1
|
Qi M, Sha Y, Zhang D, Ren J. An MRI-based radiomics nomogram for detecting cervical esophagus invasion in hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. Cancer Imaging 2023; 23:120. [PMID: 38102719 PMCID: PMC10724942 DOI: 10.1186/s40644-023-00642-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/03/2023] [Accepted: 12/04/2023] [Indexed: 12/17/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Accurate detection of cervical esophagus invasion (CEI) in HPSCC is challenging but crucial. We aimed to investigate the value of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomics for detecting CEI in patients with HPSCC. METHODS This retrospective study included 151 HPSCC patients with or without CEI, which were randomly assigned into a training (n = 101) or validation (n = 50) cohort. A total of 750 radiomics features were extracted from T2-weighted imaging (T2WI) and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (ceT1WI), respectively. A radiomics signature was constructed using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator method. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were adopted to establish a clinical model and a radiomics nomogram. Two experienced radiologists evaluated the CEI status based on morphological findings. Areas under the curve (AUCs) of the models and readers were compared using the DeLong method. The performance of the nomogram was also assessed by its calibration and clinical usefulness. RESULTS The radiomics signature, consisting of five T2WI and six ceT1WI radiomics features, was significantly associated with CEI in both cohorts (all p < 0.001). The radiomics nomogram combining the radiomics signature and clinical T stage achieved significantly higher predictive value than the clinical model and pooled readers in the training (AUC 0.923 vs. 0.723 and 0.621, all p < 0.001) and validation (AUC 0.888 vs. 0.754 and 0.647, all p < 0.05) cohorts. The radiomics nomogram showed favorable calibration in both cohorts and provided better net benefit than the clinical model. CONCLUSIONS The MRI-based radiomics nomogram is a promising method for detecting CEI in HPSCC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Meng Qi
- Department of Radiology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, No.83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Yan Sha
- Department of Radiology, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, No.83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200030, China
| | - Duo Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology-HNS, Eye & ENT Hospital, Fudan University, No.83 Fenyang Road, Shanghai, 200030, China.
| | - Jiliang Ren
- Department of Radiology, Shanghai Ninth People's Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, No.639 Zhizaoju Road, Shanghai, 200010, China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Chen J, Lu S, Mao Y, Tan L, Li G, Gao Y, Tan P, Huang D, Zhang X, Qiu Y, Liu Y. An MRI-based radiomics-clinical nomogram for the overall survival prediction in patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a multi-cohort study. Eur Radiol 2022; 32:1548-1557. [PMID: 34665315 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-021-08292-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/08/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To explore whether radiomics features extracted from pre-treatment magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) can predict the overall survival (OS) in patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. METHODS A total of 190 patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma were eligibly enrolled from two institutions. Radiomics features were extracted from contrast-enhanced axial T1-weighted (CE-T1WI) sequence. The least absolute shrinkage selection operator (LASSO) algorithm was applied to establish a radiomics score correlated with OS. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was applied to determine the independent risk factors, which was combined with radiomics score to build the final radiomics nomogram. RESULTS A radiomics score with 6 CE-T1WI features for OS prediction was constructed and validated; its integration with specific clinicopathologic factors (N stage) showed a better prediction performance in the training, internal validation, and external validation cohorts (C-index 0.78, 0.75, and 0.75). Calibration curves determined a good agreement between the predicted and actual overall survival. CONCLUSIONS The radiomics-clinical nomogram and radiomics score might be non-invasive and reliable methods for the risk stratification in patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. KEY POINTS • An MRI-based radiomics model was constructed to evaluate of OS in patients with hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. • A radiomics-clinical nomogram that combined radiomics features and clinical characteristics was established. • Multi-cohort study validated the predictive performance of the radiomics-clinical nomogram to stratify patients with high risk in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Juan Chen
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
- Clinical Research Center for Pharyngolaryngeal Diseases and Voice Disorders in Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Shanhong Lu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
- Clinical Research Center for Pharyngolaryngeal Diseases and Voice Disorders in Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Yitao Mao
- Department of Radiology, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Lei Tan
- College of Computer and Information Engineering, Hunan University of Technology and Business, Changsha, 410205, Hunan, China
| | - Guo Li
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
- Clinical Research Center for Pharyngolaryngeal Diseases and Voice Disorders in Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Yan Gao
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
- Clinical Research Center for Pharyngolaryngeal Diseases and Voice Disorders in Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Pingqing Tan
- Department of Head and Neck Surgery, The Affiliated Tumor Hospital of Xiangya Medical School, Hunan Cancer Hospital, Central South University, Changsha, 410013, Hunan, China
| | - Donghai Huang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
- Clinical Research Center for Pharyngolaryngeal Diseases and Voice Disorders in Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders (Xiangya Hospital), Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Xin Zhang
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
- Clinical Research Center for Pharyngolaryngeal Diseases and Voice Disorders in Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders (Xiangya Hospital), Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China
| | - Yuanzheng Qiu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
- Clinical Research Center for Pharyngolaryngeal Diseases and Voice Disorders in Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders (Xiangya Hospital), Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
| | - Yong Liu
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Xiangya Hospital, Central South University, 87 Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
- Otolaryngology Major Disease Research Key Laboratory of Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
- Clinical Research Center for Pharyngolaryngeal Diseases and Voice Disorders in Hunan Province, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
