The Use of Navigation in Osteotomies Around the Knee

Early results of high tibial osteotomy versus combined arthroscopic surgery

Objective

To investigate the early effect of high tibial osteotomy (HTO) compared with combined arthroscopic surgery.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on patients who underwent HTO at The First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University from January 2018 to January 2022. 138 patients (163 knees) with knee osteoarthritis (KOA) treated with HTO were selected. The medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), joint line convergence angle (JLCA), femoral tibial angle (FTA), hip-knee-ankle (HKA) angle, weight-bearing line (WBL) ratio of the knee joint, opening gap, opening angle, American Knee Society score (KSS), US Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) score, and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score were measured to determine the different effects between HTO and HTO combined with arthroscopic by logistic regression analysis.

Results

Patients with HTO combined with arthroscopic surgery have improved functional scores as well as imaging perspectives compared to preoperative. By multivariate logistic analysis, it was concluded that arthroscopic surgery and gender are influential factors in the outcome of HTO surgery. The postoperative KSS score was 2.702 times more likely to be classified as excellent in the HTO combined with arthroscopy group than in the HTO group [Exp (β) = 2.702, 95% CI (1.049-6.961), P = 0.039]; the postoperative KSS score was 0.349 times more likely to be classified as excellent in women than in men [Exp (β) = 0.349, 95% CI (0.138-0.883), P = 0.026].

Conclusion

Better results with HTO combined with arthroscopic surgery. HTO combined with arthroscopy is a better choice in the surgical treatment of KOA.

[High tibial osteotomy with computer navigation for medial gonarthritis]

OBJECTIVE

To study significance of computer navigation for improving clinical and radiological results of medial gonarthritis treatment compared to non-invasive methods of lower limb axis correction control.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 73 patients who were divided into 2 groups. The main group included 40 patients, the control group - 33 patients. In the main group, high tibial osteotomy was performed using computer navigation, in the control group - using non-invasive techniques. Clinical assessment was carried out according to the KSS, KOOS and VAS scales. We assessed the main reference angles of the lower limb considering X-ray data.

RESULTS

Both groups were characterized by postoperative improvement of clinical results according to various scales. Computer navigation provided higher accuracy in most cases. We focused on target correction of 3° valgus.

CONCLUSION

High tibial osteotomy with computer navigation or non-invasive techniques is an effective treatment method for medial gonarthritis. There are no significant differences in clinical results according to the KSS and KOOS scales, as well as X-ray data after correction. We found significant differences in VAS scores.

Comparison of computer-assisted navigated technology and conventional technology in high tibial osteotomy (HTO): a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Though some studies have reported navigated high tibial osteotomy (HTO) is a useful procedure to correct knee deformity. There is still great controversy whether navigated HTO can achieve better accuracy of limb alignment and greater clinical outcomes. Current meta-analysis was conducted to investigate whether better radiographic outcomes and clinical outcomes could be acquired in navigated HTO compared with the conventional procedure.

METHOD

We conducted a literature search in the electronic databases, including Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. We identified studies published before August 2020. We also checked the references of the related articles for any relevant studies. We strictly followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematics reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines in this review. This research was performed using Review Manager 5.4 software.

RESULTS

Fourteen articles were included, involving 1399 knees. Our meta-analysis indicated that patients undergoing navigated HTO had significantly better outcomes in outliers of aimed limb alignment (RD=-0.24, 95% CI: =-0.34 to -0.13, p < 0.01), outliers of aimed tibial posterior slope (TPS) (RD=-0.41, 95% CI: -0.51 to -0.30, p < 0.01), Range of Motion (ROM) (MD = 6.37, 95%CI: 0.83-11.91, p = 0.02), and American knee society knee score (AKS knee score) (MD = 3.88, 95%CI: 1.37-6.39, p = 0.002). No significant differences were found in Lysholm score (MD = 1.30, 95%CI: -0.31 to 2.90, p = 0.11), American knee society function score (AKS function score) (RD = 1.42, 95%CI: -0.15 to 2.99, p = 0.08), complications (RD=-0.01, 95% CI: = -0.05 to 0.04, p = 0.77), delayed union (RD=-0.01, 95% CI: = -0.02 to 0.03, p = 0.59), and reoperation (RD = 0, 95% CI: -0.09 to 0.10, p = 0.98) between the two groups. The operation time in the navigated group was 15.46 min longer than in the conventional group.

CONCLUSION

Navigated HTO provided more accurate and reproducible radiographic outcomes in the correction of the malalignment than conventional techniques, and there is no difference in the risk of complications compared with conventional HTO. However, it is unclear whether navigation HTO can achieve better clinical results. More randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with high quality, large sample size, and sufficient follow-up period are required.