1
|
Wyse JJ, Eckhardt A, Newell S, Gordon AJ, Morasco BJ, Carlson K, Korthuis PT, Ono SS, Lovejoy TI. Integrating Buprenorphine for Opioid Use Disorder into Rural, Primary Care Settings. J Gen Intern Med 2024; 39:2142-2149. [PMID: 38955895 PMCID: PMC11347530 DOI: 10.1007/s11606-024-08898-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/14/2024] [Accepted: 06/12/2024] [Indexed: 07/04/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Medications for opioid use disorder (MOUD) including buprenorphine are effective, but underutilized. Rural patients experience pronounced disparities in access. To reach rural patients, the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) has sought to expand buprenorphine prescribing beyond specialty settings and into primary care. OBJECTIVE Although challenges remain, some rural VA health care systems have begun offering opioid use disorder (OUD) treatment with buprenorphine in primary care. We conducted interviews with clinicians, leaders, and staff within these systems to understand how this outcome had been achieved. DESIGN Using administrative data from the VA Corporate Data Warehouse (CDW), we identified rural VA health care systems that had improved their rate of primary care-based buprenorphine prescribing over the period 2015-2020. We conducted qualitative interviews (n = 30) with staff involved in implementing or prescribing buprenorphine in these systems to understand the processes that had facilitated implementation. PARTICIPANTS Clinicians, staff, and leaders embedded within rural VA health care systems located in the Northwest, West, Midwest (2), South, and Northeast. APPROACH Qualitative interviews were analyzed using a mixed inductive/deductive approach. KEY RESULTS Interviews revealed the processes through which buprenorphine was integrated into primary care, as well as processes insufficient to enact change. Implementation was often initially catalyzed through a targeted hire. Champions then engaged clinicians and leaders one-on-one to "pitch" the case, describe concordance between buprenorphine prescribing and existing goals, and delineate the supportive role that they could provide. Sites were prepared for implementation by developing new clinical teams and redesigning clinical processes. Each of these processes was made possible with the active, instrumental support of leadership. CONCLUSIONS Results suggest that rural systems seeking to improve buprenorphine accessibility in primary care may need to alter primary care structures to accommodate buprenorphine prescribing, whether through new hires, team development, or clinical redesign.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jessica J Wyse
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA.
- School of Public Health, OHSU-PSU, 1810 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 510, Portland, OR, 97201, USA.
| | - Alison Eckhardt
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Summer Newell
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Adam J Gordon
- Informatics, Decision-Enhancement, and Analytic Sciences (IDEAS) Center, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, 500 Foothill Drive, Salt Lake City, UT, 84148, USA
- Division of Epidemiology & Department of Internal Medicine, University of Utah School of Medicine, 295 Chipeta Way, Salt Lake City, UT, 84132, USA
| | - Benjamin J Morasco
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Kathleen Carlson
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- School of Public Health, OHSU-PSU, 1810 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 510, Portland, OR, 97201, USA
| | - P Todd Korthuis
- School of Public Health, OHSU-PSU, 1810 SW 5th Avenue, Suite 510, Portland, OR, 97201, USA
- Department of Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine & Geriatrics, Section of Addiction Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Road, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Sarah S Ono
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- VA Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Portland, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| | - Travis I Lovejoy
- Center to Improve Veteran Involvement in Care, VA Portland Health Care System, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- Department of Psychiatry, Oregon Health & Science University, 3181 SW Sam Jackson Park Rd, Portland, OR, 97239, USA
- VA Office of Rural Health, Veterans Rural Health Resource Center-Portland, 3710 SW U.S. Veterans Hospital Rd., Portland, OR, 97239, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Christine PJ, Chahine RA, Kimmel SD, Mack N, Douglas C, Stopka TJ, Calver K, Fanucchi LC, Slavova S, Lofwall M, Feaster DJ, Lyons M, Ezell J, Larochelle MR. Buprenorphine Prescribing Characteristics Following Relaxation of X-Waiver Training Requirements. