1
|
Noebauer-Huhmann IM, Vanhoenacker FM, Vilanova JC, Tagliafico AS, Weber MA, Lalam RK, Grieser T, Nikodinovska VV, de Rooy JWJ, Papakonstantinou O, Mccarthy C, Sconfienza LM, Verstraete K, Martel-Villagrán J, Szomolanyi P, Lecouvet FE, Afonso D, Albtoush OM, Aringhieri G, Arkun R, Aström G, Bazzocchi A, Botchu R, Breitenseher M, Chaudhary S, Dalili D, Davies M, de Jonge MC, Mete BD, Fritz J, Gielen JLMA, Hide G, Isaac A, Ivanoski S, Mansour RM, Muntaner-Gimbernat L, Navas A, O Donnell P, Örgüç Ş, Rennie WJ, Resano S, Robinson P, Sanal HT, Ter Horst SAJ, van Langevelde K, Wörtler K, Koelz M, Panotopoulos J, Windhager R, Bloem JL. Soft tissue tumor imaging in adults: whole-body staging in sarcoma, non-malignant entities requiring special algorithms, pitfalls and special imaging aspects. Guidelines 2024 from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR). Eur Radiol 2024:10.1007/s00330-024-10897-z. [PMID: 39030374 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10897-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2024] [Revised: 03/30/2024] [Accepted: 04/30/2024] [Indexed: 07/21/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The revised European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology (ESSR) consensus guidelines on soft tissue tumor imaging represent an update of 2015 after technical advancements, further insights into specific entities, and revised World Health Organization (2020) and AJCC (2017) classifications. This second of three papers covers algorithms once histology is confirmed: (1) standardized whole-body staging, (2) special algorithms for non-malignant entities, and (3) multiplicity, genetic tumor syndromes, and pitfalls. MATERIALS AND METHODS A validated Delphi method based on peer-reviewed literature was used to derive consensus among a panel of 46 specialized musculoskeletal radiologists from 12 European countries. Statements that had undergone interdisciplinary revision were scored online by the level of agreement (0 to 10) during two iterative rounds, that could result in 'group consensus', 'group agreement', or 'lack of agreement'. RESULTS The three sections contain 24 statements with comments. Group consensus was reached in 95.8% and group agreement in 4.2%. For whole-body staging, pulmonary MDCT should be performed in all high-grade sarcomas. Whole-body MRI is preferred for staging bone metastasis, with [18F]FDG-PET/CT as an alternative modality in PET-avid tumors. Patients with alveolar soft part sarcoma, clear cell sarcoma, and angiosarcoma should be screened for brain metastases. Special algorithms are recommended for entities such as rhabdomyosarcoma, extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma, myxoid liposarcoma, and neurofibromatosis type 1 associated malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumors. Satisfaction of search should be avoided in potential multiplicity. CONCLUSION Standardized whole-body staging includes pulmonary MDCT in all high-grade sarcomas; entity-dependent modifications and specific algorithms are recommended for sarcomas and non-malignant soft tissue tumors. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT These updated ESSR soft tissue tumor imaging guidelines aim to provide support in decision-making, helping to avoid common pitfalls, by providing general and entity-specific algorithms, techniques, and reporting recommendations for whole-body staging in sarcoma and non-malignant soft tissue tumors. KEY POINTS An early, accurate, diagnosis is crucial for the prognosis of patients with soft tissue tumors. These updated guidelines provide best practice expert consensus for standardized imaging algorithms, techniques, and reporting. Standardization can improve the comparability examinations and provide databases for large data analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Iris-Melanie Noebauer-Huhmann
- Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image Guided Therapy, Division of Neuroradiology and Musculoskeletal Radiology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
| | - Filip M Vanhoenacker
- Department of Radiology, AZ Sint Maarten Mechelen University (Hospital) Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium
- Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, University of Ghent, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Joan C Vilanova
- Department of Radiology, Clínica Girona, Institute of Diagnostic Imaging (IDI) Girona, University of Girona, Girona, Spain
| | - Alberto S Tagliafico
- Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy
- Department of Radiology, IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genoa, Italy
| | - Marc-André Weber
- Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Pediatric Radiology and Neuroradiology, University Medical Center Rostock, Rostock, Germany
| | - Radhesh K Lalam
- Department of Radiology, Robert Jones and Agnes Hunt Orthopaedic Hospital, Oswestry, UK
| | - Thomas Grieser
- Department for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Violeta Vasilevska Nikodinovska
- Medical Faculty, Ss. Cyril and Methodius University, Skopje, Macedonia
- Department of Radiology, University Surgical Clinic "St. Naum Ohridski", Skopje, Macedonia
| | - Jacky W J de Rooy
- Department of Imaging, Radiology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - Olympia Papakonstantinou
- 2nd Department of Radiology, Attikon Hospital, National and Kapodistrian University of Athens, Athens, Greece
| | - Catherine Mccarthy
- Oxford Musculoskeletal Radiology and Oxford University Hospitals, Oxford, UK
| | - Luca Maria Sconfienza
- IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Milan, Italy
- Dipartimento Di Scienze Biomediche Per La Salute, Università Degli Studi Di Milano, Milan, Italy
| | | | | | - Pavol Szomolanyi
- High Field MR Center, Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image‑Guided Therapy, Medical University Vienna, Vienna, Austria
- Department of Imaging Methods, Institute of Measurement Science, Slovak Academy of Sciences, Bratislava, Slovakia
| | - Frédéric E Lecouvet
- Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, Cliniques Universitaires Saint Luc, Institut de Recherche Expérimentale et Clinique (IREC), Institut du Cancer Roi Albert II (IRA2), Université Catholique de Louvain (UCLouvain), Brussels, Belgium
| | - Diana Afonso
- Hospital Particular da Madeira and Hospital da Luz Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Omar M Albtoush
- Department of Radiology, University of Jordan, Ammam, Jordan
| | - Giacomo Aringhieri
- Academic Radiology, Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Remide Arkun
- Ege University Medical School (Emeritus), Izmir, Türkiye
- Star Imaging Center, Izmir, Türkiye
| | - Gunnar Aström
- Department of Immunology, Genetics and Pathology (Oncology) and Department of Surgical Sciences (Radiology), Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden
| | - Alberto Bazzocchi
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rajesh Botchu
- Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | | | | | - Danoob Dalili
- Academic Surgical Unit, South West London Elective Orthopaedic Centre (SWLEOC), London, UK
| | - Mark Davies
- Department of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Royal Orthopedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK
| | - Milko C de Jonge
- Department of Radiology, St. Antonius Hospital, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Berna D Mete
- Department of Radiology School of Medicine, Izmir Demokrasi University, Izmir, Türkiye
| | - Jan Fritz
- Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA
- Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Eberhard Karls University Tuebingen, University Hospital Tuebingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Jan L M A Gielen
- Department of Radiology, Jessa Ziekenhuis, Campus Virga Jesse, Hasselt, Belgium
| | - Geoff Hide
- Department of Radiology, Freeman Hospital, Newcastle Upon Tyne, UK
| | - Amanda Isaac
- School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King's College London, London, UK
| | - Slavcho Ivanoski
- St. Erasmo Hospital for Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology Ohrid, Ohrid, Macedonia
| | | | | | - Ana Navas
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | | | | | - Winston J Rennie
- Clinical MSK Radiology, Loughborough University, Leicester Royal Infirmary, Leicester, UK
| | | | - Philip Robinson
- Musculoskeletal Radiology Department Chapel Allerton Hospital, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- NIHR Leeds Biomedical Research Centre, Leeds, UK
| | - Hatice T Sanal
- Radiology Department, University of Health Sciences, Gülhane Training and Research Hospital, Ankara, Türkiye
| | - Simone A J Ter Horst
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Centre Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | | | - Klaus Wörtler
- Musculoskeletal Radiology Section, Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich ‑ TUM School of Medicine, Munich, Germany
| | - Marita Koelz
- Clinical Institute of Pathology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Joannis Panotopoulos
- Departement of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Division of Orthopaedics, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Reinhard Windhager
- Departement of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria
| | - Johan L Bloem
