Risk of second primary malignancies of adolescent and young adult patients with germ cell cancer: A US population-based analysis

Patient preferences and comfort for cancer survivorship models of care: results of an online survey

PURPOSE

Workforce shortages will impact oncologists' ability to provide both active and survivorship care. While primary care provider (PCP) or survivorship clinic transition has been emphasized, there is little evidence regarding patient comfort.

METHODS

We developed an online survey in partnership with patient advocates to assess survivors' comfort with PCP or survivorship clinic care and distributed the survey to online, cancer-specific patient communities from June to August 2020. Descriptive and logistic regression analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

A total of 975 surveys were complete. Most respondents were women (91%) and had private insurance (65%). Thirty-six cancer types were reported. Ninety-three percent had a PCP. Twenty-four percent were comfortable seeing a PCP for survivorship care. Higher odds of comfort were seen among respondents who were Black or had stage 0 cancer; female sex was associated with lower odds. Fifty-five percent were comfortable with a survivorship clinic. Higher odds of comfort were seen with lymphoma or ovarian cancer, > 15 years from diagnosis, and non-US government insurance. Lower odds were seen with melanoma, advanced stage, Medicaid insurance, and one late effect. Preference for PCP care was 87% for general health, 32% for recurrence monitoring, and 37% for late effect management.

CONCLUSIONS

One quarter of cancer survivors were comfortable with PCP-led survivorship care and about half with a survivorship clinic. Most preferred oncologist care for recurrence monitoring and late-effect management.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Patient preference and comfort should be considered when developing survivorship care models. Future efforts should focus on facilitating patient-centered transitions to non-oncologist care.

The risk and latency evaluation of secondary primary malignancies of cervical cancer patients who received radiotherapy: A study based on the SEER database

Objectives

To study the risk factors for the onset of secondary primary malignancies (SPM) and the latency between SPM and cervical cancer after radiotherapy.

Methods

We selected patients with cervical cancer who underwent radiotherapy between 2000 and 2019 from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. And the data of patients with cervical cancer who underwent radiotherapy in Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital during January 1,1997 to December 31,2016 were collected and analyzed. The factors associated with SPM onset and latency were then estimated by nomograms based on logistic regression and a complete risk model. Dynamic risk plots were performed by Poisson regression.

Results

A total of 32,313 cases of cervical cancer who underwent radiotherapy were downloaded from the SEER database; of these, 19,439 cases had a complete dataset and were included in the final analysis. In total, 561 cases suffered from SPM; the remaining 18,878 did not. And a total of 1486 cases of cervical cancer who underwent radiotherapy from Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital were analyzed, 27 cases caught SPM and the rest of 1459 cases did not. Patients with SPM were older than those without SPM(p=0.000); significant associations were also identified between SPM and white race(p=0.000), localized stage (p=0.000), squamous carcinoma (SCC)(p=0.003), surgery(p=0.000), and combination radiotherapy (p=0.026). A logistic regression nomogram showed that older age (HR:1.015, 95%CI:1.009-1.021, p=0.000), localized stage (HR:4.056, 95%CI: 2.625-6.269, p=0.000) and regional stage (HR: 3.181, 95%CI:2.094-4.834, p=0.000), white (HR: 1.722, 95%CI:1.145-2.590, p=0.000) and black race (HR: 1.889, 95%CI:1.327-2.689, p=0.000), and the receipt of surgery (HR: 1.381, 95%CI:1.151-1.657, p=0.000) were all independent risk factors for the onset of SPM. The largest proportion of cases involved SPM in the female reproductive system. A dynamic risk plot showed that age, race, stage, and surgery had impacts on the latency of SPM onset. A competing risk regression analysis nomogram showed that age (HR: 1.564, 95%CI: 1.272-1.920, p=0.000), surgery (HR: 1.415, 95%CI: 1.140-1.760, p=0.002), localized stage (HR: 8.035, 95%CI: 4.502-14.340, p=0.000) and regional stage (HR: 4.904, 95%CI: 2.790-8.620, p=0.000), and black race (HR: 1.786, 95%CI: 1.161-2.750, p=0.008) all had significant impacts on the cumulative incidence and latency of SPM.

