1
|
Abdelghany M, Amin A, Degni E, Crescio C, Hassan AEMA, Ftohy T, Bussu F. Pectoralis Major in Salvage Total Laryngectomy after Irradiation: Morbidity, Mortality, Functional, and Oncological Results in a Referral Center in Egypt. J Pers Med 2023; 13:1223. [PMID: 37623473 PMCID: PMC10455500 DOI: 10.3390/jpm13081223] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2023] [Revised: 07/13/2023] [Accepted: 07/28/2023] [Indexed: 08/26/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nonsurgical organ preservation protocols have seen a large diffusion worldwide in the last decades. Their oncological and functional effectiveness in a real-world setting has been recently questioned because of the high morbidity of salvage procedures. The aim of this study is to review the outcomes of postirradiation salvage total laryngectomy (STL) and reconstruction with pectoralis major flap. METHODS This retrospective observational study included 37 cases of STL in the period from January 2015 to December 2021. Data for each patient were extracted from the hospital information system and reviewed. RESULTS The 3-year overall and disease-specific survival are, respectively, 28% and 51%. Only seven recurrences after salvage surgery were recorded and all of them died from the disease. The other 14 deaths derived from comorbidities, with diabetes being the most significant predictive parameter for overall survival. Also, lower postoperative albumin levels were associated with a higher risk of death. CONCLUSIONS Overall survival after STL and reconstruction with PMMF is low but most deaths are due to comorbidities and not to cancer progression or recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mahmoud Abdelghany
- Maxillofacial Unit, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag 82524, Egypt; (M.A.); (T.F.)
| | - Ayman Amin
- Surgery Department, National Cancer Institute (NCI), Cairo University, Cairo 12613, Egypt;
| | - Emilia Degni
- Otolaryngology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Viale San Pietro 12, 07100 Sassari, Italy; (C.C.); (F.B.)
| | - Claudia Crescio
- Otolaryngology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Viale San Pietro 12, 07100 Sassari, Italy; (C.C.); (F.B.)
| | | | - Tarek Ftohy
- Maxillofacial Unit, General Surgery Department, Faculty of Medicine, Sohag University, Sohag 82524, Egypt; (M.A.); (T.F.)
| | - Francesco Bussu
- Otolaryngology Division, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria, Viale San Pietro 12, 07100 Sassari, Italy; (C.C.); (F.B.)
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, Università di Sassari, 07100 Sassari, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Poonia SK, Nicolli E. Surgical Management of Advanced Glottic Cancer. Otolaryngol Clin North Am 2023; 56:275-283. [PMID: 37030940 DOI: 10.1016/j.otc.2022.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/10/2023]
Abstract
In advanced glottic cancer, it is widely known that definitive chemoradiation can result in comparable survival outcomes to primary surgery. This deserves consideration given the immense effects total laryngectomy (TL) has on patients. It is important to consider that not all advanced glottic tumors should be treated in the same way, and surgical management remains a critical consideration for optimization of local control and survival outcomes. Advances in organ preservation surgery and the more developed understanding of the survival benefits of TL in extensive T4 disease further support the importance of surgery in the management of advanced glottic cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Seerat K Poonia
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Hospital, 1121 NW 14th Street, Sylvester Medical Office Building, 3rd Floor, Suite 325 Miami, FL 33136, USA
| | - Elizabeth Nicolli
- Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Miller School of Medicine, University of Miami Hospital, 1121 NW 14th Street, Sylvester Medical Office Building, 3rd Floor, Suite 325 Miami, FL 33136, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Ahn SH, Hong HJ, Kwon SY, Kwon KH, Roh JL, Ryu J, Park JH, Baek SK, Lee GH, Lee SY, Lee JC, Chung MK, Joo YH, Ji YB, Hah JH, Kwon M, Park YM, Song CM, Shin SC, Ryu CH, Lee DY, Lee YC, Chang JW, Jeong HM, Cho JK, Cha W, Chun BJ, Choi IJ, Choi HG, Lee KD. Guidelines for the Surgical Management of Laryngeal Cancer: Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery. Clin Exp Otorhinolaryngol 2017; 10:1-43. [PMID: 28043099 PMCID: PMC5327593 DOI: 10.21053/ceo.2016.01389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/07/2016] [Accepted: 10/24/2016] [Indexed: 01/08/2023] Open
Abstract
Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery appointed a Task Force to develop clinical practice guidelines for the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer. This Task Force conducted a systematic search of the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases to identify relevant articles, using search terms selected according to the key questions. Evidence-based recommendations were then created on the basis of these articles. An external expert review and Delphi questionnaire were applied to reach consensus regarding the recommendations. The resulting guidelines focus on the surgical treatment of laryngeal cancer with the assumption that surgery is the selected treatment modality after a multidisciplinary discussion in any context. These guidelines do not, therefore, address non-surgical treatment such as radiation therapy or chemotherapy. The committee developed 62 evidence-based recommendations in 32 categories intended to assist clinicians during management of patients with laryngeal cancer and patients with laryngeal cancer, and counselors and health policy-makers.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Korean Society of Thyroid-Head and Neck Surgery Guideline Task Force
