Concomitant use of miglitol and mitiglinide as initial combination therapy in type 2 diabetes mellitus

Early combination versus initial metformin monotherapy in the management of newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes: An East Asian perspective

Type 2 diabetes (T2D) in the East Asian population is characterized by phenotypes such as low body mass index, an index of β-cell dysfunction, and higher percentage of body fat, an index of insulin resistance. These phenotypes/pathologies may predispose people to early onset of diabetes with increased risk of stroke and renal disease. Less than 50% of patients with T2D in East Asia achieve glycaemic targets recommended by national or regional guidelines, which may be attributable to knowledge and/or implementation gaps. Herein, we review the latest evidence with special reference to East Asian patients with T2D and present arguments for the need to use early combination therapy to intensify glycaemic control. This strategy is supported by the 5-year worldwide VERIFY study, which reported better glycaemic durability in newly diagnosed patients with T2D with a mean HbA1c of 6.9% treated with early combination therapy of vildagliptin plus metformin versus those treated with initial metformin monotherapy followed by addition of vildagliptin only with worsening glycaemic control. This paradigm shift of early intensified treatment is now recommended by the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. In order to translate these evidence to practice, increased awareness and strengthening of the healthcare system are needed to diagnose and manage patients with T2D early for combination therapy.

Usefulness of antidiabetic alpha-glucosidase inhibitors: a review on the timing of administration and effects on gut hormones

Elevation of postprandial plasma glucose is correlated with an increase in cardiovascular events, and alpha-glucosidase inhibitors (αGIs) are effective at reducing postprandial glucose levels. In Japan, the αGIs acarbose, voglibose, and miglitol have been available since 1993, 1994, and 2006, respectively. Dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors are also effective at reducing postprandial glucose levels, and they have been available in Japan since 2009. A combination therapy of αGI, miglitol, and the DPP-4 inhibitor, sitagliptin, is more effective at decreasing postprandial glucose levels than monotherapy with either miglitol or sitagliptin. Moreover, the combination therapy of miglitol and sitagliptin is more effective at increasing postprandial active glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) levels than monotherapy. Peptide YY (PYY) has appetite-suppressing and gastric-emptying effects similar to GLP-1. In healthy individuals, miglitol increases the postprandial total PYY; however, combination therapy of miglitol and vildagliptin does not change postprandial total PYY levels. αGIs are typically prescribed to be taken just before a meal, which can result in decreased drug adherence. Different patterns of αGI intake were examined, and the results showed that miglitol or acarbose administration after a meal is effective. The effects of taking miglitol dissolved in water during a meal appeared to be similar to that of taking miglitol as a tablet just before a meal. The long-term effects of taking miglitol dissolved in water should be evaluated in future studies. αGIs may be effective even when they are not taken before a meal, and a more flexible administration may improve drug adherence.

Efficacy and Safety of Initial Combination Therapy in Treatment-Naïve Type 2 Diabetes Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of initial combination therapy compared with monotherapy in drug-naïve type 2 diabetes patients.

METHODS

MEDLINE, Embase and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched for randomized clinical trials of initial combination therapy with hypoglycemic agents compared with monotherapy. Those which satisfied the search criteria were included in the meta-analysis. Weighted mean difference and relative risks were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 36 studies were included in the meta-analysis. Compared with metformin monotherapy, initial combination therapy with metformin plus another anti-diabetes drug exhibited significant reductions in glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) (p < 0.001). Most of the combination therapies had a similar risk of hypoglycemia (p > 0.05), with the exception of combinations of sulfonylurea/glinide and metformin or combinations of thiazolidinedione and metformin. Compared with dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor monotherapy, initial combination therapy with DPP-4 inhibitor plus another anti-diabetes drug showed a significant decrease in HbA1c (p < 0.001) and a similar risk of hypoglycemia (p > 0.05). Compared with monotherapy with other anti-diabetes drugs, initial combination therapies also resulted in significant HbA1c reductions, a similar risk of hypoglycemia and similar risks of other adverse events.

CONCLUSION

Compared with monotherapy, all initial combination therapies resulted in significant HbA1c reductions. Compared with metformin monotherapy, initial combination therapies with DPP-4 inhibitors plus metformin, sodium/glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors and metformin, respectively, were associated with similar risks of hypoglycemia, but initial combination therapies with sulfonylurea plus metformin, thiazolidinedione and metformin, respectively, were associated with higher risks of hypoglycemia.