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Øines MN, Smith HG, Preisler L, Penninga L. Leiomyosarcoma of the abdomen and retroperitoneum; a systematic review. Front Surg 2024; 11:1375483. [PMID: 39086921 PMCID: PMC11288885 DOI: 10.3389/fsurg.2024.1375483] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/23/2024] [Accepted: 06/24/2024] [Indexed: 08/02/2024] Open
Abstract
Background Intraabdominal and retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas are rare cancers, which cause significant morbidity and mortality. Symptoms, treatment and follow up differs from other cancers, and proper diagnosis and treatment of intraabdominal and retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas is of utmost importance. We performed a systematic review to collect and summarize available evidence for diagnosis and treatment for these tumours. Methods We performed a systematic literature search of Pubmed from the earliest entry possible, until January 2021. Our search phrase was (((((colon) OR (rectum)) OR (intestine)) OR (abdomen)) OR (retroperitoneum)) AND (leiomyosarcoma). All hits were evaluated by two of the authors. Results Our predefined search identified 1983 hits, we selected 218 hits and retrieved full-text copies of these. 144 studies were included in the review. Discussion This review summarizes the current knowledge and evidence on non-uterine abdominal and retroperitoneal leiomyosarcomas. The review has revealed a lack of high-quality evidence, and randomized clinical trials. There is a great need for more substantial and high-quality research in the area of leiomyosarcomas of the abdomen and retroperitoneum. Systematic Review Registration PROSPERO, identifier, CRD42023480527.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mari Nanna Øines
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | | | - Louise Preisler
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Luit Penninga
- Department of Surgery and Transplantation, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Department of Clinical Medicine, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Bozkurt E, Yigman S, Adsay V, Gurses B, Tellioglu G, Bilge O. Primary angiosarcoma of the Pancreas - A case Report and review of the literature. Acta Chir Belg 2024; 124:73-80. [PMID: 38265358 DOI: 10.1080/00015458.2024.2309718] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2023] [Accepted: 01/20/2024] [Indexed: 01/25/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Angiosarcomas are malignant neoplasms that originate from endothelial cells. The symptoms exhibit a non-specific nature, and achieving a preoperative diagnosis is frequently challenging. They are seldom encountered in the abdomen, and their occurrence in the pancreas is even rarer. METHODS Here we document a 67-year-old man with pancreatic angiosarcoma and analyse the literature to outline the clinicopathologic characteristics of this rare phenomenon. RESULTS This patient with family history of pancreas cancer presented with abdominal pain, and the CT-scan revealed a 4 cm mass at the neck of the pancreas but CA19-9 was normal. Radiologic findings were unusual for ordinary pancreas cancer. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy through endoscopic ultrasound revealed "undifferentiated malignant cells for which the diagnosis of "carcinoma" was favoured. Total pancreatectomy, splenectomy and portal vein reconstruction were performed and epithelioid angiosarcoma were diagnosed. Despite an uneventful postoperative period, discharge on postoperative day 8 without any complications, as well as diligent post-discharge clinical care, the patient died 65 days postoperatively, attributed to the presence of extensive metastasis. A comprehensive literature search has identified a limited number of documented cases of primary pancreatic angiosarcoma, with only ten cases reported to date. CONCLUSIONS Pancreatic angiosarcomas are very rare and prone to misdiagnosis. The formation of a more demarcated but high-grade tumour with necrosis is a feature that distinguishes angiosarcomas from ordinary carcinomas of this organ. Pathologic diagnosis is also highly challenging closely resembling undifferentiated carcinomas. Angiosarcomas are highly aggressive when they occur in the pancreas. Prompt diagnosis at an early stage is crucial as surgery with curative intent serves as the primary treatment approach.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emre Bozkurt
- Department of General Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Samet Yigman
- Department of General Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Volkan Adsay
- Department of Pathology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Bengi Gurses
