The bulk compressive creep and recovery behavior of human dentine and resin-based dental materials

Martens Hardness of CAD/CAM Resin-Based Composites

(1) Background: The properties of CAD/CAM resin-based composites differ due to differences in their composition. Instrumented indentation testing can help to analyze these differences with respect to hardness, as well as energy-converting capabilities due to viscoelastic behavior. (2) Methods: Eleven materials were investigated using instrumented indentation testing. Indentation depth (hr), Martens hardness (HM), indentation hardness (HIT), indentation modulus (EIT), the elastic part of indentation work (ηIT), and indentation creep (CIT) were investigated, and statistical analysis was performed using one-way ANOVA, Bonferroni post-hoc test, and Pearson correlation (α = 0.05). (3) Results: All of the investigated parameters revealed differences between the analyzed materials. Besides the differences in hardness-associated parameters (hr, HM, and HIT), instrumented indentation testing demonstrated differences in energy-converting properties. The subsequent one-way ANOVA revealed significant differences (p < 0.001). A significant (p < 0.01, Pearson correlation >0.576) correlation between the materials and HM, HIT, or EIT was identified. (4) Conclusions: Due to the differences found in the energy-converting properties of the investigated materials, certain CAD/CAM resin-based composites could show superior stress-breaking capabilities than others. The consequential reduction in stress build-up may prove to beneficial, especially for implant-retained restorations or patients suffering from parafunctions.

Post-irradiation surface viscoelastic integrity of photo-polymerized resin-based composites

OBJECTIVE

A class of ultra-rapid-cure resin-based composites (RBCs) exhibited immediate post-irradiation surface viscoelastic integrity using an indentation-creep/recovery procedure. The aim of this study was to determine whether such behavior is more generally characteristic of a wider range of RBCs.

METHODS

Eight representative RBCs were selected based on different clinical categories: three bulkfills (OBF, Filtek One Bulk Fill; VBF, Venus Bulkfill; EBF, Estelite Bulkfill), three conventional non-flowables (XTE, Filtek Supreme XTE; GSO, GrandioSo; HRZ, Harmonize) and conventional flowables (XTF, Filtek Supreme XTE Flow; GSF, GrandioSo Flow). Stainless steel split molds were used to fabricate cylindrical specimens (4mm (dia)×4mm). These were irradiated (1.2W/cm²) for 20s on the top surface. Post-irradiation specimens (n=3), within their molds, were centrally loaded with a flat-ended 1.5mm diameter indenter under 14MPa stress: either immediately (<2min) or after 24h delayed indentation. Stress was maintained for 2h, then - after removal - recovery measurements continued for a further 2h. Indentation depth (%) versus time was measured continuously to an accuracy of <0.1μm. Data were analyzed by One-way ANOVA and Tukey post-hoc tests (α=0.05).

RESULTS

Time-dependent viscoelastic indentation was observed for all RBCs. For immediate indentation, the maximum indentation range was 1.43-4.92%, versus 0.70-2.22% for 24h delayed indentation. Following 2h recovery, the residual indentation range was 0.86-3.58% after immediate indentation, reducing to 0.22-1.27% for delayed indentation. The greatest immediate indentation was shown by VBF followed by XTF and GSF. OBF, HRZ, XTE and GSO had significantly lower indentations (greater hardness). XTE showed a significantly reduced indentation maximum compared to OBF (p<0.05). Indentations delayed until 24h post-irradiation were reduced (p<0.05) for most materials.

SIGNIFICANCE

The indentation-creep methodology effectively characterized resin-based composites within several categories. Viscoelastic properties evaluated by the indentation-creep method confirmed that highly filled RBCs were more resistant to indentation. Indentations were reduced after 24h post-irradiation due to further matrix-network development.