Influence of abutment-to-fixture design on reliability and failure mode of all-ceramic crown systems

Mechanical strength of stock and custom abutments as original and aftermarket components after thermomechanical aging

OBJECTIVES

The study aimed to assess the impact on the mechanical strength and failure patterns of implant-abutment complexes of choosing different abutment types, designs and manufacturers, aiding in selecting the optimal restorative solution. Stock and custom abutments from original and aftermarket suppliers were subjected to thermomechanical aging.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Stock and custom abutments from the implant manufacturer (original) and a aftermarket supplier (nonoriginal) were connected to identical implants with internal connection. Custom abutments were designed in a typical molar and premolar design, manufactured using the workflow from the respective suppliers. A total of 90 implants (4 mm diameter, 3.4 mm platform, 13 mm length) equally divided across 6 groups (three designs, two manufacturers) underwent thermo-mechanical aging according to three different regimes, simulating five (n = 30) or 10 years (n = 30) of clinical function, or unaged control (n = 30). Subsequently, all samples were tested to failure.

RESULTS

During aging, no failures occurred. The mean strength at failure was 1009N ± 171, showing significant differences between original and nonoriginal abutments overall (-230N ± 27.1, p < .001), and within each abutment type (p = .000), favoring original abutments. Aging did not significantly affect the failure load, while the type of abutment and manufacturer did, favoring original and custom-designed abutments. The most common failure was implant bending or deformation, significantly differing between original and nonoriginal abutments and screws. All failure tests resulted in clinically unsalvageable implants and abutments.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limitations of this study, original abutments exhibited a higher mechanical strength compared to the nonoriginal alternative, regardless of the amount of simulated clinical use. Similarly, custom abutments showed higher mechanical strength compared to stock abutments. However, mechanical strength in all abutments tested was higher than average chewing forces reported in literature, thus components tested in this study can be expected to perform equally well in clinical situations without excessive force.

Mechanical Behavior of Five Different Morse Taper Implants and Abutments with Different Conical Internal Connections and Angles: An In Vitro Experimental Study

The present study evaluated the mechanical behavior of five designs of Morse taper (MT) connections with and without the application of loads. For this, the detorque of the fixing screw and the traction force required to disconnect the abutment from the implant were assessed. A total of 100 sets of implants/abutments (IAs) with MT-type connections were used, comprising five groups (n = 20/group): (1) Group Imp 11.5: IA sets with a cone angulation of 11.5°; (2) Group SIN 11.5: with a cone angulation of 11.5°; (3) Group SIN 16: with a cone angulation of 16°; (4) Group Neo 16: with a cone angulation of 16°; and (5) Group Str 15: with a cone angulation of 15°. All sets received the torque recommended by the manufacturer. After applying the torque, the counter torque of the fixing screws was measured in ten IA sets of each group without the application of cyclic loads (frequencies ≤ 2 Hz, 360,000 cycles, and force at 150 Ncm). The other ten sets of each group were subjected to cyclic loads, after which the detorque was measured. Afterwards, the force for disconnection between the implant and the abutment was measured by traction on all the samples. The untwisting of the abutment fixation screws showed a decrease in relation to the initial torque applied in all groups. In the unloaded samples, it was found to be -25.7% in Group 1, -30.4% in Group 2, -36.8% in Group 3, -29.6% in Group 4, and -25.7% in Group 5. After the applied loads, it was found to be -44% in Group 1, -43.5% in Group 2, -48.5% in Group 3, -47.2% in Group 4, and -49.8% in Group 5. The values for the IA sets were zero for SIN 16 (Group 3) and Neo16 (Group 4), both without and with loads. In the other three groups, without loads, the disconnection value was 56.3 ± 2.21 N (Group 1), 30.7 ± 2.00 N (Group 2), and 26.0 ± 2.52 N (Group 5). After applying loads, the values were 63.5 ± 3.06 N for Group 1, 34.2 ± 2.45 N in Group 2, and 23.1 ± 1.29 N in Group 5. It was concluded that in terms of the mechanical behavior of the five designs of MT IA sets, with and without the application of loads, the Imp 11.5, SIN 11.5, and Srt 15 groups showed better results compared to the SIN 16 and Neo 16 groups, showing that lower values of cone angulation increase the friction between the parts (IA), thus avoiding the need to maintain the torque of the fixing screw to maintain the union of the sets.