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Daejin Medical Center, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seonam University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Soon-Hyun Ahn
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyun Jun Hong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Catholic Kwandong University College of Medicine, Incheon, Korea
| | - Soon Young Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kee Hwan Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jong-Lyel Roh
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Junsun Ryu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Jun Hee Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chosun University College of Medicine, Gwangju, Korea
| | - Seung-Kuk Baek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Guk Haeng Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sei Young Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chung-Ang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jin Choon Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Man Ki Chung
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Hoon Joo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, College of Medicine, The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul, Korea
| | - Yong Bae Ji
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jeong Hun Hah
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Minsu Kwon
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Gyeongsang National University School of Medicine, Jinju, Korea
| | - Young Min Park
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Daejin Medical Center, Bundang Jesaeng Hospital, Seongnam, Korea
| | - Chang Myeon Song
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hanyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Sung-Chan Shin
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Chang Hwan Ryu
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, National Cancer Center, Goyang, Korea
| | - Doh Young Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Young Chan Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kyung Hee University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Jae Won Chang
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Chungnam National University School of Medicine, Daejeon, Korea
| | - Ha Min Jeong
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Wonkwang University School of Medicine, Iksan, Korea
| | - Jae-Keun Cho
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Inje University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Wonjae Cha
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Pusan National University School of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| | - Byung Joon Chun
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Seonam University College of Medicine, Goyang, Korea
| | - Ik Joon Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Korea Cancer Center Hospital, Seoul, Korea
| | - Hyo Geun Choi
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea
| | - Kang Dae Lee
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, Kosin University College of Medicine, Busan, Korea
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Attempt to improve functional outcomes in supracricoid laryngectomy in T2b and T3 glottic cancers. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2014; 272:2925-31. [PMID: 25142079 PMCID: PMC4545186 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-014-3244-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/04/2014] [Accepted: 08/12/2014] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
The goal of this study was to compare the survival rate and functional outcome of an open partial horizontal laryngectomies, Type IIa and modified Type IIa (OPHL Type IIa and OPHL mType IIa), in treatment of moderately advanced glottic carcinoma. Retrospective analysis. 80 Patients underwent OPHL Type IIa and 27, OPHL modified Type IIa (OPHL mType IIa) between the years 2001 and 2009. Clinical staging was performed according to the UICC criteria (2002). Primary endpoints of study were recurrence rate, and 3- and 5-year survival time. Secondary endpoints were laryngeal functions: respiration, swallowing and voice. There were no significant differences within local and regional recurrence rates, organ preservation rate, 3- and 5-year specific disease survival rates between OPHL Type II and OPHL modified Type IIa. Significantly lower need for temporary (OPHL mType IIa 4/27, OPHL Type IIa 30/80) and permanent tracheostomy (OPHL mType IIa 2/27, OPHL Type IIa 16/80) was found. All but one patient (OPHL Type IIa) achieved unrestricted diet. Significantly differed social eating, this ability gained 25/27 OPHL mType IIa and 54/80 OPHL Type IIa (p < 0.05). Voice handicap index revealed a decrease in quality of life in all areas; OPHL Type IIa and OPHL mType IIa differed significantly (31 and 46 points respectively, p < 0.005). The MPT value (longest pitch) for OPHL Type IIa and OPHL mType IIa lasted 8 s and 10, respectively (p < 0.005). There was no significant difference in oncological outcomes between the two types of OPHL succeeded in the earlier extubation, thus significantly lowering the need for temporary and permanent tracheotomy and providing better long-term swallowing. Although the voice was altered in all observed OPHL patients, modified Type IIa technique proved to be superior to the Type IIa in terms of voice quality. Thus, OPHL modified Type IIa is worth promoting, as long as indications were strictly conformed.
