID: PMC5611705 DOI: 10.2174/1874325001711010826] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2016] [Revised: 10/28/2016] [Accepted: 10/28/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND It is estimated that approximately 5% of glenohumeral instabilities are posterior. There are a number of controversies regarding therapeutic approaches for these patients. METHODS We analyse the main surgery alternatives for the treatment of the posterior shoulder instability. We did a research of the publications related with posterior glenohumeral instability. RESULTS There are conservative and surgical treatment options. Conservative treatment has positive results in most patients, with around 65 to 80% of cases showing recurrent posterior dislocation. There are multiple surgical techniques, both open and arthroscopic, for the treatment of posterior glenohumeral instability. There are procedures that aim to repair bone defects and others that aim to repair soft tissues and capsulolabral injuries. The treatment should be planned according to each case on an individual basis according to the patient characteristics and the injury type. Surgical treatment is indicated in patients with functional limitations arising from instability and/or pain that have not improved with rehabilitation treatment. The indications for arthroscopic treatment are recurrent posterior subluxation caused by injury of the labrum or the capsulolabral complex; recurrent posterior subluxation caused by capsuloligamentous laxity or capsular redundancy; and multidirectional instability with posterior instability as a primary component. Arthroscopic assessment will help identify potential injuries associated with posterior instability such as bone lesions or defects and lesions or defects of soft tissues. The main indications for open surgery would be in cases of Hill Sachs lesions or broad reverse Bankart lesions not accessible by arthroscopy. We indicated non-anatomical techniques (McLaughlin or its modifications) for reverse Hill-Sachs lesions with impairment of the articular surface between 20% and 50%. Disimpaction of the fracture and placement of bone graft (allograft or autograft) is a suitable treatment for acute lesions that do not exceed 50% of the articular surface and with articular cartilage in good condition. Reconstruction with allograft may be useful in lesions affecting up to 50% of the humeral surface and should be considered when there is a situation of non-viable cartilage at the fracture site. For defects greater than 50% of the articular surface or in the case of dislocations over 6 months in duration where there is poor bone quality, some authors advocate substitution techniques as a treatment of choice. The main techniques for treating glenoid bone defects are posterior bone block and posterior opening osteotomy of the glenoid. CONCLUSIONS The treatment of the posterior glenohumeral instability has to be individualized based on the patient´s injuries, medical history, clinical exam and goals. The most important complications in the treatment of posterior glenohumeral instability are recurrent instability, avascular necrosis and osteoarthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | - Nadia Jover Jorge
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Unión de Mutuas. Valencia. Spain
| | - Francisco Lucas García
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| | - Vicente Carratalá Baixauli
- Department of Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Saw R, Finch CF, Samra D, Baquie P, Cardoso T, Hope D, Orchard JW. Injuries in Australian Rules Football: An Overview of Injury Rates, Patterns, and Mechanisms Across All Levels of Play. Sports Health 2017; 10:208-216. [PMID: 28825878 PMCID: PMC5958447 DOI: 10.1177/1941738117726070] [Citation(s) in RCA: 50] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
CONTEXT The nature of Australian rules football (Australian football) predisposes both unique and common injuries compared with those sustained in other football codes. The game involves a combination of tackling, kicking, high-speed running (more than other football codes), and jumping. Two decades of injury surveillance has identified common injuries at the professional level (Australian Football League [AFL]). OBJECTIVE To provide an overview of injuries in Australian rules football, including injury rates, patterns, and mechanisms across all levels of play. STUDY DESIGN A narrative review of AFL injuries, football injury epidemiology, and biomechanical and physiological attributes of relevant injuries. RESULTS The overall injury incidence in the 2015 season was 41.7 injuries per club per season, with a prevalence of 156.2 missed games per club per season. Lower limb injuries are most prevalent, with hamstring strains accounting for 19.1 missed games per club per season. Hamstring strains relate to the volume of high-speed running required in addition to at times having to collect the ball while running in a position of hip flexion and knee extension. Anterior cruciate ligament injuries are also prevalent and can result from contact and noncontact incidents. In the upper limb, shoulder sprains and dislocations account for 11.5 missed games per club per season and largely resulted from tackling and contact. Concussion is less common in AFL than other tackling sports but remains an important injury, which has notably become more prevalent in recent years, theorized to be due to a more conservative approach to management. Although there are less injury surveillance data for non-AFL players (women, community-level, children), many of these injuries appear to also be common across all levels of play. CLINICAL RELEVANCE An understanding of injury profiles and mechanisms in Australian football is crucial in identifying methods to reduce injury risk and prepare players for the demands of the game.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard Saw
- Olympic Park Sports Medicine Centre,
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Caroline F. Finch
- Australian Collaboration for Research
into Injury in Sport and Its Prevention, Federation University Australia, Ballarat,
Victoria, Australia
| | - David Samra
- The Stadium Sports Medicine Clinic,
Sydney, New South Walesm Australia
| | - Peter Baquie
- Olympic Park Sports Medicine Centre,
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Tanusha Cardoso
- Alphington Sports Medicine Clinic,
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Danielle Hope
- Peak Sports Medicine Clinic, Melbourne,
Victoria, Australia
| | - John W. Orchard
- School of Public Health, University of
Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
DeLong JM, Bradley JP. Posterior shoulder instability in the athletic population: Variations in assessment, clinical outcomes, and return to sport. World J Orthop 2015; 6:927-934. [PMID: 26716088 PMCID: PMC4686439 DOI: 10.5312/wjo.v6.i11.927] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/29/2015] [Revised: 07/29/2015] [Accepted: 10/27/2015] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Posterior instability of the shoulder is becoming an increasingly recognized shoulder injury in the athletic population. Diagnostic elements, such as etiology, directionality, and degree of instability are essential factors to assess in the unstable athletic shoulder. Concomitant injuries and associated pathologic lesions continue to be a significant challenge in the surgical management of posterior shoulder instability. Return to sport and previous level of play is ultimately the goal for every committed athlete and surgeon, thus subpopulations of athletes should be recognized as distinct entities requiring unique diagnostic, functional outcome measures, and surgical approaches.
Collapse
|
14
|
Nonoperative Rehabilitation for Shoulder Instability. TECHNIQUES IN SHOULDER AND ELBOW SURGERY 2014. [DOI: 10.1097/bte.0000000000000016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
|