Mechanical Behavior and Fracture Loads of Screw-Retained and Cement-Retained Lithium Disilicate Implant-Supported Crowns

PURPOSE

To evaluate the fatigue survival, fracture loads and failure modes of monolithic lithium disilicate screw-retained crowns, attached to titanium insert, and cement-retained crowns.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Internal tapered connection implants, embedded in acrylic resin at 30° inclination, were restored with lithium disilicate restorations, simulating a maxillary premolar (n = 20), with different designs: screw-retained titanium base abutment-crowns, and cement-retained crowns. The specimens were submitted to cyclic mechanical loading (1.2 × 10⁶ cycles with a load of 0-250 N at 2 Hz). Surviving specimens were subjected to single load to fracture in a universal testing machine and failure modes were determined with the aid of an optical microscope. Maximum load values were analyzed statistically using the t-test and differences in failure modes were analyzed using the chi-squared test (α = 0.05).

RESULTS

All specimens survived the cyclic mechanical loading. Fracture load was significantly higher for screw-retained crowns (821.69 ±196.71 N) than the cement-retained crowns (577.03 ± 137.75 N) (p = 0.005). Ceramic failure was the predominant mode, with no statistical difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Screw-retained and cement-retained lithium disilicate crowns survived the cyclic mechanical loading. The use of titanium inserts to support a monolithic restoration enhances the fracture strength of the crown/abutment system.

Dynamic and static load performance of dental biomaterial systems with conical implant-abutment connections

BACKGROUND

The stability of the implant-abutment interface is an important factor that influences load distribution on the marginal bone.

OBJECTIVE

In this study, three dental implants with the same connection were subjected to different dynamic loading cycles. The fracture strengths and the horizontal compatibility of implants were assessed.

METHODS

Eighty four implant specimens were embedded in a polyacetal cylinder as simulated bone loss of 3 mm from the implant platform. Three of the implants were used to determine the endurance limit. The other specimens were subdivided into four subgroups (n = 6): three for dynamic + static loading, and one for static loading (control group). The tests were performed by applying a compression load. The dynamic loading experiments included three different cycles with endurance upper limit loads at a frequency of 10 Hz.

RESULTS

The differences between the fracture strength values of the implant brands were found to be statistically significant. However, there were no meaningful differences between the fracture strength values of implants of the same brand. The specimens of the DTI implant system had the lowest strength (647.9 ± 41.5 N) and the SEM analysis indicated that the Implantium implant system had the shortest horizontal gaps.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a negative correlation between the fracture strengths and size of the microgaps. The importance of these in vitro results needs to be validated by clinical trials because the loads in the mouth can be applied from various angles.

Fatigue survival and failure resistance of titanium versus zirconia implant abutments with various connection designs

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

Data regarding the effect of connection design and abutment material on the fatigue survival and failure resistance of implant abutments are scarce.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this in vitro study was to investigate the effect of connection design and abutment material on the fatigue survival and failure resistance of implant abutment assemblies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three types of implants (n=18, N=54) and 6 groups of abutments (n=9, N=54) with different connection designs-internal conical (IC), internal tri-channel (IT), and external hexagonal (EH)-and abutment materials-titanium (T) and zirconia (Z)-were investigated. All the abutments were restored with identical central incisor crowns. Fatigue testing, including thermal and mechanical aging, was performed in a mastication simulator (Esetron Smart Robotechnologies) for up to 1.2×10⁶ cycles with a load of 50 N at an angle of 45 degrees. Then, the surviving specimens were subjected to failure resistance testing in a universal testing machine (Shimadzu AG-IS; Shimadzu Corp) at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min. The maximum loads to failure (N) were recorded. Survival performance of the specimens throughout the fatigue testing was examined by the Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. The failure loads were analyzed by using the Kruskal-Wallis test followed by the Mann-Whitney U tests with Bonferroni-Holm correction (α=.05).

