1
|
Liu J, Chen W, Shao S, Chen Y, Wang H, Xi Y, Wang L. Efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers for nocturnal blood pressure reduction: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med 2024; 56:2362880. [PMID: 38830046 PMCID: PMC11149579 DOI: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2362880] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/17/2023] [Accepted: 05/09/2024] [Indexed: 06/05/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Nocturnal blood pressure (BP) is correlated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events and is an important predictor of cardiovascular death in hypertensive patients. OBJECTIVE Nocturnal BP control is of great importance for cardiovascular risk reduction. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to explore the efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for nocturnal BP reduction in patients with mild to moderate hypertension. METHODS PICOS design structure was used to formulate the data extraction. All statistical calculations and analyses were performed with R. RESULTS Seventy-seven studies with 13,314 participants were included. The overall analysis indicated that nocturnal BP drop varied considerably among different ARBs. Allisartan (13.04 [95% CI (-18.41, -7.68)] mmHg), olmesartan (11.67 [95% CI (-14.12, -9.21)] mmHg), telmisartan (11.11 [95% CI (-12.12, -10.11)] mmHg) were associated with greater reduction in nocturnal systolic BP. In the aspect of the nocturnal-diurnal BP drop ratio, only allisartan was greater than 1. While, the variation tendency of last 4-6 h ambulatory BP was basically consistent with nocturnal BP. Additionally, allisartan showed improvement effect in the proportion of patients with dipping BP pattern. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates that for patients with mild to moderate hypertension, allisartan, olmesartan and telmisartan have more advantages in nocturnal BP reduction among the ARBs, while allisartan can reduce nighttime BP more than daytime BP and improve the dipping pattern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jing Liu
- Department of Hypertension, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Wei Chen
- Department of Hypertension, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Shihuan Shao
- Department of Hypertension, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yuanyuan Chen
- Department of Hypertension, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Hongyi Wang
- Department of Hypertension, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Yang Xi
- Department of Hypertension, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Luyan Wang
- Department of Hypertension, Peking University People’s Hospital, Beijing, China
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang JG, Zhang M, Feng YQ, Ma CS, Wang TD, Zhu ZM, Kario K. Is the newest angiotensin-receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil more efficacious in lowering blood pressure than the older ones? A systematic review and network meta-analysis. J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich) 2021; 23:901-914. [PMID: 33609077 PMCID: PMC8678765 DOI: 10.1111/jch.14227] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2020] [Revised: 01/26/2021] [Accepted: 01/31/2021] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Angiotensin‐receptor blockers are often considered insufficiently efficacious in reducing blood pressure. However, newer angiotensin‐receptor blockers may be more effective than the older ones. A network meta‐analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of various angiotensin‐receptor blockers in reducing office and ambulatory blood pressure in hypertensive patients. Relevant literature was searched from English and Chinese databases for randomized controlled trials involving angiotensin‐receptor blockers in hypertension. Efficacy variables included systolic and diastolic blood pressure either in the office or on ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Absolute blood pressure reductions at 6‐12 weeks of treatment and their credible intervals were reported. A total of 34 publications provided adequate data for analysis (n = 14 859). In 28 studies on office systolic blood pressure (n = 12 731), against the common comparator valsartan 80 mg, the differences in systolic blood pressure were in favor of azilsartan medoxomil (20‐80 mg), irbesartan (300 mg), olmesartan (20‐40 mg), telmisartan (80 mg), and valsartan (160‐320 mg), but not candesartan (8‐16 mg), losartan (50‐100 mg), irbesartan (150 mg), olmesartan (10 mg), and telmisartan (40 mg). The ranking plot shows that azilsartan medoxomil 80 mg had a possibility of 99% being the best in the class. Similar results were observed for office diastolic blood pressure and from 13 studies for 24‐hour ambulatory systolic and diastolic blood pressure. In conclusion, angiotensin‐receptor blockers had different blood pressure lowering efficacy. The newest angiotensin‐receptor blocker azilsartan medoxomil at the dose of 80 mg seemed to be most efficacious in reducing both systolic and diastolic blood pressure in the office and on ambulatory measurement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ji-Guang Wang