Conclusions

Advanced age, the receipt of surgery, earlier stages, and white and black race were identified as risk factors for SPM onset and influenced latency in patients with cervical cancer after radiotherapy.

Association between postoperative radiotherapy for young-onset head and neck cancer and long-term risk of second primary malignancy: a population-based study

Background

Second primary malignancy (SPM) represents the leading long-term cause of death among patients with index head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We aimed to quantify the association between postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and the risk of SPM development for index HNSCC among adolescent and young patients, who are particularly vulnerable to radiation-associated impacts due to their increased tissue susceptibilities and longer life expectancies.

Methods

This study was conducted using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to collect the data of 5 year survivors of index young-onset HNSCC from 1975 to 2011. The outcome of interest was SPM, a new, metachronous malignancy after the index HNSCC. Standardized incidence ratios (SIRs) and excess absolute risks (EARs) were used to quantify the PORT-associated risks externally, and relative risks (RRs) were estimated by the multivariate Poisson regression analysis to quantify the PORT-associated risks internally.

Results

Of the included 2771 5 year survivors with index young-onset HNSCCs, the receipt of PORT (37.6%) was associated with higher risk of SPMs (RR, 1.23; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.43). PORT-associated risks were elevated for the majority of sites, including head and neck (RR, 1.19; 95% CI 0.95 to 1.50) and lung (RR, 1.67; 95% CI 1.18 to 2.34). With regarding to the subsites of head and neck, RRs were above unity in oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) (RR, 1.68; 95% CI 1.39 to 2.03) and laryngeal SCC (RR, 1.02; 95% CI 0.73 to 1.43). A relatively greater RR was observed for patients younger than 35 years (RR, 1.44, 95% CI 0.37 to 5.57) and those diagnosed with localized diseases (RR, 1.16, 95% CI 0.9 to 1.5). PORT-associated risks were increased remarkably after 15 years of follow-up (RR, 1.24; 95% CI 0.97 to 1.58).

Conclusions

An association was discovered between PORT treatment and increased long-term risk of SPM among patients with index young-onset HNSCC. The findings suggest long-term follow-up surveillance for these patients, particularly those with oral cavity SCC or laryngeal SCC.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12967-022-03544-y.

Second Primary Malignancies following a Diagnosis of Conjunctival Melanoma

BACKGROUND

Although incidence of second primary malignancies (SPMs) has been investigated in patients with cutaneous melanoma and uveal melanoma, limited studies have investigated their occurrence subsequent to conjunctival melanoma (CM). We conducted a retrospective observational study to assess incidence of SPMs in patients with primary CM and to identify associated risk factors.

METHODS

Cases of first primary CM diagnosed from 2000 to 2018 were extracted from the national cancer database Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Standardized incidence ratios (SIR) and excess absolute risk (EAR) of SPMs were calculated compared to a matched cohort from the general population with similar sex, race, age group, and calendar year. EAR was per 10,000 individuals, and a P-value of <0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

A total of 471 patients met inclusion criteria, 57 (12.1%) of whom developed second primary malignancies (excluding eye and orbit melanomas) over an average (±SD) follow-up period of 6.8 (±5.0) years. Average age at diagnosis for the overall cohort was 60.2 (±18.6) years. Patients with CM demonstrated a significantly increased risk for overall SPMs relative to the general population, even after excluding eye and orbit melanomas (SIR 1.52; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-1.97; EAR 67.58). Specific sites and malignancy types with increased risk were cutaneous melanoma (SIR 7.95; 95% CI, 4.45-13.12; EAR 45.34), ophthalmic non-melanoma malignancies (SIR 80.92; 95% CI, 2.05-450.84; EAR 3.41), and non-intrahepatic biliary malignancies (SIR 11.72; 95% CI, 1.42-42.32; EAR 6.32). Risk of overall SPMs (excluding eye and orbit melanomas) was significantly increased 5-10 years from diagnosis date.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with CM had an increased incidence of SPMs compared to the general population. Specifically, these patients developed more cutaneous, ophthalmic non-melanoma, and non-intrahepatic biliary malignancies. These second neoplasms could be due to shared pathophysiology or mutual risk factors. Patients with CM may benefit from surveillance for SPMs, such as annual age-appropriate screenings in the first 10 years after diagnosis.