Clinical evaluation of lithium disilicate versus indirect resin composite partial posterior restorations - A 7.8-year retrospective study

Clinical performance of minimally invasive full-mouth rehabilitation using different materials and techniques for patients with moderate to severe tooth wear: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate short, mid and long-term clinical outcomes and patients' satisfaction of minimally invasive full-mouth rehabilitation using different materials and techniques for patients with moderate to severe tooth wear. Furthermore, materials were analyzed to identify their influences on clinical results.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trial, Embase, Web of science and Scopus until December 19, 2024. Randomized clinical trials (RCT), cohort studies and case series with at least mean period of 3 years were included. The revised Cochrane risk of bias tool, Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal were used to evaluate the quality of RCT, cohort studies and case series. Meta-analysis and Poisson regression were conducted.

RESULTS

Ten studies in this review included three case series, six cohort studies and one RCT with three low, six moderate risks and one some concerns. Annual failure rates (AFRs) and annual complication rates (ACRs) of direct composite restorations were 0-6.2% and 1.0%-4.2%, respectively. AFRs of indirect restorations were 0%-0.5%. Overall ACRs of indirect restorations fabricated by traditional indirect resin composites, polymer-infiltrated ceramic-network, resin nanoceramics and ceramics were at 1.6%-15.1%, 0.7%-4.8%, 0.5%-5.0% and 0.2%-1.1%, respectively. The estimated AFRs of direct composites, resin nanoceramics and ceramics were 0.64%, 0.13% and 0.04% respectively. Significantly lowest AFRs of ceramic was found after mid-term follow-up with incidence rate ratios of direct composites, resin nanoceramics and ceramics being 1: 0.68 (P = 0.60): 0.001 (P < 0.05). The estimated ACRs of the three materials were 2.16%, 2.14% and 0.62%. Overall AFRs of restorations using different techniques were 0%-0.5%. Overall ACRs of direct and indirect techniques were 1.1%-2.2% and 0.2%-4.8%, respectively. Overall ACRs of hybrid technique were 0.5% to 15.1%. Restoration fracture was the most predominant complication regardless of materials. High appreciation was expressed by patient reported outcomes measures.

CONCLUSIONS

Minimally invasive full-mouth rehabilitation for patients with moderate to severe tooth wear presented good clinical performance apart from traditional indirect resin composite used in posterior teeth.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Minimally invasive full-mouth rehabilitation should be strongly advocated for the patients with moderately and severely worn dentition.

Minimally invasive prosthodontics using the concept of prosthetically guided orthodontics

OBJECTIVE

This case report aims to present how digital technology can be employed to plan the orthodontic movement of teeth into their final positions for prosthodontic rehabilitation. An interdisciplinary approach to treatment planning and the result of prosthodontic treatment involves the cooperation of an orthodontist and a prosthodontist. When planned to achieve optimal results for a minimally invasive and functional prosthodontic treatment, orthodontic pretreatment provides superior esthetic results and favorable long-term success.

CLINICAL CONSIDERATIONS

The orthodontic movements of the teeth were planned so that the prosthodontist could reconstruct an optimally functional and esthetic occlusion while preserving the hard dental tissues. The orthodontic pretreatment minimized the need to prepare the teeth, avoiding any mucogingival surgery to improve the gingival architecture.

CONCLUSIONS

In complex clinical cases, it is essential to evaluate the advantages of an orthodontic pretreatment before starting a prosthodontic treatment. This pretreatment can help preserve dental tissues, reduce or eliminate the need for surgical intervention, and achieve long-term stability and esthetic results.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

This case clearly shows the benefits of orthodontic pretreatment for prosthodontic outcomes. With modern digital tools, such an orthodontic pretreatment should become standard clinical practice when planning a complex clinical case.

Biomechanics, Bioactive and Biomimetic philosophy in restorative dentistry ̶ Quo vadis?

INTRODUCTION

In recent years, restorative dentistry has embraced various techniques, including direct, semi-direct, and indirect restorations, to address the replacement of lost tooth tissue. The focus has been on integrating the principles of Biomechanics, Bioactivity, and Biomimicry (3-Bio) as key drivers behind these innovations.

METHODS

The aim of this article is to provide a concise overview of three important aspects of restorative dental materials: biomechanics, bioactivity and biomimetics. Further, the aim is to provide readers with relevant information on the 3-Bio concept, offering insights in to the innovative approaches shaping modern restorative dentistry.

RESULTS

Developing restorative materials with interactive properties aligned with the 3-Bio concept poses a significant challenge. Currently, dentistry lacks a comprehensive system in this regard. The development of dental materials based on the 3-Bio concept could potentially elicit positive mechanical and biological responses in targeted tooth tissues.