- The Shanghai Institute of Hypertension, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Miao Zhang
- Medical Affairs, Takeda Pharmaceuticals Ltd, Shanghai, China
| | - Ying-Qing Feng
- Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital, Guangdong Academy of Medical Sciences, Guangzhou, China
| | - Chang-Sheng Ma
- Department of Cardiology, Beijing Anzhen Hospital, Beijing, China
| | - Tzung-Dau Wang
- Cardiovascular Center and Divisions of Hospital Medicine and Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital and National Taiwan University College of Medicine, Taipei City, Taiwan
| | - Zhi-Ming Zhu
- Chongqing Hypertension Institute, Department of Hypertension and Endocrinology, Daping Hospital, The Third Military Medical University, Chongqing, China
| | - Kazuomi Kario
- Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Medicine, Jichi Medical University School of Medicine, Tochigi, Japan
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Kourlaba G, Gialama F, Tsioufis K, Maniadakis N. A literature review to evaluate the clinical and economic value of olmesartan for the treatment of hypertensive patients. Int J Cardiol 2016; 221:60-74. [PMID: 27404671 DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2016.06.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2016] [Revised: 05/19/2016] [Accepted: 06/21/2016] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
The objective of the present study was to systematically review the clinical and economic outcomes of olmesartan as monotherapy or in combination with other antihypertensive agents in the treatment of hypertension. A literature search was performed using PubMed and the Cochrane library until December 2015, with no limit on publication date. Eligible studies were selected using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, limiting articles to those published in the English language. Background information of the study, participants' characteristics and study outcomes were collected. Meta-analysis of data was not performed. Fifty-five studies were included, of which fifty investigated the clinical efficacy of olmesartan and five the cost-effectiveness of olmesartan. In general results from clinical trials evaluating the efficacy of olmesartan as monotherapy and as combination therapy demonstrated that olmesartan provided better antihypertensive blood pressure-lowering efficacy and was generally well tolerated compared with other antihypertensive agents. Results from economic evaluations indicated that olmesartan may be more cost-effective than other ARBs such as losartan, valsartan, irbesartan and candesartan, having the potential of decreasing the overall medical costs of care for patients with hypertension. Evidence from the present systematic review confirms the antihypertensive efficacy and good safety profile of olmesartan both as monotherapy and as combination therapy. Olmesartan was also found to be cost-effective compared with other ARBs, though this area has yet relatively poor evidence and needs to further be explored.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- G Kourlaba
- EVROSTON LP, Chatzigianni Mexi 5, 115 28 Athens, Greece; Collaborative Center of Clinical Epidemiology and Outcomes Research (CLEO), Non-Profit Company, Chatzigianni Mexi 5, 115 28 Athens, Greece.
| | - F Gialama
- EVROSTON LP, Chatzigianni Mexi 5, 115 28 Athens, Greece
| | - K Tsioufis
- 1st Depertment of Cardiology, University of Athens, Hippocration Hospital, Vassilisis Sophias 114, 115 27, Greece
| | - N Maniadakis
- Department of Health Services Organization, National School of Public Health, 196 Alexandras Avenue, 115 21 Athens, Greece
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Neldam S, Schumacher H, Kjeldsen SE, Neutel JM. Telmisartan in combination with hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg for the management of patients with hypertension. Curr Med Res Opin 2014; 30:1715-24. [PMID: 24834808 DOI: 10.1185/03007995.2014.924912] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the efficacy and safety of telmisartan 40 mg (T40) or 80 mg (T80) plus hydrochlorothiazide 12.5 mg (H12.5) single-pill combinations (SPCs) with telmisartan monotherapies, in a pooled analysis of patients with mild to moderate hypertension. METHODS Six phase 3, double-blind studies of 8 weeks' duration that assessed the T/H12.5 SPC and T40 or T80 monotherapy, were included in the analysis. Data was pooled separately for the two T40 non-responder studies (T40 