Collapse
|
7
|
Goessler UR. Traditional transcutaneous approaches in head and neck surgery. GMS CURRENT TOPICS IN OTORHINOLARYNGOLOGY, HEAD AND NECK SURGERY 2012; 11:Doc06. [PMID: 23320058 PMCID: PMC3544212 DOI: 10.3205/cto000088] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/12/2023]
Abstract
The treatment of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal malignancies remains a challenging task for the head and neck surgeon as the chosen treatment modality often has to bridge the gap between oncologically sound radicality and preservation of function. Due to the increase in transoral laser surgery in early tumor stages and chemoradiation in advanced stages, the usage of traditional transcutaneous approaches has decreased over the recent past. In addition, the need for a function-sparing surgical approach as well as highest possible quality of life has become evident. In view of these facts, rationale and importance of traditional transcutaneous approaches to the treatment of laryngeal and hypopharyngeal malignancies are discussed in a contemporary background. The transcutaneous open partial laryngectomies remain a valuable tool in the surgeon's armamentarium for the treatment of early and advanced laryngeal carcinomas, especially in cases of impossible laryngeal overview using the rigid laryngoscope. Open partial laryngetomies offer superior overview and oncologic safety at the anterior commissure, especially in recurrencies. In select advanced cases and salvage settings, the supracricoid laryngectomy offers a valuable tool for function-preserving but oncologically safe surgical therapy at the cost of high postoperative morbidity and a very demanding rehabilitation of swallowing.In hypopharyngeal malignancies, the increasing use of transoral laser surgery has led to a decline in transcutaneous resections via partial pharyngectomy with partial laryngectomy in early tumor stages. In advanced stages of tumors of the piriform sinus and the postcricoid area with involvement of the larynx, total laryngectomy with partial pharyngectomy is an oncologically safe approach. The radical surgical approach using circumferent laryngopharyngectomy with/without esophagectomy is indicated in salvage cases with advanced recurrences or as a primary surgical approach in patients where chemoradiation does not offer sufficient oncologic control or preservation of function. In cases with impending reconstruction, fasciocutaneous free flaps (anterolateral thigh flap, radial forearm flap) seem to offer superior results to enteric flaps in cases where the cervical esophagus is not involved leading to better voice rehabilitation with fewer complications and postoperative morbidity. In salvage situations, the Gastroomental Free Flap has proven to be a valuable tool.In conclusion, the choice of a surgical treatment modality is influenced by the patient's anatomy, tumor size and location as well as the surgeon's personal expertise.
Collapse
|
9
|
Bussu F, Paludetti G, Almadori G, De Virgilio A, Galli J, Miccichè F, Tombolini M, Rizzo D, Gallo A, Giglia V, Greco A, Valentini V, De Vincentiis M. Comparison of total laryngectomy with surgical (cricohyoidopexy) and nonsurgical organ-preservation modalities in advanced laryngeal squamous cell carcinomas: A multicenter retrospective analysis. Head Neck 2012; 35:554-61. [PMID: 22495830 DOI: 10.1002/hed.22994] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Functional outcome and quality of life (QOL) have become relevant endpoints in the field of laryngeal oncology, leading to the emergence of organ-preserving strategies. METHODS The medical records of 166 patients with advanced (stages III and IV) laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) who were treated with a total laryngectomy, radiochemotherapy, or cricohyoidopexy (CHP) were reviewed. RESULTS In the whole series, no statistically significant differences among the 3 treatment arms with respect to the overall survival (OS) and disease-specific survival (DSS) rates were observed. The organ-preservation rate was 45% for radiotherapy and 76.7% for CHP (p = .0002). Among the cT4a cases, a longer survival was observed for the patients treated with total laryngectomy (3 yr-OS = 78% vs 68% for CHP and 54% for radiochemotherapy, p = .031). CONCLUSIONS In advanced laryngeal SCC, CHP shows survival rates comparable to those of radiochemotherapy and a higher larynx-preservation rate, although it may not replace radiochemotherapy because it can be recommended only in selected cases.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Bussu
- Institute of Otorhinolaryngology, Policlinico Agostino Gemelli, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Supracricoid laryngectomy: oncologic validity and functional safety. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2010; 267:1919-25. [PMID: 20490818 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-010-1279-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/17/2010] [Accepted: 05/05/2010] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
Abstract
The objectives of this study are to elucidate the oncologic validity of the supracricoid laryngectomy (SCL) for locally advanced endolaryngeal cancers and as a salvage procedure, and to determine its safety in maintaining laryngeal physiology. The medical records of 114 patients that underwent SCL were reviewed. We examined whether the extended procedures, salvage procedure, adjuvant treatment, and type of reconstruction were associated with patient survival and the mean time of decannulation and nasogastric tube removal. Postoperative complications were investigated. There was no significant difference in survival according to the extent of the resection of the primary tumors and the presence or absence of previous treatment. However, the survival of patients that received radiation or concurrent chemoradiation after SCL was significantly lower than that of patients without any adjuvant treatment. Decannulation and nasogastric tube removal was possible for all except for two patients, and the mean time required was 18.4 and 26.1 days, respectively. The interval to starting oral feeding was significantly increased in cases that underwent cricohyoidopexy, an extended procedure, and salvage surgery compared to their counterparts. Pulmonary complications, particularly aspiration pneumonia, were the most common postoperative complications. The results of this study suggest that SCL was feasible for locally advanced laryngeal cancers and as a salvage procedure. Active and effective postoperative swallowing rehabilitation, particularly in cases that underwent cricohyoidopexy, an extended procedure, and salvage surgery, is needed to prevent aspiration pneumonia.
Collapse
|