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e2425999. [PMID: 39102264 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.25999] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/06/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Local-level data are needed to understand whether the relaxation of X-waiver training requirements for prescribing buprenorphine in April 2021 translated to increased buprenorphine treatment. Objective To assess whether relaxation of X-waiver training requirements was associated with changes in the number of clinicians waivered to and who prescribe buprenorphine for opioid use disorder and the number of patients receiving treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants This serial cross-sectional study uses an interrupted time series analysis of 2020-2022 data from the HEALing Communities Study (HCS), a cluster-randomized, wait-list-controlled trial. Urban and rural communities in 4 states (Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio) with a high burden of opioid overdoses that had not yet received the HCS intervention were included. Exposure Relaxation of X-waiver training requirements (ie, allowing training-exempt X-waivers) on April 28, 2021. Main Outcomes and Measures The monthly number of X-waivered clinicians, X-waivered buprenorphine prescribers, and patients receiving buprenorphine were each summed across communities within a state. Segmented linear regression models to estimate pre- and post-policy change by state were used. Results The number of individuals in 33 participating HCS communities included 347 863 in Massachusetts, 815 794 in Kentucky, 971 490 in New York, and 1 623 958 in Ohio. The distribution of age (18-35 years: range, 29.4%-32.4%; 35-54 years: range, 29.9%-32.5%; ≥55 years: range, 35.7%-39.3%) and sex (female: range, 51.1%-52.6%) was similar across communities. There was a temporal increase in the number of X-waivered clinicians in the pre-policy change period in all states, which further increased in the post-policy change period in each state except Ohio, ranging from 5.2% (95% CI, 3.1%-7.3%) in Massachusetts communities to 8.4% (95% CI, 6.5%-10.3%) in Kentucky communities. Only communities in Kentucky showed an increase in the number of X-waivered clinicians prescribing buprenorphine associated with the policy change (relative increase, 3.2%; 95% CI, 1.5%-4.9%), while communities in other states showed no change or a decrease. Similarly, only communities in Massachusetts experienced an increase in patients receiving buprenorphine associated with the policy change (relative increase, 1.7%; 95% CI, 0.8%-2.6%), while communities in other states showed no change. Conclusions and Relevance In this serial cross-sectional study, relaxation of X-waiver training requirements was associated with an increase in the number of X-waivered clinicians but was not consistently associated with an increase in the number of buprenorphine prescribers or patients receiving buprenorphine. These findings suggest that training requirements may not be the primary barrier to expanding buprenorphine treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul J Christine
- Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado School of Medicine, Aurora
- Department of General Internal Medicine, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, Colorado
| | - Rouba A Chahine
- Social, Statistical, and Environmental Sciences, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Simeon D Kimmel
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
- Section of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center and Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Nicole Mack
- Social, Statistical, and Environmental Sciences, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Christian Douglas
- Social, Statistical, and Environmental Sciences, Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Thomas J Stopka
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Katherine Calver
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Laura C Fanucchi
- Division of Infectious Diseases, College of Medicine, University of Kentucky, Lexington
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Svetla Slavova
- Department of Biostatistics, College of Public Health, University of Kentucky, Lexington
- Kentucky Injury Prevention Research Center, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Michelle Lofwall
- Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, University of Kentucky, Lexington
- Department of Behavioral Science and Psychiatry, University of Kentucky, Lexington
| | - Daniel J Feaster
- Division of Health Services Research and Policy, Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami Miller School of Medicine, Miami, Florida
| | - Michael Lyons
- Department of Emergency Medicine, College of Medicine, The Ohio State University, Columbus
| | - Jerel Ezell
- Division of Community Health Sciences, School of Public Health, University of California, Berkeley
| | - Marc R Larochelle
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine, Boston University, Boston, Massachusetts
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
McKendrick G, Stull SW, Sharma A, Dunn KE. Availability and Opportunities for Expansion of Buprenorphine for the Treatment of Opioid Use Disorder. Semin Neurol 2024; 44:419-429. [PMID: 38876459 DOI: 10.1055/s-0044-1787569] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/16/2024]
Abstract