NR group, two T80 non-responder studies (T80 NR group), and the two factorial design dose-response studies (FD-DR group). RESULTS After 8 weeks' treatment, the adjusted mean reduction in systolic blood pressure (SBP) and diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and the SBP, DBP, and blood pressure (BP) goal rates were significantly higher with the T40/H12.5 SPC than T40 in the T40 NR group and with the T80/H12.5 SPC than T80 in the T80 NR group. In the FD-DR group, the adjusted mean reduction in SBP and DBP, and DBP goal rates were significantly higher for T40/H12.5 versus T40. The percentage of patients with an adverse event was numerically higher with T40/H12.5 versus T40 in the T40 NR group, and was similar in telmisartan monotherapies and the T/H12.5 SPCs in the T80 NR group and FD-DR group. A limitation of this study is the retrospective and pooled nature of the analysis. Also, >75% of patients were <65 years of age, which limits the applicability of the results to older patients. CONCLUSIONS In patients with mild to moderate hypertension, 8 weeks' treatment with the T/H12.5 SPC is significantly more efficacious than telmisartan monotherapies. The safety and tolerability of the T/H12.5 SPC are comparable to that of telmisartan monotherapy and consistent with that reported in previous studies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Makani H, Bangalore S, Supariwala A, Romero J, Argulian E, Messerli FH. Antihypertensive efficacy of angiotensin receptor blockers as monotherapy as evaluated by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J 2013; 35:1732-42. [PMID: 23966312 DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/eht333] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) are available in different dosages and it is common clinical practice to uptitrate if blood pressure goal is not achieved with the initial dose. Data on the incremental antihypertensive efficacy with uptitration are scarce. It is also unclear if antihypertensive efficacy of losartan is comparable with other ARBs. METHODS AND RESULTS We systematically reviewed PubMed/EMBASE/Cochrane databases for all randomized clinical trials until December 2012 reporting 24 h ambulatory blood pressure (ABP) for most commonly available ARBs in patients with hypertension. Reduction in ABP with ARBs was evaluated at 25% of the maximum (max) dose, 50% of the max dose, and at the max dose. Comparison was made between 24 h BP-lowering effect of losartan 50 and 100 mg and other ARBs at 50% max dose and the max dose, respectively. Sixty-two studies enrolling 15 289 patients (mean age 56 years; 60% men) with a mean duration of 10 weeks were included in the analysis. Overall, the dose-response curve with ARBs was shallow with decrease of 10.3/6.7 (systolic/diastolic), 11.7/7.6, and 13.0/8.3 mmHg with 25% max dose, 50% max dose, and with the max dose of ARBs, respectively. Losartan in the dose of 50 mg lowered ABP less well than other ARBs at 50% max dose by 2.5 mmHg systolic (P < 0.0001) and 1.8 mmHg diastolic (P = 0.0003). Losartan 100 mg lowered ABP less well than other ARBs at max dose by 3.9 mm Hg systolic (P = 0.0002) and 2.2 mmHg diastolic (P = 0.002). CONCLUSION In this comprehensive analysis of the antihypertensive efficacy of ARBs by 24 h ABP, we observed a shallow dose-response curve, and uptitration marginally enhanced the antihypertensive efficacy. Blood pressure reduction with losartan at starting dose and at max dose was consistently inferior to the other ARBs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Harikrishna Makani
- Division of Cardiology, St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1000, 10th Avenue, Suite 3B-30, New York, NY 10019, USA
| | | | - Azhar Supariwala
- Division of Cardiology, St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1000, 10th Avenue, Suite 3B-30, New York, NY 10019, USA
| | - Jorge Romero
- Albert Einstein College of Medicine/Montefiore Medical Center, New York, NY, USA
| | - Edgar Argulian
- Division of Cardiology, St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1000, 10th Avenue, Suite 3B-30, New York, NY 10019, USA
| | - Franz H Messerli
- Division of Cardiology, St Luke's Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University College of Physicians and Surgeons, 1000, 10th Avenue, Suite 3B-30, New York, NY 10019, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Kjeldsen S, Mancia G, Schmieder R, Mattheus M, Unger T. An update on telmisartan/hydrochlorothiazide combinations for the management of hypertensive patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther 2013; 11:673-82. [PMID: 23750676 DOI: 10.1586/erc.13.63] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