- Department of Radiology, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Gurkan Tellioglu
- Department of General Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| | - Orhan Bilge
- Department of General Surgery, Koç University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Ferron G, Bataillon G, Martinez A, Chibon F, Valentin T. Gynecological sarcomas, surgical management: primary, metastatic, and recurrent disease. Int J Gynecol Cancer 2024; 34:393-402. [PMID: 38438176 DOI: 10.1136/ijgc-2023-004582] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Adult-type gynecological soft tissue and visceral sarcomas are rare tumors, with an estimated incidence of 13% of all sarcomas and 4% of all gynecological malignancies. They most often develop in the uterus (83%), followed by the ovaries (8%), vulva and vagina (5%), and other gynecological organs (2%). The objective of this review is to provide an overview of the current management of gynecological sarcomas, according to international guidelines. The management of gynecological sarcomas should follow the recommendations for the management of soft tissue and visceral sarcomas. Centralizing cases in expert centers improves patient survival, both for the diagnostic phase and for multidisciplinary therapeutic management. In the case of pelvic soft tissue sarcomas, a radiological biopsy is essential before any surgical decision is taken. In the case of a myometrial tumour which may correspond to a sarcoma, if conservative surgery such as myomectomy or morcellation is planned, an ultrasound-guided biopsy with pathological analysis including comparative genomic hybridization analysis must be carried out. In all cases, en bloc surgery, without rupture, is mandatory. Many rare histological subtypes require specific surgical management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Gwenael Ferron
- Surgical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
- OncoSARC (Oncogenesis of Sarcoma), INSERM UMR1037, Toulouse, France
| | - Guillaume Bataillon
- Anatomopathology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Alejandra Martinez
- Surgical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
- T2i (Anti-tumour immunity and immunotherapy), INSERM UMR1037, Toulouse, France
| | - Frederic Chibon
- OncoSARC (Oncogenesis of Sarcoma), INSERM UMR1037, Toulouse, France
- Surgical Pathology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - Thibaud Valentin
- OncoSARC (Oncogenesis of Sarcoma), INSERM UMR1037, Toulouse, France
- Medical Oncology, Institut Universitaire du Cancer Toulouse Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Tong Y, Pi Y, Cui Y, Jiang L, Gong Y, Zhao D. Early distinction of lymph node metastasis in patients with soft tissue sarcoma and individualized survival prediction using the online available nomograms: A population-based analysis. Front Oncol 2022; 12:959804. [PMID: 36568161 PMCID: PMC9767978 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.959804] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/09/2022] [Accepted: 11/16/2022] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Background The presence of metastatic tumor cells in regional lymph nodes is considered as a significant indicator for inferior prognosis. This study aimed to construct some predictive models to quantify the probability of lymph node metastasis (LNM) and survival rate of patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS) with LNM. Methods Research data were extracted from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2017, and data of patients with STS from our medical institution were collected to form an external testing set. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to determine the independent risk factors for developing LNM. On the basis of the identified variables, we developed a diagnostic nomogram to predict the risk of LNM in patients with STS. Those patients with STS presenting with LNM were retrieved to build a cohort for identifying the independent prognostic factors through univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Then, two nomograms incorporating the independent prognostic predictors were developed to predict the overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) for patients with STS with LNM. Kaplan-Meier (K-M) survival analysis was conducted to study the survival difference. Moreover, validations of these nomograms were performed by the receiver operating characteristic curves, the area under the curve, calibration curves, and the decision curve analysis (DCA). Results A total of 16,601 patients with STS from the SEER database were enrolled in our study, of which 659 (3.97%) had LNM at the initial diagnosis. K-M survival analysis indicated that patients with