Prenatal Diagnosis of Epidermolysis Bullosa

Self-improving dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa with a novel heterozygous missense variant in the COL7A1 gene in a Taiwanese family

Self-improving dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB) is a genodermatosis that is inherited autosomal dominantly or recessively, and its clinical symptoms may improve or subside spontaneously. Herein, we report a case of self-improving DEB with COL7A1 p.Gly2025Asp variant. The diagnosis was made through histopathological, electron microscopic examination, and genetic testing. The same variant is also noted on his father, who presents with dystrophic toenails without any blisters. This study highlights that idiopathic nail dystrophy could be linked to congenital or hereditary disease. Furthermore, we conducted a review of the literature on the characteristics of reported cases of self-improving DEB with a personal or family history of nail dystrophy. The results supported our findings that nail dystrophy may be the sole manifestation in some family members. We suggest that individuals suffering from idiopathic nail dystrophy may seek genetic counselling when planning pregnancy to early evaluate the potential risk of hereditary diseases.

Case report: A case of epidermolysis bullosa complicated with pyloric atresia and a literature review

Objective

This article aims to explore the diagnosis, molecular characteristics, treatment, and prognosis of epidermolysis bullosa with pyloric atresia (EB-PA).

Methods

The clinical manifestations, diagnosis and treatment, and genetic characteristics of a patient with EB-PA admitted to our hospital were analysed. The disease subtypes, concomitant abnormalities, molecular characteristics, and prognosis of patients with EB-PA were summarized by searching the EB-PA-related literature since 2011.

Results

We present a very low birth weight female infant with skin blisters and pyloric obstruction. Exome sequencing revealed heterozygous mutations in the ITGB4 gene: c.794dupC (p. S265fs*5) and c.2962G > A (p.A988T). This infant was diagnosed with EB-PA. Coverage of the wounds and Penicillin were used to prevent infection, but the patient eventually developed severe sepsis. A literature review was carried out including 49 cases of EB-PA; among these cases, 34 were preterm infants, weighing between 930 and 3,640 g. Of these EB-PA patients, 28 had accompanying malformations, including urinary system malformations and aplasia cutis congenita (ACC). Thirty-two patients identified the subtype of EB-PA, of whom 25 were diagnosed with junctional epidermolysis bullosa (JEB), 6 with epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS), and 1 with dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa (DEB). Genetic testing was conducted on 23 patients, of whom 15 carried Integrin Beta-4 (ITGB4) gene mutations and one JEB patient carried an Integrin Alpha-6 (ITGA6) gene mutation; 4 of the 5 EBS patients had Plectin (PLEC) gene mutations, and the other had an ITGB4 mutation. ITGB4 mutation cases involved 29 mutation sites, primarily concentrated in the region encoding the integrin beta subunit; PLEC mutation cases involved 7 mutation sites. Among all cases, 43 underwent pyloric atresia surgery, of whom 24 died postoperatively, and 6 without surgery therapy died within a short period.

Conclusion

EB-PA is a rare genetic disorder characterized by increased skin fragility and PA involving mutations in the ITGB4, PLEC, or ITGA6 genes. EB-PA has a high incidence of complications and mortality, surgery and supportive therapy are currently the most common treatment options.

A retrospective analysis of diagnostic testing in a large North American cohort of patients with epidermolysis bullosa

BACKGROUND

Accurate diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa (EB) has significant implications for prognosis, management, and genetic counseling.

OBJECTIVE

To describe diagnostic testing patterns and assess diagnostic concordance of transmission electron microscopy (TEM), immunofluorescence mapping (IFM), and genetic analysis for EB.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort included patients enrolled in the Epidermolysis Bullosa Clinical Characterization and Outcomes Database from January 1, 2004, to July 8, 2019. Tests concluding the same EB type (EB simplex, junctional EB, dominant dystrophic EB, and recessive dystrophic EB) were considered concordant; those concluding different EB types were considered discordant; and those with nonspecific/nondefinitive results were equivocal.

