Concepts of Rigid Fixation in Facial Fractures

New design titanium miniplate versus conventional miniplate in treatment of mandibular angle fractures: A comparative study

Introduction

Mandibular angle fracture (MAF) is the second most common site of all fractures of the mandible with the highest complication rate. Management of MAF has evolved in the past four decades. The purpose of the prospective study was to compare the efficacy of new design titanium miniplate (NDM) with conventional titanium miniplate (CTM) in the treatment of MAF.

Objectives

Mouth opening, occlusion, bite force measurement, and radiographs compared preoperatively and first week, first month and third month postoperatively.

Materials and Method

Fourteen patients diagnosed with MAF were randomly divided into two groups: Group A (seven patients) was treated with NDM and Group B (seven patients) with CTM. Patients were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at an interval of one week, one month and three months.

Results

Repeated measures ANOVA and Post hoc Tukey test showed a significant increase in bite force and mouth opening for both groups in first and third postoperative months. Unpaired t-test showed slightly better mouth opening in Group B and slightly higher bite force in Group A.

Discussion

Both miniplates fulfilled all the study objectives and equally satisfactory healing was seen at the end of third month. NDM offers better stability, rigidity, and anatomic reduction of the fracture with a drawback of difficulty in adaptation and increased operative timing compared to CTM. Hence, we would like to conclude that both miniplates are equally efficient in the treatment of non-comminuted angle fractures with the NDM having upper hand in stability.

In silico analysis of modular bone plates

BACKGROUND

Inventory management or immediate availability of fracture plates can be problematic since for each surgical intervention a specific plate of varying size and functionality must be ordered. Modularization of the standard monolithic plate is proposed to address this issue.

METHODS

The effects of four different unit module design parameters (type, degree of modularization, connector screw diameter, sandwich ratio) on the plate bending stiffness and failure are investigated in a finite element four-point-bending analysis. A chosen, best-performing modular plate is then tested in silico for a simple diaphyseal tibial fracture scenario under anatomical compressional, torsional, and bending loads.

RESULTS

A modularization strategy is proposed to match the monolithic plate bending properties as closely as possible. With the best combination of design parameters, a fully modularized equivalent length plate with a 42.3% decrease in stiffness and 46.2% decrease in strength could be assembled. The chosen modular plate also displayed sufficient mechanical performance under the fracture fixation scenarios for a potentially successful osteosynthesis.

CONCLUSIONS

Via computational methods, the viability of the modularization strategy as an alternate to the traditional monolithic plate is demonstrated. As a further realized advantage, the modular plates can alleviate stress shielding thanks to the reduced stiffness.

Research status of biodegradable metals designed for oral and maxillofacial applications: A review

The oral and maxillofacial regions have complex anatomical structures and different tissue types, which have vital health and aesthetic functions. Biodegradable metals (BMs) is a promising bioactive materials to treat oral and maxillofacial diseases. This review summarizes the research status and future research directions of BMs for oral and maxillofacial applications. Mg-based BMs and Zn-based BMs for bone fracture fixation systems, and guided bone regeneration (GBR) membranes, are discussed in detail. Zn-based BMs with a moderate degradation rate and superior mechanical properties for GBR membranes show great potential for clinical translation. Fe-based BMs have a relatively low degradation rate and insoluble degradation products, which greatly limit their application and clinical translation. Furthermore, we proposed potential future research directions for BMs in the oral and maxillofacial regions, including 3D printed BM bone scaffolds, surface modification for BMs GBR membranes, and BMs containing hydrogels for cartilage regeneration, soft tissue regeneration, and nerve regeneration. Taken together, the progress made in the development of BMs in oral and maxillofacial regions has laid a foundation for further clinical translation.