The MEK1 inhibitors UO126 and PD98059 block PDGF-AB induced phosphorylation of threonine 292 in porcine smooth muscle cells

Risk Stratification, Screening and Treatment of BRAF/MEK Inhibitors-Associated Cardiotoxicity

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In this review article we describe the cardiovascular adverse events associated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors as well as their pathophysiologic mechanisms and provide up to date guidance for risk stratified surveillance of patients on treatment and the optimal management of emergent cardiotoxicities.

RECENT FINDINGS

Combination BRAF/MEK inhibition has become an established standard treatment option for patients with a wide variety of BRAF mutant haematological and solid organ cancers, its use is most commonly associated with stage three and metastatic melanoma. The introduction of these targeted drugs has significantly improved the prognosis of previously treatment resistant cancers. It is increasingly recognised that these drugs have a number of cardiovascular toxicities including left ventricular systolic dysfunction, hypertension and QTc interval prolongation. Whilst cardiotoxicity is largely reversible and manageable with medical therapy, it does limit the effective use of these highly active agents.

Toxicities from BRAF and MEK Inhibitors: Strategies to Maximize Therapeutic Success

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This report highlights several of the recent therapeutic advancements in the treatment of BRAF-mutant tumors, discusses the most common adverse events observed with BRAF-targeted agents, and suggests strategies to manage and mitigate treatment-related toxicities.

RECENT FINDINGS

BRAF and MEK inhibitors represent a significant advancement in the treatment of BRAF-mutated malignancies with data across tumor types demonstrating the anti-tumor efficacy of dual MAPK inhibition. Although these agents have a reasonable toxicity profile, variable side effects across organ systems can develop. The discovery of activating BRAF mutations and subsequent development of BRAF and MEK inhibitors has transformed the treatment algorithms of BRAF-mutant malignancies. With increased application of these targeted regimens, identification and prompt management of their unique adverse events are crucial.

Cancer Therapies and Vascular Toxicities

OPINION STATEMENT

Vascular events have become an important issue in the overall management of cancer patients. They usually result from a combination of (i) direct or indirect toxicity of anticancer treatments, (ii) a higher prevalence of cardiovascular risk factors in cancer patients, and (iii) prolonged exposure to treatments due to an increasing patient survival rate. In addition to conventional chemotherapies and radiotherapy, targeted therapies and immunotherapies have been developed which improve the prognosis of cancer patients but sometimes at the cost of vascular toxicity, which can lead to systemic or pulmonary hypertension and arterial/venous thromboembolic events. Endothelial dysfunction, a procoagulant state and metabolic disorders are the three main pathophysiological patterns leading to cancer treatment-related vascular toxicity. This issue is challenging because serious vascular adverse events can necessitate cancer treatment being put on hold or stopped, which could compromise patient survival. In addition to increasing the risk of thrombotic adverse events, cancer therapies may lead to an increased risk of bleeding, especially in treatments with vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors. Therefore, we can define vasculo-oncology as a part of the cardio-oncology specialty; its aims are to predict, prevent, screen, and treat vascular toxicity related to cancer treatments. While the level of evidence is low regarding the management of vascular toxicity during cancer therapy, cardiologists and specialists in vascular diseases should closely collaborate with oncologists and hematologists to determine the optimal strategy for each patient.

Mechanistic and Clinical Overview Cardiovascular Toxicity of BRAF and MEK Inhibitors: JACC: CardioOncology State-of-the-Art Review

Rapidly accelerated fibrosarcoma B-type (BRAF) and mitogen-activated extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK) inhibitors have revolutionized melanoma treatment. Approximately half of patients with melanoma harbor a BRAF gene mutation with subsequent dysregulation of the RAF-MEK-ERK signaling pathway. Targeting this pathway with BRAF and MEK blockade results in control of cell proliferation and, in most cases, disease control. These pathways also have cardioprotective effects and are necessary for normal vascular and cardiac physiology. BRAF and MEK inhibitors are associated with adverse cardiovascular effects including hypertension, left ventricular dysfunction, venous thromboembolism, atrial arrhythmia, and electrocardiographic QT interval prolongation. These effects may be underestimated in clinical trials. Baseline cardiovascular assessment and follow-up, including serial imaging and blood pressure assessment, are essential to balance optimal anti-cancer therapy while minimizing cardiovascular side effects. In this review, an overview of BRAF/MEK inhibitor-induced cardiovascular toxicity, the mechanisms underlying these, and strategies for surveillance, prevention, and treatment of these effects are provided.

The MEK/ERK Module Is Reprogrammed in Remodeling Adult Cardiomyocytes

Fetal and hypertrophic remodeling are hallmarks of cardiac restructuring leading chronically to heart failure. Since the Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK cascade (MAPK) is involved in the development of heart failure, we hypothesized, first, that fetal remodeling is different from hypertrophy and, second, that remodeling of the MAPK occurs. To test our hypothesis, we analyzed models of cultured adult rat cardiomyocytes as well as investigated myocytes in the failing human myocardium by western blot and confocal microscopy. Fetal remodeling was induced through endothelial morphogens and monitored by the reexpression of Acta2, Actn1, and Actb. Serum-induced hypertrophy was determined by increased surface size and protein content of cardiomyocytes. Serum and morphogens caused reprogramming of Ras/Raf/MEK/ERK. In both models H-Ras, N-Ras, Rap2, B- and C-Raf, MEK1/2 as well as ERK1/2 increased while K-Ras was downregulated. Atrophy, MAPK-dependent ischemic resistance, loss of A-Raf, and reexpression of Rap1 and Erk3 highlighted fetal remodeling, while A-Raf accumulation marked hypertrophy. The knock-down of B-Raf by siRNA reduced MAPK activation and fetal reprogramming. In conclusion, we demonstrate that fetal and hypertrophic remodeling are independent processes and involve reprogramming of the MAPK.

