Psoriasis and its treatment with infliximab-mediated tumor necrosis factor α blockade

Pathological role of excessive DNA as a trigger of keratinocyte proliferation in psoriasis

Psoriasis is characterized by excessive growth and aberrant differentiation of epidermal keratinocytes due to persistent inflammation. However, the underlying mechanism that triggers immune activation in psoriasis is not clear. In this study, we explored excessive DNA as a potential trigger of psoriasis using cultured human keratinocytes and psoriatic skin tissues. We demonstrated that human genomic DNA fragments induced tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-α expression, hyperproliferation and over-expression of heparin-binding epidermal-like growth factor (HB-EGF) and transforming growth factor (TGF)-α, accompanied by defective expression of keratins 1 and 10 in cultured normal human epidermal keratinocytes, which have a similar phenotype to that of keratinocytes in psoriatic skin lesions. In psoriatic lesions, we found high levels of double-stranded (ds)DNA fragments, accompanying keratinocytes expressing Ki-67, HB-EGF and TNF-α. In addition, we showed that 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃ inhibited genomic DNA fragment-induced TNFA and interleukin-1β (IFNB) expression in human keratinocytes, and an intact function of cathelicidin anti-microbial peptide (CAMP) was required for this effect. These results suggest that excessive dsDNA fragments probably act as a risk factor for immune activation in psoriasis, and the active form of vitamin D can prevent genomic DNA-mediated skin inflammation via CAMP.

Inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor-alpha for treatment ofpsoriatic patients

The article describes current concepts of the role of cytokines in the pathogenesis of inflammatory diseases. The authors describe the biological action of tumor necrosis factor-alpha and its soluble receptors on body cells. They also provide data on the role of tumor necrosis factor-alpha in the formation of skin and joint inflammatory affections at psoriasis. The authors substantiate treatment of medium to severe forms of psoriasis with biological gene-engineered anti-cytokine drugs, and provide and their comparative characteristics.

Infliximab and insulin resistance

Insulin resistance is the most important pathophysiologic feature of obesity, type 2 diabetes mellitus and prediabetic states. TNF-alpha, a proinflammatory cytokine, plays a pivotal role in the pathogenesis of inflammation-associated insulin resistance during the course of rheumatic diseases. Therapies aimed at neutralizing TNF-alpha, such as the monoclonal antibody infliximab, represent a novel approach for the treatment of rheumatic diseases and allow to obtain significant results in terms of control of the inflammatory process. In this article we reviewed the scientific evidence published in the literature about a potential role of TNF-alpha blockade in improving insulin resistance in non-diabetic rheumatic patients.

Emerging drugs for psoriasis

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis is a relatively common, chronic and disabling skin disease, due to a disturbed proliferation and differentiation of keratinocytes, accompanied by vascular alterations and infiltration of inflammatory cells with a local T(H)1-type cytokine immune response. There is no cure, but several treatment options are available.

OBJECTIVE

The treatment of psoriasis is far from being satisfactory, due to the impractical modalities of topical treatment and the suboptimal safety profile of the systemic treatments available. In the last few years, parallel to an improved understanding of the disease pathogenesis, there has been a boosting of research in new agents for the treatment of psoriasis. These new agents are the focus of this paper.

METHODS

After a short review of the treatment options already available (mainly based on the available systematic reviews), we focused on agents that are still in clinical development (Phase I - III) and have not yet entered the market. For the purpose of this study, we systematically searched the main registries of ongoing trials up to August 2008.

RESULTS/CONCLUSION

The field is very dynamic, with both immunopharmacology of recombinant DNA techniques and more traditional small-molecule pharmacology actively delivering new agents. With the increasing number of new options, there is a need for research systems that enable to effectively collect long-term safety data on treated patients.

