Diagnostic value of an enzyme-linked immunospot assay for interferon-γ in genitourinary tuberculosis

Current updates in diagnosis of male urogenital tuberculosis

Introduction: Urogenital tuberculosis (UGTB) is a common manifestation of extrapulmonary TB (EPTB), which affects both men and women in a ratio of 2:1. Similar to other EPTB types, diagnosis of UGTB is quite challenging owing to atypical clinical presentation and paucibacillary nature of specimens. This review is primarily focused on the current updates developed in the diagnosis of male UGTB.Area covered: Smear/culture, imaging, histopathology, and interferon-γ release assays are the main modalities employed for detecting male UGTB cases. Moreover, we described the utility of nucleic acid amplification tests (NAATs), including loop-mediated isothermal amplification, PCR, nested-PCR, and GeneXpert (MTB/RIF) assays. The possibility of using other novel modalities, such as immuno-PCR (I-PCR), aptamer-linked immobilized sorbent assay (ALISA), and identification of circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) by NAATs were also discussed.Expert opinion: The current methods used for the diagnosis of male UGTB are not adequate. Therefore, the latest molecular/immunological tools, i.e. Xpert Ultra, Truenat MTB^TM, I-PCR, ALISA, and cfDNA detection employed for the diagnosis of other EPTB forms and pulmonary TB may also be exploited for UGTB diagnosis. Reliable and timely diagnosis of male UGTB may initiate an early start of anti-tubercular therapy that would reduce infertility and other complications associated with disease.

Utility of in vitro interferon-γ release assay in differential diagnosis between intestinal tuberculosis and Crohn's disease

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the diagnostic utility of interferon-γ release assay (T-SPOT.TB) for the differential diagnosis between Crohn's disease (CD) and intestinal tuberculosis (ITB).

METHODS

A total of 103 CD and 88 ITB patients, confirmed by histology and anti-tuberculosis treatment response from 2003 to 2011, were included. Their characteristics and clinical features were recorded. Mycobacterium tuberculosis (MTB) polymerase chain reaction (PCR) of IS6110, in vitro T-SPOT.TB, tuberculin skin test (TST), immunoglobulin G (IgG) antibody to MTB (protein chip), serum anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA IgG, chronic inflammatory bowel disease profile) and acid-fast staining of biopsied colonic tissue specimens were performed. Statistical analysis was conducted to determine their concordance with the diagnosis and its sensitivity, specificity, positive (PPV) and negative predictive value (NPV).

RESULTS

Abnormal pulmonary X-ray, ascites and lesions of both cecum and ascending colon were more associated with ITB, while intestinal surgery and lesions of both ileum and adjacent colon were more commonly seen in CD. Significant diagnostic concordance was found using T-SPOT.TB (κ = 0.786) by consistency test. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of T-SPOT.TB were 86%, 93%, 88% and 91%, respectively, and the sensitivity and NPV were significantly higher than other examinations (P < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

T-SPOT.TB is a valuable assay in differentiating ITB from CD, particularly in the diagnostic exclusion of ITB based on its high specificity and NPV.

Interferon-gamma release assays for the diagnosis of extrapulmonary tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Interferon -gamma release assays (IGRAs) provide a new diagnostic method for Mycobacterium tuberculosis (TB) infection. However, the diagnostic value of IGRAs for extrapulmonary TB (EPTB) has not been clarified. We searched several databases and selected papers with strict inclusion criteria, evaluated the evidence of commercially available IGRAs (QuantiFERON(®) -TB Gold QFT-G or QFT-GIT and T-SPOT(®) .TB) on blood and the tuberculin skin test (TST) using random effects models. Twenty studies with 1711 patients were included. After excluding indeterminate results, pooled sensitivity for the diagnosis of EPTB was 72% [95% confidence interval (CI) 65-79%] for QFT-G or GIT and 90% (95% CI, 86-93%) for T-SPOT; in high-income countries the sensitivity of QFT-G or GIT (79%, 95% CI 72-86%) was much higher than that (29%, 95% CI 14-48%) in low/middle-income countries. Pooled specificity for EPTB was 82% (95% CI 78-87%) for QFT-G or GIT and 68% (95% CI 64-73%) for T-SPOT. Pooled sensitivity of TST from four studies in high-income countries was lower than that of IGRAs. T-SPOT was more sensitive in detecting EPTB than QFT-G or GIT and TST. However, both IGRAs and TST have similar specificity for EPTB. IGRAs have limited value as diagnostic tools to screen and rule out EPTB, especially in low/middle-income countries. The immune status of patients does not affect the diagnostic accuracy of IGRAs for EPTB.

