Influence of shading on zirconia's phase transformation and flexural strength after artificial aging

The physical-mechanical properties of 3D-printed versus conventional milled zirconia for dental clinical applications: A systematic review with meta-analysis

AIM OF STUDY

This systematic review aimed to compare the physical-mechanical properties of 3D-printed (additively manufactured (AM)) zirconia compared to conventionally milled (subtractive manufactured: SM) zirconia specimens.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A thorough search of Internet databases was conducted up to September 2023. The search retrieved studies that evaluated AM zirconia specimens and restorations regarding the physical-mechanical properties and mechanical behavior of zirconia. The main topic focused on 3Y-TZP. However, records of 4YSZ and 5YSZ were also included to gather more comprehensive evidence on additively manufactured zirconia ceramic. The quality of studies was assessed using the ROB2 tool, Newcastle Ottawa scale, and the Modified Consort Statement. Of 1736 records, 57 were assessed for eligibility, and 38 records were included in this review, only two clinical trials meet the inclusion criteria and 36 records were laboratory studies. There were no signs of mechanical complications and wear to antagonists with short-term clinical observation. SM thin specimens ≤1.5 mm showed statistically significant higher flexural strength than AM zirconia (p ≤ 0.01), while thicker specimens showed comparable outcomes (p > 0.5). The fracture resistance of dental restorations was dependent on the aging protocol, restoration type, and thickness. The bond strength of veneering ceramic to zirconia core was comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

The results pooled from two short-term clinical trials showed no signs of mechanical or biological complications of additively manufactured 3Y-TZP zirconia crowns. The flexural strength might depend on the specimens' thickness, but it showed promising results to be used in clinical applications, taking into account the printing technique and orientation, material composition (yttria content), solid loading, and sintering parameters. 3D-printed restorations fracture resistance improved when adhered to human teeth. The veneering ceramic bond was comparable to milled zirconia specimens. Long-term RCTs are recommended to confirm the mechanical behavior of 3D-printed restorations.

Development of zirconia-based polymer-infiltrated ceramic network for dental restorative material

Polymer-infiltrated ceramic network (PICN) materials have gained considerable attention as tooth restorative materials owing to their mechanical compatibility with human teeth. However, the mechanical strength of contemporary PICN materials is lower than those of conventional resin composites and ceramics. This study aims to develop novel high-strength PICN for use as a dental restorative material. Zirconia-based PICN (EXP) was fabricated using 3 mol% yttria tetragonal polycrystalline zirconia powder and resin monomers via slip casting, followed by sintering and polymer infiltration. Comprehensive analyses of the microstructure, mechanical properties, and physicochemical properties of EXP were performed using scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, inorganic content measurements, three-point bending test, Vickers hardness test, two-body wear test, shear bond strength (SBS) test, surface free energy analysis, and water sorption/solubility test. Commercially available computer-aided design/computer-aided manufacturing (CAD/CAM) materials, including resin composite (CERASMART), silicate-based PICN (ENAMIC), and zirconia ceramic (e.max ZirCAD), were used for comparison. The analyses highlight the dual network structure of EXP, which comprised a zirconia skeleton and an infiltrated resin phase. EXP exhibits a flexural strength of 346.0 ± 46.0 MPa, flexural modulus of 44.0 ± 3.7 GPa, and Vickers hardness of 440.1 ± 51.2 VHN. The mechanical properties of EXP are significantly higher than those of CERASMART and ENAMIC but lower than those of ZirCAD. Notably, the EXP hardness closely mimics that of the human enamel. The wear volume, SBS, and water sorption/solubility of EXP are comparable to those of CERASMART and ENAMIC. Therefore, EXP has potential applications as a tooth restorative material.