International hypertension guidelines endorse the use of combination therapy to achieve blood pressure control in the majority of patients. Angiotensin AT1 receptor blockers, in combination with diuretics, are among the preferred combinations, with telmisartan plus hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) being an effective and well-tolerated combination. This article provides an up-to-date review of the existing data on telmisartan/HCTZ combination for the management of hypertension in patients with additional cardiovascular risk factors, including reports emerging from a number of recent clinical trials and secondary analyses of older trials. The accumulated evidence from clinical trials demonstrates that telmisartan/HCTZ combinations are effective and well tolerated in patients with mild-to-severe hypertension, including subgroups of patients with cardiovascular risk factors such as advanced age, obesity, chronic kidney disease, diabetes mellitus and treatment-resistant hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sverre Kjeldsen
- Department of Cardiology, Ullevål Hospital, N-0407 Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
7
|
Destro M, Cagnoni F, Dognini GP, Galimberti V, Taietti C, Cavalleri C, Galli E. Telmisartan: just an antihypertensive agent? A literature review. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2012; 12:2719-35. [PMID: 22077832 DOI: 10.1517/14656566.2011.632367] [Citation(s) in RCA: 37] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The modulation of the renin angiotensin aldosterone system (RAAS) is an important pathway in managing high blood pressure, and its overexpression plays a key role in target end-organ damage. Telmisartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) with unique pharmacologic properties, including the longest half-life among all ARBs; this leads to a significant and 24-h sustained reduction of blood pressure. Telmisartan has well-known antihypertensive properties, but there is also strong clinical evidence that it reduces left ventricular hypertrophy, arterial stiffness and the recurrence of atrial fibrillation, and confers renoprotection. AREAS COVERED This paper reviews telmisartan's pharmacological properties in terms of efficacy for hypertension control and, importantly, focuses on its new therapeutic indications and their clinical implications. EXPERT OPINION ONTARGET (ongoing telmisartan alone and in combination with ramipril global endpoint trial) demonstrated, that telmisartan confers cardiovascular protective effects similar to those of ramipril, but with a better tolerability. Moreover, recent investigations focused on the capability of telmisartan to modulate the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma (PPAR-γ), an established target in the treatment of insulin resistance, diabetes and metabolic syndrome, whose activation is also correlated to anti-inflammatory and, finally, anti-atherosclerotic properties. Telmisartan shows peculiar features that go beyond blood pressure control. It presents promising and unique protective properties against target end-organ damage, potentially able to open a scenario of new therapeutic approaches to cardiovascular disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Maurizio Destro
- General Medicine Unit, Treviglio-Caravaggio Hospital, Medical Department, A.O. Treviglio, 24047 Treviglio (BG), Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Maladkar M, Verma VK, Narsikar KA, Walinjkar RD, Patil WR, Saggu NJS, Kulkarni SP. Triple drug combination of telmisartan, amlodipine and hydrochlorothiazide in the treatment of essential hypertension. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.4236/ojim.2012.22014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
|
9
|
Kjeldsen SE, Schmieder RE, Unger T, Mancia G. Telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide combination therapy for the treatment of hypertension. Curr Med Res Opin 2010; 26:879-87. [PMID: 20144138 DOI: 10.1185/03007991003635178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Control of elevated blood pressure has been shown to reduce the risk of cardiovascular events. The angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB), telmisartan, has been shown to provide effective 24-hour blood pressure control. Additional antihypertensive efficacy can be achieved by combining telmisartan with the thiazide diuretic hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ). OBJECTIVE To review the clinical data in combination therapy with telmisartan and HCTZ. METHODS Search of Medline and Embase for published clinical studies using the keywords telmisartan and HCTZ. FINDINGS The telmisartan/HCTZ combination provides significant reductions in blood pressure, effective 24-hour blood pressure control and is well-tolerated. Blood pressure reductions with this combination are greater than those achieved with either drug alone, and in comparative studies telmisartan/HCTZ is more effective than other ARB/HCTZ combinations. However, it should be noted that some of the combinations assessed used doses of the drugs that were commercially available at the time of the trial and not higher doses that have been shown to have greater antihypertensive efficacy. CONCLUSION The combination of telmisartan/HCTZ is an effective and well-tolerated treatment option for patients with hypertension.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sverre E Kjeldsen