RESULTS

All the specimens of groups ICT, ITT, ITZ, and EHT survived fatigue testing, whereas 2 specimens from group ICZ and 3 specimens from EHZ failed. Statistically significant differences were found among the groups, based on the results of maximum failure loads (P<.05). The highest mean failure load was obtained in the ICT group (1069 ±182 N), followed by the ITT (926 ±197 N), EHT (873 ±126 N), ITZ (568 ±81 N), EHZ (311 ±45 N), and ICZ (287 ±63 N) groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Abutment material and connection design affected the fatigue survival of implant abutment assemblies. Implant abutment assemblies with a titanium-titanium interface revealed higher failure resistance than the implant abutment assemblies with a titanium-zirconia interface.

Effect of Bonding and Rebonding on the Shear Bond Strength of Two-Piece Implant Restorations

PURPOSE

To evaluate the rebonding strength of ceramics to titanium alloy after disassembling by heat treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A total of 40 titanium alloy (titanium-6 aluminum-4 vanadium) disks (4.0 × 6.6 mm) and 20 zirconia (Lava Plus) disks were manufactured using computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) technology. Twenty heat-pressed lithium disilicate glass-ceramic (IPS e.max Press LT) disks were fabricated and used as controls. Bonding protocol for each specimen surface was performed according to manufacturer's instructions. Specimens (n = 10) of zirconia/titanium alloy (ZR) and lithium disilicate/titanium alloy (LD) were bonded using adhesive resin cement (RelyX Ultimate) and then subjected to a heat treatment (HT, 320°C, 2 minutes) to disassemble the bonding complex, cleaned with aluminum oxide airborne-particle abrasion, and rebonded following the initial protocol, group ZRHT and group LDHT, respectively. After 5000 cycles of thermal cycling, a shear bond test was conducted. A universal testing machine was used at a 5 mm/min crosshead speed. Failed specimens were examined with stereomicroscopy at 10× magnification to identify the mode of failure. One-way ANOVA and Tukey HSD tests were applied for statistical analysis of the shear bond strength data, with statistical significance at α = 0.05.

RESULTS

The mean ± SD bond strength values ranged from 28.3 ± 7.2 to 45.9 ± 9.7 MPa. Statistically significant lower shear bond strength values were obtained from the LD group (p = 0.002, F = 5.89), while no statistically significant differences in bond strength were observed between the ZR and ZRHT groups (p > 0.05). Failure mode was predominantly mixed-type failure pattern for all specimens.

CONCLUSIONS

Heat and abrasion surface treatment increased the bond strength of lithium disilicate glass-ceramics cemented to titanium alloy, but no effect was observed on zirconia/titanium alloy bonding.

Fractographic analyses of failed one-piece zirconia implant restorations

BACKGROUND

Promising results of initial clinical trials with yttria-stabilized zirconia have led to more extensive use of zirconia in dental implant superstructures. The applications have extended to abutments and complex individually designed crown-abutment one-piece structures. Little is known about their clinical success and the primary cause of failures.

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to identify the cause of fracture of retrieved implant-retained one-piece prostheses that failed during clinical use.

METHODS

Nine fractured restorations were analyzed with fractographic methods and their fracture origins were identified.

RESULTS

All but two of the fractures originated in an area of tight contact between the implant or titanium screw and the abutment base. Results of the evaluation showed that zirconia-based implant restorations with very thin walls in the region connecting the prosthesis to the implant are vulnerable to damage from the screw retaining process and fracture from non-axial loads. Two restorations failed due to veneer fractures.

SIGNIFICANCE

The findings suggest that large crowns on narrow implants or implants with internal fixation should preferably not be made with zirconia abutments, or that a new design approach should be considered.

A technique for the removal of a wedged implant abutment fragment or debonded titanium base

A technique for the retrieval of wedged implant fragments is described. The technique is suitable for fractured zirconia and metal abutments and titanium bases left behind after fracture or debonding of the custom zirconia abutment from the titanium base of an implant-supported prosthesis. This straightforward, noninvasive, technique facilitates the removal of the fragments or titanium bases without risking damage to the implant, surrounding bone, or soft tissues.