Volumetric and dosimetric comparison of two delineation guidelines for the radiation treatment of laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma

Comparing different CT, PET and MRI multi-modality image combinations for deep learning-based head and neck tumor segmentation

BACKGROUND

Manual delineation of gross tumor volume (GTV) is essential for radiotherapy treatment planning, but it is time-consuming and suffers inter-observer variability (IOV). In clinics, CT, PET, and MRI are used to inform delineation accuracy due to their different complementary characteristics. This study aimed to investigate deep learning to assist GTV delineation in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) by comparing various modality combinations.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective study had 153 patients with multiple sites of HNSCC including their planning CT, PET, and MRI (T1-weighted and T2-weighted). Clinical delineations of gross tumor volume (GTV-T) and involved lymph nodes (GTV-N) were collected as the ground truth. The dataset was randomly divided into 92 patients for training, 31 for validation, and 30 for testing. We applied a residual 3 D UNet as the deep learning architecture. We independently trained the UNet with four different modality combinations (CT-PET-MRI, CT-MRI, CT-PET, and PET-MRI). Additionally, analogical to post-processing, an average fusion of three bi-modality combinations (CT-PET, CT-MRI, and PET-MRI) was produced as an ensemble. Segmentation accuracy was evaluated on the test set, using Dice similarity coefficient (Dice), Hausdorff Distance 95 percentile (HD95), and Mean Surface Distance (MSD).

RESULTS

All imaging combinations including PET provided similar average scores in range of Dice: 0.72-0.74, HD95: 8.8-9.5 mm, MSD: 2.6-2.8 mm. Only CT-MRI had a lower score with Dice: 0.58, HD95: 12.9 mm, MSD: 3.7 mm. The average of three bi-modality combinations reached Dice: 0.74, HD95: 7.9 mm, MSD: 2.4 mm.

CONCLUSION

Multimodal deep learning-based auto segmentation of HNSCC GTV was demonstrated and inclusion of the PET image was shown to be crucial. Training on combined MRI, PET, and CT data provided limited improvements over CT-PET and PET-MRI. However, when combining three bimodal trained networks into an ensemble, promising improvements were shown.

A rapid review of influential factors and appraised solutions on organ delineation uncertainties reduction in radiotherapy

Background and purpose.Accurate volume delineation plays an essential role in radiotherapy. Contouring is a potential source of uncertainties in radiotherapy treatment planning that could affect treatment outcomes. Therefore, reducing the degree of contouring uncertainties is crucial. The role of utilized imaging modality in the organ delineation uncertainties has been investigated. This systematic review explores the influential factors on inter-and intra-observer uncertainties of target volume and organs at risk (OARs) delineation focusing on the used imaging modality for these uncertainties reduction and the reported subsequent histopathology and follow-up assessment.Methods and materials.An inclusive search strategy has been conducted to query the available online databases (Scopus, Google Scholar, PubMed, and Medline). 'Organ at risk', 'target', 'delineation', 'uncertainties', 'radiotherapy' and their relevant terms were utilized using every database searching syntax. Final article extraction was performed following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Included studies were limited to the ones published in English between 1995 and 2020 and that just deal with computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) modalities.Results.A total of 923 studies were screened and 78 were included of which 31 related to the prostate 20 to the breast, 18 to the head and neck, and 9 to the brain tumor site. 98% of the extracted studies performed volumetric analysis. Only 24% of the publications reported the dose deviations resulted from variation in volume delineation Also, heterogeneity in studied populations and reported geometric and volumetric parameters were identified such that quantitative synthesis was not appropriate.Conclusion.This review highlightes the inter- and intra-observer variations that could lead to contouring uncertainties and impede tumor control in radiotherapy. For improving volume delineation and reducing inter-observer variability, the implementation of well structured training programs, homogeneity in following consensus and guidelines, reliable ground truth selection, and proper imaging modality utilization could be clinically beneficial.