Fungal infections complicating tumor necrosis factor alpha blockade therapy

Tumor necrosis factor a (TNF-alpha) blockade has emerged as a useful therapy for collagen vascular diseases or graft-vs-host disease. Fungal infections complicating such therapy have been reported sporadically. MEDLINE and PubMed databases (from January 1, 1966, to June 1, 2007) were searched for reports of invasive fungal infections (IFIs) associated with the 3 available anti-TNF- alpha agents, ie, infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab. Of the 281 cases of IFI associated with TNF-alpha inhibition, 226 (80%) were associated with infliximab, 44 (16%) with etanercept, and 11 (4%) with adalimumab. Fungal infections associated with infliximab occurred a median of 55 days (interquartile range [IQR], 15-140 days) after initiation of therapy and 3 infusions of the medication (IQR, 2-5), whereas those associated with etanercept occurred a median of 144 days (IQR, 46-240 days) after initiation of therapy. The median age of patients was 58 years (IQR, 44-68 years), and 62% were male. Use of at least 1 other immunosuppressant medication, typically a systemic corticosteroid, was reported during the course of the fungal infection in 102 (98%) of the 104 patients for whom data were available. The most prevalent IFIs were histoplasmosis (n=84 [30%]), candidiasis (n=64 [23%]), and aspergillosis (n equals 64 [23%]). Pneumonia was the most common pattern of infection. Of the 90 (32%) of 281 cases for which outcome information was available, 29 fatalities (32%) were recorded. Tumor necrosis factor a blockade is associated with IFI across a range of host groups. A high index of suspicion in patients treated with TNF-alpha antagonists is recommended because the course of such infections can be serious or fulminant, and rapid access to health care should be provided. Surveillance of IFIs complicating TNF-alpha blockade and other biologic therapies is warranted through well-organized prospective patient registries.

Perioperative management of medications for psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: a review for the dermasurgeon

BACKGROUND

Psoriasis affects an estimated 3% of the world's population. Many are on chronic immunosuppressive therapy for the cutaneous and joint manifestations of this disorder. The management of these medications in the perioperative period is controversial. Psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis medications can affect wound healing, hemostasis, and infection risk during cutaneous surgery.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this article is to provide a critical review of various medications used for care of the psoriatic patient and their potential effect on cutaneous surgical procedures.

CONCLUSIONS

This review summarizes current understanding of wound healing, hemostatic effects, and infectious risks regarding many psoriasis medications including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cyclooxygenase inhibitors, corticosteroids, various immunosuppressants, and biologic response modifiers. Recommendations vary depending on the agent in question, type of procedure, and comorbid conditions in the patient. Caution is advised when using many of the medications reviewed due to lack of human data of their effects in the perioperative period.

Current and future management of psoriasis

Management of psoriasis begins with identification of the extent of cutaneous disease. However, a holistic, contractual approach to treatment is encouraged, with particular reference to psychosocial disability and quality-of-life issues. The presence of psoriasis on palms, soles, body folds, genitals, face, or nails, and concomitant joint disease, are also important when considering treatment options. An evidence-based approach is essential in delineating differences between the many available treatments. However, archaic approaches, especially combinational ones, are routinely used by some clinicians, with inadequate prospective or comparative evidence. Treatments currently available are: topical agents used predominantly for mild disease and for recalcitrant lesions in more severe disease; phototherapy for moderate disease; and systemic agents including photochemotherapy, oral agents, and newer injectable biological agents, which have revolutionised the management of severe psoriasis. Other innovative treatments are undergoing clinical studies, with the aim of maintaining safe, long-term control of the condition.

Off-label uses of biologics in dermatology: Rituximab, omalizumab, infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, efalizumab, and alefacept (Part 2 of 2)

Recently, dermatologists have witnessed a revolution in our therapeutic armamentarium with the development of several novel biologic immunomodulators. Although psoriasis remains the only condition in dermatology for which the use of biologic immunomodulators has been approved by the Food and Drug Administration, these drugs have the potential to significantly impact the treatment of several inflammatory conditions in dermatology. This article includes a review of the mechanism of action, dosing, and side-effect profile, as well as a review of the current literature on off-label uses of the CD20-positive B-cell antagonist rituximab, the IgE antagonist omalizumab, the tumor necrosis factor-alpha antagonists infliximab, etanercept, and adalimumab, and the T-cell response modifiers efalizumab and alefacept.

Successful treatment of type I adult-onset pityriasis rubra pilaris with infliximab

A 59-year-old woman presented with a painful, pruritic eruption that had commenced as an erythematous, dry patch on the upper back but progressed to erythroderma. Examination revealed orange-tinged erythroderma, scalp scaling, ectropion, palmoplantar keratoderma and nail changes. A diagnosis of type I adult-onset pityriasis rubra pilaris was made, and a subsequent skin biopsy was consistent with this. She was treated with a number of topical and systemic agents with minimal improvement or major side-effects. The patient was then treated with intravenous infliximab 5 mg/kg. She improved dramatically within 2 weeks and was no longer erythrodermic. Five further infusions resulted in additional improvement. Methotrexate was briefly added to the regime, but was ceased owing to nausea. Topical tar and keratolytics were used on the scalp. The patient was left with minimal disease activity and was maintained on emollients.