Establishing a serologic decision tree model of extrapulmonary tuberculosis by MALDI-TOF MS analysis

Matrix-assisted laser desorption-ionization time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) combined with weak cationic exchange (WCX) magnetic beads was used to establish a decision tree model that distinguished extrapulmonary tuberculosis (EPTB) from non-EPTB individuals. Eight-one patients with EPTB and 112 non-EPTB individuals (72 disease controls and 40 healthy controls) were involved in this study. The model was set up by 5 of 19 differentially expressed peaks (P < 0.05), m/z 4100, 4310, 6093, 8605, and 14,019. This model can discriminate patients with EPTB from non-EPTB with a sensitivity of 97.7% and a specificity of 84.1%. The test set verified that this model had good sensitivity and specificity: 94.4% and 83.6%, respectively. In conclusion, MALDI-TOF MS combined with WCX magnetic beads is a powerful technology for constructing a decision tree model and the model we built could serve as a potential diagnostic tool for EPTB.

Diagnostic performance of whole-blood interferon-γ assay and enzyme-linked immunospot assay for active tuberculosis'

The aim of this study was to compare the diagnostic performance of 2 interferon-γ release assays, an enzyme-linked immunospot assay (T-SPOT.TB; Oxford Immunotec Ltd., Oxford, UK) and the QuantiFERON-TB Gold in-Tube assay (QFT-GIT; Cellestis Ltd., Carnegie, Australia), in patients with suspected active tuberculosis (TB). From October 2009 to October 2011, a total of 200 patients with suspected TB were enrolled. Clinical and microbiological characteristics of the patients were collected and blood samples were obtained for T-SPOT.TB and QFT-GIT assays. Among the 200 subjects, 98 (49%) had culture-confirmed TB, 18 (9%) had probable TB, and the remaining 84 (42%) subjects did not have TB. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for active TB diagnosis by the T SPOT. TB were 83%, 71%, 81%, and 75%, respectively. For QFT-GIT, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for active TB diagnosis were 66%, 76%, 80%, and 62%, respectively. The QFT-GIT assay resulted in more indeterminate and false-negative results than the T-SPOT.TB assay, especially in immunocompromised patients. In conclusion, T-SPOT.TB had a higher sensitivity and resulted in fewer indeterminate results than the QFT-GIT assay for diagnosing active TB.

Diagnostic value of an enzyme-linked immunospot assay for interferon-γ in cutaneous tuberculosis

The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of an enzyme-linked immunospot (ELISPOT) assay (T-SPOT.TB; Oxford Immunotec, Oxford, UK) for interferon-γ in patients with suspected cutaneous tuberculosis (TB). From March 2007 to June 2010, a total of 45 patients with suspected cutaneous TB were enrolled. Data on clinical characteristics of the patients and conventional laboratory results were collected, and blood samples were obtained for ELISPOT assay. Ten subjects (22.2%) had culture-confirmed TB, 2 (4.4%) subjects had probable TB, and the remaining 33 (73.3%) subjects did not have TB. Twenty-one patients with mycobacterial infection had available biopsy or surgical specimens for histopathologic examination and 16 (76.2%) specimens had pathologic features (granulomatous inflammation, caseating necrosis, or acid-fast bacilli) consistent with mycobacterial infection. Among these 16 patients, all 6 patients with TB and 3 patients with Mycobacterium marinum infection had positive ELISPOT results, but none of the patients with Mycobacterium abscessus, Mycobacterium chelonae, or Mycobacterium avium infection had positive ELISPOT results. Overall, 9 of 10 patients with culture-confirmed TB and both patients with probable TB had positive ELISPOT assay. For patients with nontuberculous mycobacteria infections, ELISPOT assay was positive only in patients with M. marinum and M. kansasii infection. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for cutaneous TB diagnosis by the ELISPOT assay were 91.6% (95% CI, 64.6-98.5%), 75.8% (95% CI, 59.0-87.2%), 57.9% (95% CI, 34.0-78.9%), and 96.2% (95% CI, 59.0-87.2%), respectively. In conclusion, ELISPOT assay can provide useful support in the diagnosis of cutaneous TB.