2
|
Zhang W, Wang L, Sun XH, Liu X, Xiao Y, Zhang J, Wang T, Chen H, Zhan YQ, Yu M, Ge CH, Li CY, Ren GM, Yin RH, Yang XM. Toll-like receptor 5-mediated signaling enhances liver regeneration in mice. Mil Med Res 2021; 8:16. [PMID: 33622404 PMCID: PMC7901072 DOI: 10.1186/s40779-021-00309-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/03/2020] [Accepted: 02/10/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Toll-like receptor 5 (TLR5)-mediated pathways play critical roles in regulating the hepatic immune response and show hepatoprotective effects in mouse models of hepatic diseases. However, the role of TLR5 in experimental models of liver regeneration has not been reported. This study aimed to investigate the role of TLR5 in partial hepatectomy (PHx)-induced liver regeneration. METHODS We performed 2/3 PHx in wild-type (WT) mice, TLR5 knockout mice, or TLR5 agonist CBLB502 treated mice, as a model of liver regeneration. Bacterial flagellin content was measured with ELISA, and hepatic TLR5 expression was determined with quantitative PCR analyses and flow cytometry. To study the effects of TLR5 on hepatocyte proliferation, we analyzed bromodeoxyuridine (BrdU) incorporation and proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA) expression with immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining. The effects of TLR5 during the priming phase of liver regeneration were examined with quantitative PCR analyses of immediate early gene mRNA levels, and with Western blotting analysis of hepatic NF-κB and STAT3 activation. Cytokine and growth factor production after PHx were detected with real-time PCR and cytometric bead array (CBA) assays. Oil Red O staining and hepatic lipid concentrations were analyzed to examine the effect of TLR5 on hepatic lipid accumulation after PHx. RESULTS The bacterial flagellin content in the serum and liver increased, and the hepatic TLR5 expression was significantly up-regulated in WT mice after PHx. TLR5-deficient mice exhibited diminished numbers of BrdU- and PCNA-positive cells, suppressed immediate early gene expression, and decreased cytokine and growth factor production. Moreover, PHx-induced hepatic NF-κB and STAT3 activation was inhibited in Tlr5-/- mice, as compared with WT mice. Consistently, the administration of CBLB502 significantly promoted PHx-mediated hepatocyte proliferation, which was correlated with enhanced production of proinflammatory cytokines and the recruitment of macrophages and neutrophils in the liver. Furthermore, Tlr5-/- mice displayed significantly lower hepatic lipid concentrations and smaller Oil Red O positive areas than those in control mice after PHx. CONCLUSION We reveal that TLR5 activation contributes to the initial events of liver regeneration after PHx. Our findings demonstrate that TLR5 signaling positively regulates liver regeneration and suggest the potential of TLR5 agonist to promote liver regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wen Zhang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.,State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Lei Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Xue-Hua Sun
- Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.,State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Xian Liu
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Yang Xiao
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Jie Zhang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China.,State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Ting Wang
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China.,School of Basic Medical Sciences, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, 230032, Anhui Province, China
| | - Hui Chen
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Yi-Qun Zhan
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Miao Yu
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Chang-Hui Ge
- Beijing Institute of Radiation Medicine, Beijing, 100850, China
| | - Chang-Yan Li
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China
| | - Guang-Ming Ren
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China.
| | - Rong-Hua Yin
- State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China.