A1CF-promoted colony formation and proliferation of RCC depends on DKK1-MEK/ERK signal axis

The function and mechanism of RNA editing proteins have been extensively studied, but its association with cellular processes and signaling pathways remained unaddressed. Here, we explored the function of RNA editing complementary protein- Apobec-1 Complementation Factor (A1CF) in the proliferation and colony formation of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) cells. Decreased A1CF expression inhibits the proliferation and colony formation of 786-O cells; and further signaling pathway screening demonstrated that A1CF increases ERK activation and DKK1 expression. Moreover, knockdown of DKK1 has similar phenotypes with A1CF deficiency in 786-O cells on cell proliferation and colony formation and ERK activation. Decreasing of DKK1 expression reduces the phosphorylation of ERK1/2 and MEK1/2 increased by A1CF overexpression; further, inhibiting of the phosphorylation of MEK1/2 by U0126 also decreases the ERK activation upregulated by A1CF overexpression. Deficiency of DKK1 or U0126 treatment suppresses the cell proliferation promoted by A1CF overexpression in 786-O cells; furthermore, U0126 treatment inhibits DKK1-increased cell proliferation in 786-O cells. Our results reveal that DKK1 mediates A1CF to activate ERK in promotion renal carcinoma cell proliferation and colony formation. For the important function of ERK signaling pathway in tumor metastasis and key position of DKK1 in Wnt signaling pathway, we associate RNA editing protein-A1CF with multiple cellular processes and signaling pathways through DKK1, and the key node of A1CF-DKK1-MEK/ERK axis is a potential targeting site for RCC therapy.

Cardiovascular Adverse Events Associated With BRAF and MEK Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

IMPORTANCE

Cardiovascular adverse events (CVAEs) after treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors in patients with melanoma remain incompletely characterized.

OBJECTIVE

To determine the association of BRAF and MEK inhibitor treatment with CVAEs in patients with melanoma compared with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, Cochrane, and Web of Science were systematically searched for keywords vemurafenib, dabrafenib, encorafenib, trametinib, binimetinib, and cobinimetinib from database inception through November 30, 2018.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomized clinical trials reporting on CVAEs in patients with melanoma being treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors compared with patients with melanoma being treated with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy were selected.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Data assessment followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guidelines. Pooled relative risks (RRs) and 95% CIs were determined using random-effects and fixed-effects analyses. Subgroup analyses were conducted to assess study-level characteristics associated with CVAEs.

MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES

The selected end points were pulmonary embolism, a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction, arterial hypertension, myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, and QTc interval prolongation. All-grade and high-grade (≥3) CVAEs were recorded.

RESULTS

Overall, 5 randomized clinical trials including 2317 patients with melanoma were selected. Treatment with BRAF and MEK inhibitors was associated with an increased risk of pulmonary embolism (RR, 4.36; 95% CI, 1.23-15.44; P = .02), a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction (RR, 3.72; 95% CI, 1.74-7.94; P < .001), and arterial hypertension (RR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.12-1.97; P = .005) compared with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. The RRs for myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation, and QTc prolongation were similar between the groups. These results were consistent when assessing high-grade CVAEs (left ventricular ejection fraction: RR, 2.79; 95% CI, 1.36-5.73; P = .005; I2 = 29%; high-grade arterial hypertension: RR, 1.54; 95% CI, 1.14-2.08; P = .005; I2 = 0%), but RRs for high-grade pulmonary embolism were similar between groups. A higher risk of a decrease in left ventricular ejection fraction was associated with patients with a mean age younger than 55 years (RR, 26.50; 95% CI, 3.58-196.10; P = .001), and the associated risk of pulmonary embolism was higher for patients with a mean follow-up time longer than 15 months (RR, 7.70; 95% CI, 1.40-42.12; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors was associated with a higher risk of CVAEs compared with BRAF inhibitor monotherapy. The findings may help to balance between beneficial melanoma treatment and cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Cardiotoxicity mechanisms of the combination of BRAF-inhibitors and MEK-inhibitors

Many new drugs have appeared in last years in the oncological treatment scenario. Each drug carries an important set of adverse events, not less, cardiovascular adverse events. This aspect is even more important considering the increasing use of combination therapies with two drugs, or three drugs as in some ongoing clinical trials. Besides it represents a growing problem for Cardiologists, that face it in every day clinical practice and that will face it probably more and more in the coming years. This work reviews the mechanism of action of BRAF-inhibitors and MEK-inhibitors used together, the pathophysiological mechanisms that lead to cardiovascular toxicity. Particularly, it focuses on hypertension and ejection fraction reduction development. Then, it follows the examination of published data for each combination therapy. A Literature research was carried out using Pubmed selecting review articles, original studies and clinical trials, but mainly focusing on phase 3 studies. This work aims to summarize the knowledge about BRAF-inhibitor and MEK-inhibitor treatment and its cardiovascular toxicity to make it usable and give the basic tools to Cardiologists and Oncologists for a better management of cancer patient undergoing this treatment. Besides a deeper knowledge of the cardiovascular adverse events linked to this treatment and the magnitude of their expression and frequency can lead to a targeted cardiological treatment.