LNM had poorer survival rate. Sex, histology, primary site, grade, M stage, and T stage were found to be independently related with development of LNM in patients with STS. Age, grade, histology, M stage, T stage, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and surgery were identified as the independent prognostic factors for OS of patients with STS with LNM, and age, grade, M stage, T stage, radiotherapy, and surgery were determined as the independent prognostic factors for CSS. Subsequently, we constructed three nomograms, and their online versions are as follows: https://tyxupup.shinyapps.io/probabilityofLNMforSTSpatients/, https://tyxupup.shinyapps.io/OSofSTSpatientswithLNM/, and https://tyxupup.shinyapps.io/CSSofSTSpatientswithLNM/. The areas under the curve (AUCs) of diagnostic nomogram were 0.839 in the training set, 0.811 in the testing set, and 0.852 in the external testing set. For prognostic nomograms, the AUCs of 24-, 36-, and 48-month OS were 0.820, 0.794, and 0.792 in the training set and 0.759, 0.728, and 0.775 in the testing set, respectively; the AUCs of 24-, 36-, and 48-month CSS were 0.793, 0.777, and 0.775 in the training set and 0.775, 0.744, and 0.738 in the testing set, respectively. Furthermore, calibration curves suggested that the predicted values were consistent with the actual values. For the DCA, our nomograms showed a superior net benefit across a wider scale of threshold probabilities for the prediction of risk and survival rate for patients with STS with LNM. Conclusion These newly proposed nomograms promise to be useful tools in predicting the risk of LNM for patients with STS and individualized survival prediction for patients with STS with LNM, which may help to guide clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yuexin Tong
- Department of Orthopedics, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Yangwei Pi
- Department of Orthopedics, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Yuekai Cui
- The Second Clinical Medical School of the Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, Zhejiang, China
| | - Liming Jiang
- Department of Orthopedics, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Yan Gong
- Department of Orthopedics, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China
| | - Dongxu Zhao
- Department of Orthopedics, The China-Japan Union Hospital of Jilin University, Changchun, Jilin, China,*Correspondence: Dongxu Zhao,
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
García-Ortega DY, Álvarez-Cano A, Clara-Altamirano MA, Caro-Sánchez C, Ruvalcaba-González CDLC, Cortés-González CC, Luna-Ortiz K. Bone invasion in soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities: An underappreciated prognostic factor. Bone invasion in soft tissue sarcomas. Surg Oncol 2021; 40:101692. [PMID: 34864631 DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2021.101692] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Revised: 11/24/2021] [Accepted: 11/26/2021] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Bone invasion is unfrequently reported in soft tissue sarcomas of the extremities (eSTS), it is difficult to assess preoperatively and its prognostic impact has not been extensively studied. The objective of this paper was to analyze the incidence and the clinical impact of histologically proven bone invasion in individuals with eSTS. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed using the medical files patients who had eSTS and were treated between 2012 and 2016. A 5 years survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional risk assessment. The outcomes of patients with and without bone invasion were compared. RESULTS 370 patients were included in the analysis. The median follow up was 25 months, the median age was 45 years (IQR 31-58). Bone invasion was found in 41 (11.08%). Median tumor size was 11.8 cm. The majority of individuals were diagnosed at stage IV (n = 116, 31.4%), followed by stage IIIB (n = 87, 23.5%). High histological grade was associated with worse OS (HR 2.23, CI 95% 1.36-3.65, p = 0.001). Absence of bone invasion was associated with better prognosis (HR 0.541, CI 95% 0.34-0.86, p = 0.009). OS was 27.3 vs 49.28 months. The disease-free survival (DFS) was 25.1 in bone invasion vs 45.23 without bone invasion. CONCLUSION Bone invasion in individuals with eSTS is an independent adverse prognostic factor associated with lower OS and DFS; although infrequently reported, bone invasion might be considered as part of the staging in the future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | | | | | - Kuauhyama Luna-Ortiz
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery Department. National Cancer Institute, Mexico City, Mexico
| |
Collapse
|