- Department of Cardiology, Oslo University Hospital, Ullevaal, Oslo, Norway.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Galzerano D, Capogrosso C, Di Michele S, Galzerano A, Paparello P, Lama D, Gaudio C. New standards in hypertension and cardiovascular risk management: focus on telmisartan. Vasc Health Risk Manag 2010; 6:113-33. [PMID: 20448797 PMCID: PMC2860444 DOI: 10.2147/vhrm.s7857] [Citation(s) in RCA: 26] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/19/2010] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Blockade of the renin–angiotensin system is an important approach in managing high blood pressure, and has increasingly been shown to affect cardiovascular disease processes mediated by angiotensin II throughout the cardiovascular and renal continua. Telmisartan is an angiotensin II receptor blocker (ARB) displaying unique pharmacologic properties, including a longer half life than any other ARB, that result in large and sustained reductions of blood pressure. In patients with mild-to-moderate hypertension, telmisartan has proved superior to other antihypertensive agents (valsartan, losartan, ramipril, perindopril, and atenolol) in controlling blood pressure particularly towards the end of the dosing interval. There is also clinical evidence that telmisartan reduces left ventricular hypertrophy, reduces arterial stiffness and the recurrence of atrial fibrillation, and confers renoprotection. The ONgoing Telmisartan Alone and in combination with Ramipril Global Endpoint Trial (ONTARGET®) study has demonstrated that telmisartan has similar cardiovascular protective effects to ramipril in a large, high-risk patient population but was better tolerated. The powerful and sustained blood pressure control apparent in clinical trials, together with cardiovascular protection and tolerability demonstrated in ONTARGET® means that telmisartan may be a preferred option for patients with hypertension.
Collapse
|
11
|
Neutel JM. Choosing among renin-angiotensin system blockers for the management of hypertension: from pharmacology to clinical efficacy. Curr Med Res Opin 2010; 26:213-22. [PMID: 19921961 DOI: 10.1185/03007990903444434] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Hypertension is an important healthcare challenge, yet despite initiatives to improve detection and advances in therapy, the majority of patients do not achieve recommended blood pressure targets and remain at high cardiovascular risk. Physicians are confronted with an array of antihypertensive agents, accompanied by increasingly complex and often conflicting evidence regarding their efficacy and tolerability. SCOPE An extensive PubMed and Cochrane database search was conducted to identify clinical literature (published 1990-2009) on the blood pressure lowering efficacy, tolerability and target organ protection of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibitors (ACEIs) and angiotensin II receptor blockers (ARBs). While not a systematic review, this article reviews the best available evidence in an attempt to clarify current uncertainty within medical practice regarding treatment options in patients with hypertension. FINDINGS ACEIs have been at the forefront of hypertension therapy for several years, especially in hypertensive at-risk patients. However, their use is restricted by burdensome side-effects and their limited ability to reach target blood pressure. Newer ARBs, such as telmisartan, have more sustained blood pressure control throughout the 24-h dosing period compared with ACEIs and other ARBs. For uncomplicated hypertension, ARBs are preferred to ACEIs because of their superior tolerability and adherence. In specific patient populations, namely heart failure patients, ARBs have previously shown equal cardiovascular protection to ACEIs. ONTARGET showed that an ARB, in this case telmisartan, was as effective as ramipril in reducing cardiovascular events in a wide cross-section of at-risk cardiovascular patients, but was better tolerated even though patients were screened for ACEI tolerance. CONCLUSION Telmisartan is currently the only ARB to have demonstrated equivalence to ramipril in reducing cardiovascular events in a broad patient population. In practical terms, telmisartan is superior to the reference standard ramipril because of more powerful blood pressure lowering and superior tolerability. However, in many countries, guidance to physicians prioritizes ACEIs. In these countries, telmisartan should be the first choice ARB for hypertensive at-risk patients who do not achieve adequate blood pressure control with an ACEI, or for whom tolerability is a concern.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J M Neutel