| | - Xiao-Ming Yang
- Department of Pharmaceutical Engineering, School of Chemical Engineering and Technology, Tianjin University, Tianjin, 300072, China. .,State Key Laboratory of Proteomics, Beijing Proteome Research Center, National Center for Protein Sciences (Beijing), Beijing Institute of Lifeomics, Beijing, 102206, China.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Qujeq D, Abassi R, Faeizi F, Parsian H, Faraji AS, Taheri H, Tatar M, Elmi MM, Halalkhor S. Effect of granulocyte colony-stimulating factor administration on tissue regeneration due to carbon tetrachloride–induced liver damage in experimental model. Toxicol Ind Health 2012; 29:498-503. [DOI: 10.1177/0748233712440136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
The mechanism by which granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) could lead to the protection from liver injury is not well known. Therefore, the resolution of this role needs further basic and clinical experimental investigation. Acute liver injury was induced in rats by single intraperitoneal injection of a 0.50-mL/kg dose of carbon tetrachloride (CCl4 ). Granulocyte colony-stimulating factor or vehicle of 150 µg/kg was given immediately after intoxicating the liver by CCl4 . The animals were divided into four groups of twelve each. Administration of G-CSF caused a decrease in the activity of liver enzymes, aminotransferases, compared with the untreated group.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Durdi Qujeq
- Cellular and Molecular Biology Research Center (CMBRC), Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Roya Abassi
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Farideh Faeizi
- Department of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Hadi Parsian
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Alieh Sohan Faraji
- Department of Anatomical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Hassan Taheri
- Department of Internal Medicine, Ayatollah Rouhani Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Mohsen Tatar
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Marym M Elmi
- Cellular and Molecular Biology Research Center (CMBRC), Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| | - Sohhrab Halalkhor
- Department of Biochemistry and Biophysics, Faculty of Medicine, Babol University of Medical Sciences, Babol, Iran
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Abstract
Liver regeneration is known to be a process involving highly organized and ordered tissue growth triggered by the loss of liver tissue, and remains a fascinating topic. A large number of genes are involved in this process, and there exists a sequence of stages that results in liver regeneration, while at the same time inhibitors control the size of the regenerated liver. The initiation step is characterized by priming of quiescent hepatocytes by factors such as TNF-α, IL-6 and nitric oxide. The proliferation step is the step during which hepatocytes enter into the cell cycle's G1 phase and are stimulated by complete mitogens including HGF, TGF-α and EGF. Hepatic stimulator substance, glucagon, insulin, TNF-α, IL-1 and IL-6 have also been implicated in regulating the regeneration process. Inhibitors and stop signals of hepatic regeneration are not well known and only limited information is available. Furthermore, the effects of other factors such as VEGF, PDGF, hypothyroidism, proliferating cell nuclear antigen, heat shock proteins, ischemic-reperfusion injury, steatosis and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor on liver regeneration are also systematically reviewed in this article. A tissue engineering approach using isolated hepatocytes for in vitro tissue generation and heterotopic transplantation of liver cells has been established. The use of stem cells might also be very attractive to overcome the limitation of donor liver tissue. Liver-specific differentiation of embryonic, fetal or adult stem cells is currently under investigation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Changku Jia
- Department of Hepatobiliary Surgery, Affiliated Hospital of Hainan Medical University, Haikou, Hainan Province, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Both tacrolimus and sirolimus decrease Th1/Th2 ratio, and increase regulatory T lymphocytes in the liver after ischemia/reperfusion. J Transl Med 2009; 89:433-45. [PMID: 19188906 DOI: 10.1038/labinvest.2009.3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 30] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
The protective effects of immunosuppressants against ischemia/reperfusion (I/R) injury have been attributed to their non-specific anti-inflammatory effect. However, these effects may also depend on their effect on T lymphocytes, which are increasingly considered to be key players in I/R. Here, we studied the effects of tacrolimus and sirolimus on lymphocyte subpopulations in an I/R rat model. The animals were treated with tacrolimus, sirolimus or vehicle, before undergoing a 60-min ischemia event of the right hepatic lobe, followed by excision of the remaining liver. After 2 h, I/R rats showed increased mortality, plasma lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels, hepatocyte apoptosis, liver histological injury and parenchymal infiltration by neutrophils, macrophages, NK cells and T lymphocytes. Most of the changes were antagonized by both immunosuppressants. Tacrolimus augmented the proportion of cycling cells in I/R rats, whereas sirolimus showed the opposite effect. The increased Th1/Th2 ratio found in I/R livers after 2 h was reverted by immunosuppressants, which also amplified the proportion of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+) regulatory T lymphocytes at 24 h. The protective effects of both tacrolimus and sirolimus correlated well with a decreased ratio of proinflammatory to anti-inflammatory T lymphocytes, and with an increase in the Treg proportion. This suggests a new mechanism to explain the known beneficial effect shown by immunosuppressants early after I/R.