FUNDING

AstraZeneca Ltd. (China).

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Registration number CRD42017060717 in PROSPERO.

Glucose excursions and hypoglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes treated with mitiglinide/voglibose versus glimepiride: A randomized cross-over trial

BACKGROUND

Glucose excursions and hypoglycemia are associated with cardiovascular complications. However, no studies have evaluated glucose excursions and the frequency of hypoglycemia in patients treated with mitiglinide/voglibose versus glimepiride as add-on to dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor therapy.

METHODS

This cross-over trial included 20 patients with type 2 diabetes. After initiating vildagliptin 100 mg, patients were randomly assigned to receive mitiglinide 10 mg/voglibose 0.2 mg three times daily for 3 days followed by glimepiride 1 mg once daily for the subsequent 3 days as add-on therapy, or vice versa. Glucose excursions and hypoglycemia frequency were measured using 24-h continuous glucose monitoring. Metabolic profile changes were evaluated using a meal tolerance test.

RESULTS

The mean glucose levels in the mitiglinide/voglibose and glimepiride phases were identical (8.01 vs 8.24 mmol/L, respectively). However, during the mitiglinide/voglibose phase compared with the glimepiride phase, the standard deviation of glucose (1.30 vs 2.10 mmol/L; P < 0.001), mean amplitude of glycemic excursions (3.47 vs 5.28 mmol/L; P < 0.001), M-value (24.6 vs 70.0; P < 0.001), continuous overlapping net glycemic action for a 1-h time interval (22.6 vs 31.0; P < 0.001), and area under the curve >10 mmol/L (0.18 vs 0.52 mmol/L per h; P < 0.001) were significantly lower. Hypoglycemia (glucose <3.8 mmol/L) was not observed during the mitiglinide/voglibose phase, but occurred 0.35 times/day in those taking glimepiride. Moreover, the mitiglinide/voglibose phase had higher premeal and lower post-meal glucose levels than the glimepiride phase.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding mitiglinide/voglibose to vildagliptin therapy results in more efficient postprandial glucose control and less hypoglycemia than adding glimepiride.

Long-term Effects of Mitiglinide in Japanese Diabetics Inadequately Controlled with DPP-4 Inhibitor or Biguanide Monotherapy

INTRODUCTION

The goal of treatment in diabetes is to control hyperglycemia to near-normal glucose levels, which is important to prevent the progression of microvascular and macrovascular complications. Mitiglinide is a rapid- and short-acting insulinotropic sulfonylurea receptor ligand that is known to improve postprandial hyperglycemia in patients with type 2 diabetes. The aim of this study was to investigate the long-term efficacy and safety of mitiglinide in Japanese type 2 diabetic patients inadequately controlled by dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitor or biguanide monotherapy.

METHODS

In patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) receiving a stable monotherapy regimen with a DPP-4 inhibitor or biguanide added to dietary therapy, an additional 10 mg mitiglinide was administered for 52 weeks. The efficacy end points were postprandial plasma glucose (PPG) (30 min, 1 h, 2 h), postprandial insulin (30 min, 1 h, 2 h), insulinogenic index, 1,5-anhydroglucitol (1,5-AG), glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c), and fasting plasma glucose. The safety end points included the incidence and types of adverse events and adverse drug reactions.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients with T2DM were eligible for enrollment in this study and received mitiglinide. The average HbA1c before the start of mitiglinide administration (baseline) was 7.47% in the DPP-4 inhibitor combined treatment group (DPP-4 inhibitor CTG) and 7.50% in the biguanide combined treatment group (biguanide CTG), and the 2 h PPG was 248.1 and 243.3 mg/dL, respectively. Following the addition of mitiglinide to the treatment regimen for 52 weeks, the early postprandial decrease in insulin secretion improved and PPG improved in both the DPP-4 inhibitor CTG and biguanide CTG. At final evaluation, the HbA1c <7.0% achievement rate was 57.4% in the DPP-4 inhibitor CTG and 29.2% in the biguanide CTG. The incidence of hypoglycemia in the DPP-4 inhibitor CTG and biguanide CTG was 3.0% (2/67 patients) and 2.9% (2/69 patients), respectively. The hypoglycemic symptoms were mild in all cases.

CONCLUSION

Combination therapy with mitiglinide and DPP-4 inhibitors or biguanides improved glycemic control over the long term without increasing risks to safety due to events such as hypoglycemia, and this is a clinically promising therapeutic strategy in T2DM.