Evolutionary Genomics: A Dinosaur's View of Genome-Size Evolution

C-value paradox: Genesis in misconception that natural selection follows anthropocentric parameters of 'economy' and 'optimum'

C-value paradox refers to the lack of correlation between biological complexity and the intuitively expected protein-coding genomic information or DNA content. Here I discuss five questions about this paradox: i) Do biologically complex organisms carry more protein-coding genes? ii) Does variable accumulation of selfish/ junk/ parasitic DNA underlie the c-value paradox? iii) Can nucleoskeletal or nucleotypic function of DNA explain the enigma of orders of magnitude high levels of DNA in some 'lower' taxa or in taxonomically related species? iv) Can the newly understood noncoding but functional DNA explain the c-value paradox? and, v) Does natural selection uniformly apply the anthropocentric parameters for 'optimum' and 'economy'? Answers to Q.1-5 are largely negative. Biology presents numerous 'anomalous' examples where the same end function/ phenotype is attained in different organisms through astoundingly diverse ways that appear 'illogical' in our perceptions. Such evolutionary oddities exist because natural selection, unlike a designer, exploits random and stochastic events to modulate the existing system. Consequently, persistence of the new-found 'solution/s' often appear bizarre, uneconomic, and therefore, paradoxical to human logic. The unexpectedly high c-values in diverse organisms are irreversible evolutionary accidents that persisted, and the additional DNA often got repurposed over the evolutionary time scale. Therefore, the c-value paradox is a redundant issue. Future integrative biological studies should address evolutionary mechanisms and processes underlying sporadic DNA expansions/ contractions, and how the newly acquired DNA content has been repurposed in diverse groups.

Evolution of the functionally conserved DCC gene in birds

Understanding the loss of conserved genes is critical for determining how phenotypic diversity is generated. Here we focus on the evolution of DCC, a gene that encodes a highly conserved neural guidance receptor. Disruption of DCC in animal models and humans results in major neurodevelopmental defects including commissural axon defects. Here we examine DCC evolution in birds, which is of particular interest as a major model system in neurodevelopmental research. We found the DCC containing locus was disrupted several times during evolution, resulting in both gene losses and faster evolution rate of salvaged genes. These data suggest that DCC had been lost independently twice during bird evolution, including in chicken and zebra finch, whereas it was preserved in many other closely related bird species, including ducks. Strikingly, we observed that commissural axon trajectory appeared similar regardless of whether DCC could be detected or not. We conclude that the DCC locus is susceptible to genomic instability leading to independent disruptions in different branches of birds and a significant influence on evolution rate. Overall, the phenomenon of loss or molecular evolution of a highly conserved gene without apparent phenotype change is of conceptual importance for understanding molecular evolution of key biological processes.

Sauropod dinosaurs evolved moderately sized genomes unrelated to body size

Sauropodomorph dinosaurs include the largest land animals to have ever lived, some reaching up to 10 times the mass of an African elephant. Despite their status defining the upper range for body size in land animals, it remains unknown whether sauropodomorphs evolved larger-sized genomes than non-avian theropods, their sister taxon, or whether a relationship exists between genome size and body size in dinosaurs, two questions critical for understanding broad patterns of genome evolution in dinosaurs. Here we report inferences of genome size for 10 sauropodomorph taxa. The estimates are derived from a Bayesian phylogenetic generalized least squares approach that generates posterior distributions of regression models relating genome size to osteocyte lacunae volume in extant tetrapods. We estimate that the average genome size of sauropodomorphs was 2.02 pg (range of species means: 1.77-2.21 pg), a value in the upper range of extant birds (mean = 1.42 pg, range: 0.97-2.16 pg) and near the average for extant non-avian reptiles (mean = 2.24 pg, range: 1.05-5.44 pg). The results suggest that the variation in size and architecture of genomes in extinct dinosaurs was lower than the variation found in mammals. A substantial difference in genome size separates the two major clades within dinosaurs, Ornithischia (large genomes) and Saurischia (moderate to small genomes). We find no relationship between body size and estimated genome size in extinct dinosaurs, which suggests that neutral forces did not dominate the evolution of genome size in this group.

Genome size and wing parameters in passerine birds

Despite their status as the most speciose group of terrestrial vertebrates, birds exhibit the smallest and least variable genome sizes among tetrapods. It has been suggested that this is because powered flight imposes metabolic constraints on cell size, and thus on genome size. This notion has been supported by analyses of genome size and cell size versus resting metabolic rate and other parameters across birds, but most previous studies suffer from one or more limitations that have left the question open. The present study provides new insights into this issue through an examination of newly measured genome sizes, nucleus and cell sizes, body masses and wing parameters for 74 species of birds in the order Passeriformes. A positive relationship was found between genome size and nucleus/cell size, as well as between genome size and wing loading index, which is interpreted as an indicator of adaptations for efficient flight. This represents the single largest dataset presented for birds to date, and is the first to analyse a distinctly flight-related parameter along with genome size using phylogenetic comparative analyses. The results lend additional support to the hypothesis that the small genomes of birds are indeed related in some manner to flight, though the mechanistic and historical bases for this association remain an interesting area of investigation.