RESULTS

A total of 970 diagnostic tests were conducted from 1984 to 2018 in 771 patients. Genetic analyses were performed chronologically later than IFM or TEM (P < .001). The likelihood of undergoing genetic analysis was greater for junctional EB and recessive dystrophic EB, and the same for dominant dystrophic EB as compared with EB simplex. TEM results in 163 patients were equivocal (55%), concordant (42%), and discordant (3%). IFM results in 185 patients were equivocal (54%), concordant (42%), and discordant (4%).

LIMITATIONS

Retrospective design.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnostic testing has shifted in favor of genetic analysis. TEM and IFM frequently offer equivocal findings when compared to the specificity afforded by genetic analysis.

Recommendations on pregnancy, childbirth and aftercare in epidermolysis bullosa: a consensus-based guideline

Linked Comment:A.W. Lucky and E. Pope. Br J Dermatol 2022; 186:602–603.

Plain language summary available online

Genetic diagnosis of epidermolysis bullosa: recommendations from an expert Spanish research group

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare genetic disease that causes mucocutaneous fragility. It comprises a clinically and genetically heterogeneous group of disorder characterized by spontaneous or contact/friction-induced blistering. EB is classified into 4 types-simplex, junctional, dystrophic, and Kindler syndrome-and 30 subtypes. The disease is caused by defects in proteins implicated in dermal-epidermal adhesion. At least 19 genes have been characterized and more than 1000 mutations identified, thus rendering diagnosis complex. Molecular diagnosis of EB is the last stage of a laborious process that starts with a detailed clinical history compilation and careful procurement of a skin fresh biopsy that includes an area where the epidermis detaches from the dermis. The detachment area makes it possible to establish the cleavage plane by antigen mapping and, in the best scenario, to identify a single candidate gene to search for pathogenic mutations. The results of the molecular diagnosis enable the physician to provide appropriate genetic counseling (inheritance pattern, risk of recurrence, and options for prenatal and preimplantation diagnosis) and implement subsequent preventive programs, as well as to establish a reasonable clinical prognosis facilitating access to specific therapy and rehabilitation. Lastly, molecular diagnosis is essential for the participation of patients in clinical trials, a critical issue given the current incurable status of EB. The present guidelines aim to disseminate the procedure for diagnosing EB in our laboratory and thus avoid suboptimal or incomplete clinical diagnoses. The recommendations we provide are the result of more than 10 years' experience in the molecular diagnosis of EB in Spain.

Retrospective evidence on outcomes and experiences of pregnancy and childbirth in epidermolysis bullosa in Australia and New Zealand

BACKGROUND

Pregnancy in epidermolysis bullosa (EB) has not been comprehensively studied.

OBJECTIVE

We aimed to develop a foundational database, which could provide peri-obstetric advice in EB.

METHODS

Survey questionnaires were sent to obstetricians, unaffected mothers of EB babies, and mothers with EB. Results were analyzed using chi-square, Fisher exact, and t-tests.

RESULTS

Out of 1346 obstetricians surveyed, 195 responded, and only 14 had encountered EB. All recommended normal vaginal delivery (NVD), except for one elective Caesarean section (CS). We received responses from 75 unaffected mothers who had delivered EB babies. They had significantly more complications in their EB pregnancies compared to their non-EB pregnancies. A further 44 women with various types of EB who had given birth responded. Most delivered via NVD and had no significant increase in complications in both their EB and non-EB pregnancies. In both groups, there were no significant differences in blistering at birth in babies delivered via NVD and CS.

CONCLUSION

In conclusion, most patients with EB who are capable of giving birth do not have an increased risk for pregnancy-related complications and NVD appears to be safe. Awareness of this data amongst obstetricians and dermatologists should lead to improved quality of care for mothers and babies affected with EB.