- Orange County Research Center, Tustin, CA 92780, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Plosker GL, White WB. Telmisartan/Hydrochlorothiazide: a review of its use as fixed-dose combinations in essential hypertension. Drugs 2009; 68:1877-99. [PMID: 18729541 DOI: 10.2165/00003495-200868130-00010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023]
Abstract
Fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan and hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) [Micardis Plus, Micardis HCT, PritorPlus] are available in many countries for the treatment of patients with essential hypertension. Combining the angiotensin II receptor antagonist (angiotensin II receptor blocker [ARB]) telmisartan with the thiazide diuretic HCTZ provides antihypertensive therapy with complementary mechanisms of action. In the US and EU, telmisartan/HCTZ is approved for patients whose hypertension is not adequately controlled with telmisartan monotherapy; US labelling for the fixed-dose combination also includes inadequate control of blood pressure (BP) with HCTZ monotherapy.The antihypertensive efficacy of once-daily telmisartan/HCTZ has been demonstrated in several large, randomized trials in patients with stages 1 and 2 hypertension. The addition of HCTZ to telmisartan achieved significant reductions in BP in nonresponders to telmisartan monotherapy, and the antihypertensive efficacy of telmisartan/HCTZ was similar to or significantly greater than that of various comparator agents. Moreover, in studies that used ambulatory BP monitoring, telmisartan/HCTZ provided consistent 24-hour BP reductions throughout morning, daytime and night-time periods. The BP-lowering efficacy over the entire 24-hour dose administration interval is consistent with the pharmacokinetic profile of telmisartan, which has the longest elimination half-life among currently available ARBs and a unique chemical structure. Adverse events with telmisartan/HCTZ in clinical trials were typically mild and transient, and no unexpected events occurred that had not been previously reported with either telmisartan or HCTZ. Extensive tolerability data are available for telmisartan, in particular from the ONTARGET study, the largest clinical outcomes trial with an ARB. As such, fixed-dose combinations of telmisartan/HCTZ provide an effective, rational and generally well tolerated treatment option for the management of patients with hypertension.
Collapse
|
13
|
Abstract
Olmesartan medoxomil (Olmetec, Benicar) is an angiotensin II type 1 (AT(1)) receptor antagonist (angiotensin receptor blocker [ARB]) that inhibits the actions of angiotensin II on the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system, which plays a key role in the pathogenesis of hypertension. Oral olmesartan medoxomil 10-40 mg once daily is recommended for the treatment of adult patients with hypertension. In those with inadequate BP control using monotherapy, fixed-dose olmesartan medoxomil/hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) [Olmetec plus, Benicar-HCT] combination therapy may be initiated. Extensive clinical evidence from several large well designed trials and the clinical practice setting has confirmed the antihypertensive efficacy and good tolerability profile of oral olmesartan medoxomil, as monotherapy or in combination with HCTZ, in patients with hypertension, including elderly patients with isolated systolic hypertension (ISH). Notably, BP control is sustained throughout the 24-hour dosage interval, including during the last 4 hours of this period. In clinical trials, olmesartan medoxomil monotherapy provided better antihypertensive efficacy than losartan, candesartan cilexetil or irbesartan monotherapy, and was at least as effective as valsartan treatment, with a faster onset of action than other ARBs in terms of reductions from baseline in diastolic BP (DBP) and, in most instances, systolic BP (SBP). Combination therapy with olmesartan medoxomil plus HCTZ was superior to that with benazepril plus amlodipine, as effective as that with losartan plus HCTZ, noninferior to that with atenolol plus HCTZ, but less effective than that with telmisartan plus HCTZ, in individual trials. Data from ongoing clinical outcome trials are required to more fully determine the relative position of olmesartan medoxomil therapy in the management of hypertension. In the meantime, the consistent antihypertensive efficacy during the entire 24-hour dosage interval and good tolerability profile of olmesartan medoxomil, with or without HCTZ, make it a valuable option for the treatment of adult patients with hypertension, including the elderly.
Collapse
|