Combined treatment strategies in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) after imatinib and sunitinib therapy

The influence of lymphadenectomy on the prognosis of small intestinal stromal tumors: a study based on the SEER database

BACKGROUND

Small intestinal stromal tumors (SISTs) typically require surgical treatment. However, the impact of lymphadenectomy (LA) on long-term prognosis in patients remains unclear. Therefore, we plan to analyze the effect of LA on the prognosis of patients with SISTs using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

METHODS

Data on SISTs patients between 2000 and 2019 were obtained from the SEER database. Multiple imputation (MI) was employed to handle missing data, while propensity score matching (PSM) was conducted to mitigate selection bias in the comparative assessments between the LA group and the No-LA group. Kaplan-Meier analyses and multivariate Cox proportional hazards models were utilized to evaluate both overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

A total of 2412 patients diagnosed with SISTs were included in the study, with 879 undergoing LA and 1533 not undergoing LA. There were no significant differences observed between the two cohorts concerning long-term OS (hazard ratio [HR] 0.97, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.13, P  = 0.720) and CSS (HR 1.05, 95% CI 0.86-1.29, P = 0.622). After PSM, 1596 patients (798 in the LA group and 789 in the No-LA group) were matched for comparison. There was also no difference in long-term OS and CSS between the two groups. Subgroup analysis revealed that in the age group > 60 years, the CSS in the No-LA group was superior to that in the LA group. Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, M stage, marital status, and mitotic rate are significant risk factors influencing OS and CSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Conducting LA in patients with SISTs does not enhance long-term prognosis. For patients aged over 60 years, it may be more advisable to refrain from performing LA.

KIT gene mutation analysis in solid tumours: biology, clincial applications and trends in diagnostic reporting

Gain-of-function mutations involving c-kit protein, a cell-surface transmembrane receptor for stem cell factor, have been identified as a key oncogenic driver in a variety of solid tumours. Coupled with the development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors such as imatinib, c-kit has emerged as a viable drug target in what seems to be a validated therapeutic concept. This review will focus on gastrointestinal stromal tumours and melanomas, two types of solid tumours most closely associated with KIT gene mutations. The biology of KIT mutations in both conditions, as well as the value of KIT mutation testing in predicting disease and treatment outcomes are discussed. Since initial response to imatinib is largely influenced by mutation status, genotyping these tumours serves to facilitate personalised oncology. We also summarise our experience with diagnostic reporting of KIT mutation analysis over a period of 3 years, and briefly survey future developments in treatment, which indeed look very promising.

Preclinical evaluation of KIT/PDGFRA and mTOR inhibitors in gastrointestinal stromal tumors using small animal FDG PET

Background

Primary and secondary drug resistance to imatinib and sunitinib in patients with gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) has led to a pressing need for new therapeutic strategies such as drug combinations. Most GISTs are caused by mutations in the KIT receptor, leading to upregulated KIT tyrosine kinase activity. Imatinib and nilotinib directly inhibit the kinase activity of KIT, while RAD001 (everolimus) inhibits mTOR. We report a preclinical study on drug combinations in a xenograft model of GIST in which effects on tumor dimensions and metabolic activity were assessed by small animal PET imaging.

Methods

Rag2-/-; γcommon -/- male mice were injected s.c. into the right leg with GIST 882. The animals were randomized into 6 groups of 6 animals each for different treatment regimens: No therapy (control), imatinib (150 mg/kg b.i.d.) by oral gavage for 6 days, then once/day for another 7 days, everolimus (10 mg/kg/d.) by oral gavage, everolimus (10 mg/kg/d.) + imatinib (150 mg/kg b.i.d.) by oral gavage for 6 days, then once/day for another 7 days, nilotinib (75 mg/kg/d.) by oral gavage, nilotinib (75 mg/kg/d.) + imatinib (150 mg/kg b.i.d) by oral gavage for 6 days, then once/day for another 7 days. Tumor growth control was evaluated by measuring tumor volume (cm³). Small animal PET (GE Explore tomography) was used to evaluate tumor metabolism and performed in one animal per group at base-line then after 4 and 13 days of treatment.

Results

After a median latency time of 31 days, tumors grew in all animals (volume 0,06-0,15 cm³) and the treatments began at day 38 after cell injection. Tumor volume control (cm3) after 13 days of treatment was > 0.5 for imatinib alone and nilotinib alone, and < 0.5 for the 2 combinations of drugs and for everolimus alone. The baseline FDG uptake was positive in all animals. FDG/SUV/TBR was strongly reduced over time by everolimus both as a single agent and in combination with imatinib respectively: 3.1 vs. 2.3 vs. 1.9 and 2.5 vs 2.3 vs 0.

Conclusions

As single agents, all drugs showed an anti-tumor effect in GIST xenografts but everolimus was superior. The everolimus plus imatinib combination appeared to be the most active regimen both in terms of inhibiting tumor growth and tumor metabolism. The integration of everolimus in GIST treatment merits further investigation.

The emerging role of insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1r) in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs)

Recent years have seen a growing interest in insulin-like growth factor 1 receptor (IGF1R) in medical oncology. Interesting data have been reported also on IGF1r in gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs) especially in children and in young adult patients whose disease does not harbour mutations on KIT and PDGFRA and are poorly responsive to conventional therapies. However, it is too early to reach conclusions on IGF1R as a novel therapeutic target in GIST because the receptor's biological role is still to be defined and the clinical significance in patients needs to be studied in larger studies. We update and comment the current literature on IGF1R in GISTs and discuss the future perspectives in this promising field.