Assessing the Influence of Subsequent Immunotherapy on Overall Survival in Patients with Unresectable Stage III Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer from the PACIFIC Study

Risk and safety profile in checkpoint inhibitors on non-small-cel lung cancer: A systematic review

Treating non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has gained increased importance in recent years due to the high mortality rate and dismal five-year survival rate. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) are a promising approach with exceptional outcomes in NSCLC thanks to the antigenic nature of cells. Conversely, immune system over-stimulation with ICI is a double-edged sword that can lead to various negative effects ranging from mild to life-threatening. This review explores current breakthroughs in nanoparticle-based ICI and their limitations. The PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science were examined for relevant publications. Thirty-eight trials (N = 16,781) were included in the analyses. The mixed effects analyses on quantifying the treatment effect contributed significantly to the subgroups within studies for ICI treatment effect. Models confirmed ICI's higher impact on treatment effectivity and the decrease in respondents' mortality compared to conventional treatment regiments. ICI might be used as first-line therapy due to their proven effectiveness and safety profile.

Treatment-Switching Adjustment of Overall Survival in CheckMate 227 Part 1 Evaluating First-Line Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy for Metastatic Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer

OBJECTIVES

CheckMate 227 (NCT02477826) evaluated first-line nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression ≥ 1% or < 1% and no EGFR/ALK alterations. However, many patients randomized to chemotherapy received subsequent immunotherapy. Here, overall survival (OS) and relative OS benefit of nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab were adjusted for potential bias introduced by treatment switching.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Treatment-switching adjustment analyses were conducted following the NICE Decision Support Unit Technical Support Document 16, for CheckMate 227 Part 1 OS data from treated patients (database lock, July 2, 2019). Inverse probability of censoring weighting (IPCW) was used in the base-case analysis; other methods were explored as sensitivity analyses.

RESULTS

Of 1166 randomized patients, 391 (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 185 (PD-L1 < 1%) patients received nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab; 387 (PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 183 (PD-L1 < 1%) patients received chemotherapy, with 29.3-month minimum follow-up. Among chemotherapy-treated patients, 169/387 (43.7%; PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 66/183 (36.1%; PD-L1 < 1%) switched to immunotherapy poststudy. Among treated patients, median OS was 17.4 months with nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus 14.9 months with chemotherapy (hazard ratio [HR], 0.80; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.68-0.95) in the PD-L1 ≥ 1% subgroup and 17.1 versus 12.4 months (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.49-0.80) in the PD-L1 < 1% subgroup. After treatment-switching adjustment using IPCW, the HR (95% CI) for OS for nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus chemotherapy was reduced to 0.68 (0.56-0.83; PD-L1 ≥ 1%) and 0.53 (0.40-0.69; PD-L1 < 1%). Sensitivity analyses supported the robustness of the results.

CONCLUSION

Treatment-switching adjustments resulted in a greater estimated relative OS benefit with first-line nivolumab-plus-ipilimumab versus chemotherapy in patients with metastatic NSCLC.