1
|
Veas Rodríguez J, Prieto A, Vilaprinyo E, Bonet M, Diez M, Salud A, Montal R. Surrogate endpoints in phase III randomized trials of advanced gastroesophageal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2024; 201:104416. [PMID: 38871262 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2024.104416] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/16/2024] [Revised: 06/05/2024] [Accepted: 06/06/2024] [Indexed: 06/15/2024] Open
Abstract
Overall survival (OS) is the most meaningful endpoint in clinical trials. However, owing to their limitations, surrogate endpoints are commonly used and validation studies are required to assess their reliability. Analysis of phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of advanced gastroesophageal cancer (AGC) with > 100 patients, correlation coefficients (r), and determination coefficients (R²) between OS and surrogates were evaluated through meta-analyses. Progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), and objective response rate (ORR) were examined to determine their correlations with OS. Analysis of 65 phase III RCTs (29,766 subjects) showed a moderate correlation between PFS/TTP and OS (r = 0.77, R² = 0.59), while ORR correlation was low (r = 0.56, R² = 0.31). Excluding immunotherapy trials improved the PFS/TTP and OS correlations (r = 0.83, R² = 0.70). These findings suggest the potential use of PFS/TTP in AGC phase III investigations, disregarding the use of ORR as a surrogate endpoint.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Joel Veas Rodríguez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain; Department of Medical Oncology, Taunton and Somerset NHS Foundation Trust, Taunton, United Kingdom.
| | - Ana Prieto
- Department of Medical Oncology, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain
| | - Ester Vilaprinyo
- Department of Basic Medical Sciences, University of Lleida, IRBLLEIDA, Lleida, Spain
| | - Marta Bonet
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain
| | - Marc Diez
- Department of Medical Oncology, Vall d' Hebron University Hospital, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Antonieta Salud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain
| | - Robert Montal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Arnau de Vilanova University Hospital, Lleida, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Shahnam A, Hitchen N, Nindra U, Manoharan S, Desai J, Tran B, Solomon B, Luen SJ, Hui R, Hopkins AM, Sorich MJ. Objective response rate and progression-free survival as surrogates for overall survival treatment effect: A meta-analysis across diverse tumour groups and contemporary therapies. Eur J Cancer 2024; 198:113503. [PMID: 38134560 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.113503] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/27/2023] [Revised: 12/06/2023] [Accepted: 12/14/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Overall survival (OS) results from randomized control trials (RCT) provide the strongest evidence for efficacy of anti-cancer treatments but can take a considerable amount of time to mature. Progression free survival (PFS) and objective response rate (ORR) are used as an early surrogate of OS treatment effect however their validity remains unclear. Our study aims to comprehensively evaluate ORR and PFS as surrogates for OS treatment effect across tumor groups and treatment types. MATERIAL AND METHODS Phase 3 RCTs in solid malignancies that reported OS/PFS and ORR published between 1st of January 2010 and 30th of June 2022 were evaluated. The relationship of surrogate endpoints and OS treatment effect was assessed via weighted linear regression. The coefficient of determination (R2) quantified the fit of the regression model. RESULTS 675 phase 3 RCT comprising of 350 112 patients were analysed. ORR (R2 of 0.10) and PFS (R2 of 0.38) were poor surrogate markers of OS treatment effect. The strength of surrogacy differed within treatment and tumour groups. PFS had the highest R2 for chemotherapy (0.56) and lowest for targeted therapy (0.40). PFS had the highest level of surrogacy for melanoma (R2 = 0.72) and pancreatic cancer (R2 = 0.70) compared to other tumour groups. Importantly ORR and PFS were also poorly correlated to each other (R2 = 0.33). CONCLUSIONS ORR and PFS were poor trial-level surrogate markers of OS. The surrogacy performance of ORR and PFS differed by treatment and malignancy sub-type.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Adel Shahnam
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
| | - Nadia Hitchen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Udit Nindra
- Department of Medical Oncology, Liverpool Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sathya Manoharan
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia
| | - Jayesh Desai
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Ben Tran
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Benjamin Solomon
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Stephen J Luen
- Department of Medical Oncology, Peter McCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, VIC, Australia; Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Rina Hui
- The Centre of Cancer Medicine, University Hong Kong, Hong Kong
| | - Ashley M Hopkins
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| | - Michael J Sorich
- College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|