CONCLUSION

Assessing several parameters through a battery of in vitro and in silico assays could help in tailoring the different aspects of the 3-Bio concept, spanning from bioactivity to biomimetics via biomechanics. This approach could allow the prediction and translation of the clinical performance of the assessed restorative materials.

CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE

The findings of this opinion article highlight that the development of restorative materials aligned with the 3-Bio concept could enhance the management of dental defects and extend the longevity of bonded restorations, thereby improving patient care through tissue preservation. More collective efforts between clinicians, researchers, and even industrial partners are required to fully understand the correlation between bioactive behavior, biomechanical limitations, and biomimetics to provide suitable restorative materials for specific clinical applications.

Advanced Material Strategy for Restoring Damaged Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Comprehensive Review

The restoration of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) remains a significant challenge in modern dentistry. These teeth often suffer from substantial structural damage due to both the original pathology and the invasive nature of endodontic procedures. Consequently, ETT are more susceptible to fractures compared to vital teeth, necessitating restorative strategies that can effectively restore both function and aesthetics while minimizing the risk of failure. In recent years, advances in adhesive dentistry and the development of high-strength ceramics have further expanded the restorative options for ETT. Bonded restorations have gained popularity as they preserve more tooth structure and enhance the overall strenght of the tooth-restoration complex. The choice of restorative material and technique is influenced by numerous factors, including the amount of remaining tooth structure, the functional requirements of the tooth, and the aesthetic demands of the patient. Despite the plethora of available materials and techniques, the optimal approach to restoring ETT remains a topic of ongoing research and debate. In this comprehensive review, the current state of and recent advances in restoring damaged endodontically treated teeth are explored. Numerous therapeutic options exist, involving a wide range of materials. This article aims to present the biomaterial advancements of the past decade and their applications, offering alternative approaches to treating damaged ETT with the goal of prolonging their retention on the dental arch and serving as a valuable resource for dental practitioners who face this issue daily.

Clinical benefits of immediate dentin sealing: A systematic review and meta-analysis

STATEMENT OF PROBLEM

The clinical complications, success, and survival rates of indirect restorations delivered with the immediate dentin sealing protocol are unclear.

PURPOSE

The purpose of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to find and collect evidence on the clinical complication, success, and survival rates of indirect restorations delivered with immediate dentin sealing.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for clinical studies on immediate dentin sealing up to December 2023, without language or time limitations. The records were included if they were clinical trials evaluating the clinical complication and survival rates of indirect restorations bonded to tooth substrate sealed immediately after preparation with suitable resin bonding. The extracted data were analyzed via Review Manager 5.4 for meta-analysis (α=.05).

RESULTS

A total of 11 studies were included in this review. The clinical complication rate was lower for immediately sealed dentin than for protocols without dentin sealing. The survival rate of restorations luted with the immediate dentin sealing protocol was higher (96.4% to 100%) than that of immediate dentin sealing (81.8% to 96.7%), negatively correlated with the observation time. The intensity and incidence of postoperative sensitivity were statistically significantly lower for restorations with immediate dentin sealing than for those without dentin sealing or conventionally cemented (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Immediate dentin-sealed indirect restorations had fewer clinical complications and higher success and survival rates than those delivered without dentin sealing. To avoid postoperative sensitivity or reduce its intensity, dentin surfaces should be sealed immediately after preparation. More long-term randomized clinical trials are recommended to confirm these evidence-based conclusions.

Evaluation of the Mechanical and Adhesion Characteristics of Indirect Restorations Manufactured with Three-Dimensional Printing

The aim of this study was to investigate the marginal fit and bond strength characteristics of onlay restorations manufactured by three-dimensional printing (Varseo XS, Bego GmbH, Bremen, Germany) and CAD/CAM (CAMcube, Montreal, QC, Canada) systems. Class II onlay cavities on sixty mandibular molars were prepared in cavities and restored in three separate groups using different fabrication methods. Digital and conventional impressions were taken to design the restorations in the CAD system (DWOS, Straumann GmbH, Freiburg, Germany). To evaluate the marginal fit and void volumes, all specimens were scanned with microcomputed tomography. A microshear test was performed to compare the bond strength of the restorations to the tooth surface. The marginal fit values measured for the 3D-printed and CAD/CAM onlay restorations were found to be at clinically acceptable levels (<120 µm), and no significant difference could be observed between the three different fabrication methods (p > 0.05). According to the microshear test results, the CAD/CAM group had the highest bond strength values before (34.82 MPa) and after (26.87 MPa) thermal cycling (p < 0.05), while the 3D-printed and conventionally produced onlays had similar results (p < 0.05). 3D printing technology is a promising option for indirect restorations; however, the post-production phase is as crucial as the printing and cementation phases.