There is an urgent need to expand access to treatment for persons with opioid use disorder (OUD). As neurologists may frequently encounter patients with chronic pain who have developed OUD, they are in a position to serve as advocates for treatment. Buprenorphine is the most scalable medication for OUD in the United States, yet expansion has plateaued in recent years despite growing treatment needs. Reluctance of providers to establish treatment with new patients, challenges with rural expansion, stigma related to buprenorphine-based care, and pharmacy pressures that incentivize low dispensing and inventories may have stalled expansion. This review introduces these challenges before outlining actionable and evidenced-based strategies that warrant investigation, including methods to improve patient access to care (remotely delivered care, mobile delivery programs, Bridge programs) and provider retention and confidence in prescribing (expert consults, Extension for Community Healthcare Outcomes, a telementoring model, hub-and-spoke services), as well as novel innovations (virtual reality, artificial intelligence, wearable technologies). Overall, fortifying existing delivery systems while developing new transformative models may be necessary to achieve more optimal levels of buprenorphine treatment expansion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Greer McKendrick
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| | - Samuel W Stull
- Department of Biobehavioral Health, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA
| | | | - Kelly E Dunn
- Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Silwal A, Dayton ZA. Understanding the Political Frames of the Opioid Crisis: A Content Analysis of U.S. Senators' Tweets. HEALTH COMMUNICATION 2024:1-15. [PMID: 38862402 DOI: 10.1080/10410236.2024.2364465] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/13/2024]
Abstract
The opioid epidemic in the United States is a public health emergency that has triggered calls to action for policy reforms. However, variations exist between political parties and policymakers on how this issue is communicated to the public. With the substantial growth in the use of social media by policymakers as a tool for disseminating policy-related information affecting their constituents, examining their communication strategies on public health emergency issues is imperative. To better understand how U.S. Senate members use Twitter (now known as X) to communicate opioid-related issues, we conducted a quantitative content analysis of their opioid-related tweets (N = 697) from January 1 to August 25 2022. Findings reveal a significant political divide regarding how senators characterize the opioid crisis, influencing user engagement on Twitter. Guided by the moral foundation theory, the results suggest that Democratic senators were more likely to employ care/harm or fairness/cheating moral foundations, relative to Republican senators, who used more loyalty/betrayal or authority/subversion. Additionally, Democratic senators framed the opioid crisis as a health or policy issue, relative to Republican senators' immigration/border frame. For inclusion of information sources, Democratic senators included significantly more health sources compared to Republican senators' use of media or law enforcement sources. Issue frame and source type significantly influenced user engagement in the form of likes and retweets. These findings provide both practical and theoretical implications.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anita Silwal
- Department of Communication, University of Kentucky
- Substance Use Priority Research Area, University of Kentucky
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Stopka TJ, Babineau DC, Gibson EB, Knott CE, Cheng DM, Villani J, Wai JM, Blevins D, David JL, Goddard-Eckrich DA, Lofwall MR, Massatti R, DeFiore-Hyrmer J, Lyons MS, Fanucchi LC, Harris DR, Talbert J, Hammerslag L, Oller D, Balise RR, Feaster DJ, Soares W, Zarkin GA, Glasgow L, Oga E, McCarthy J, D’Costa L, Chahine R, Gomori S, Dalvi N, Shrestha S, Garner C, Shadwick A, Salsberry P, Konstan MW, Freisthler B, Winhusen J, El-Bassel N, Samet JH, Walsh SL. Impact of the Communities That HEAL Intervention on Buprenorphine-Waivered Practitioners and Buprenorphine Prescribing: A Prespecified Secondary Analysis of the HCS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024; 7:e240132. [PMID: 38386322 PMCID: PMC10884876 DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.0132] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/22/2023] [Accepted: 01/03/2024] [Indexed: 02/23/2024] Open
Abstract
Importance Buprenorphine significantly reduces opioid-related overdose mortality. From 2002 to 2022, the Drug Addiction Treatment Act of 2000 (DATA 2000) required qualified practitioners to receive a waiver from the Drug Enforcement Agency to prescribe buprenorphine for treatment of opioid use disorder. During this period, waiver uptake among practitioners was modest; subsequent changes need to be examined. Objective To determine whether the Communities That HEAL (CTH) intervention increased the rate of practitioners with DATA 2000 waivers and buprenorphine prescribing. Design, Setting, and Participants This prespecified secondary analysis of the HEALing Communities Study, a multisite, 2-arm, parallel, community-level, cluster randomized, open, wait-list-controlled comparison clinical trial was designed to assess the effectiveness of the CTH intervention and was conducted between January 1, 2020, to December 31, 2023, in 67 communities in Kentucky, Massachusetts, New York, and Ohio, accounting for approximately 8.2 