- National Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Disorders (Xiangya Hospital), Xiangya Road, Changsha, 410008, Hunan, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wahid KA, He R, McDonald BA, Anderson BM, Salzillo T, Mulder S, Wang J, Sharafi CS, McCoy LA, Naser MA, Ahmed S, Sanders KL, Mohamed ASR, Ding Y, Wang J, Hutcheson K, Lai SY, Fuller CD, van Dijk LV. Intensity standardization methods in magnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 20:88-93. [PMID: 34849414 PMCID: PMC8607477 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2021.11.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/26/2021] [Revised: 11/09/2021] [Accepted: 11/10/2021] [Indexed: 11/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Conventional magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) poses challenges in quantitative analysis because voxel intensity values lack physical meaning. While intensity standardization methods exist, their effects on head and neck MRI have not been investigated. We developed a workflow based on healthy tissue region of interest (ROI) analysis to determine intensity consistency within a patient cohort. Through this workflow, we systematically evaluated intensity standardization methods for MRI of head and neck cancer (HNC) patients. Materials and Methods Two HNC cohorts (30 patients total) were retrospectively analyzed. One cohort was imaged with heterogenous acquisition parameters (HET cohort), whereas the other was imaged with homogenous acquisition parameters (HOM cohort). The standard deviation of cohort-level normalized mean intensity (SD NMIc), a metric of intensity consistency, was calculated across ROIs to determine the effect of five intensity standardization methods on T2-weighted images. For each cohort, a Friedman test followed by a post-hoc Bonferroni-corrected Wilcoxon signed-rank test was conducted to compare SD NMIc among methods. Results Consistency (SD NMIc across ROIs) between unstandardized images was substantially more impaired in the HET cohort (0.29 ± 0.08) than in the HOM cohort (0.15 ± 0.03). Consequently, corrected p-values for intensity standardization methods with lower SD NMIc compared to unstandardized images were significant in the HET cohort (p < 0.05) but not significant in the HOM cohort (p > 0.05). In both cohorts, differences between methods were often minimal and nonsignificant. Conclusions Our findings stress the importance of intensity standardization, either through the utilization of uniform acquisition parameters or specific intensity standardization methods, and the need for testing intensity consistency before performing quantitative analysis of HNC MRI.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kareem A Wahid
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Renjie He
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Brigid A McDonald
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Brian M Anderson
- Imaging Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Travis Salzillo
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sam Mulder
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jarey Wang
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Christina Setareh Sharafi
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Lance A McCoy
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Mohamed A Naser
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Sara Ahmed
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Keith L Sanders
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Abdallah S R Mohamed
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Yao Ding
- Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Jihong Wang
- Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Kate Hutcheson
- Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Stephen Y Lai
- Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| | - Lisanne V van Dijk
- Departments of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, United States
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Morgan HE, Wang K, Dohopolski M, Liang X, Folkert MR, Sher DJ, Wang J. Exploratory ensemble interpretable model for predicting local failure in head and neck cancer: the additive benefit of CT and intra-treatment cone-beam computed tomography features. Quant Imaging Med Surg 2021; 11:4781-4796. [PMID: 34888189 PMCID: PMC8611459 DOI: 10.21037/qims-21-274] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/11/2021] [Accepted: 06/28/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Local failure (LF) following chemoradiation (CRT) for head and neck cancer is associated with poor overall survival. If machine learning techniques could stratify patients at risk of treatment failure based on baseline and intra-treatment imaging, such a model could facilitate response-adapted approaches to escalate, de-escalate, or switch therapy. METHODS A 1:2 retrospective case control cohort of patients treated at a single institution with definitive radiotherapy for head and neck cancer who failed locally, in-field at a primary or nodal structure were included. Radiomic features were extracted from baseline CT and CBCT scans at fractions 1 and 21 (delta) of radiotherapy with PyRadiomics and were selected for by: reproducibility (intra-class correlation coefficients ≥0.95), redundancy [maximum relevance and minimum redundancy (mRMR)], and informativeness [recursive feature elimination (RFE)]. Separate models predicting LF of primaries or nodes were created using the explainable boosting machine (EBM) classifier with 5-fold cross-validation for (I) clinical only, (II) radiomic only (CT1 and delta features), and (III) fused models (clinical + radiomic). Twenty-five iterations were performed, and predicted scores were averaged with a parallel ensemble design. Receiver operating characteristic curves were compared between models with paired-samples t-tests. RESULTS The fused ensemble model for primaries (using clinical, CT1, and delta features) achieved an AUC of 0.871 with a sensitivity of 78.3% and specificity of 90.9% at the maximum Youden J statistic. The fused ensemble model trended towards improvement when compared to the clinical only ensemble model (AUC =0.788, P=0.134) but reached significance when compared to the radiomic ensemble model (AUC =0.770, P=0.017). The fused ensemble model for nodes achieved an AUC of 0.910 with a sensitivity of 100.0% and specificity of 68.0%, which also trended towards improvement when compared to the clinical model (AUC =0.865, P=0.080). CONCLUSIONS The fused ensemble EBM model achieved high discriminatory ability at predicting LF for head and neck cancer in independent primary and nodal structures. Although an additive benefit of delta radiomics over clinical factors could not be proven, the results trended towards improvement with the fused ensemble model, which are promising and worthy of prospective investigation in a larger cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Howard E. Morgan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Kai Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Michael Dohopolski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Xiao Liang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Michael R. Folkert
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - David J. Sher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| | - Jing Wang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
- Medical Artificial Intelligence and Automation Laboratory, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA
| |
Collapse
|