The effects of short-term continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion treatment on fasting glucagon-like peptide-1 concentrations in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes

Decreased circulating dipeptidyl peptidase-4 activity after short-term intensive insulin therapy predicts clinical outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes

Background

This study aims to investigate the changes in circulating dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) activity following short-term intensive insulin therapy (SIIT) in newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes (T2D) patients and to assess its potential in predicting long-term remission.

Methods

Ninety-five patients underwent SIIT for 2-3 weeks to attain and sustain near-normal glycemia. Insulin was then discontinued, and patients were followed for a year to evaluate glycemic outcomes. Biochemical tests, serum DPP-4 activity, and mixed meal tolerance tests were conducted at baseline, post-SIIT, and the 3-month follow-up.

Results

DPP-4 activity decreased from 44.08 ± 9.58 to 40.53 ± 8.83 nmol/min/mL after SIIT (P<0.001). After three months post-SIIT, DPP-4 activity remained stable in the remission group (39.63 ± 8.53 nmol/L) but increased in the non-remission group (42.34 ± 6.64 nmol/L). This resulted in a more pronounced decrease in DPP-4 activity from baseline in the remission group (-3.39 ± 8.90 vs. -1.10 ± 8.95, P = 0.035). Logistic regression analyses showed that patients with greater DPP-4 activity reduction had a higher likelihood of 1-year remission (70% vs. 51.1%, OR: 7.939 [1.829, 34.467], P = 0.006 in the fully adjusted model). A non-linear relationship between △DPP-4 and 1-year remission rate was observed, with a clear threshold and saturation effect.

Conclusion

Circulating DPP-4 activity significantly decreases after SIIT. The change in circulating DPP-4 activity during the 3-month post-treatment phase has the potential to predict long-term remission.

Insulin Pump Therapy for Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: Evidence, Current Barriers, and New Technologies

An increasing number of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) use insulin pumps. The first insulin pumps especially designed for patients with T2DM have recently become available. However, national guidelines do not primarily recommend the use of continuous subcutaneous insulin infusion (CSII) for this patient group. The effectiveness of CSII in T2DM has not yet been convincingly demonstrated, despite some positive evidence. An overview and an assessment of various studies to date will be given. T2DM is a heterogeneous disease with a substantial phenotypic variability; therefore, it is difficult to provide general conclusions about the effectiveness of CSII in T2DM therapy. The pump types, characteristics, and associated barriers may play a relevant role for therapy outcome. Most advanced functions like various bolus dosages offered by conventional insulin pumps are not needed for T2DM treatment and complicate the device handling for this subject group. Additionally, new technologies like increased connectivity, advanced software features, and interoperability are currently becoming available representing further barriers. The implementation of this technological progress might be a benefit for pumps for T2DM as well. However, these have not been sufficiently examined either and increased security challenges due to integrated peripheral components should not be neglected in terms of a sound cybersecurity. Pump features and handling for patients with T2DM should be as easy as possible, indicating a need for insulin pumps specially designed for patients with T2DM. However, it has to be investigated if pumps designed for T2DM are more effective than other intensified insulin regimens.

Should the last be first? Questions and dilemmas regarding early short-term insulin treatment in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

INTRODUCTION

Early short-term insulin treatment (STIT), defined as insulin administration shortly after diabetes diagnosis for only a brief period of time, is an alternative concept, aiming to entirely revise the perspective of type 2 diabetes (T2DM) management.

AREAS COVERED

The present review intends to summarize what is already known regarding early STIT in T2DM and highlight questions and dilemmas from the clinician's point of view, with a discourse on future research agenda.

EXPERT OPINION

STIT has the potential to modify the natural history of T2DM, resulting in improved drug-free remission rates by favorably affecting the underlying pathophysiology of the disease. Existing data in the field manifest significant weaknesses, mainly being the small number of trials and patients included, the lack of control groups in most studies and the wide heterogeneity between study designs and explored outcomes, which limit definitive conclusions. Therefore, before such a therapeutic strategy is incorporated into daily practice, important issues require further clarification by future trials. These issues include the optimal time point for the intervention, the ideal insulin type, the identification of patients being most likely to benefit, the STIT effects on cardiovascular and other clinical outcomes and the cost-effectiveness evaluation of this therapeutic strategy.

ABBREVIATIONS

T2DM: Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus; HbA_1C: Hemoglobin A_1c; OHA: Oral Hypoglycemic Agents; STIT: Short-term Insulin Treatment; CSII: Continuous Subcutaneous Insulin Infusion; MDI: Multiple Daily Injections; PPG: Postprandial Plasma Glucose; FPG: Fasting Plasma Glucose; HOMA-b: Homeostasis Model Assessment of beta-cell function; TDD: Total Daily Insulin Dose; DI: Disposition Index; HOMA-IR: Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance; ROS: Reactive Oxygen Species; TNF: Tumor Necrosis Factor; GLP-1: Glucagon-like peptide-1; GIP: Glucose-dependent Insulinotropic Polypeptide; BMI: Body Mass Index; CV: Cardiovascular; DR: Diabetic Retinopathy; SU: Sulfonylurea; IGI: Insulinogenic Index.