million adults. The participants in this trial were communities consisting of counties (n = 48) and municipalities (n = 19). Trial arm randomization was conducted using a covariate constrained randomization procedure stratified by state. Each state was balanced by community characteristics including urban/rural classification, fatal opioid overdose rate, and community population. Thirty-four communities were randomized to the intervention and 33 to wait-list control arms. Data analysis was conducted between March 20 and September 29, 2023, with a focus on the comparison period from July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022. Intervention Waiver trainings and other educational trainings were offered or supported by the HEALing Communities Study research sites in each state to help build practitioner capacity. Main Outcomes and Measures The rate of practitioners with a DATA 2000 waiver (overall, and stratified by 30-, 100-, and 275-patient limits) per 100 000 adult residents aged 18 years or older during July 1, 2021, to June 30, 2022, were compared between the intervention and wait-list control communities. The rate of buprenorphine prescribing among those waivered practitioners was also compared between the intervention and wait-list control communities. Intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses were performed. Results A total of 8 166 963 individuals aged 18 years or older were residents of the 67 communities studied. There was no evidence of an effect of the CTH intervention on the adjusted rate of practitioners with a DATA 2000 waiver (adjusted relative rate [ARR], 1.04; 95% CI, 0.94-1.14) or the adjusted rate of practitioners with a DATA 2000 waiver who actively prescribed buprenorphine (ARR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.86-1.10). Conclusions and Relevance In this randomized clinical trial, the CTH intervention was not associated with increases in the rate of practitioners with a DATA 2000 waiver or buprenorphine prescribing among those waivered practitioners. Supporting practitioners to prescribe buprenorphine remains a critical yet challenging step in the continuum of care to treat opioid use disorder. Trial Registration ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04111939.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Thomas J. Stopka
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Erin B. Gibson
- Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Charles E. Knott
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Debbie M. Cheng
- Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Jennifer Villani
- National Institute on Drug Abuse, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland
| | - Jonathan M. Wai
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Derek Blevins
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - James L. David
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Dawn A. Goddard-Eckrich
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Michelle R. Lofwall
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington
| | - Richard Massatti
- Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, Columbus
| | | | | | - Laura C. Fanucchi
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington
| | | | | | - Lindsey Hammerslag
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington
| | - Devin Oller
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington
| | - Raymond R. Balise
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - Daniel J. Feaster
- Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Miami, Miami, Florida
| | - William Soares
- UMass Chan Medical School–Baystate, Springfield, Massachusetts
| | - Gary A. Zarkin
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - LaShawn Glasgow
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Emmanuel Oga
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - John McCarthy
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Lauren D’Costa
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Rouba Chahine
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Steve Gomori
- Research Triangle Institute, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina
| | - Netrali Dalvi
- Office of Prescription Monitoring and Drug Control, Massachusetts Department of Public Health, Boston
| | - Shikhar Shrestha
- Department of Public Health and Community Medicine, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts
| | | | - Aimee Shadwick
- RecoveryOhio, Office of Ohio Governor Mike DeWine, Columbus
| | - Pamela Salsberry
- Health Behavior and Health Promotion, Ohio State University, Columbus
| | | | | | - John Winhusen
- University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio
| | - Nabila El-Bassel
- Department of Psychiatry, Columbia University; Division on Substance Use Disorders, New York State Psychiatric Institute, New York
| | - Jeffrey H. Samet
- Department of Medicine, Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
- Clinical Addiction Research and Education Unit, Section of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, Boston University Chobanian & Avedisian School of Medicine and Boston Medical Center, Boston, Massachusetts
| | - Sharon L. Walsh
- College of Medicine, University of Kentucky Center on Drug and Alcohol Research, Lexington
| |
Collapse
|