Collapse
|
6
|
Antoniades CG, Berry PA, Wendon JA, Vergani D. The importance of immune dysfunction in determining outcome in acute liver failure. J Hepatol 2008; 49:845-61. [PMID: 18801592 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2008.08.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 253] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/06/2023]
Abstract
Acute liver failure (ALF) shares striking similarities with septic shock with regard to the features of systemic inflammation, progression to multiple organ dysfunction and functional immunoparesis. While the existence of opposing systemic pro- and anti-inflammatory profiles resulting in organ failure and immune dysfunction are well recognised in septic shock, characterization of these processes in ALF has only recently been described. This review explores the evolution of the systemic inflammation in acute liver failure, its relation to disease progression, exacerbation of liver injury and development of innate immune dysfunction and extra-hepatic organ failure as sequelae. Defects in innate immunity are described in hepatic and extra-hepatic compartments. Clinical studies measuring levels of pro- and anti-inflammatory cytokines and expression of the antigen presentation molecule HLA-DR on monocytes, in combination with ex-vivo experiments, demonstrate that the persistence of a compensatory anti-inflammatory response syndrome, leading to functional monocyte deactivation, is a central event in the evolution of systemic immune dysfunction. Accurate immune profiling in ALF may permit the development of immunomodulatory strategies in order to improve outcome in this condition.
Collapse
|
7
|
Caraceni P, Giannone F, Catani L, Talarico S, Pertosa AM, Domenicali M, Fogli M, Principe A, Trevisani F, Baccarani M, Bernardi M, Lemoli RM. Effects of granulocyte colony stimulating-factor in a rat model of acute liver injury. Dig Liver Dis 2007; 39:943-51. [PMID: 17692581 DOI: 10.1016/j.dld.2007.06.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/23/2006] [Revised: 06/05/2007] [Accepted: 06/06/2007] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND/AIM Controversial experimental observations suggest that granulocyte colony stimulating-factor may promote hepatic regeneration after hepatectomy and chemical injury either by directly stimulating adult liver cells or facilitating the mobilization of bone marrow cells and their homing to the liver. We investigated whether different schedules of granulocyte colony stimulating-factor administration protect against experimental acute liver injury. METHODS Acute liver injury was induced in Sprague-Dawley fed rats by injecting a single intraperitoneal dose of carbon tetrachloride. Recombinant human granulocyte colony stimulating-factor or vehicle was given daily after intoxication (4 days) or before (7 days) and after carbon tetrachloride administration. Liver injury and regeneration were assessed 2 and 4 days after damage. Bone marrow cells mobilization was evaluated by the white blood cell count and the assessment of circulating clonogenic haematopoietic progenitors (colony forming unit-cells). RESULTS In this experimental model, although granulocyte colony stimulating-factor induced the significant mobilization of colony forming unit-cells, the study cytokine had no effect on liver injury (serum alanine amino transaminase level and necrotic index) and liver regeneration (mitotic index and bromodeoxyuridine incorporation), regardless of the administration schedule. CONCLUSIONS This study does not support the conclusion that: (1) granulocyte colony stimulating-factor exerts a protective effect against toxic-induced, non-lethal acute liver injury and (2) promotes hepatocyte regeneration.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- P Caraceni
- Department of Internal Medicine, Cardioangiology, Hepatology, University of Bologna, and Ospedale Policlinico S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|