Ocular manifestations of genetic skin disorders

Genetic skin diseases, or genodermatoses, often have extracutaneous manifestations. Ocular manifestations in particular can have significant clinical implications, like blindness. Other manifestations, such as the corneal opacities that occur in X-linked ichthyosis, are asymptomatic but characteristic of a particular genodermatosis. Ophthalmologic examination can aid in diagnosis when characteristic findings are seen. The genodermatoses with ocular manifestations will be reviewed, but neurocutaneous, syndromes, genetic pigmentary disorders, and genetic metabolic diseases are not included because they are covered elsewhere in this issue.

Retrospective evidence on outcomes and experiences of pregnancy and childbirth in epidermolysis bullosa in Australia and New Zealand

Background

Pregnancy in epidermolysis bullosa (EB) has not been comprehensively studied.

Objective

We aimed to develop a foundational database, which could provide peri-obstetric advice in EB.

Methods

Survey questionnaires were sent to obstetricians, unaffected mothers of EB babies, and mothers with EB. Results were analyzed using chi-square, Fisher exact, and t-tests.

Results

Out of 1346 obstetricians surveyed, 195 responded, and only 14 had encountered EB. All recommended normal vaginal delivery (NVD), except for one elective Caesarean section (CS). We received responses from 75 unaffected mothers who had delivered EB babies. They had significantly more complications in their EB pregnancies compared to their non-EB pregnancies. A further 44 women with various types of EB who had given birth responded. Most delivered via NVD and had no significant increase in complications in both their EB and non-EB pregnancies. In both groups, there were no significant differences in blistering at birth in babies delivered via NVD and CS.

Conclusion

In conclusion, most patients with EB who are capable of giving birth do not have an increased risk for pregnancy-related complications and NVD appears to be safe. Awareness of this data amongst obstetricians and dermatologists should lead to improved quality of care for mothers and babies affected with EB.

•

There is limited information on pregnancy in EB.

•

This is the first comprehensive study in the world on pregnancy experiences of a large group of mothers with EB, unaffected mothers of EB babies and an obstetrician survey.

•

We have recommendations for mothers expecting EB babies and expectant mothers with EB.

Plectin-related skin diseases

Plectin has been characterized as a linker protein that is expressed in many cell types and is distinctive in various isoforms in the N-terminus and around the rod domain due to complicated alternative splicing of PLEC, the gene encoding plectin. Plectin deficiency causes autosomal recessive epidermolysis bullosa simplex (EBS) with involvement of the skin and other organs, such as muscle and gastrointestinal tract, depending on the expression pattern of the defective protein. In addition, a point mutation in the rod domain of plectin leads to autosomal dominant EBS, called as EBS-Ogna. Plectin can be targeted by circulating autoantibodies in subepidermal autoimmune blistering diseases. This review summarizes plectin-related skin diseases, from congenital to autoimmune disorders.

Revisited diagnostics of hereditary epidermolysis bullosa

Hereditary epidermolysis bullosa is a big group of hereditary diseases with the main manifestations in the form of blisters on the skin and mucous coat after slight mechanical injuries. It is not always possible to diagnose this disease based on the clinical picture. The article discusses current laboratory diagnostics methods for hereditary epidermolysis bullosa including immunofluorescence antigen mapping (IFM), transmission electron microscopy (TEM) and genetic analysis (molecular or DNA diagnostics) as well as their advantages and disadvantages. TEM determines the micro splitting level and nature of ultrafine changes in the area of the dermoepidermal junction; at the same time, such tests need special expensive equipment. Substantial experience is also needed to analyze the resulting submicroscopic images. IFM determines whether expression of the affected protein related to the disease development is reduced or absent; however, invalid (false positive or false negative) results can be obtained in patients with the reduced expression of the affected protein. Genetic analysis plays a key role for prenatal diagnostics. Therefore, to make an exact diagnosis of hereditary epidermolysis bullosa, it is expedient to apply IFM, TEM and genetic analysis. The need to set an exact diagnosis of the disease is related to the fact that the promising treatment methods being currently developed are aimed at treating patients with certain forms of the disease.

