Response to "How many species of giraffe are there?"

Complete chloroplast genome molecular structure, comparative and phylogenetic analyses of Sphaeropteris lepifera of Cyatheaceae family: a tree fern from China

Sphaeropteris lepifera is a tree fern in the Cyatheaceae, a family that has played an important role in the evolution of plant systems. This study aimed to analyze the complete chloroplast genome of S. lepifera and compared it with previously published chloroplast genomes Cyatheaceae family. The chloroplast genome of S. lepifera comprised 162,114 bp, consisting of a large single copy (LSC) region of 86,327 bp, a small single copy (SSC) region of 27,731 bp and a pair of inverted repeats (IRa and IRb) of 24,028 bp each. The chloroplast genome encoded 129 genes, comprising 32 transfer RNAs, 8 ribosomal RNAs, and 89 protein-coding genes. Comparison of the genomes of 7 Cyatheaceae plants showed that the chloroplast genome of S. lepifera was missing the gene trnV-UAC. Expansion of the SSC region led to the difference in the chloroplast genome size of S. lepifera. Eight genes, atpI, ccsA, petA, psaB, rpl16, rpoA, rpoC1, and ycf2 have high nucleic acid diversity and can be regarded as potential molecular markers. The genes trnG-trnR and atpB were suitable for DNA barcodes between different communities of S. lepifera. The S. lepifera groups in Zhejiang Province probably diffused from Pingtan and Ningde, Fujian. The results will provide a basis for species identification, biological studies, and endangerment mechanism of S. lepifera.

Taxonomy and Translocations of African Mammals: A Plea for a Cautionary Approach

Ecotourism can fuel an important source of financial income for African countries and can therefore help biodiversity policies in the continent. Translocations can be a powerful tool to spread economic benefits among countries and communities; yet, to be positive for biodiversity conservation, they require a basic knowledge of conservation units through appropriate taxonomic research. This is not always the case, as taxonomy was considered an outdated discipline for almost a century, and some plurality in taxonomic approaches is incorrectly considered as a disadvantage for conservation work. As an example, diversity of the genus Giraffa and its recent taxonomic history illustrate the importance of such knowledge for a sound conservation policy that includes translocations. We argue that a fine-grained conservation perspective that prioritizes all remaining populations along the Nile Basin is needed. Translocations are important tools for giraffe diversity conservation, but more discussion is needed, especially for moving new giraffes to regions where the autochthonous taxa/populations are no longer existent. As the current discussion about the giraffe taxonomy is too focused on the number of giraffe species, we argue that the plurality of taxonomic and conservation approaches might be beneficial, i.e., for defining the number of units requiring separate management using a (majority) consensus across different concepts (e.g., MU—management unit, ESU—evolutionary significant unit, and ECU—elemental conservation unit). The taxonomically sensitive translocation policy/strategy would be important for the preservation of current diversity, while also supporting the ecological restoration of some regions within rewilding. A summary table of the main translocation operations of African mammals that have underlying problems is included. Therefore, we call for increased attention toward the taxonomy of African mammals not only as the basis for sound conservation but also as a further opportunity to enlarge the geographic scope of ecotourism in Africa.

Delineating species in the speciation continuum: A proposal

Delineating species is a difficult and seemingly uninteresting issue that is still essential to address. Taxonomic methodology is heterogeneous according to the taxa and scientists involved due to the disparate data quality and quantity and disagreements over the species concept. This has negative impacts on basic and applied research. Genomic data substantially enhance our understanding of the speciation process but do not provide a ubiquitous solution to the species problem. The relevance of comparative approaches in speciation research has nevertheless recently been demonstrated. I suggest moving towards a more unified taxonomic classification through a reference-based decision procedure.