Biologics in the treatment of transplant rejection and ischemia/reperfusion injury: new applications for TNFalpha inhibitors?

Tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha inhibitors have proven efficacy in various autoimmune diseases such as Crohn disease, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriasis, and ankylosing spondylitis. Indeed, some TNFalpha inhibitors have already been approved for the management of the inflammatory manifestations associated with Crohn disease and rheumatoid arthritis. These agents are increasingly used for treatment of corticosteroid-resistant graft-versus-host disease after bone marrow transplantation, and case reports have documented their efficacy in treating corticosteroid- and muromonab-resistant rejection after intestinal transplantation. Thus, the potential role of TNFalpha inhibitors in transplantation of other vascularized solid organs is worthy of investigation. Experimental evidence indicates that TNFalpha plays a key role in mediating ischemia/reperfusion (IR) injury after liver, kidney, intestine, heart, lung, and pancreas transplantation. TNFalpha was also identified as a marker cytokine during organ rejection. Single-center studies evaluating the role of TNFalpha inhibitors in kidney transplantation have been initiated but the results are not yet available. TNFalpha is known to be a contributing factor in kidney allograft rejection, and may have value in predicting the onset of steroid-resistant acute rejection after liver transplantation. Experimental and preliminary clinical data have shown that circulating levels of TNFalpha are increased during cardiac graft rejection, and indicate that TNFalpha plays a role in the pathogenesis of acute cardiac allograft rejection. Anti-TNFalpha therapy was shown to prolong cardiac allograft survival when used alone or in combination with other drugs. TNFalpha genotype has been strongly associated with mortality in humans due to acute cell-mediated heart transplant rejection. In addition, there is evidence for a genetic predisposition toward acute rejection after kidney and simultaneous kidney-pancreas transplantation. TNFalpha inhibition has been used successfully as part of an induction therapy for pancreatic islet cell transplantation. Apart from IR injury and acute rejection after lung transplantation, TNFalpha was also found to be involved in the pathoimmunology of obliterative bronchiolitis. In conclusion, a substantial body of experimental evidence and preliminary clinical data suggest that TNFalpha inhibitors may play an important role in solid-organ transplantation, both in the amelioration of IR injury and in the treatment and prevention of acute rejection. Pharmacodynamic monitoring and pharmacogenetic screening may help to identify patients most likely to benefit from TNFalpha blockade. Randomized controlled trials in patients undergoing solid-organ transplantation are needed to further elucidate the clinical value of TNFalpha inhibition.

Future Perspectives in the Medical Treatment of Endometriosis

In the last few years, our understanding of the pathogenesis of endometriosis at the cellular and molecular levels has improved significantly. This may give us the opportunity to use new, specific agents for the treatment of this disorder. Despite the effectiveness of the available treatments, novel therapeutic strategies may improve our ability to eliminate endometriotic lesions when present and to prevent the recurrence of endometriosis after surgical treatment. This review focuses on the new, experimental approaches to the medical treatment of endometriosis and its symptoms. The blockage of aromatase activity in endometriotic lesions with an aromatase inhibitor may represent a new step in the medical treatment of endometriosis. Preliminary clinical studies have demonstrated the efficacy of third-generation nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors (ie, anastrozole and letrozole) in reducing the intensity of pain symptoms associated with the presence of endometriosis. The new selective progesterone receptor modulators may represent a valid hormonal treatment option. Therapeutic manipulation of the immune system through TNFalpha inhibitors may be beneficial in women with endometriosis. New pharmaceutical agents affecting inflammation, angiogenesis, and matrix metalloproteinase activity may prevent or inhibit the development of endometriosis. Further clinical trials may determine if these new therapies are superior to current medical treatment strategies for endometriosis.

TARGET AUDIENCE

Obstetricians & Gynecologists, Family Physicians Learning.

OBJECTIVES

After completion of this article, the reader should be able to describe the new experimental medical treatments of endometriosis, state that the clinical use of nonsteroidal aromatase inhibitors for endometriosis appears to be efficacious but is based on preliminary clinical data, and recall that the drugs used for endometriosis in the future may include manipulation of the immune system.