Evaluation and treatment of the newborn with epidermolysis bullosa

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a heterogeneous group of inherited skin diseases characterized by increased skin fragility and variable degrees of extracutaneous involvement. The clinical spectrum ranges from localized skin disease to a life-threatening and disabling disease with extensive extracutaneous involvement. All four major types of EB, namely EB simplex, Junctional EB, Dystrophic EB and Kindler syndrome, can present with blistering and erosions at birth and cannot be distinguished clinically in the newborn period. The extensive differential diagnosis of blistering and erosions in the neonate must be considered and common etiologies ruled out. The diagnosis of EB can be confirmed via a skin biopsy for immunoflourescence mapping. This review discusses the four major subtypes of EB and their associated extracutaneous features. The evaluation of a newborn suspected of having EB, including diagnosis and management, is also reviewed.

Unveiling the roots of monogenic genodermatoses: genotrichoses as a paradigm

The past two decades have seen significant and unprecedented progress in human genetics owing to the advent of novel molecular biological technologies and major developments in computational methods. Dermatology has benefited from and, in some cases, led these advances. In this article, we review major discoveries in the field of inherited hair diseases, which illustrate the changes that genodermatology has undergone in recent years from a mostly descriptive discipline through the elucidation of the molecular basis of numerous disorders, up to the first attempts at translating these new findings into novel preventive and therapeutic tools to the benefit of our patients.

Herlitz junctional epidermolysis bullosa: diagnostic features, mutational profile, incidence and population carrier frequency in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND

Junctional epidermolysis bullosa, type Herlitz (JEB-H) is a lethal, autosomal recessive blistering disease caused by null mutations in the genes coding for the lamina lucida/densa adhesion protein laminin-332 (LAMB3, LAMA3 and LAMC2).

OBJECTIVES

To present the diagnostic features and molecular analyses of all 22 patients with JEB-H in the Dutch Epidermolysis Bullosa Registry between 1988 and 2011, and to calculate the disease incidence and carrier frequency in the Netherlands.

METHODS

All patients were analysed with immunofluorescence antigen mapping (IF), electron microscopy (EM) and molecular analysis.

RESULTS

The mean lifespan of our patients with JEB-H was 5·8 months (range 0·5-32·6). IF showed absent (91%) or strongly reduced (9%) staining for laminin-332 with monoclonal antibody GB3. In EM the hemidesmosomes and sub-basal dense plates were hypoplastic or absent. We identified mutations in all 22 patients: in 19 we found LAMB3 mutations, in two LAMA3 mutations, and in one LAMC2 mutations. We found three novel splice site mutations in LAMB3: (i) c.29-2A>G resulting in an out-of-frame skip of exon 3 and a premature termination codon (PTC); (ii) c.1289-2_1296del10 leading to an out-of-frame skip of exon 12 and a PTC; and (iii) c.3228+1G>T leading to an exon 21 skip.

CONCLUSIONS

All diagnostic tools should be evaluated to clarify the diagnosis of JEB-H. We have identified 11 different mutations in 22 patients with JEB-H, three of them novel. In the Netherlands the incidence rate of JEB-H is 4·0 per one million live births. The carrier frequency of a JEB-H mutation in the Dutch population is 1 in 249.

A review of the obstetric management of patients with epidermolysis bullosa

Epidermolysis bullosa (EB) is a rare inherited skin condition characterized by the development of blisters after minor mechanical friction or trauma. There are few reported pregnancies in the literature in these women. We describe a pregnancy we recently managed. The collated series of pregnancies show that there are no additional antenatal or postnatal problems and that the skin itself does not worsen during pregnancy. Vaginal delivery is most favourable, but if a caesarean section is required, regional anaesthesia should be attempted. A multidisciplinary team should be active throughout the pregnancy of these women and a well-documented labour plan should be made in advance.